1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article is a suggested explanation for the multiple variants of the forms of some Malayo-Polynesian pronouns that have been characterized as the result of drift. The explanation that is given is referred to here as paradigmatic instability, a phenomenon not previously discussed with reference to these problems. In the cases discussed in this article it is the avoidance of forms that are semantically or pragmatically inappropriate within the context of the paradigm in which they occur which renders the forms morphologically variable and the paradigms in which they occur unstable. In Malayo-Polynesian languages, it is the avoidance of a form that is reconstructed as a plural pronoun in Proto-Austronesian but which in all Malayo-Polynesian daughter languages is found as a singular pronoun. Where this form is retained as part of some other plural forms, it has been lost or modified in a wide range of variants in the daughter languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.6.2.01rei
2017-02-13
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1942 Outline of Ilocano Syntax. Language18.193–200. doi: 10.2307/409552
    https://doi.org/10.2307/409552 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blust, Robert A
    1977 The Proto-Austronesian Pronouns and Austronesian Subgrouping: A Preliminary Report. University of Hawaiʻi Working Articles in Linguistics9:2.1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1993 Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics32.241–294. doi: 10.2307/3623195
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3623195 [Google Scholar]
  4. 1999 Subgrouping, Circularity and Extinction: Some Issues in Austronesian Comparative Linguistics. Selected Articles from the 8th International Conference on Austronesian Linguisticsed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul J-K Li , 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 [2013]Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. Revised edition available online atpacling.anu.edu.au/materials/Blust2013Austronesian.pdf/.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cysouw, Michael
    2003The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2005 What it Means to be Rare: The Variability of Person Marking. Linguistic Diversity and Language Theoriesed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier , Adam Hodges & David S. Rood , 235–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.72.12cys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.12cys [Google Scholar]
  8. Dutton, Tom & Darrell T. Tryon
    eds. 1994Language Contact and Change in the Austronesian World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110883091
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883091 [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenburg, Joseph H
    1988 The First Person Inclusive Dual as an Ambiguous Category. Studies in Language12:1.1–18. doi: 10.1075/sl.12.1.02gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.02gre [Google Scholar]
  10. Joseph, Brian D
    2013 Demystifying Drift. Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languagesed. by H. Cuykens , Martine Robeets & Irma Martine , 43–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.132.08jos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.132.08jos [Google Scholar]
  11. Kikusawa, Ritsuko
    2004 Development of the Number Systems in Oceanic Pronoun Systems. Paper presented at The 6th International Oceanic Linguistics Conference (COOL6) , University of the South Pacific, Emalus Campus, July 5, 2004. Available online athttps://www.academia.edu/6062716/On_the_Development_of_Number_Systems_in_Oceanic_Pronouns/.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis, M. Paul , Gary F. Simons , & Charles D. Fennig
    eds. 2015Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 18th ed. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Available online atwww.ethnologue.com/.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liao, Hsiu-chuan
    2008 A Typology of First Person Dual Pronouns and Their Reconstructibility in Philippine Languages. Oceanic Linguistics47:1.1–29. doi: 10.1353/ol.0.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lithgow, David
    1976 History of Research in Austronesian Languages: Milne Bay Province. New Guinea Area Languages and Language Study, Vol. 2. Austronesian Languages (= Pacific Linguistics, C-39) ed. by S. A. Wurm , 157–170. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lobel, Jason W
    2010 Manide: An Undescribed Philippine Language. Oceanic Linguistics49:2.478–510.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2016Northern Borneo Sourcebook: Vocabularies and Functors. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lynch, John , Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
    2002The Oceanic Languages. (= Curzon Language Family Series). Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McFarland, Curtis D
    1974 The Dialects of the Bikol Area. Yale University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McKay, G. R
    1978 Pronominal Person and Number Categories in Rembarrnga and Djeebbana. Oceanic Linguistics17.27–37. doi: 10.2307/3622826
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622826 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mintz, Macolm W
    1971Bikol Grammar Notes (= PALI Language Texts: Philippines). Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Panganiban, José Villa
    1966Talahuluganang Pilipino-Ingles. [Pilipino-English Dictionary]. Manila: Government Printing Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pawley, Andrew
    1999 Chasing Rainbows: Implications for the Rapid Dispersal of Austronesian Languages for Subgrouping and Reconstruction. Selected Articles from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguisticsed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li , 95–138. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2006 Origins of the Filipinos: Linguistic and Archaeological Evidence. Article Presented at the 9th Philippine Linguistics Congress (9 PLC) , University of the Philippines, January 25–27, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Plessis, Frédéric
    1996Morphologie de Proto-philippine II: Reconstruction du système pronominal Proto-philippin (PPH), Mémoire de DEA. Langues, littératures et civilisations: Etudes austronésiennes. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Reid, Lawrence A
    1981 Proto-Austronesian Genitive Determiners. Linguistics Across Continents: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Pittmaned. by Andrew Gonzalez & David Thomas , 97–105. Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics (Philippines) and Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1987 The Early Switch Hypothesis: Linguistic Evidence for Contact Between Negritos and Austronesians. Man and Culture in Oceania3.41–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2006 On the Origin of Philippine Vowel Grades. Oceanic Linguistics45:2.457–472. doi: 10.1353/ol.2007.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2007.0008 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2007 Philippine Hunter-Gatherers and Historical Linguistics. Piakandatu ami Dr. Howard P. McKaughaned. by Loren Billings & Nelleke Goudswaard , 6–32. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines & SIL, Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2009 The Reconstruction of a Dual Pronoun to Proto Malayo-Polynesian. Discovering History Through Language: Articles in Honour of Malcolm Ross (=Pacific Linguistics 605) ed. by Bethwyn Evans , 461–477. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2012 ‘Say What?’ Some Diachronic Developments of the Verb ‘Say’ in Some Western Austronesian Languages. Seminar Presentation, University of Bergen, May 9, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2013a Who are the Philippine Negritos? Evidence from Language. Human Biology85:1.329–358. Available online atdigitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol85/iss1/15/. doi: 10.3378/027.085.0316
    https://doi.org/10.3378/027.085.0316 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013bIraya Field Notes.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Revel, Nicole
    1990Fleur de paroles: Histoire Naturelle Palawan. Vol. 1. Paris: SELAF.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ross, Malcolm
    1992 The Sound of Proto-Austronesian: An Outsider's View of the Formosan Evidence. Oceanic Linguistics31:1.23–64. doi: 10.2307/3622965
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622965 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2005 The Batanic Languages in Relation to the Early History of the Malayo-Polynesian Language Family. Journal of Austronesian Studies1:2.1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2006 Reconstructing the Case-Marking and Personal Pronouns Systems of Proto Austronesian. Streams Converging into an Ocean: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on his 79th birthdayed. by Henry Y. Chang , Lillian M. Huang & Dah-an Ho , 521–563. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rubino, Carl R. G
    2000Ilocano Dictionary and Grammar (= PALI Language Texts). Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sagart, Laurent
    2004 The Higher Phylogeny of Austronesian and the Position of Tai–Kadai. Oceanic Linguistics43.411–440. doi: 10.1353/ol.2005.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0012 [Google Scholar]
  39. Senft, G
    1986Kilivila: The Language of the Trobriand Islanders (Mouton Grammar Library 3). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110861846
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110861846 [Google Scholar]
  40. Spriggs, Matthew
    2003 Chronology of the Neolithic Transition in Island Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific. The Review of Anthropology24.57–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2011 Archaeology and Austronesian Expansion: Where are we now?Antiquity85:328.510–528. Available online atfaculty.washington.edu/plape/pacificarchaut12/Spriggs%202011.pdf/. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00067910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00067910 [Google Scholar]
  42. Topping, Donald
    1973Chamorro Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wolff, John U
    2010Proto-Austronesian Phonology with Glossary. 2 Vols. Southeast Asia Program Publications. Ithaca: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Zeitoun, Elizabeth , Chu Tai-hwa , & Lalo a tahesh kanbaybaw
    2015A study of Saisiyat Morphology (= Ocenic Linguistics Special Publication No. 40). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Zorc, R. David
    1974 The Internal and External Relations of the Mangyan Languages. Oceanic Linguistics13.561–600. doi: 10.2307/3622753
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622753 [Google Scholar]
  46. 1977The Bisayan Dialects of the Philippines: Subgrouping and Reconstructions.Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1986 The Genetic Relationship of Philippine Languages. FOCAL II: Articles from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (= Pacific Linguistics, C94) ed. by Paul Geraghty, S. A. Wurm & Lois Carrington , 147–173. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.6.2.01rei
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.6.2.01rei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error