1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Diachronic change in Spanish ‘liking’ constructions
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

Analyzing quantitative corpus data from the 13th to the 19th centuries, this study applies a usage-based construction grammar approach and an onomasiological approach to the examination of change in argument structure in Spanish verbs of “liking”, focusing on the verb ‘to like.’ This verb went from having a nominative experiencer to having a dative one. I highlight how the semantic properties of the stimuli of liking verbs helped determine the linguistic encoding of the arguments of liking constructions. Furthermore, I argue that a key cause in the change in argument structure of was the analogical extension of the dative-experiencer pattern via a multiplicity of source constructions. This study is the first to consider (a) the verb forms , and and (b) onomasiological profiles for the concept of liking, regarding the change in argument structure of . Results shed light on cross-linguistic variation in argument structures and extend scholarship on the issue of word order in psych-verb constructions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj
2025-12-16
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj/jhl.23031.moj.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aaron, Jessi
    2016 The road already traveled. Constructional analogy in lexico-syntactic change. Studies in Language:.–. 10.1075/sl.40.1.02aar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.02aar [Google Scholar]
  2. Agresti, Alan
    1990 Categorical Data Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen, Cynthia
    1995 Case marking and reanalysis: grammatical relations from old to early modern English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198240969.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240969.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Amaral, Patricia
    2018 Current Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics)ed. byKimberly Geeslin, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316779194.027
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.027 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anthony, Laurence
    2017 AntConc (Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available fromwww.laurenceanthony.net/software
  6. Barðdal, Jóhanna
    2006 Predicting the Productivity of Argument Structure Constructions. Berkeley Linguistic Society:.–. 10.3765/bls.v32i1.3438
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v32i1.3438 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2008 Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.8 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009 The Development of case in Germanic. The role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Caseed. byJóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana Chelliah, –. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.108.09bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.108.09bar [Google Scholar]
  9. Batllori, Montserrat
    2012 Diacronía de los verbos psicológicos: una propuesta de entrada léxica. Historia del léxico: perspectivas de investigación (Vol. 47)ed. byGloria Clavería, Margarita Freixas, Marta Prat & Joan Torruella, –. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. 10.31819/9783865278784‑011
     https://doi.org/10.31819/9783865278784-011 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauer, Brigitte
    2000 Archaic Syntax in Indo-European. The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110825992
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825992 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beardsley, Wilfred
    1921 Infinitive Constructions in Old Spanish. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bencini, Giulia & Adele Goldberg
    2000 The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language:.–. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2757
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2757 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bybee, Joan
    1988 Morphology as lexical organization. Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguisticsed. byMichael Hammond & Michael Noonan, –. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004454101_010
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454101_010 [Google Scholar]
  14. 1995 Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes:.–. 10.1080/01690969508407111
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bybee, Joan & David Eddington
    2006 A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming.’ Language:.–. 10.1353/lan.2006.0081
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bybee, Joan & Thompson, Sandra
    2000 Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Clements, J. Clancy
    2006 Transitivity and Spanish non-anaphoric se. Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntaxed. byJ. Clancy Clements & Jiyoung Yoon, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230522688_11
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522688_11 [Google Scholar]
  19. Corominas, Joan
    1954 Diccionario crítico etimológico de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Gredos.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. De Smet, Hendrik
    2009 Analyzing reanalysis. Lingua.–. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Delbecque, Nicole
    1987 Problèmes et méthodes de l’étude de la variation linguistique. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Delicado Cantero, Manuel
    2013 Prepositional clauses in Spanish. A diachronic and comparative syntactic study. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614510628
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510628 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dunning, Ted
    1993 Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence. Computational Linguistics:.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Elvira, Javier
    2006 El desarrollo de la construcción biactancial estativa en español. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fedriani, Ciara
    2013 The me pudet construction in the history of Latin. The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects (Vol. 140)ed. byLeonid Kulikov & Ilja Serzant. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/slcs.140.10fed
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.140.10fed [Google Scholar]
  26. (2014) Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Fillmore, Charles
    1968 The case for case. Universals in linguistic theoryed. byEmmon Barch & Robert Harms, –. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fischer, Olga
    2013 An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization. Studies in Language:.–. 10.1075/sl.37.3.03fis
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.03fis [Google Scholar]
  29. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010 Lexical variation in space. Language in space. An international handbook of linguistic variation. Volume 1: Theories and methodsed. byPeter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt, –. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Givón, Talmy
    1991 Markedness in grammar: Distributional, communicative and cognitive correlates of syntactic structure. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”:.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Goldberg, Adele
    1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2003 Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences:.–. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2013 Constructionist approaches. The Oxford handbook of construction grammared. byThomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Harris, Alice & Lyle Campbell
    1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge/ New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  36. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001 Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. Typological Studies in Language.–. 10.1075/tsl.46.04has
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.46.04has [Google Scholar]
  37. Hilpert, Martin
    2013 Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammared. byThomas Hoffman & Graeme Trousdale, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lahousse, Karen & Béatrice Lamiroy
    2012 Word order in French, Spanish and Italian: A grammaticalization account. Folia linguistica:.–. 10.1515/flin.2012.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.014 [Google Scholar]
  39. Langacker, Ronald
    1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lapesa, Rafael
    1981 Historia de la lengua española. Novena edición corregida y aumentada. Madrid: Gredos.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Melis, Chantal
    1997 Las emociones, la transitividad y el aspecto. Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 1998 Sobre la historia sintáctica de gustar. Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española: La Rioja, 1–5 de abril de 1997ed. byClaudio García, Fabián González, & José Javier Mangado, –. Universidad de la Rioja: Servicio de publicaciones.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 1999a Los verbos placer y pesar en la Edad Media: la expresión ‘impersonal’ de las emociones. El Centro de Lingüística Hispánica y la lengua española. Volumen conmemorativo del 30 aniversario de su fundacióned. byFulvia Colombo, –. Mexico: UNAM.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 1999b Variación sintáctica con los verbos de emoción. Español Actual.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 2018 Sobre la caída en desuso del verbo placer. Caleidoscopio de estudios colonialescoord. byBeatriz Arias & María Guadalupe Juárez. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Melis, Chantal & Marcela Flores
    2013 On the historical expansion of non-canonically marked ‘subjects’ in Spanish. The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects (Vol. 140)ed. byLeonid Kulikov & Ilja Serzant, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/slcs.140.08mel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.140.08mel [Google Scholar]
  47. 2018 The dative experiencer of Spanish gustar. Studies in Historical Ibero-Romance Morpho-Syntaxed. byMiriam Bouzouita, Ioanna Sitaridou & Enrique Pato, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.16.06mel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.16.06mel [Google Scholar]
  48. Miglio, Viola, Stefan Gries, Michael Harris, Eva Wheeler & Raquel Santana-Paixão
    2013 Spanish lo(s)-le(s) Clitic alternations in psych verbs: A multifactorial corpus-based analysis. Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic linguistics symposiumed. byJennifer Cabrelli Amaro, Gillian Lord, Ana de Prada Pérez & Jessi Elana Aaron, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Mojedano Batel, Andrea
    2020 ‘Liking’ constructions in Spanish: Syntactic category of the stimulus and constructional change. Historical Linguistics 2017ed. byBridget Drinka, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.350.05moj
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.05moj [Google Scholar]
  50. Moore, Robert C.
    2004 On log-likelihood-ratios and the significance of rare events. InProceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, –. Barcelona, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Rayson, Paul & Roger Garside
    2000 Comparing Corpora using Frequency Profiling. Proceedings of the Workshop Comparing Corpora, held in conjunction with the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000).
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 1959 Gramática de la lengua española, nueva edición, reformada, de 1931. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Geeraerts
    2003 Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities.–. 10.1023/A:1025019216574
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025019216574 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tarr, Frederick Courtney
    1922 Prepositional complementary clauses in Spanish with special reference to the works of Pérez Galdós. Revue Hispanique.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Thompson, Sandra & Paul Hopper
    2001 Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structureed. byJoan Bybee & Paul Hopper, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.03tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.03tho [Google Scholar]
  56. Touratier, Christian
    2008 Grammaire latine. Paris: Editions Sedes.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Vázquez Rozas, Victoria
    2006 Gustar-type verbs. Functional approaches to Spanish syntax: lexical semantics, discourse and transitivityed. byJ. Clancy Clements & Jiyoung Yoon. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Vázquez Rozas, Victoria
    2015 Dialogue and epistemic stance: a diachronic analysis of cognitive verb constructions in Spanish. eHumanista/IVITRA.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Vázquez Rozas, Victoria & Elena Rivas
    2007 Un análisis construccionista de la diacronía de gustar. Language, Mind, and the Lexiconed. byIraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Carlos Inchaurralde & Jesús Sánchez-García, –. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Vergara-Wilson, Damián
    2009 Formulaic Language and Adjective Categories in Eight Centuries of the Spanish Expression of ‘Becoming’ / Quedar(se) + Adj. Albuquerque, NM: The University of New Mexico PhD. dissertation.
  61. 2014 Categorization and Constructional Change in Spanish Expressions of ‘Becoming.’Leiden, Netherlands/Boston, MA: Brill Academic Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Wasow, Thomas
    1997 Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change:.–. 10.1017/S0954394500001800
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001800 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj
Loading
Diachronic change in Spanish ‘liking’ constructions
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.23031.moj
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Spanish ; argument structure ; psych-verbs ; analogical extension ; construction grammar

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error