oa How fear developed from an object to a subject experiencer verb

References

1. Alexiadou, Artemis
   2016 ‘English psych verbs and the causative alternation: A case study in the history of English.’ Questions and Answers in Linguistics:.–. 10.1515/qal‑2016‑0003
   https://doi.org/10.1515/qal-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, Cynthia
   1986 ‘Reconsidering the History of “Like”.’ Journal of Linguistics:.–. 10.1017/S0022226700010847
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010847 [Google Scholar]
3. Allen, Cynthia
   1995 Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198240969.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198240969.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Becker, Laura & Matías G. Naranjo
   2020 ‘Psych predicates in European languages: A parallel corpus study.’ Language Typology and Universals:.–. 10.1515/stuf‑2020‑1017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2020-1017 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Douglas
   1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
6. Bossong, Georg
   1998 ‘Le marquage de l’expérient dans les langues d’Europe.’ Actance et valence dans les langues d’Europe, ed. byJack Feuillet, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804485.259
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804485.259 [Google Scholar]
7. Bresnan, Joan & Annie Zaenen
   1990 “Deep unaccusativity in LFG.” Grammatical Relations. A Cross-Theoretical Perspective, ed. byKatarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell & Errapel Mejías-Bikandi, –. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Meaghan, Michael Poston & Elizabeth Williamson
   2016 A Digital Anthology of Early Modern English Drama. Folger Shakespeare Library. emed.folger.edu (Accessed31 August 2023).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Castro-Chao, Noelia
   2021 ‘The Development of long in Early Modern English: Impersonal Verbs of Desire in Focus.’ Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies:.–.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Farmer, Alan B. & Zachary Lesser
    2007 DEEP: Database of Early English Playbooks. deep.sas.upenn.edu (Accessed8 December 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1968 ‘The Case for Case.’ Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. byEmmon Bach & Robert T. Harms, –. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hopper, Paul
    1991 ‘Principles of Grammaticalization: Towards a Diachronic Typology.’ Approaches to Grammaticalisation, ed. byElizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
13. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2023 ‘The rise of middle voice systems: A study in diachronic typology.’ Diachronica:.–. 10.1075/dia.20058.ing
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20058.ing [Google Scholar]
14. Iyeri, Yoko
    2009 “I fear: The Historical Development of the Verb fear and its Changing Patterns of Complementation.” Studies in Modern English.–.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jespersen, Otto
    1927 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Volume. London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kitis, Eliza
    2015 ‘Emotions as discursive constructs: the case of the psych-verb fear.’ Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics, ed. byLewandowska-Tomaszczyk Barbara & Katarzyna Dziwirek, –. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kroch, Anthony
    1994 “Morphosyntactic Variation.” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. byKatharine Beals, –. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Labov, William
    1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lass, Roger
    1990 ‘How to do things with junk: exaptation in language evolution.’ Journal of Linguistics:.–. 10.1017/S0022226700014432
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
20. Lass, Roger
    1997 Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620928 [Google Scholar]
21. Liljencrants, Johan & Björn Lindblom
    1972 ‘Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast.’ Language:.–. 10.2307/411991
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411991 [Google Scholar]
22. Liu, Meichun
    2016 ‘Emotion in lexicon and grammar: lexical-constructional interface of Mandarin emotional predicates.’ Lingua Sinica:.–. 10.1186/s40655‑016‑0013‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40655-016-0013-0 [Google Scholar]
23. Markus, Manfred
    2002 “The Innsbruck Prose Corpus: Its concept and usability in Middle English lexicology.” A Changing World of Words: Studies in English Historical Lexicography, Lexicology and Semantics, ed. byJavier E. Díaz Vera, –. Amsterdam: Brill. 10.1163/9789004489349_019
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004489349_019 [Google Scholar]
24. Messenger, Katherine, Holly P. Branigan, Janet F. McLean & Antonella Sorace
    2012 ‘Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming.’ Journal of Memory and Language:–. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008 [Google Scholar]
25. Michigan Library DCC
    Michigan Library DCC 2018 The Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse. quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cme/ (Accessed19 October 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
26. Möhlig-Falke, Ruth
    2012 The Early English Impersonal Construction: An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777723.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777723.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Pesetsky, David
    1995 Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Peterson, Clifford J.
    1974 ‘The Pearl-Poet and John Massey of Cotton, Cheshire.’ The Review of English Studies New Series. .–. 10.1093/res/XXV.99.257
    https://doi.org/10.1093/res/XXV.99.257 [Google Scholar]
29. Rott, Julian A., Elisabeth Verhoeven & Paola Fritz-Huechante
    2020 ‘Valence orientation and psych properties: Toward a typology of the psych alternation.’ Open Linguistics:–. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0020 [Google Scholar]
30. Taavitsainen, Irma & Päivi Pahta
    2010 Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.160
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.160 [Google Scholar]
31. Text Creation Partnership (TCP)
    Text Creation Partnership (TCP) 2022 Early English Books Online (EEBO). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebogroup/ (Accessed31 October 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths
    2003 The York-Toronto Helsinki Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE). Oxford Text Archive. https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YcoeHome1.htm (Accessed13 December 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
33. Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac
    1990 ‘The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English.’ Journal of Pragmatics.–. 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90012‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90012-M [Google Scholar]
34. Timberlake, Alan
    1977 ‘Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change.’ Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, ed. byCharles Li, –. Austin: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑006
    https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-006 [Google Scholar]
35. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1989 ‘On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.’ Language:.–. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
36. Trips, Carola
    2020 ‘Impersonal and reflexive uses of Middle English psych verbs under contact influence with Old French.’ Linguistics Vanguard:.–. 10.1515/lingvan‑2019‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0016 [Google Scholar]
37. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1985 ‘Remarks on Transitivity.’ Journal of Linguistics:.–. 10.1017/S0022226700010318
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010318 [Google Scholar]
38. Van Gelderen, Elly
    2014 ‘Changes in Psych-verbs: A reanalysis of little v.’ Catalan Journal of Linguistics.–. 10.5565/rev/catjl.154
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.154 [Google Scholar]
39. Van Gelderen, Elly
    2018 The Diachrony of Verb Meaning: Aspect and Argument Structure. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180335
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180335 [Google Scholar]
40. Van Valin, Robert Jr. & Randy LaPolla
    1997 Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
41. Wallenberg, Joel
    2019 ‘A variational theory of specialization in acquisition and diachrony.’ The Determinants of Diachronic Stability, ed. byAnne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert & Melissa Farasyn, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.254.10wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.254.10wal [Google Scholar]
42. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
    1968 ‘Empirical foundations for a theory of language change.’ Directions for Historical Linguistics, ed. byWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel, –. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]