Joint innovation

References

1. Andersen, Henning
   1973 Abductive and deductive change. Language().–. 10.2307/412063
   https://doi.org/10.2307/412063 [Google Scholar]
2. Arnaud, René
   1998 The development of the progressive in 19th century English: A quantitative survey. Language variation and change.–. 10.1017/S0954394500001265
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001265 [Google Scholar]
3. Babel, M., G. McGuire, S. Walters & A. Nicholls
   2014 Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation. Laboratory Phonology().–. 10.1515/lp‑2014‑0006
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0006 [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Adam, Diana Archangeli & Jeff Mielke
   2011 Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change.–. 10.1017/S0954394511000135
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394511000135 [Google Scholar]
5. Beckner, Clay & Joan Bybee
   2009 A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning:.–. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00534.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x [Google Scholar]
6. Beddor, Patrice Speetor
   2009 A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language.–. 10.1353/lan.0.0165
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0165 [Google Scholar]
7. Bell, Alan, Jason Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Dan Jurafsky
   2009 Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language:.–. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
   2007 Diachronic phonology. The Cambridge Handbook of Phonologyed. byPaul de Lacy, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486371.022
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.022 [Google Scholar]
9. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
   2020 The initiation and incrementation of sound change: Community-oriented momentum-sensitive learning. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics(). .–. 10.5334/gjgl.627
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.627 [Google Scholar]
10. Berry, Grant
    2015 Structural autonomy and aspectual import: A new(er) Spanish progressive Probus:.–.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bock, J. Kathryn
    1986 Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology.–. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
13. Browman, Catherine & Louis Goldstein
    1991 Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes and historical change. Modularity and the motor theory of speech perceptioned. byIgnatius G. Mattingly & Michael Studdert-Kennedy, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brown, Earl K. & Matthew Alba
    2017 The role of contextual frequency in the articulation of initial /f/ in Modern Spanish: The same effect as in the reduction of Latin /f/?Language Variation and Change.–. 10.1017/S0954394517000059
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000059 [Google Scholar]
15. Brown, Esther
    2004 Reduction of syllable initial /s/ in the Spanish of New Mexico and southern Colorado: A usage-based approach. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Ph.D. dissertation.
16. Bybee, Joan
    2000 The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. Usage-based models of languageed. byMichael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer, –. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bruderer, Alison G., D. Kyle Danielson, Padmapriya Kandhadai & Janet F. Werker
    2015 Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy. PNAS:–.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bybee, Joan
    2002 Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically-conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change.–. 10.1017/S0954394502143018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502143018 [Google Scholar]
19. Bybee, Joan
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. byR. Janda & B. Joseph, –. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
20. Bybee, Joan
    2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language:. –. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
21. Bybee, Joan
    2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
22. Bybee, Joan
    2012 Patterns of lexical diffusion and articulatory motivation for sound change. The initiation of sound change: Perception, production and social factorsed. byMaria-Josep Solé & Daniel Recasens, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.323.16byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.323.16byb [Google Scholar]
23. Bybee, Joan & Shelece Easterday
    2019 Consonant strengthening: a crosslinguistic survey and articulatory proposal. Linguistic Typology():–.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Bybee, Joan & Carol Moder
    2024 Interaction and conventionalized expressions create the contexts for bleaching and constructional expansion: the case of GRAB. Folia Linguistica(), –. 10.1515/flin‑2024‑2018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2024-2018 [Google Scholar]
25. Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca
    1987 The evolution of future meaning. Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Historical Linguisticsed. byAnna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.48.09byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.09byb [Google Scholar]
26. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bybee, Joan & Rena Torres Cacoullos
    2015 Grammaticalization and variation of will and shall in Shakespeare’s comedies. Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theoryed. byRena Torres Cacoullos, Nathalie Dion & André Lapierre, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chitoran, Ioana
    2012 The nature of historical change, The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonologyed. byA. Cohn, C. Fougeron & M. K. Huffman, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Choi, Dawoon, Alison G. Bruderer & Janet F. Werker
    2019 Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in pre-babbling infants: Replication and extension of Bruderer et al. (2015). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review:–. 10.3758/s13423‑019‑01601‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01601-0 [Google Scholar]
30. Clark, Herb
    1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
31. Cohn, Abigail
    . Is there gradient phonology?Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives ed. by G. Fanselow, C. Féry, R. Vogel & M. Schlesewsky, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
32. Croft, William
    2000 Explaining language change. Harlow, England: Longman Linguistic Library.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Cutler, A. & M. Pearson
    2018 On the analysis of prosodic turn-taking cues. Intonation in discourseed byCatherine Johns-Lewis, –. Oxford: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429468650‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468650-8 [Google Scholar]
34. Davies, Mark
    2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online athttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
35. Denton, Jeannette Marshall
    2003 Reconstructing the articulation of Early Germanic *r. Diachronica().–. 10.1075/dia.20.1.04den
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20.1.04den [Google Scholar]
36. De Smet, H.
    2012 The course of actualization. Language().–. 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
37. De Smet, Hendrik & Freek van de Velde
    2017 Experimenting on the past: a case study on changing analysability in English ly-adverbs. English Language and Linguistics.:–. 10.1017/S1360674317000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000168 [Google Scholar]
38. Dell, Gary S. & Franklin Chang
    2014 The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science (): . 10.1098/rstb.2012.0394
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0394 [Google Scholar]
39. Dijksterhuis, Ap & John A. Bargh
    2001 The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.–. 10.1016/S0065‑2601(01)80003‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80003-4 [Google Scholar]
40. Drew, P.
    2009 Quit talking while I’m interrupting: a comparison between positions of overlap onset in conversation. Talk in interaction: Comparative dimensionsed. byHaakana, Markku, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, –. Helskini: Finnish Literature Society/SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Du Bois, John W.
    2014 Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics().–. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
42. Eckardt, Regine
    2009 APO: Avoid pragmatic overload. Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmaticsed. byMaj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004253216_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_003 [Google Scholar]
43. Eckert, Penny
    2019 The individual in the semiotic landscape. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics().–, 10.5334/gjgl.640
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.640 [Google Scholar]
44. Eisner, F. & J. M. McQueen
    2006 Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America().–. 10.1121/1.2178721
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178721 [Google Scholar]
45. Forrest, Jon
    2015 Community rules and speaker behavior: Individual adherence to group constraints on (ING). Language Variation and Change().–. 10.1017/S0954394515000137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000137 [Google Scholar]
46. Fowler, C. A., J. M. Brown, L. Sabadini & J. Weihing
    2003 Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. Journal of Memory and Language().–. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00072‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00072-X [Google Scholar]
47. Fruehwald, Joseph
    2016 The early influence of phonology on a phonetic change. Language().–. 10.1353/lan.2016.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0041 [Google Scholar]
48. Galantucci, B., C. A. Fowler & M. T. Turvey
    2006 The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review().–. 10.3758/BF03193857
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193857 [Google Scholar]
49. Garrod, S. & M. J. Pickering
    2004 Why is conversation so easy?Trends in Cognitive Sciences().–. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016 [Google Scholar]
50. Garrod, S. & M. J. Pickering
    2009 Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science().–. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2009.01020.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01020.x [Google Scholar]
51. Gee, Julie & Iskender Savasir
    1985 On the use of will and gonna: Toward a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes.–. 10.1080/01638538509544612
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544612 [Google Scholar]
52. Giles, Howard, Donald M. Taylor & Richard Bourhis
    1973 Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society().–. 10.1017/S0047404500000701
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000701 [Google Scholar]
53. Goldstein, L. & C. A. Fowler
    2003 Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similaritiesed. byNiels O. Schiller and Antje S. Meyer, –. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110895094.159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895094.159 [Google Scholar]
54. Goodwin, Charles
    1979 The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodologyed. byG. Psathas, –. New York: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gries, Stefan Th
    2005 Syntactic priming: a corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research().–. 10.1007/s10936‑005‑6139‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3 [Google Scholar]
56. Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis
    2014 On the pragmatics of subjectification: The grammaticalization of verbless allative futures (with a case study in Ancient Egyptian). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia().–. 10.1080/03740463.2014.956007
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.956007 [Google Scholar]
57. Hall-Lew, Lauren, Patrick Honeybone & James Kirby
    2021 Individuals, communities, and sound change: An introduction. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics(): .–. 10.5334/gjgl.1630
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1630 [Google Scholar]
58. Harrington, Jonathan
    2012 The relationship between synchronic variation and diachronic change. The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonologyed. byA. Cohn, C. Fougeron, M. K. Huffman, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Haiman, John
    1994 Ritualization and the development of language. Perspectives on grammaticalizationed. byWilliam Pagliuca, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Hay, Jennifer
    2001 Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?Linguistics. –. 10.1515/ling.2001.041
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.041 [Google Scholar]
61. Herold, Ruth
    1997 Solving the actuation problem: Merger and immigration in eastern Pennsylvania. Language Variation and Change:.–. 10.1017/S0954394500001861
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001861 [Google Scholar]
62. Hsiao, Y. & M. C. MacDonald
    2016 Production predicts comprehension: Animacy effects in Mandarin relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language. –. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.006 [Google Scholar]
63. Hyman, Larry
    1975 Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hyman, Larry
    2013 Enlarging the scope of phonologization. Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologizationed. byAlan Yu, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
65. Janda, R. D.
    2001 Beyond ‘pathways and ‘unidirectionality’: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Grammaticalization: A critical assessment. Language Sciencesed. byLyle Campbell, ().–.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Janda, Richard D. & Brian D. Joseph
    2003 Reconsidering the canons of sound change: Towards a ‘Big Bang’ theory. Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected Papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001ed. byBarry J. Blake & Kate Burridge, –. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.237.14jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.237.14jan [Google Scholar]
67. Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory & William D. Raymond
    2001 Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structureed. byJoan Bybee & Paul Hopper, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.13jur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.13jur [Google Scholar]
68. Kerswill, P. & A. Williams
    2000 Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society:.–. 10.1017/S0047404500001020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001020 [Google Scholar]
69. Kimbara, I.
    2006 On gestural mimicry. Gesture().–. 10.1075/gest.6.1.03kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.6.1.03kim [Google Scholar]
70. Kroch, Anthony
    1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change.–. 10.1017/S0954394500000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000168 [Google Scholar]
71. Labov, William
    2001 Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. vol., . Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Labov, William
    2006 The social stratification of English in New York City. 2nd. Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618208 [Google Scholar]
73. Labov, William
    2012 What is to be learned. The community as the focus of social cognition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics.–. 10.1075/rcl.10.2.02lab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.10.2.02lab [Google Scholar]
74. Labov, William
    2019 What has been built on empirical foundations. New directions for historical linguisticsed. byH. C. Boas & M. Pierce, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004414075_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414075_003 [Google Scholar]
75. Lerner, Gene
    2002 Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. The language of turn and sequenceed. byC. E. Ford, B. Fox & S. A. Thompson, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
76. Lindblom, Björn, Susan Guion & Susan Hura
    1995 Is sound change adaptive?Rivista di Linguistica:. –.
    [Google Scholar]
77. MacDonald, Maryellen C.
    2013 How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology.–. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226 [Google Scholar]
78. MacKenzie, Laurel
    2019 Perturbing the community grammar: Individual differences and community-level constraints on sociolinguistic variation. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics(): .–, 10.5334/gjgl.622
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.622 [Google Scholar]
79. Mair, Christian
    2017 From priming and processing to frequency effects and grammaticalization? Contracted semi-modals in Present-Day EnglishThe changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectivesed. byM. Hundt, S. Mollin & S. E. Pfenninger, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.009 [Google Scholar]
80. Mann, V. A. & B. H. Repp
    1980 Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics().–. 10.3758/BF03204377
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204377 [Google Scholar]
81. Mowrey, Richard & William Pagliuca
    1995 The reductive character of articulatory evolution. Rivista di Linguistica().–.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    2001 The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
83. Myhill, John
    1995 Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics.–. 10.1515/ling.1995.33.2.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.2.157 [Google Scholar]
84. Nesselhauf, Nadja
    2012 Mechanisms of language change in a functional system The recent semantic evolution of English future time expressions. Journal of Historical Linguistics:.–. 10.1075/jhl.2.1.06nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.2.1.06nes [Google Scholar]
85. Ohala, John
    1981 The listener as a source of sound change. Papers from the Parasession on Language and Language Behavior, Chicago Linguistic Societyed. byC. Masek, R. Hendrick & M. Miller, –. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Ohala, John
    1993 The phonetics of sound change. Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectivesed. byCharles Jones, –. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Ohala, John
    2003 Phonetics and historical phonology. Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. byBrian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, –. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch22 [Google Scholar]
88. Ohala, John
    2012 The listener as the source of sound change: An update. The initiation of sound change: perception, production and social factorsed. byMaria-Josep Solé & Daniel Recasens, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.323.05oha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.323.05oha [Google Scholar]
89. Ono, T. & S. A. Thompson
    1996 Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap and syntactic dissociation. Computational and Conversational Discourseed. byE. Hovey & D. Scott, –. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03293‑0_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03293-0_3 [Google Scholar]
90. Pardo, J. S., R. Gibbons, A. Suppes & R. M. Krauss
    2012 Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics(), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001 [Google Scholar]
91. Pardo, J. S., A. Urmanche, S. Wilman, J. Wiener, N. Mason, K. Francis & M. Ward
    2018 A comparison of phonetic convergence in conversational interaction and speech shadowing. Journal of Phonetics.–. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001 [Google Scholar]
92. Payne, A.
    1976 The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.
93. Pickering, M. J. & S. Garrod
    2017 Priming and language change. The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectivesed. byM. Hundt, S. Mollin & S. E. Pfenninger, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.008 [Google Scholar]
94. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    1994 Knowledge of variation. Papers from the Parasession on Variation, –. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Mary E. Beckman & D. R. Ladd
    2000 Conceptual foundations in phonology as a laboratory science. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issuesed. byN. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr & G. Docherty, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198241270.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198241270.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
96. Poplack, Shana
    1980 Deletion and disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language. –. 10.1353/lan.1980.0033
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0033 [Google Scholar]
97. Raymond, William D. & Esther L. Brown
    2012 Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish. Frequency effects in language. Vol 2: Learning and processinged. byStefan Th. Gries & Dagmar S. Divjak, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110274059.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110274059.35 [Google Scholar]
98. Redford, M. A.
    2015 Unifying speech and language in a developmentally sensitive model of production. Journal of Phonetics.–. 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.006 [Google Scholar]
99. Rosemeyer, Malte & Eitan Grossman
    2021 Why don’t grammaticalization pathways always recur?Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory:.–. 10.1515/cllt‑2020‑0053
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2020-0053 [Google Scholar]
100. Rosemeyer, Malte & Scott Schwenter
     2017 Entrenchment and persistence in language change: the Spanish past subjunctive. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory:.–. 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0047
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0047 [Google Scholar]
101. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson
     1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language:.–. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
102. Saltzman, D. & E. Myers
     2021 Listeners are initially flexible in updating phonetic beliefs over time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.–. 10.3758/s13423‑021‑01885‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01885-1 [Google Scholar]
103. Sankoff, Gillian
     2019 Language change across the lifespan: Three trajectory typesLanguage:.–. 10.1353/lan.2019.0029
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0029 [Google Scholar]
104. Schegloff, E. A.
     1995 Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction().–. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2 [Google Scholar]
105. Schwenter, Scott & Richard Waltereit
     2010 Presupposition accommodation and language change. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalizationed. byK. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens, –. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102.2.75
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.2.75 [Google Scholar]
106. Seyfarth, Scott
     2014 Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition.–. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013 [Google Scholar]
107. Shockley, K., A. A. Baker, M. J. Richardson & C. A. Fowler
     2007 Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance()..
     [Google Scholar]
108. Shockley, K., D. C. Richardson & R. Dale
     2009 Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science().–. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2009.01021.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.x [Google Scholar]
109. Silverman, Dan
     2006 A critical introduction to phonology. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Smirnova, Elena
     2015 When secondary grammaticalization starts: A look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences.–. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.009 [Google Scholar]
111. Sóskuthy, Márton & Jennifer Hay
     2017 Changing word usage predicts changing word durations in New Zealand English. Cognition.–. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.032
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.032 [Google Scholar]
112. Stadler, K., R. A. Blythe, K. Smith & S. Kirby
     2016 Momentum in language change: a model of self-actuating s-shaped curves. Language Dynamics and Change().–. 10.1163/22105832‑00602005
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00602005 [Google Scholar]
113. Stanford, James
     2008 A sociotonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change:.–. 10.1017/S0954394508000161
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394508000161 [Google Scholar]
114. Stuart-Smith, Jane, Morgan Sonderegger, Rachel MacDonald, Jeff Mielke, Michael McAuliffe & Erik Thomas
     2019 Large-scale acoustic analysis of dialectal and social factors in English /s/-retraction. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2019), pp.–.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Stevens, Mary & Jonathan Harrington
     2014 The individual and the actuation of sound change. Loquens. 10.3989/loquens.2014.003
     https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2014.003 [Google Scholar]
116. Stevens, Mary & Harrington, Jonathan
     2016 The phonetic origins of /s/-retraction: Acoustic and perceptual evidence from Australian English. Journal of Phonetics. –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.08.003 [Google Scholar]
117. Stevens, Mary & Jonathan Harrington
     2022 Individual variation and the coarticulatory path to sound change: Agent-based modeling of /str/ in English and Italian. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
     2006 Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse snalysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197808
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197808 [Google Scholar]
119. Tolkien, J. R. R. & E. V. Gordon
     eds. 1936 Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Second Edition byNorman Davis (1968) Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Tomasello, Michael
     2003 Constructing a language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Tomasello, Michael
     2008 Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
122. Torres Cacoullos, Rena
     2006 Relative frequency in the grammaticization of collocations: Nominal to concessive a pesar de. Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposiumed. byTimothy L. Face & Carol A. Klee, –. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Torres Cacoullos, Rena
     2012 Grammaticalization through inherent variability: The development of a progressive in Spanish. Studies in Language:. –. 10.1075/sl.36.1.03tor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.03tor [Google Scholar]
124. Torres Cacoullos, Rena
     2015 Gradual loss of analyzability: Diachronic priming effects. Variation in language: System- and usage-based approachesed. byAria Adli, Göz Kaufmann & Marco García, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110346855‑011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110346855-011 [Google Scholar]
125. Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine Travis
     2025 Parallel linguistic and sociocultural change: Modals and mores. Acting on actuation: Why here, why now?ed. byHendrik de Smet, Guglielmo Inglese & Malte Rosemeyer, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
     2009 The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language:.–. 10.1353/lan.0.0110
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0110 [Google Scholar]
127. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
     2015 Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. Diachronic construction grammared. byJóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea, –. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.02tra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra [Google Scholar]
128. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
     2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
129. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
     2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect?Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalizationed. byElizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.04tra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.04tra [Google Scholar]
130. Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
     2023 Form and function covariation: Obligation modals in Australian English. Language Variation and Change..–. 10.1017/S0954394523000200
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394523000200 [Google Scholar]
131. Trudgill, Peter
     2021 Dialect convergence and the formation of new dialects. The Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. byRichard D. Janda, Brian D. Joseph & Barbara S. Vance, –. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Warner, Anthony
     2004 What drove “do”?New perspectives on English historical linguistics, Volume 1: Syntax and morphologyed. byChristian Kay, Simon Horobin & Jeremy J. Smith, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.251.14war
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.251.14war [Google Scholar]
133. Weiner, Judith E. & William Labov
     1983 Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics. –. 10.1017/S0022226700007441
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007441 [Google Scholar]
134. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
     1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Directions for historical linguisticsed. byW. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel, –. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
135. Yu, Alan C. L.
     2013 Individual differences in socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of sound change. Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologizationed byAlan C. L. Yu, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0010 [Google Scholar]