Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper proposes a novel structural analysis of Hittite determinate relative clauses on the basis of a corpus study considering a wider and fuller array of Hittite data than ever before. In Hittite, relative -phrases attest a wide range of linear positions: first/initial, clause-second, immediately preverbal or even postverbal. We build upon the current assumption that -pronouns are clitics and thus their placement is determined by the syntax-prosody interface. As for the syntactic component, we argue against the construal of -elements. Instead, we propose that what linearly appears to be clause-second, preverbal or postverbal position of the -pronoun is structurally associated with Spec, FinP. The prosodic component is provided by the standardly acknowledged prosodic inversion, but the prosodic domain for the placement of -clitics is not clausal (CP), it is rather to be identified with a smaller domain within CP, namely, FinP. We also provide the first ever systematic treatment of split -phrases which are highly problematic for existing approaches but are fully accounted for by our analysis.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aristar, Anthony R.
    1991 On Diachronic Sources and Synchronic Patterns: An Investigation into the Origin of Linguistic Universals. Language67.1–33. 10.2307/415537
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415537 [Google Scholar]
  2. Becker, Kristina
    2014Zur Semantik der hethitischen Relativsätze. Hamburg: Baar.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berman, Howard R.
    1972 Relative Clauses in Hittite. The Chicago Which Hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, April 13, 1972ed. byPaul M. Peranteau, Judith L. Levi & Gloria C. Phares, 1–8. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatt, Rajesh
    2002 The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: Evidence from Adjectival Modification. Natural Language Semantics101.43–90. 10.1023/A:1015536226396
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015536226396 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bianchi, Valentina
    1999Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803372
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2002a Headed Relative Clauses in Generative Syntax, Part I. Glot International6.7:197–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2002b Headed Relative Clauses in Generative Syntax, Part II. Glot International6.8:1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bošković, Željko
    2005 On the Locality of Left Branch Extraction and the Structure of NP. Studia Linguistica59.1:1–45. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2005.00118.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Bresnan, Joan & Jane Grimshaw
    1978 The Syntax of Free Relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry9.3:331–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brosch, Cyril
    2014Untersuchungen zur hethitischen Raumgrammatik. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, Noam
    1977 On Wh-Movement. Formal Syntaxed. byPeter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1993 A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. The View From Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Brombergered. byKenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik
    1977 Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry8.3:425–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dayal, Veneeta. S.
    1996Locality in Wh-Quantification: Questions and Relative Clauses in Hindi. (= Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 62). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4808‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4808-5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Demirdache, Hamida
    1991 Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
  16. Diesing, Molly
    1992Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1996 Semantic Variables and Object Shift. Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax IIed. byHoskuldur Thrainsson, Samuel D. Epstein & Steve Peter, 66–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑9806‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9806-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Diesing, Molly & Eloise Jelinek
    1993 The Syntax and Semantics of Object Shift. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax511.1–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunkel, George E.
    2014Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal-stämme. Bd.21Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Erschler, David
    2010 Modularity and 2P clitics: Arguments from Digor Ossetic. Proceeding of Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics251ed. byYehuda N. Falk. Online: linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/25/Erschler.pdf (last accessed11 May 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fanselow, Gisbert & Damir Ćavar
    2002 Distributed Deletion. Theoretical Approaches to Universalsed. byArtemis Alexiadou, 65–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.49.05fan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.49.05fan [Google Scholar]
  22. Francia, Rita
    2002Le funzioni sintattiche degli elementi avverbiali di luogo ittiti anda(n), appa(n), katta(n), katti-, peran, para, šer, šara. (= Studia Asiana, 1). Roma: Herder.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Garrett, Andrew J.
    1994 Relative Clause Syntax in Lycian and Hittite. Die Sprache361.29–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Georgi, Doreen, & Martin Salzmann
    2017 The Matching Effect in Resumption: A Local Analysis Based on Case Attraction and Top-Down Derivation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory351.61–98. 10.1007/s11049‑016‑9338‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9338-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Givón, Talmy
    1971 Historical Syntax and Synchronic Morphology: An Archaeologist’s Field Trip. Chicago Linguistic Society7.1:394–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goedegebuure, Petra
    2009 Focus Structure and Q-word Questions in Hittite. Interpersonal Grammar: A Cross-Linguistic Perspectiveed. byEvelien Keizer & Mirjam van Staden, 945–967 (Thematic issue of Linguistics 47/4).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2013 Hittite Noun Phrases in Focus. Proceedings of the 24th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conferenceed. byStephanie W. Jamison, Brent Vine & Craig Melchert, 27–45. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2014The Hittite Demonstratives: Studies in Deixis, Topics and Focus. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Grimshaw, Jane
    1977 English wh-Constructions and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Massachusetts.
  30. Groos, Anneke & Henk van Riemsdijk
    1981 Matching Effects with Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar. Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conferenceed. byAdriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi & Luigi Rizzi171–216. Pisa: Scuola normale superiore.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Grosu, Alexander
    1996 The Proper Analysis of “Missing-P” Free Relative Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry27.2:257–293.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2002 Strange Relatives at the Interface of Two Millennia. Glot International61:145–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Grosu, Alexander & Fred Landman
    1998 Strange Relatives of the Third Kind. Natural Language Semantics61.125–170. 10.1023/A:1008268401837
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008268401837 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hahn, E. Adelaide
    1946 The Origins of the Relative kwi- kwo-. Language221.68–85. 10.2307/410340
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410340 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hale, Mark Robert
    1987 Studies in the Comparative Syntax of the Oldest Indo-Iranian Languages. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
  36. Halpern, Aaron
    1995On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer
    1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Held, Jr., Warren H.
    1957 The Hittite Relative Sentence. (= Language Dissertation, 55). Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America. 10.2307/522235
  39. Hoffner, Jr., Harry A. & Craig H. Melchert
    2008A Grammar of the Hittite Language, Part 1: Reference Grammar. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Huggard, Mattyas
    2011 On Wh-(Non)-Movement and Internal Structures of the Hittite Preposed Relative Clause. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conferenceed. byStephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert & Brent Vine, 83–104. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2015 Wh-words in Hittite: A Study in Syntax-Semantics and Syntax-Phonology Interfaces. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  42. Izvorski, Roumyana
    1996 The Syntax and Semantics of Correlative Proforms. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society261:133–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2000 Free Relatives and Related Matters. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  44. Jackendoff, Ray
    1977X̅ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure (=Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A.
    2001 IP-internal Topic and Focus Phrases. Studia Linguistica551.39–75. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00074
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00074 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2014 Coordination, Relativization and Finiteness in Dravidian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory32.1:191–211. 10.1007/s11049‑013‑9222‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9222-8 [Google Scholar]
  47. Justus-Raman, Carol F.
    1973 The Old Hittite Relative Construction. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  48. Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
    2001 On wh-Questions in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics46.1/2:41–61. 10.1017/S000841310001793X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S000841310001793X [Google Scholar]
  49. Kaufman, Daniel Aaron
    2010 The Morphosyntax of Tagalog Clitics: A Typologically Driven Approach. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
  50. Kayne, Richard S.
    1975French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kiss, Katalin É.
    2002The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755088
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755088 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kloekhorst, Alwin
    2014Accent in Hittite: A Study in Plene Spelling, Consonant Gradation, Clitics, and Metrics. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz. 10.2307/j.ctvc2rm8t
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc2rm8t [Google Scholar]
  54. Kroch, Anthony
    2001 Syntactic Change. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theoryed. byMark Baltin & Chris Collins, 699–730. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756416.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kudrinsky, Maxim
    2016 Hittite Heterographic Writings and Their Interpretation: The Evidence of Sentential Clitics. Indogermanische Forschungen1211.159–176. 10.1515/if‑2016‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2016-0009 [Google Scholar]
  56. Larson, Richard K.
    1987 “Missing Prepositions” and the Analysis of English Free Relative Clauses. Linguistic Inquiry18.2:239–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lechner, Winfried
    2013 Diagnosing Covert Movement: The Duke of York and Reconstruction. Diagnosing Syntaxed. byLisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver, 158–189. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  58. Lightfoot, David
    1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lipták, Anikó
    2009 The Landscape of Correlatives: An Empirical and Analytical Survey. Correlatives Cross-Linguisticallyed. byAnikó Lipták, 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lfab.1.02lip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.1.02lip [Google Scholar]
  60. Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Andrei Sideltsev
    2021a Bracketing Paradoxes at Clausal Boundaries in Hittite. Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology251.809–846. 10.30842/ielcp230690152548
    https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp230690152548 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2021b Deriving Preverbal Position in a Verb-Final Language: The Case of Hittite. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics6.1:49. 10.5334/gjgl.1216
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1216 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2022 External Heads in Hittite Relative Constructions. Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology261:794–820. 10.30842/ielcp230690152651
    https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp230690152651 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Sergei Tatevosov
    2009 The Clause Internal Left Edge: Exploring the Preverbal Position in Ossetian. International Conference on Iranian Linguistics 3. University of Paris III: Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, 11–13 September 2009. Online: otipl.philol.msu.ru/staff/people/tatevosov/clause_internal_left_edge_4.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Motter, Thomas
    2020 Hittite Correlative Resumption as Discourse Anaphora. Proceedings of the 31st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conferenceed. byDavid Goldstein, Stephanie Jamison & Brent Vine, 215–228. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Nunes, Jairo
    1999 Linearization of Chains and Phonetic Realization of Chain Links. Working Minimalismed. bySamuel David Epstein & Norbert Hornstein, 217–249. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 2004Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  67. Pesetsky, David
    2000Phrasal Movement and Its Kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2013 Phrasal Movement and Its Discontents: Diseases and Diagnoses. Diagnosing Syntaxed. byLisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver, 123–157. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  69. Pittner, Karin
    1995 The Case of German Relatives. The Linguistic Review12.3:197–232. 10.1515/tlir.1995.12.3.197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1995.12.3.197 [Google Scholar]
  70. Probert, Philomen
    2006 Clause Boundaries in Old Hittite Relative Sentences. Transactions of the Philological Society104.1:17–83. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2006.00165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2006.00165.x [Google Scholar]
  71. 2014 Relative Clauses, Indo-Hittite and Standard Average European. Proceedings of the 25th Annual UCLA Conferenceed. byStephanie Jamison, H. Craig Melchert & Brent Vine, 137–164. Bremen: Hempen.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    1976 The Duke of York Gambit. Journal of Linguistics121.83–102. 10.1017/S0022226700004813
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700004813 [Google Scholar]
  73. Roberts, Ian
    1993Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Salisbury, Donna M.
    2005 Local Adverbs in Neo-Hittite. Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  75. Salzmann, Martin
    2006 Resumptive Pronouns and Matching Effects in Zurich German Relative Clauses as Distributed Deletion. Leiden Papers in Linguistics3.1:17–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sideltsev, Andrei & Maria Molina
    2015 Enclitic -(m)a ‘but’, Clause Architecture and the Prosody of Focus in Hittite. Indogermanische Forschungen1201.209–254. 10.1515/if‑2015‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2015-0011 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sideltsev, Andrei
    2015 Hittite Clause Architecture. Revue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale1091.79–112. 10.3917/assy.109.0079
    https://doi.org/10.3917/assy.109.0079 [Google Scholar]
  78. Sideltsev, Аndrei
    2017aSyntax of Hittite Clause. Moscow: LRC.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Sideltsev, Andrei
    2017b Accented Clitics in Hittite?. Transactions of the Philological Society115.2:176–211. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12097
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12097 [Google Scholar]
  80. 2022 Mismatch Between Syntax and Prosody and Complex Sentence Structure in Hittite. Indo-European Linguistics101.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Skopeteas, Stavros & Gisbert Fanselow
    2010 Focus in Georgian and the Expression of Contrast. Lingua120.6:1370–1391. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  82. Srivastav, Veneeta. S.
    1991 The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory91.637–686. 10.1007/BF00134752
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134752 [Google Scholar]
  83. Suñer, Margarita
    1984 Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter. The Linguistic Review31.363–387. 10.1515/tlir.1984.3.4.363
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1984.3.4.363 [Google Scholar]
  84. Tjerkstra, Francoise A.
    1999Principles of the Relation between Local Adverb, Verb and Sentence Particle in Hittite. Groningen: Styx.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
    2006 Free Relatives. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Volume IIed. byMartin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 338–382. Oxford: OUP. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch27
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch27 [Google Scholar]
  86. Yates, Anthony
    2014 Anatolian “Indeterminate” Relative Clauses Revisited: Syntax, Semantics, and the “Held-Garrett Rule”. HandoutÖsterreichische linguistiktagung 41, 6 December 2014.

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error