1887
image of Modeling sound change in a dialectically heterogeneous community
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Vertical and horizontal models of language relatedness, such as tree models and wave models, approach language change from two fundamentally different perspectives. Vertical models capture the diachronic nature of language differentiation but do not offer a satisfactory way to show diffusion across linguistic boundaries. Horizontal models excel at modeling diffusion but are essentially distributional models and have no temporal element. In this paper, a mixed model that incorporates both vertical and horizontal innovation spread is used to analyze the development of rhotacism in the Upper Kapuas-Mahakam languages of central Borneo. It is shown that subtle differences in the outcomes of rhotacism suggest a historical diffusion of rhotacism between dialects in a Proto-Upper Kapuas-Mahakam community. The subgroup-wide application of rhotacism interacted with other, localized changes that were restricted to specific dialects. Subgroup-wide changes therefore interact with already established dialectical divisions, leaving a mark on the historical evolution of languages in a dialectically heterogeneous community.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23014.smi
2026-03-02
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blust, Robert
    2003Thao dictionary (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A5). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013The Austronesian languages. 2nd edn. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blust, Robert, Stephen Trussel & Alexander D. Smith
    2023 CLDF dataset derived from Blust’s “Austronesian Comparative Dictionary” (v1.2). 10.5281/zenodo.7741197
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7741197 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bynon, Theodora
    1977Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165709
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165709 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cedeño, Rafael A. Núñez
    1987 Intervocalic /d/ Rhotacism in Dominican Spanish: A Non Linear Analysis. Hispania(). –. 10.2307/343378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/343378 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chrétien, C. Douglas
    1965 The statistical structure of the Proto-Austronesian morph. Lingua. –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(65)90044‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(65)90044-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. François, Alexandre
    2014 Trees, Waves, and Linkages: Models of Language Diversification. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Heggarty, Paul, Warren Maguire & McMahon April
    2010 Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. –. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0099
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0099 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hock, Hans Henrich
    2021Principles of Historical Linguistics (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 34). 3rd edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110746440
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746440 [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacques, Guillaume & Johan-Mattis List
    2019 Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/jhl.17008.mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17008.mat [Google Scholar]
  11. Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy
    1985 Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700010306
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010306 [Google Scholar]
  12. Nandris, Octave
    1963Phonétique Historique du Roumain. Paris: Klincksiek.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Roberts, Phillip J.
    2012 Latin rhotacism: A case study in the life cycle of phonological processes. Transactions of the Philological Society(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2012.01285.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01285.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Ross, Malcolm
    1988Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1997 Social networks and kinds of speech-community event. InRoger M. Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language 1: Theoretical and methodological orientations, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schleicher, August
    1853a Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1853b O jazyku litevském, zvlástě ohledem na slovanský června. Časopis Českého Museum. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmidt, Johannes
    1872Die Verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1900Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten: Probe-Vorlesung, gehalten zu Leipzig am 30 April 1870. Graz.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sellato, Bernard
    1981 Three-gender personal pronouns in some languages of central Borneo. Borneo Research Bulletin. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1982 A double polarity in Aoheng terminological systems of direction. Borneo Research Bulletin. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1994Nomads of the Bornean rainforest: the economics, politics, and ideology of settling down. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824842871
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824842871 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sellato, Bernard & Pierre Le Roux
    2004 A note in intervals, space and time, and the colors of vowels in the Aoheng language of Borneo. InPierre Le Roux, Bernard Sellato & Jaques Ivanoff (eds.), Poids et Mesures en Asie du sud-est systèms métrologiques et sociétés, vol. 1, L’Asie du sud-est Austronésienne et ses marches (Études Thématiques 13), –. Paris: École Fran.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sellato, Bernard & Antonia Soriente
    2015 The languages and peoples of the Müller mountains: a contribution to the study of the origins of Borneo’s nomads and their languages. Wacana(). –. 10.17510/wacana.v16i2.381
    https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v16i2.381 [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, Alexander D.
    2017a The languages of Borneo: a comprehensive classification. Department of Linguistics, University of HawaiiPhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2017b The Western Malayo-Polynesian Problem. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2017.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2017.0021 [Google Scholar]
  27. Soriente, Antonia
    2013 Undergoer voice in Borneo Penan, Punan, Kenyah, and Kayan languages. InK. Alexander Adelaar (ed.), Voice variation in Austronesian languages: linguistic studies of Indonesian and other languages in Indonesia, –. NUSA 54, Special Issue.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23014.smi
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23014.smi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: sound change ; diffusion ; Borneo ; Austronesian ; contact
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error