Passing is giving

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2006 Serial Verb Constructions in Typological Perspective. Serial verb constructions: a cross-linguistic typology, ed. byAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, Lloyd B.
   1982 The ‘perfect’ as a Universal and as a Language-particular Category. Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and pragmatics, ed. byPaul. Hopper, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.1.16and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.16and [Google Scholar]
3. Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
   2014 Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction, Version 1.1. New York: Oxford University Press. ocbaxtersagart.lsait.lsa.umich.edu/. (AccessedJanuary 19, 2023). 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945375.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Bisang, Walter
   2015 Linguistic Change in Grammar. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. Harald Baayen
   2007 Predicting the Dative Alternation. Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, ed. byGerlof Bouma, Irene Maria Krämer & Joost Zwarts, –. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell, Lyle
   2013 Historical Linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chang, Li-li
   2006 Hanyu shiyiju biao beidong de yuyin fazhan漢語使役句表被動的語義發展 [The Semantic Development from Causatives to Passives in Chinese]. Language and Linguistics:. –.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chappell, Hilary M.
   2001 Synchrony and Diachrony of Sinitic Languages: A Brief History of Chinese Dialects. Sinitic Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, ed. byHilary M. Chappell, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198299776.003.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198299776.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Chappell, Hilary M.
   2015 Linguistic Areas in China for Differential Object Marking, Passive, and Comparative Constructions. Diversity in Sinitic languages, ed. byHilary M. Chappell, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723790.003.0002
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723790.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
10. Chin, Andy Chi-on
    2010 Two Types of Indirect Object Markers in Chinese: Their Typological Significance and Development. Journal of Chinese Linguistics:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chin, Andy Chi-on
    2011 Grammaticalization of the Cantonese Double Object Verb [pei35] 畀 in Typological and Areal Perspectives. Language and Linguistics:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chin, Andy Chi-on
    2022 Cantonese GIVE and Double-Object Construction: Grammaticalization and Word Order Change. (= Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 15.) Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing House. 10.1075/scld.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.15 [Google Scholar]
13. Cristofaro, Sonia
    1998 Grammaticalization and Clause Linkage Strategies: A Typological Approach with Particular Reference to Ancient Greek. The Limits of Grammaticalization, ed. byAnna G. Ramat & Paul J. Hopper, –. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.37.03cri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.37.03cri [Google Scholar]
14. Croft, William
    1990 Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Croft, William
    2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins
    2000 In the Mind’s Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. Language:. –. 10.2307/417135
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417135 [Google Scholar]
17. Givón, Talmy
    1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Güldemann, Tom
    2013 Using Minority Languages to Inform the Historical Analysis of Major Written Languages: A Tuu Perspective on the ‘Give’~ Object Marker Polysemy in Sinitic. Journal of Asian and African Studies. –.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath, & Sebastian Bank
    2022 Glottolog 4.7. [Released on5 December 2022]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. glottolog.org. (Accessed onJuly 4, 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hashimoto, Mantaro
    1976 Language Diffusion on the Asian Continent. Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages. –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hashimoto, Mantaro
    1988 The Structure and the Typology of the Chinese Passive Construction. Passive and Voice. (= Typological Studies in Language, 16.), ed. byMasayoshi Shibatatni, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.16.11has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.11has [Google Scholar]
22. Haspelmath, Martin
    2003 The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-linguistic Comparison. The New Psychology of Language, Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. byMichael Tomasello & Volume, –. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997 From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbs in the World’s Languages. Munich and Newcastle: LINCOM.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Ditransitive Alignment Splits and Inverse Alignment. Functions of Language:. –. 10.1075/fol.14.1.06has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.1.06has [Google Scholar]
25. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2005 Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
26. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. New Reflections on Grammaticalization, ed. byIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
27. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2003 On Contact-induced Grammaticalization. Studies in Language. –. 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
28. Heine, Bernd, Claudi Ulrike & Hünnemeyer Friederike
    1991a Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Heine, Bernd, Claudi Ulrike & Hünnemeyer Friederike
    1991b From Cognition to Grammar. Evidence from African Languages. Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. byElizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, volume, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.09hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.09hei [Google Scholar]
30. Hirata, Shoji
    (ed.) 1998 Huizhou fangyan yanjiu徽州方言研究 [Research on the Huizhou Dialect]. Tokyo: Kobun.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hopper, Paul. J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
32. Hui, Man-Shan & Richard VanNess Simmons
    2023 Contact Induced Layering and Diffusion in Yuè Chinese Varieties — the *-iun/iut and *-un/ut Merger Reconsidered. Languages:. . 10.3390/languages8020146
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020146 [Google Scholar]
33. Jackendoff, Ray S.
    1990 Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Karlgren, Bernhard
    1940 Zhongguo yinyùnxue yanjiu [A study of Chinese Phonology]. Translated byYuenren Chao, Changpei Luo, Fangkuei Li. Changsha: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Keenan, Edward
    1985 Relative Clauses. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. byTimothy Shopen, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kittilä, Seppo
    2006 The Anomaly of the Verb ‘Give’ Explained by its High (Formal and Semantic) Transitivity. Linguistics:. –. 10.1515/LING.2006.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.019 [Google Scholar]
37. Knott, Judith
    1995 The Causative-passive Correlation. Subject, voice, and ergativity: Selected essays, ed. byDavid C. Bennett, Theodora Bynon & B. George Hewitt, –. London: University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN9781107136243. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
39. Kwok, Bit-Chee
    2008 邵武話動態助詞 “度” 的來源—兼論邵武話和閩語的關係[The Origin of the Aspect Marker thɔ35 in Shaowu and Discussion on the Relation between Shaowu and Min]. Zhongguo yuwen中國語文 [Chinese linguistics] . –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lai, Huei-ling
    2001 On Hakka BUN: A Case of Polygrammaticalization. Language and Linguistics: . –.
    [Google Scholar]
41. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2001 The Role of Migration and Language Contact in the Development of the Sino-Tibetan Language Family. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Case Studies in Language Change, ed. byRobert M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198299813.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198299813.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
42. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
43. Li, Jingzhong
    1994 Yuyan yanbian lun語言演變論 [Theories of Language Change]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Li, Hua
    2008 Shexian Sanyang fangyan yuyin yanjiu歙縣三陽方言語言研究 [A Study on the Phonology of Sanyang Dialect of Shexian). Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University master’s dissertation.
45. Li, Rong
    1987 Zhongguo yuyan dituji中國語言地圖集 [Language Atlas of China]. 1st ed.Hong Kong: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Li, Xuping
    2015 Ditransitive Constructions in Gan Chinese: A Case Study of the Yichun Dialect. Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument Realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET Verbs, ed. byBrian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens & Elke Diedrichsen, –. Cambridge: University Press. 10.1075/slcs.167.06li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.06li [Google Scholar]
47. Liu, Lili
    2007 Xiuning Xikou fangyan yuyin yanjiu休寧溪口方言語音研究 [A Study on the Phonology of Xikou Dialect of Yixian]. Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University master’s dissertation.
48. Lord, Carol
    1976 Evidence for Syntactic Reanalysis: From Verb to Complementizer in Kwa. Papers from the 12th Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. bySalikoko S. Mufwene, Carol A. Walker & Sanford B. Steever, –. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Lord, Carol, Foong Ha Yap & Shoichi Iwasaki
    2002 Grammaticalization of ‘Give’: African and Asian Perspectives. New reflections on grammaticalization. (= Topological Studies in Language, 49.), ed. byIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.15lor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.15lor [Google Scholar]
50. Lu, Wen
    2018 Aspects of the Grammar of Tunxi Hui: A transitional Sinitic language. Hong Kong, China: University of Hong Kong PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lu, Wen & Pui-yiu Szeto
    2023 Polyfunctionality of ‘Give’ in Hui Varieties of Chinese: A Typological and Areal Perspective. Languages:. . 10.3390/languages8030217
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030217 [Google Scholar]
52. MacWright, Tom
    2016 GeoJSON. https://geojson.io/
    [Google Scholar]
53. Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie
    2010 Ditransitive Constructions: A Typological Overview. Studies in Ditransitive Constructions, ed. byAndrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110220377.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220377.1 [Google Scholar]
54. Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
    1994 Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Matthews, Stephen
    2006 On Serial Verbs in Cantonese. Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic typology, ed. byAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
    2009 Contact-induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition. Studies in Language:. –. 10.1075/sl.33.2.06mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.2.06mat [Google Scholar]
57. Meacham, William
    1996 Defining the Hundred Yue. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association:. –. 10.7152/bippa.v15i0.11537
    https://doi.org/10.7152/bippa.v15i0.11537 [Google Scholar]
58. Meng, Qinghui
    2005 Huizhou Fangan徽州方言 [Hui Dialects]. Hefei: Anhui People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Michaelis, Susanne & Martin Haspelmath
    2003 “Ditransitive constructions: Creole languages in a cross-linguistic perspective.” Creolica. https://www.creolica.net/michaelis.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
60. Newman, John
    1993 The Semantics of Giving in Mandarin. Conceptualization and Mental Processing in Languages, ed. byRichard A. Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, –. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857108.433
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857108.433 [Google Scholar]
61. Newman, John
    1996 Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110823714
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110823714 [Google Scholar]
62. Ngai, Sing Sing
    2015 Giving is Receiving: The Polysemy of the GET/GIVE Verb [tie53] in Shaowu. Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument Realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET Verbs, ed. byBrian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens & Elke Diedrichsen, –. Cambridge: University Press. 10.1075/slcs.167.09nga
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.09nga [Google Scholar]
63. Ngai, Sing Sing
    2021 A Grammar of Shaowu: A Sinitic Language of Northwestern Fujian. Sinitic Languages of China 5. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501512483
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512483 [Google Scholar]
64. Norman, Jerry
    2006 Common Dialectal Chinese. The Chinese Rime Tables: Linguistic Philosophy and Historical-comparative Phonology. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 271.), ed. byDavid Prager Branner, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cilt.271.16nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.271.16nor [Google Scholar]
65. Norman, Jerry
    . Forthcoming. Jerry Norman’s Early Chinese and Common Dialectal Chinese — Collected Essays with Representative Syllabaries. Compiled byRichard VanNess Simmons & South Coblin. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, CUHK.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Peyraube, Alain
    1981 The Dative Construction in Cantonese. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages. –.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1984 Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. 10.59962/9780774854580
    https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774854580 [Google Scholar]
68. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1991 Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation: In Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. 10.59962/9780774854597
    https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774854597 [Google Scholar]
69. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
    2008 The English Dative alternation: The Case for Verb Sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics. –.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Rice, Sally & Kaori Kataba
    2007 Cross-linguistic Grammaticalization Patterns of the Allative. Linguistics Typology:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Shen, Zhongwei
    2020 A Phonological History of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316476925
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316476925 [Google Scholar]
72. Siewierska, Anna
    (ed.) 1998 Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110812206
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812206 [Google Scholar]
73. Swadesh, Morris
    1952 Lexico-statistic Dating of Prehistoric Ethnic Contacts: With Special Reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
74. T Liberté
    T Liberté (2018, March29). Tunxihua fangyan xiaozhu peiqi屯溪話方言小豬佩奇 [Peppa pig in Tunxi Hui] [Video]: YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_5FJJXmDX4. (AccessedJanuary 2, 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
75. Tang, Sze-Wing
    1998 On the ‘Inverted’ Double Object Construction. Studies in Cantonese linguisticsed. byStephen Matthews, –. Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
76. The Institute of Linguistics of CASS, The Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of CASS & Language Information Sciences Research Centre of City University of Hong Kong
    The Institute of Linguistics of CASS, The Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of CASS & Language Information Sciences Research Centre of City University of Hong Kong 2012 Zhongguo yuyan dituji中國語言地圖集 [Language Atlas of China]. 2nd ed.Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Tsao, Feng-fu
    1988 The Functions of Mandarin GEI and Taiwanese HOU in the Double Object and Passive Constructions. The Structure of Taiwanese: A Modern Synthesis, ed. byRobert L. Cheng & Shuanfan Huang, –. Taipei: Crane.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Xu, Dan
    (2006) Typological Change in Chinese Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297566.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297566.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
79. Xu, Fan
    (2022) Zhonggu shangshengzi zai xiandai fangyán zhongdi yanbian yanjiu中古上聲字在現代方言中的演變研究 [Study on the Development of Middle Chinese Shangsheng Characters in Modern Dialects]. Beijing: China Social Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Yap, Foong Ha & Shoichi Iwasaki
    2003 From Causatives to Passives: A Passage in Some East and Southeast Asian Languages. Cognitive Linguistics and Non-Indo-European Languages. –. 10.1515/9783110197150.10.419
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197150.10.419 [Google Scholar]
81. Yap, Foong Ha & Shoichi Iwasaki
    2007 The Emergence of ‘Give’ Passives in East and Southeast Asian Languages. SEALS VIII: Papers from the 8th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1998, ed. byMark Alves, Paul Sidwell & David Gil, –. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Yue-Hashimoto, Anne
    1971 Mandarin Syntactic Structure. Unicorn. –. Princeton: Chinese Linguistics Project and Seminar, Princeton University.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Zhang, Min
    2011 Hanyu fangyan shuangjiwu jiegou nanbei chayi de chengyin漢語方言雙及物結構南北差異的成因:類型學研究引發的新問題 [Revisiting the Alignment Typology of Ditransitive Constructions in Chinese Dialects]. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics:. –.
    [Google Scholar]