1887
image of Crosslinguistic perspectives on the source of first/second person pronouns
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates demonstratives as the diachronic source of first/second person pronouns and shows that though several languages use them to designate the speaker/addressee, most usage does not conventionalize as first/second person pronouns despite the claim in previous studies. It then presents functional reasons that demonstratives rarely give rise to first/second person pronouns. This study additionally examines nouns and reflexives as the source of first/second person pronouns and shows that while it is relatively common for nouns to develop into first/second person pronouns, the same conclusion as demonstratives can be drawn for reflexives. I argue that the historical development of first/second person pronouns differs from that of third person pronouns due to speech-functional and discourse-pragmatic reasons. The development of the former concerns the speaker-addressee axis, thus more strongly affected than the latter by the tug of war between efficiency in linguistic communication and social success in interpersonal communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.24009.ish
2025-01-06
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ariel, Mira
    1990Accessing Noun Antecedents. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benveniste, Emile
    1971Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhat, D. N. S.
    2004Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2013 Third Person Pronouns and Demonstratives. WALS Onlineed. byMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, Chapter 43. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/43, Accessed on2024-07-23.)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blake, Frank R.
    1934 The Origin of Pronouns of First and Second Person. The American Journal of Philology:.–. 10.2307/289776
    https://doi.org/10.2307/289776 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1956 Chinese Terms of Address. Language:.–. 10.2307/410666
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410666 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cole, Peter
    1982Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooke, Joseph R.
    1968Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dench, Alan Charles
    1994Martuthunira: A language of the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Diessel, Holger
    1999Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2003 The Relationship between Demonstratives and Interrogatives. Studies in Language:.–. 10.1075/sl.27.3.06die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.06die [Google Scholar]
  13. 2006 Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics:.–. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1988A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath
    eds. 2013WALS Online. (Available online atwals.info, Accessed on2024-07-23.)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Garvey, Catherine J.
    1964A Sketch of Malagasy Grammar. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Givón, Talmy
    1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hagège, Claude
    1993The Language Builder: An essay on the human signature in linguistic morphogenesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.94
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.94 [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris, Martin
    1988 French. The Romance languages, ed. byMartin Harris & Nigel Vincent, –. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hashimoto, Shirou
    1982 Shijigo no Shiteki Tenkai [Historical Development of Demonstratives]. Kouza Nihongogaku Vol. 2: Bunpoushi [Lectures on Japanese Linguistics Vol. 2: History of grammar], ed. byKenji Morioka & Yutaka Miyaji, –. Tokyo: Meijishoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Haspelmath, Martin
    1999 Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?Linguistics:.–. 10.1515/ling.37.6.1043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.6.1043 [Google Scholar]
  22. Head, Brian F.
    1978 Respect Degrees in Pronominal Reference. Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word structure, ed. byJoseph Greenberg, Charles Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik, –. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song
    2010 On the Genesis of Personal Pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition:.–. 10.1515/langcog.2010.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2011 On the Grammaticalization of Personal Pronouns. Journal of Linguistics:.–. 10.1017/S0022226711000016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000016 [Google Scholar]
  25. Helmbrecht, Johannes
    2004Personal Pronouns: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Erfurt: University of Erfurt Habilitationschrift.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013 Politeness Distinctions in Pronouns. WALS Onlineed. byMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, Chapter 45. (Available online atwals.info/chapter/45, Accessed on2024-7-23.)
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hinds, John
    1986Japanese. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hunt, R. J.
    1940Mataco Grammar. Tucumán: Instituto de Antropología.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ishiyama, Osamu
    2008 Diachronic Perspectives on Personal Pronouns in Japanese. Bufalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo Ph.D. dissertation.
  31. 2012 The Diachronic Relationship between Demonstratives and First/Second Person Pronouns. Journal of Historical Pragmatics:.–. 10.1075/jhp.13.1.03ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.13.1.03ish [Google Scholar]
  32. 2019Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese: A functional and cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.344
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.344 [Google Scholar]
  33. Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom
    2005A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jakobson, Roman
    1971 Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. Roman Jakobson Selected Writings II: Word and language, –. The Haugue: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110889604
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889604 [Google Scholar]
  35. Joseph, Brian D. & Irene Philippaki-Warburton
    1987Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kachru, Yamuna
    2006Hindi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.12 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kornfilt, Jaklin
    1997Turkish. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kutsch Lojenga, Constance
    1994Ngiti: A central Sudanic language of Zaire. (Nilo-Saharan Linguistic Analyses and Documentation, 9.) Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Nicong
    1991 Perspective-Taking in Mandarin Discourse. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo Ph.D. dissertation.
  40. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics, Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahootian, Shahrzad
    1997Persian. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    1988 Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics:.–. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
  43. Morgan, Lawrence Richard
    1991 A Description of the Kutenai Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.
  44. Ri, Choha
    2002Nihongo Shijitaikei no Rekishi [History of the Japanese Demonstrative System]. Kyoto: Kyoto Daigaku Gakujyutsu Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sarumpaet, J. P. & J. A. C. Mackie
    1966Introduction to Bahasa Indonesia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schiffman, Harold F.
    1979A Reference Grammar of Spoken Kannada. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Siewierska, Anna
    2004Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
  48. Smeets, Ineke
    2008A Grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sohn, Hon-Min
    1994Korean. London: Rutledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Solnit, David B.
    1997Eastern Kayah Li: Grammar, texts, and glossary. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824841638
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824841638 [Google Scholar]
  51. Song, Kyung-An
    2002 Korean Reflexives and Grammaticalization: A speaker-hearer dynamic approach. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF, Berlin):.–. 10.1524/stuf.2002.55.4.340
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2002.55.4.340 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sridhar, S. N.
    1990Kannada. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Suzuki, Takao
    1978Words in Context: A Japanese perspective on language and culture. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Trask, R. L.
    2003 The Noun Phrase: Nouns, determiners and modifiers; pronouns and names. A Grammar of Basque, ed. byJosé Ignacio Hualde & Jon Ortiz de Urbina, –. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
    2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tsujimura, Toshiki
    1969Keigo no Shiteki Kenkyuu [Historical Studies of Honorifics]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Zubin, David A., Soon Ae Chun & Nicong Li
    1990 Misbehaving Reflexives in Korean and Mandarin. Berkeley Linguistics Society.–. 10.3765/bls.v16i0.1702
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v16i0.1702 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.24009.ish
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.24009.ish
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: personal pronouns ; reflexives ; demonstratives ; terms of address
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error