1887
Volume 7, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2210-2116
  • E-ISSN: 2210-2124
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The article traces the diachronic development of the assumed evidential . This parenthetical expression allows the speaker to make certain assertions regarding the obviousness of what s/he is about to say, thus serving as an evidential strategy that marks the information conveyed as being based on inference and/or assumed or general knowledge. Parenthetical has its roots in the Early Modern English - construction (meaning ‘it is unnecessary to do something’), which originally licensed a wide range of infinitives. Over the course of time, however, it became restricted to uses with utterance verbs, eventually giving rise to the grammaticalized evidential expression . In fact, it is only in Late Modern English that the evidential pragmatic inferences become conventionalized and that the first parenthetical uses of the construction are attested. In Present-day English, parenthetical occurs primarily at the left periphery with forward scope.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.06bla
2017-11-23
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BYU-BNC: Brigham Young University-British National Corpus (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press) compiled by Mark Davies 2004– Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/bnc/.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CLMET: The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0
    CLMET: The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0 compiled by Hendrik De Smet , Hans Jürgen Dillerand , & Jukka Tyrkkö . Available online athttps://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/.
  3. EEBOCorp: Early English Books Online Corpus 1.0
    EEBOCorp: Early English Books Online Corpus 1.0 compiled by Peter Petré 2013 Available online athttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/416330/.
  4. HANSARD: The Hansard Corpus
    HANSARD: The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005, compiled by Marc Alexander & Mark Davies 2015– Available online atwww.hansard-corpus.org/.
  5. FRANTEXT: Base textuelle FRANTEXT
    FRANTEXT: Base textuelle FRANTEXT , ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine. Available online atwww.frantext.fr/.
  6. MED: Middle English Dictionary
    MED: Middle English Dictionary . Kurath, Hans , Sherman M. Kuhn , et al. eds. 1952–2001 Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Available online atquod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.
  7. OED: Oxford English Dictionary Online
    OED: Oxford English Dictionary Online . Oxford University Press. Available online atwww.oed.com/.
  8. TILG: Tesouro informatizado da lingua galega
    TILG: Tesouro informatizado da lingua galega . Santamarina, Antón coord. Available online atilg.usc.es/TILG/.
  9. Adolphs, Svenja
    2007 Definitely Maybe: Modality clusters and politeness in spoken discourse. Phraseology and Culture in Englished. by Paul Skandera , 257–272. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197860.257
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197860.257 [Google Scholar]
  10. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, Douglas
    1988Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1995Dimensions of Register Variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  13. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
    2009 Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of language16:1.9–43. doi: 10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 A Usage-Based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization. Language88:1.1–44. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bybee, Joan L.
    2003 Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The role of frequency. The Handbook of Historical Linguisticsed. by Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda , 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2007Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bybee, Joan L. & Rena Torres-Cacoullos
    2009 The Role of Prefabs in Grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. Formulaic Language: Distribution and historical changeed. by Roberta Corrigan , Edith A. Moravcsik , Hamid Ouali , & Kathleen Wheatley , 187–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.82.09the
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.82.09the [Google Scholar]
  18. Cruschina, Silvio
    2015 The Expression of Evidentiality and Epistemicity: Cases of grammaticalization in Italian and Sicilian. Probus27:1.1–31. doi: 10.1515/probus‑2013‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0006 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cruschina, Silvio & Eva-Maria Remberger
    2008 Hearsay and Reported Speech: Evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa33.95–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Davidse, Kristin , Lieven Vandelanotte , & Hubert Cuyckens
    eds. 2010Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102 [Google Scholar]
  21. Degand, Liesbeth
    2014So very fast very fast then. Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language changeed. by Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges , 151–178. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004274822_008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova
    2007 Parentheticals: An introduction. Parentheticalsed. by Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova , 1–22. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.106.03deh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.106.03deh [Google Scholar]
  23. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012 The Course of Actualization. Language88:3.601–633. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2014 Does Innovation Need Reanalysis?Usage-Based Approaches to Language Changeed. by Evie Coussé & Ferdinand Von Mengden , 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sfsl.69.02sme
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.69.02sme [Google Scholar]
  25. Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
    2010Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110241037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241037 [Google Scholar]
  26. Faller, Martina T.
    2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford University PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fischer, Olga , Ans van Kemenade , Willem Koopman , & Wim van der Wurff
    2001 The History of the ‘easy-to-please’ Construction. The Syntax of Early English, 256–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612312.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612312.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heine, Bernd
    2013 On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?Linguistics51:6.1205–1247. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On Some Principles of Grammaticization. Approaches to GrammaticalizationVol.1ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine , 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  30. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaltenböck, Gunther , Bernd Heine , & Tania Kuteva
    2011 On Thetical Grammar. Studies in Language35:4.852–897. doi: 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaltenböck, Gunther & Bernd Heine
    2014 Sentence Grammar vs. Thetical Grammar: Two competing domains. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usageed. by Brian MacWhinney , Andrej Malchukov , & Edith Moravcsik , 348–363. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0021 [Google Scholar]
  33. Light, Steven Andrew & Kathryn R. L. Rand
    2005Indian Gaming and Tribal Sovereignty: The casino compromise. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. López-Couso, María José
    2010 Subjectification and Intersubjectification. Historical Pragmaticsed. by Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen , 127–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 0.1515/9783110214284.3.127
    https://doi.org/0.1515/9783110214284.3.127 [Google Scholar]
  35. López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
    2015 Evidential/Epistemic Markers of the Type Verb +  Complementizer: Some parallels from English and Romance. New Directions in Grammaticalization Researched. by Andrew D. M. Smith , Graeme Trousdale , & Richard Waltereit , 93–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.166.05lop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.166.05lop [Google Scholar]
  36. Noonan, Michael
    2007 [1985] Complementation. Language Typology and Syntactic DescriptionVol.2ed. by Timothy Shopen , 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schenner, Mathias
    2010 Embedded Evidentials in German. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languagesed. by Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova , 157–185. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110223972.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.157 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schrickx, Josine
    2014 Latin Commitment-Markers: Scilicet and videlicet . Certainty-Uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Betweened. by Sibilla Cantarini , Werner Abraham , & Elisabeth Leiss , 285–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.165.16sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.165.16sch [Google Scholar]
  39. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer
    2007The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198928
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198928 [Google Scholar]
  40. Squartini, Mario
    2001 The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language25:2.297–334. doi: 10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.2.05squ [Google Scholar]
  41. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1989 On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language57:1.33–65. doi: 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2003 From Subjectification to Intersubjectification. Motives for Language Changeed. by Raymond Hickey , 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens , 29–70. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2012 Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery. English Text Construction5:1.7–28. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau [Google Scholar]
  45. Willett, Thomas
    1988 A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality. Studies in Language12:1.51–97. doi: 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.06bla
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhl.7.1-2.06bla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error