Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper focuses on the influence of Italian conduct manuals, as translated into English, in the second half of the sixteenth century and early seventeenth century. I approach this task in two ways. One is to trace the rise of the term , and also to examine the words with which it typically cohabited, thus giving a sense of the discourses of which it was a part. The analysis reveals a dramatic rise in usage of the term in the period 1550–1624, and its role in discourses to do with social regulation, negative evaluation and moralizing. The other is to undertake a detailed comparison of Della Casa’s and, in particular, Brown and Levinson (1987) . The major finding here is the close similarity between the two. Along the way, the paper also airs some theoretical distinctions relating to notions of politeness, notably the distinction between first- and second-order politeness, and touches on some of the features of the social context of Early Modern England.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ascham, Roger
    1570 The scholemaster or plaine and perfite way of teachyng children, to vnderstand, write, and speake, the Latin tong but specially purposed for the priuate brynging vp of youth in ientlemen and noble mens houses, and commodious also for all such, as haue forgot the Latin tonge […]. STC (2nd ed.) / 832. Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery.
  2. Bax, Marcel and Dániel Kádár
    2012Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness: Relational Linguistic Practice over Time and across Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.41
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.41 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1990The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bryson, Anna
    1998From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2009 “The Metalanguage of impoliteness: Explorations in the Oxford English Corpus”. In Paul Baker (ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, 64–86. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2010 “Historical Sociopragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 69–96. (In Wolfram Bublitz , Andreas H. Jucker and Klaus P. Schneider [eds], Handbooks of Pragmatics [Volume5].) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth-century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. In Dániel Z. Kádár and Marcel Bax (eds), Understanding Historical (Im)politeness. Special issue ofJournal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 49–81. doi: 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan and Dániel Kádár
    2010Historical (Im)Politeness Research. Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0025‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9 [Google Scholar]
  11. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ehlich, Konrad
    2005 [1992] “On the Historicity of Politeness”. In Richard J. Watts , Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory andPractice, 71–107. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haugh, Michael
    2012 “Epilogue: Deconstructing the First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research”. Special issue on Chinese face and im/politeness ofJournal of Politeness Research8 (1): 111–34. doi: 10.1515/pr‑2012‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0007 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2014(Im)politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2008 “Politeness in the History of English”. In Richard Dury , Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena (eds), English Historical Linguistics 2006. Volume II: Lexical and Semantic Change. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), 3–29. 21–25August 2006 Bergamo. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.296.04juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.296.04juc [Google Scholar]
  16. 2011 “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1–2): 178–97. doi: 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.08juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.08juc [Google Scholar]
  17. 2012 “Changes in Politeness Cultures”. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 422–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, Andreas H. , Irma Taavitsainen and Gerold Schneider
    2012 “Semantic Corpus Trawling: Expressions of ‘Courtesy’ and ‘Politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus”. In Carla Suhr , and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at: www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/11/jucker_taavitsainen_schneider/.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kádár, Dániel and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2011 “From Good Manners to Facework: Politeness Variations and Constants in France from the Classic Age to Today”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1–2): 133–55. doi: 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.06ker
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.06ker [Google Scholar]
  21. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2003 “Towards an Anatomy of Politeness in Communication”. International Journal of Pragmatics14: 101–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mcenery, Tony and Andrew Hardie
    2012Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nevala, Minna
    2004Address in Early English Correspondence: Its Forms and Socio-Pragmatic Functions. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    2003Historical Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rusnak, M. F.
    (ed.) 2013Galateo: The Rules of Polite Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sell, Roger D.
    2005 [1992] “Literary texts and diachronic aspects of politeness”. In Richard J. Watts , Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 109–29. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Spingarn, Joel E.
    (ed.) 1914A Renaissance Courtesy-book: Galateo – Of Manners and Behaviours By Giavanni Della Casa. Boston: The Merrymount Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Terkourafi, Marina
    2011 “From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking Norms of Im/Politeness across Time and Space”. Journal of Politeness Research7: 159–85. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2011.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Thomas, Jenny
    1981Pragmatic Failure. Unpublished MA dissertation. University of Lancaster.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1983 “Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure”. Applied Linguistics4 (2): 91–112. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.91
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91 [Google Scholar]
  32. Watts, Richard J.
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  33. Watts, Richard J. , Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich
    (eds) 2005 [1992]Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199819
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199819 [Google Scholar]
  34. Woodhouse, John R.
    1994 “The tradition of Della Casa’s Galateo in English”. In Jacques Carré (ed.), The Crisis of Courtesy: Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600–1900, 11–16. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004247024_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004247024_003 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): civility; conduct manuals; Galateo; manners; politeness
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error