The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atlas, Jay David & Stephen C. Levinson
   1981  It-clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole , 1–61. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bickel, Balthasar
   1996 Aspect, Mood, and Time in Belhare: Studies in the semantics-pragmatics interface of a Himalayan language (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 15). Zürich: Universität Zürich.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Creissels, Denis
   2008  Remarks on So-Called “Conjunct/Disjunct” Systems . Paper presented at theconference Syntax of the World’s Languages III , Free University of Berlin, September 25–28. Available online atwww.deniscreissels.fr/public/Creissels-conj.disj.pdf (accessedJune 22 2016).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Croft, William
   2000 Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dahl, Östen
   2000 Egophoricity in Discourse and Syntax. Functions of Language7:1.37–77. doi: 10.1075/fol.7.1.03dah
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.7.1.03dah [Google Scholar]
7. Daudey, Henriëtte
   2014 A Grammar of Wadu Pumi. Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DeLancey, Scott
   2010 Towards a History of Verb Agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics9:1.1–39.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dickinson, Connie
   2000 Mirativity in Tsafiki. Linguistic Typology24:2.379–421.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Francke, August H.
    1909 Tabellen der Pronomina und Verba in den drei Sprachen Lahoul’s: Bunan, Manchad und Tinan. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft63.65–97.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Genetti, Carol
    2007 A Grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198812
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198812 [Google Scholar]
12. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and Conversation. Speech Actsed. by Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan , 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grierson, George A.
    ed. 1909 Linguistic Survey of India: Vol. III, Part I, Tibeto-Burman Family: Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hale, Austin
    1980 Person Markers: Finite egophoric and allophoric verb forms in Newari. Papers in South East Asian Linguistics 7 (Pacific Linguistics A 53), ed. by Stephen A. Wurm , 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haller, Felix & Chungda Haller
    2007 Einführung in das moderne Zentraltibetische. Auf Basis des Dialektes von Shigatse / westliches Zentraltibet (Tsang). Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haller, Felix
    2000 Verbal Categories of Shigatse Tibetan and Themchen Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area23:2.175–191.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hargreaves, David J.
    2005 Agency and Intentional Action in Kathmandu Newari. Himalayan Linguistics Journal5.1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haspelmath, Martin
    2008 Framework-Free Grammatical Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Analysised. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog , 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher
    2015 Four Types of Evidentiality in the Native Languages of Brazil. Linguistics53:3.479–524. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2015‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0010 [Google Scholar]
20. Horn, Laurence R.
    1972 On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. University of California, Los AngelesPhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huber, Christian
    2013 Subject and Object Agreement in Shumcho. Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan areaed. by Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill , 221–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110310832.221
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110310832.221 [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive Meaning: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Palmer, Frank R.
    2001 [11986] Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139167178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178 [Google Scholar]
24. Post, Mark W.
    2013 Person-Sensitive TAME Marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In honor of Scott DeLanceyed. by Tim Thornes , Erik Andvik , Gwendolyn Hyslop , & Joana Jansen , 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.103.06pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.103.06pos [Google Scholar]
25. San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane
    2012 The New Guinea Highlands Evidentiality Area. Linguistic Typology16.111–167. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
26. San Roque, Lila , Simeon Floyd , & Elisabeth Norcliffe
    2015 Evidentiality and Interrogativitiy. Lingua186/187.120–143. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003 [Google Scholar]
27. Sharma, Devidatta
    1989 Tribal Languages of Himachal Pradesh, Part I. Delhi: Mittal.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Sharma, Suhnu Ram
    2007 Byangsi Grammar and Vocabulary. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Tournadre, Nicolas
    1991 The Rhetorical Use of the Tibetan Ergative. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area14:1.93–107.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tournadre, Nicolas
    1996 L’ergativité en Tibétain. Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla
    2014 Towards a New Approach to Evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area37:2.240–263. doi: 10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou [Google Scholar]
32. Widmer, Manuel
    2015 The Transformation of Verb Agreement into Epistemic Marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. Agreement from a Diachronic Perspectiveed. by Jürg Fleischer , Elisabeth Rieken , & Paul Widmer , 53‒73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110399967‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110399967-004 [Google Scholar]
33. Widmer, Manuel
    . Forthcoming. A Grammar of Bunan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Widmer, Manuel & Fernando Zúñiga
    . Forthcoming. Egophoricity, involvement, and semantic roles in Tibeto-Burman languages. Open Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Widmer, Manuel & Marius Zemp
    . 2017. The Epistemization of Person Markers in Reported Speech. Studies in Language41:1.33–75. doi: 10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid”
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.1.02wid [Google Scholar]
36. Willis, Christina M.
    2007 A Descriptive Grammar of Darma: An endangered Tibeto-Burman language. Austin: University of Texas PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Zemp, Marius
    2014 A Historical Grammar of the Tibetan Dialect Spoken in Kargil (Purik). University of Bern PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]