1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Interaction of scope and cliticization domain
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The paper deals with how syntax of coordination interacts with the second position constraint. It is claimed, on the basis of Hittite data, that the cliticization scope of the enclitic coordinator can be limited to its complement with the exclusion of its (inner) specifier. This aspect of the interaction of coordination syntax and second position constraint has not been observed previously. Besides, Hittite broadens the dataset of the few languages with the “too-low” position of coordinators. Moreover, it is shown that the same type of cliticization domain is available for another extraCP clitic in Hittite — the direct speech particle. This is in stark contrast to CP bound clitics that take both the complement and the specifier of the head they target (C) as their cliticization domain. Thus, we see a non-trivial correlation of the position the clitic is generated in (or targets) and its distribution. This compares to a similar (yet different in detail) correlation in Ancient Greek between sentential and clausal clitics.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.24008.sid
2026-03-10
2026-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhl.24008.sid
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agbayani, Brian & Chris Golston
    2010 Second Position is First Position: Wackernagel’s Law and the role of clausal conjunction. Indogermanische Forschungen. –. 10.1515/9783110222814.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222814.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Stephen
    2005 Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins
    2012 Morphotactics. Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 86). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑3889‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3889-8 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2018 Beware Occam’s Syntactic Razor: Morphotactic Analysis and Spanish Mesoclitics. Linguistic Inquiry/. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bánréti, Zoltán
    2022 Types of conjunctions. Syntax of Hungarian: Coordination and Ellipsis (Comprehensive Grammar Resources) ed. byZoltán Bánréti, –. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv2x4kpzk.5
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2x4kpzk.5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bate, Danny
    2024 Deriving the Old Irish Clause. Journal of Historical Syntax. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beckman, Gary M.
    1983 Hittite Birth Rituals (StBoT 29). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Beckman, Gary
    1996 Hittite Diplomatic texts (SBL Writings from the Ancient World 7). Atlanta, Georgia: Society of Biblical literature.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Belyaev, Oleg
    2022 Ossetic coordinating conjunctions in the light of typology of polipredication. A talk at 19th Conference on Typology and Grammar for Young Scholars, Saint-Petersburg, 26 November 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
    2004 Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers. The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol., ed. byLuigi Rizzi (ed.), –. New York: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bortolussi, Bernard
    2017 Topicalizations, left dislocations and the left-periphery. Catalan Journal of Linguistics. –. 10.5565/rev/catjl.208
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.208 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bošković, Željko
    2001 On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 10.1163/9780585474250
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585474250 [Google Scholar]
  13. Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
    2016 Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and Verb Phrases. Vol.. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann
    2015 Semantic Coordination without Syntactic Coordinators. Structures in the Mind: Essays on Language, Music, and Cognition in Honor of Ray Jackendoff, ed. byIda Toivonen, Piroska Csúri & Emile van der Zee (eds.), –. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10044.003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10044.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carnie, Andrew, Heidi Harley & Elisabeth Pyatt
    2000 VSO order as raising out of IP: Some evidence from Old Irish. The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages, ed. byAndrew Carnie & Eithne Guilfoyle, –. New York: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ćavar, Damir & Chris Wilder
    1994 “Clitic Third” inCroatian. Linguistics in Potsdam: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. CHD: Petra M. Goedegebuure, Hans G. Güterbock, Harry A. Hoffner & Theo P. J. van den Hout
    (eds.) (1989–): The Hittite Dictionary of the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures of the University of Chicago. Chicago: The Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures of the University of Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Collins, Billie Jean
    2014 Ritual of Puliša (CTH 407). Online edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
  19. Cormany, Ed.
    2015 Changes in Friulano subject clitics: Conflationand interactions with the left periphery. Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information–structural interactions, ed. byTheresa Biberauer & George Walkden, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dikken, Marcel den
    2006 Either-float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory:. –. 10.1007/s11049‑005‑2503‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-2503-0 [Google Scholar]
  21. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
    2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry. –. 10.1162/002438901753373005
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901753373005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Erschler, David
    2010 Modularity and 2P clitics: Arguments from Digor Ossetic. Paper read atIATL 25. Accessed atlinguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/25/Erschler.pdf11 May 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Fortson, Benjamin
    1998 A new study of Hittite -wa(r). Journal of cuneiform studies. –. 10.2307/1360029
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1360029 [Google Scholar]
  24. Franks, Steven & Tracy King
    2000 A handbook of Slavic clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195135886.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195135886.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fraser, Bruce
    1993 Discourse Markers Across Language. Pragmatics and Language Learning. Vol. (Selected papers presented atthe Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning (6th, Urbana, IL, April 2 — 4, 1992)). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 1998 Contrastive discourse markers in English. Discourse Markers: Description and Theory (Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series 57) ed. byAndreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.15fra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.15fra [Google Scholar]
  27. Fuscagni, Francesco
    2013 Vertrag Tutḫaliyas IV mit Šaušgamuwa von Amurru (CTH 105). Online edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
  28. 2014 Geburtsritual: „Wenn eine Frau gebiert‟ (CTH 430.1). Online edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
  29. Garrett, Andrew
    1990 The Syntax of Anatolian Pronomonal Clitics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PhD Dissertation.
  30. 1996 Wackernagel’s Law and unaccusativity in Hittite. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomenaed. byAaron Halpern & Arnold Zwicky, –. Stanford: CSLJ Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto
    2015 On polarity particles in Italian varieties. Discourse-oriented Syntaxed. byJosef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.226.09gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.09gar [Google Scholar]
  32. Bobaljik, Jonathan & Höskuldur Thráinsson
    1998 Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax. –. 10.1111/1467‑9612.00003
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Giorgi, Alessandra
    2015 Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation and Hanging Topic. Discourse-oriented Syntaxed. byJosef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.226.10gio
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.10gio [Google Scholar]
  34. Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi
    1997 Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goedegebuure, Petra
    2014 The Hittite Demonstratives (StBoT 55). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. . Forthcoming. Old Hittite kuid=a ‘but as for’, introducing contrastive topics in left-dislocation. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Hittitology, Chicago, August 28 — September 1, 2017 ed. by Petra Goedegebuure, Theo van den Hout & Robert Marineau. Chicago: The Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures of the University of Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Goldstein, David
    2019 Language change and linguistic theory: The case of archaic Indo-European conjunction. Transactions of the Philological Society. –. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12139
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12139 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2016 Classical Greek syntax: Wackernagel’s law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004250680
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250680 [Google Scholar]
  39. Goldstein, David & Dag Haug
    2016 Second-position clitics and the syntax-prosody interface: The case of ancient Greek. Proceedings of the Joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, ed. byDoug Arnold, Miriam Butt, Berthold Crysmann, Tracy Holloway & Stefan Müller, –. Stanford, CA: CSLO Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Haegeman, Liliane
    2004 Topicalization, CLLD and the Left Periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics:. –. 10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226
     https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2006 Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD, and the left periphery. Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture, ed. byRaffaella Zanuttini, –. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 2012 Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and composition of the left periphery. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Haegeman, Liliane & Ciro Greco
    2018 Main clause external constituents and the derivation of subject-initial verb second. Nederlandse taalkunde:. –. 10.5117/NEDTAA2018.1.HAEG
     https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.1.HAEG [Google Scholar]
  44. Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
    2013 The syntactization of discourse. Syntax and its limitsed. byRafaella Folli, Christian Sevdali & Robert Truswell, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0018 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2014 Vocatives and Speech Act Projections: A case study in West Flemish. On peripheries: Exploring clause initial and clause final positionsed. byAnna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo, –. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hale, Mark
    1996 Deriving Wackernagel’s Law: Prosodic and syntactic factors determining clitic placement in the language of the Rigveda. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomenaed. byAaron Halpern & Arnold Zwicky, –. Stanford, CA: CSLJ Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 2007 Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics). Malden & Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Halpern, Aaron Lars
    1992 Topics in the Placement and Morphology of Clitics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD Dissertation.
  49. Halpern, Aaron
    1995 On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics. Stanford, CA: CSLJ Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Harley, Heidi
    2017 The ‘bundling’ hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. The verbal domained. byRoberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Angel J. Gallego, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Coordination. Language Typology and syntactic description. 2nd ed., vol., ed. byTimothy Shopen (ed.), –. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hill, Virginia
    2007 Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2014 Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics (Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory 6). Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Hoffner, Harry A., Jr.
    1998 Hittite Myths. 2nd ed. (SBL WAW 2). Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoffner, Harry A. Jr., & Craig H. Melchert
    2008 A grammar of the Hittite language, Part 1: Reference grammar. 1st ed. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 2024 A grammar of the Hittite language, Part 1: Reference grammar. 2nd ed. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Holmberg, Anders
    2020 On the bottleneck hypothesis of verb second in Swedish. Rethinking verb seconded. byRebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198844303.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198844303.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  58. Huggard, Mattyas
    2015 Wh-words in Hittite: A study in syntax-semantics and syntax-phonology interfaces. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Ph.D. Dissertation.
  59. Hsu, Brian
    2017 Verb second and its deviations: An argument for feature scattering in the left periphery. Glossa:. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2016 Subordination and sentence connectives in Old Hittite. A corpus-based study of clause linkage strategies in Hittite (Lincom Studies in Indo-European Linguistics 49). München: Lincom Europa.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
    2008 Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  62. Johannessen, Janne Bondi
    1998 Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198237099.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198237099.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2005 The syntax of correlative adverbs. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kandybowics, Jason
    2006 Nupe coordinate structures: a syntactically heterogeneous class. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (Volume 31S: Special Session on Languages of West Africa) ed. byRebecca Cover & Yuni Kim, –. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Kaufman, Daniel Aaron
    2010 The Morphosyntax of Tagalog Clitics: A Typologically Driven Approach. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PhD Dissertation.
  66. Kayne, Richard
    1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Klavans, Judith L.
    1995 On Clitics and Cliticization (Outstanding dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland Publishing.
  68. Luraghi, Silvia
    1990 Old Hittite Sentence Structure. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Luraghi, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
    2018 Trends in the development of sentence connectives in Hittite: Evidence from subordination. 100 Jahre Entzifferung des Hethitischened. byElisabeth Rieken, –. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Andrei Sideltsev
    2020 On the syntax of argument clitics in Hittite. Transactions of the Philological Society:. –. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12166
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12166 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2021 Bracketing paradoxes at clausal boundaries in Hittite. Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology. – (in Russian). 10.30842/ielcp230690152548
     https://doi.org/10.30842/ielcp230690152548 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2023 Relative construction in Hittite A corpus-based case study in syntax-prosody interface. Journal of Historical Linguistics:. –. 10.1075/jhl.22014.lyu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.22014.lyu [Google Scholar]
  73. Marantz, Alec
    1988 Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. Theoretical morphologyed. byMichael Hammond & Michael Noonan, –. San Diego, California: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004454101_017
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454101_017 [Google Scholar]
  74. Meacham, Michael David
    2000 A Synchronic and Diachronic Functional Analysis of Hittite -ma. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation
  75. Miller, Jared
    2004 Studies in the Origins, Development and Interpretation of the Kizzuwatna Rituals. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 2007 Mursili II’s dictate to Tuppi-Teššup’s Assyrian antagonists. KASKAL. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 2013 Royal Hittite instructions. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Moltmann, Friederike
    1992 Coordination and comparatives. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
  79. Motter, Thomas
    2023 Clausal relations at the interface: A study of Hittite correlatives at the intersection of syntax, semantics, and discourse. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Ph.D. dissertation.
  80. Mouton, Alice
    2012 Rituel de Maštigga de Kizzuwatna contre des querelles domestiques (CTH 404.1.I). Online edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
  81. Munn, Alan
    1993 Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. College Park, MD: University of Maryland PhD Dissertation.
  82. Neeleman, Ad, Joy Philip, Misako Tanaka & Hans van der Koot
    2023 Subordination and binary branching. Syntax:. –. 10.1111/synt.12244
     https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12244 [Google Scholar]
  83. Paoli, Sandra
    2007 The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects Evidence from Romance. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  84. Rieken, Elisabeth
    2000 Die Partikeln -a, -ya, -ma im Althethitischen und das Akkadogramm Ù. 125 Jahre Indogermanistik in Graz. Festband anlässlich des 125 jährigen Bestehens der Forschungsricthung „Indogermanistik“ an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Grazed. byChristian Zinko & Michaela Ofitsch (eds.), –. Graz: Leykam.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Rieken, Elisabeth, Jürgen Lorenz, Anna Bauer & Susanne Görke
    2009 CTH 328 — Der Mythos des Wettergottes des Schreibers Pirwa. On-line edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 2010 CTH 321 — Der Drachenkampf oder “Illuyanka”. On-line edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Rizzi, Luigi
    1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of grammared. byLiliane Haegeman, –. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5420‑8_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7 [Google Scholar]
  88. Roberts, Ian
    2022 Second positions. A synchronic analysis and some diachronic consequences. Continuity and Variation in Germanic and Romanceed. bySam Wolfe & Christine Meklenborg, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Samuels, Bridget
    2005 On the Left Periphery in Anatolian. Linguistic Analysis:. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Shaer, Benjamin & Werner Frey
    2004 ‘Integrated’ and ‘Non-Integrated’ Left peripheral Elements in German and English. Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, November 2003, ZAS Berlin (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35/2) ed. byBenjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, –. 10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.238
     https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.238 [Google Scholar]
  91. Sideltsev, Andrei
    2020 Syntax of direct speech particle -wa(r) in Hittite. Acta Orientalia. –. 10.1556/062.2020.00007
     https://doi.org/10.1556/062.2020.00007 [Google Scholar]
  92. 2021 Vocatives and direct addresses in Hittite. Archiv orientální. –. 10.47979/aror.j.89.3.531‑587
     https://doi.org/10.47979/aror.j.89.3.531-587 [Google Scholar]
  93. 2022 Finer-Grained Hittite Syntax: Hittite Philology and Theory-Dependent Construals. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conferenceed. byDavid M. Goldstein & Stephanie W. Jamison, –. Hamburg: Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 2023 Mismatch between syntax and prosody and complex sentence structure in Hittite. Indo-European linguistics. –. 10.1163/22125892‑bja10023
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-bja10023 [Google Scholar]
  95. Sideltsev, Andrei & Maria Molina
    2015 Enclitic –(m)a ‘but’, clause architecture and the prosody of focus in Hittite. Indogermanische Forschungen. –. 10.1515/if‑2015‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2015-0011 [Google Scholar]
  96. Spencer, Andrew & Ana R. Luís
    2012 Clitics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139033763
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033763 [Google Scholar]
  97. Stassen, Leon
    2000 And-languages and with-languages. Linguistic Typology. –. 10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  98. Tizón-Couto, David
    2008 A corpus-based analysis of left dislocation in Late Modern English. Linguistic Studies. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Velde, John te
    2000 Assumptions about the structure of coordination. Ellipsis in Coordinationed. byKerstin Schwabe & Niina Zhang, –. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110952155‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110952155-004 [Google Scholar]
  100. Viti, Carlotta
    2008 The meanings of coordination in the early Indo-European languages. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Walkden, George
    2017 Language contact and V3 in Germanic varieties new and old. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics. –. 10.1007/s10828‑017‑9084‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-017-9084-2 [Google Scholar]
  102. Weisser, Philipp
    2020 How Germans move their ‘but’s’. A case of Prosodic Inversion across phrases. NELS 50: Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Volume, ed. byMariam Asatryan, Yixiao Song & Ayana Whitmal, –. University of Massachusetts.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. . Forthcoming. A prosodically determined second-position clitic in German: The case of the clause-internal conjunction ‘aber’. Ms assessed athttps://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/00678215.01.2024.
  104. 2024 A Typology of Shifting Coordinators and what they can tell us about clitics and their formal modelling. Habilitationsschrift zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. phil. habil. der Philologischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Weisser, Philipp & Daniel Aremu
    2024 On the non-canonical placement of the Yorùbá coordinator sì. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. 10.16995/glossa.10899
     https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10899 [Google Scholar]
  106. Widmer, Paul
    2009 Hethitisch nu als Mittel der informationsstrukturellen und syntaktischen Verknüpfung. InPragmatische Kategorien. Form, Funktion und Diachronie. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 24. bis 26. September 2007 in Marburged. byElisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer, –. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 2016 Hethitisch nu in den Masat-Briefen. Unpublished ms, available athttps://www.academia.edu/34814159/Hethitisch_nu_in_den_Ma%C5%9Fat_Briefen (accessed7 May 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Wilhelm, Gernot & Francesco Fuscagni
    2013 Vertrag Muršilis II. mit Tuppi-Teššup von Amurru (akk. und heth. Fassung) (CTH 62). Online edition athttps://www.hethport.uni-wuerzburg.de/, assessed26.02.2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Wolfe, Sam
    2022 Microvariation and change in the Romance left periphery. Probus:. –. 10.1515/probus‑2022‑0009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2022-0009 [Google Scholar]
  110. Yates, Anthony
    2014 Anatolian “indeterminate” relative clauses revisited. Syntax, semantics, and the “Held-Garrett rule”. HandoutOLT41, 6 December 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhang, Niina Ning
    2010 Coordination in syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Zoerner, Cyril Edward
    1995 Coordination. The syntax of &P. Irvine, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
  113. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    2005 Verb Second as a Function of Merge. The Function of Function Words and Functional Categoriesed. byMarcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.78.03zwa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.78.03zwa [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.24008.sid
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: clitics ; coordination ; second position ; Hittite ; syntax

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error