1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Linguistics
  4. Volume 14, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article combines ideas and concepts deriving from grammaticalization studies, cognitive linguistics and construction grammar. Specifically, it takes three important ideas developed within grammaticalization research, namely or and or (Evans & Wilkins 2000, 2006; Heine 2002), and remodels them with the concepts and . This enables the definition of three salient construct types present in historical corpora that are placed in the continuum between individual variation and language change: and . Each construct type characterizes a specific phase in language change. The data presented as illustration of the construct types stem from historical and contemporary corpora of written French, Italian and Spanish.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.22031.sch
2023-04-25
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhl.22031.sch
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BFM2019 = École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS) (ed.)
    BFM2019 = École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS) (ed.) 2019 Base de français médiéval 2019. Lyon: École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS). Online: txm.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/bfm/
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BIBIT = Quondam, Amedeo
    (eds.) 2016–2023 Biblioteca italiana. Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma. Online: www.bibliotecaitaliana.it
     [Google Scholar]
  3. CDH = Real Academia Española (ed.)
    CDH = Real Academia Española (ed.) 2013–2023 Corpus del Nuevo diccionario histórico del español. Madrid: Real Academia Española. Online: web.frl.es/CNDHE
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Frantext = Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF) (ed.)
    Frantext = Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF) (ed.) 1998–2023 Base textuelle Frantext. Nancy: Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF). Online: www.frantext.fr
  5. LIZ = Stoppelli, Pasquale & Eugenio Picchi
    (eds.) 2001 Letteratura italiana Zanichelli. Bologna: Zanichelli.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. TLFi = Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF) (ed.)
    TLFi = Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF) (ed.) 2013–2023 Trésor de la langue française informatisé. Nancy: Laboratoire Analyse et traitement informatique de la langue française (ATILF). Online: atilf.atilf.fr/tlfi.htm
  7. TLIO = Opera del vocabolario italiano (ed.)
    TLIO = Opera del vocabolario italiano (ed.) 2005–2023 Corpus del Tesoro della lingua italiana delle origini. Firenze: Opera del vocabolario italiano. Online: tlioweb.ovi.cnr.it
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Andersen, Henning
    2001 Actualization and the (Uni)directionality of Change. Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progressed. byHenning Andersen, 226–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.219.11and
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.11and [Google Scholar]
  9. Anthonissen, Lynn
    2021 Individuality in Language Change. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110725841
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110725841 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea
    2015 Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological Context, Basic Assumptions and Historical Implications. Diachronic Construction Grammared. byJóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, 2–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.01bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.01bar [Google Scholar]
  11. Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
    2008 Introduction: Constructions and Language Change. Constructions and Language Changeed. byAlexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 1–21. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211757.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211757.1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Booij, Geert
    2008 Constructional Idioms as Products of Linguistic Change: The aan het + INFINITIVE Construction in Dutch. Constructions and Language Changeed. byAlexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 81–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Börjars, Kersi, Nigel Vincent & George Walkden
    2015 On Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change. Transactions of the Philological Society1131.362–382. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12068
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12068 [Google Scholar]
  14. Buridant, Claude
    2019 Grammaire du français médiéval (XIe-XIVe siècles). Strasbourg: Éditions de linguistique et de philologie.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chomsky, Noam & Horward Lasnik
    1993 The Theory of Principles and Parameters. Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. 1. Halbband / Vol. 1ed. byJoachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann, 506–569. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506 [Google Scholar]
  17. Combettes, Bernard
    2014 Réanalyse et changement linguistique. Langages1961.53–67. 10.3917/lang.196.0053
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.196.0053 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
    (eds.) 2018 Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21 [Google Scholar]
  19. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
    2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  20. Denison, David
    2017 Ambiguity and Vagueness in Historical Change. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectivesed. byMarianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger, 292–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.013 [Google Scholar]
  21. De Smet, Hendrik
    2009 Analysing Reanalysis. Lingua1191.1728–1755. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2012 The Course of Actualization. Language881.601–633. 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2013 Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Diessel, Holger
    2015 Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Handbook of Cognitive Linguisticsed. byEwa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak, 296–322. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110292022‑015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-015 [Google Scholar]
  25. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalizationed. byIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  26. 2006 Context Types in Grammaticalization as Constructions. ConstructionsSV 1. Online: https://www.constructions.uni-osnabrueck.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/2006-SI-Diewald-24-82-1-PB.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2009 Konstruktionen und Paradigmen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik371.445–468. 10.1515/ZGL.2009.031
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.031 [Google Scholar]
  28. Diewald, Gabriele, Volodymyr Dekalo & Dániel Czicza
    2021 Grammaticalization of verdienen into an Auxiliary Marker of Deontic Modality: An Item-Driven Usage-Based Approach. Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammared. byMartin Hilpert, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere, 81–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.32.04die
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.32.04die [Google Scholar]
  29. Eckhardt, Regine
    2006 Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
    2000 In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. Language76:3.546–592. 10.2307/417135
     https://doi.org/10.2307/417135 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fedriani, Chiara
    2017 Quapropter, quaeso? ‘Why, for Pity’s Sake?’ Questions and the Pragmatic Functions of quaeso, obsecro, and amabo in Plautus. Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greeked. byCamille Denizot & Olga Spevak, 83–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.190.05fed
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.05fed [Google Scholar]
  32. Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary C. O’Connor
    1988 Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone. Language641.501–538. 10.2307/414531
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fischer, Olga
    2007 Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Flach, Susanne
    2020 Constructionalization and the Sorites Paradox: The Emergence of the into-Causative. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammared. byLotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova, 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.27.01fla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.01fla [Google Scholar]
  35. Fried, Mirjam
    2008 Constructions and Constructs: Mapping a Shift between Predication and Attribution. Constructions and Language Changeed. byAlexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Geis, Michael L. & Arnold M. Zwicky
    1971 On Invited Inferences. Linguistic Inquiry21.561–566.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
    2014 Deverbal Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. QUAESO and It. prego): The Cyclic Nature of Functional Developments. Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languagesed. byChiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli, 61–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gisborne, Nicolas & Amanda Patten
    2011 Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalizationed. byHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0008 [Google Scholar]
  39. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. Speech Actsed. byPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  40. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gras Manzano, Pedro
    2010 Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.
  43. Györi, Gábor
    1995 Historical Aspects of Categorization. Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguisticsed. byEugene H. Casad, 175–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
    2018a Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Examples from Romance. Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Changeed. bySalvador Pons Bordería & Óscar Loureda Lamas, 51–77. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 2018b The Expression of Clause Negation: From Latin to Early French. Latin tardif, français ancien. Continuités et rupturesed. byAnne Carlier & Céline Guillot-Barbance, 269–297. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110551716‑014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551716-014 [Google Scholar]
  46. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
    1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  47. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalizationed. byIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
  48. Hilpert, Martin
    2013 Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2018 Three Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammared. byEvie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
  50. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Componentsed. byWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hjelmslev, Louis
    1961 [1943] Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. [Translation ofOmkring sprogteoriens grundlæggelse. København: Munksgaard.]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hofmann, Johann B. & Anton Szantyr
    1965 Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hopper, Paul
    1987 Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting, February 14–16, 1987: General Session and Parasession on Grammar and Cognitioned. byJon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip, 139–157. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1834 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1991 On some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issuesed. byElizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  55. Hummel, Martin
    2018 Baseline Elaboration and Echo-Sounding at the Adjective Adverb Interface. Cognitive Linguistics291.407–452. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0033
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0033 [Google Scholar]
  56. Israel, Michael
    1996 The Way Constructions Grow. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Languageed. byAdele E. Goldberg, 217–230. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Jespersen, Otto
    1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Høst og Søn.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Karlsson, Emanuel
    2018 A Radical Construction Grammar Approach to Construction Split in the Diachrony of Spatial Particles of Ancient Greek. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammared. byEvie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson, 277–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c10 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore
    1999 Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? Construction. Language75:1.1–33. 10.2307/417472
     https://doi.org/10.2307/417472 [Google Scholar]
  60. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1977 Syntactic Reanalysis. Mechanisms of Syntactic Changeed. byCharles N. Li, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑005
     https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-005 [Google Scholar]
  61. 1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Lave, Jean & Étienne Wenger
    1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  63. Legallois, Dominique
    2018 La notion de construction. Encyclopédie grammaticale du français. ed. byDenis Apothéloz, Marie-José Béguelin, Christophe Benzitoun, Alain Berrendonner, Gilles Corminboeuf, Jeanne-Marie Debaisieux, José Deulofeu, Peter Lauwers & Dominique Willems. Online : encyclogram.fr/notx/012/012_Notice.php
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lehmann, Christian
    1982 Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. Vol. 1. Köln: Universität Köln.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    1991 Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization. Language671: 475–509. 10.1353/lan.1991.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0009 [Google Scholar]
  67. Masini, Francesca
    2016 Grammatica delle costruzioni. Un’introduzione. Roma: Carocci.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
    2007 Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence. Studies in Language311.829–865. 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
  69. Meillet, Antoine
    1912 L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia: rivista internazionale di sintesi scientifica121.384–400.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Molinelli, Piera
    2019 Verb-Based Functional Markers in Latin: Morphosyntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics at a Crossroads. Rivista italiana di linguistica e di dialettologia211.49–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
    2021 Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Newmeyer, Frederick
    2003 Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language79:4.682–707. 10.1353/lan.2003.0260
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0260 [Google Scholar]
  73. Nicolle, Steve
    2011 Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalizationed. byHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 401–412. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0032
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0032 [Google Scholar]
  74. Noël, Dirk
    2007 Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory. Functions of Language141.177–202. 10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe [Google Scholar]
  75. Persson, Gunnar
    1988 Homonymy, Polysemy and Heterosemy: The Types of Lexical Ambiguity in English. Symposium on Lexicography III: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Lexicography May 14–16, 1986 at the University of Copenhagened. byKarl Hyldgaard-Jensen & Arne Zettersten, 269–280. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111347349‑010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111347349-010 [Google Scholar]
  76. Petré, Peter
    2019 How Constructions are Born: The role of Patterns in the Constructionalization of be going to INF. Patterns in Language and Linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concepted. byBeatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke, 157–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110596656‑007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110596656-007 [Google Scholar]
  77. Pinkster, Harm
    1988 [1984] Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: UTB Francke. [Translation ofLatijnse Syntaxis en Semantiek. Amsterdam: Grüner.]
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Prandi, Michele, Pierluigi Cuzzolin, Nicola Grandi & Maria Napoli
    2021 Orizzonti della linguistica. Grammatica, tipologia, mutamento. Roma: Carocci.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Rheinfelder, Hans
    1952 Altfranzösische Grammatik. 1. Teil. Lautlehre. München: Hueber.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 1967 Altfranzösische Grammatik. 2. Teil. Formenlehre. München: Hueber.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Rosén, Hannah
    2010 Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-Part Modification: The Contribution of Particles. New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. Volume 1. Syntax of the Sentenceed. byPhilip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 317–441. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1995 [1916] Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par Charles Bailly et Albert Séchehaye avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. Édition critique préparée par Tullio De Mauro. Postface de Louis-Jean Calvet. Paris: Payot & Rivages.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2010 Does Frequency in Text Instantiate Entrenchment in the Cognitive System?Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approachesed. byDylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer, 101–133. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226423.101
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226423.101 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2020 The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  85. Schneider, Stefan
    2018 Verbos cognitivos en el Corpus del Nuevo diccionario histórico (CDH). RILCE. Revista de filología hispánica34:3.1081–1103. 10.15581/008.34.3.1081‑103
     https://doi.org/10.15581/008.34.3.1081-103 [Google Scholar]
  86. 2020 J’imagine comme verbe et marqueur pragmatique : une analyse diachronique. 7e Congrès mondial de linguistique française, Université de Montpellier 3, France, 6–10 juillet 2020ed. byFranck Neveu, Bernard Harmegnies, Linda Hriba, Sophie Prévost & Agnès Steuckardt. Online: 10.1051/shsconf/20207803001
     https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207803001 [Google Scholar]
  87. 2022 Dal verbo immaginare al segnale discorsivo immagino. Estensione, rianalisi e adattamento. Storie e linguaggi8:1.225–248.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Schneider, Stefan & Julie Glikman
    2015 Origin and Development of French Parenthetical Verbs. Parenthetical Verbsed. byStefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi, 163–188. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110376142‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110376142-008 [Google Scholar]
  89. Smirnova, Elena
    2015 Constructionalization and Constructional Change: The Role of Context in the Development of Constructions. Diachronic Construction Grammared. byJóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.03smi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.03smi [Google Scholar]
  90. Smirnova, Elena & Lotte Sommerer
    2020 Introduction: The Nature of the Node and the Network: Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammared. byLotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.27.int
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.int [Google Scholar]
  91. Stefenelli, Arnulf
    1996 Thesen zur Entstehung und Ausgliederung der romanischen Sprachen. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik (LRL). Band II.1: Latein und Romanisch: historisch-vergleichende Grammatik der romanischen Sprachened. byGünter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt, 73–90. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110938364.73
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110938364.73 [Google Scholar]
  92. Timberlake, Alan
    1977 Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change. Mechanisms of Syntactic Changeed. byCharles N. Li, 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑006
     https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-006 [Google Scholar]
  93. Tomasello, Michael
    2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2003 Constructions in Grammaticalization. The Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. byBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch20
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  95. 2008 The Grammaticalization of NP of NP Patterns. Constructions and Language Changeed. byAlexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald, 23–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 2022 Discourse Structuring Markers in English: A Historical Constructionalist Perspective on Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.33
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.33 [Google Scholar]
  97. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
    2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  99. Varvaro, Alberto
    2013 Latin and the Making of the Romance Languages. The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages. Volume 2: Contextsed. byMartin Maiden, John Ch. Smith & Adam Ledgeway, 6–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHO9781139019996.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139019996.002 [Google Scholar]
  100. Walkden, George
    2017 The Actuation Problem. The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntaxed. byAdam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts, 403–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279070.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279070.020 [Google Scholar]
  101. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
    1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposiumed. byWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, 95–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Wiemer, Björn & Walter Bisang
    2004 What Makes Grammaticalization? An Appraisal of its Components and its Fringes. What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Componentsed. byWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer, 3–20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.22031.sch
Loading
Construct types in language change
Journal of Historical Linguistics 14, 304 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22031.sch
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.22031.sch
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.22031.sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): construct; construction; French; grammaticalization; Italian; Spanish

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error