1887
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The (ESDD) corpus is a sociopragmatically tagged corpus of English and Swedish drama texts from the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Using this corpus, I investigated the use of the address terms and . The study focused on the contexts where these terms were found and traced diachronic usage patterns. The main questions asked in the investigation concerned, first, the speaker’s attitude towards the addressees when using the address phrases and whether attitudes connected with particular phrases changed over time; second, whether the phrases could be said to signal intimacy or distance between the interlocutors.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00018.ang
2019-02-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED)
    A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED) 2006 Compiled under the supervision ofMerja Kytö (Uppsala University) andJonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
  2. English and Swedish Drama Dialogue (ESDD)
    English and Swedish Drama Dialogue (ESDD). Compiled byLinnéa Anglemark, Merja Kytö, Ulla Melander Marttala and Mats Thelander (Uppsala University), andSofia Gustafson Capková (Stockholm University).
  3. Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper
    2003 “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics”. InAndrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Braun, Friedrike
    1988Terms of Address: Problems of Pattern and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyer. 10.1515/9783110848113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848113 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. Calvo, Clara
    1990 Power Relations and Fool-Master Discourse in Shakespeare: A Discourse Stylistics Approach to Dramatic Dialogue. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham.
  7. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan, Mick Short and Peter Verdonk
    (eds) 1998Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunkling, Leslie
    1990A Dictionary of Epithets and Terms of Address. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ervin-Tripp, Susan M.
    1972 “Sociolinguistic Rules of Address”. InJohn B. Pride and Janet Holmes (eds), Sociolinguistics, 225–240. Hammondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gustafson Capková, Sofia, Linnéa Anglemark, Merja Kytö, Ulla Melander Marttala and Mats Thelander
    2016English and Swedish Drama Dialogue/Engelsk och svensk dramadialog 1725–1950. ESDD. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Herman, Vimala
    1995Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
    1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  14. Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker
    2006Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kytö, Merja, Juhani Rudanko and Erik Smitterberg
    2000 “Building a Bridge between the Present and the Past: A Corpus of 19th-Century English”. ICAME Journal24: 85–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1999 “The Distribution and Function of Vocatives in American and British English Conversation”. InHilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell (eds), Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, 107–118. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liesenfeld, Vincent J.
    1984The Licensing Act of 1737. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Melander Marttala, Ulla and Carin Östman
    2000Svensk dramadialog under tre sekler – en projektbeskrivning [FUMS Rapport 200]. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nevala, Minna
    2004Address in Early English Correspondence: Its Forms and Socio-Pragmatic Functions. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
    1996 “Forms of Address in Early English Correspondence”. InTerttu Nevalainen and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 168–181. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sennefelt, Karin
    2014 “Wine, Corruption, and the Politics of Intoxication in Eighteenth-Century Stockholm”. Past & Present222 (suppl 9): 277–295. 10.1093/pastj/gtt038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtt038 [Google Scholar]
  24. Spitz, Alice
    2005 Power Plays: The Representation of Mother-Daughter Disputes in Contemporary Plays by Women: A Study in Discourse Analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis. Philosophische Fakultät, Universität des Saarlandes.
  25. Taavitsainen, Irma
    1995 “Interjections in Early Modern English. From Imitations of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 439–465. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.23taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.23taa [Google Scholar]
  26. Teleman, Ulf
    2003Tradis och funkis – Svensk språkvård och språkpolitik efter 1800 (Skrifter utgivna av Svenska språknämnden 87). Stockholm: Nordstedts.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Thelander, Kerstin
    2007 “Tilltal och tilltalsväxling i svensk dramadialog”. Språk och Stil17: 49–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Toolan, Michael
    1988 “Compromising Positions: Systemic Linguistics and the Locally Managed Semiotics of Dialogue”. InDavid Birch and Michael O’Toole (eds), Functions of Style, 249–260. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Walker, Terry
    2007Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues: Trials, Depositions and Drama Comedy. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.158
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.158 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00018.ang
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): address terms , drama dialogue , English , sociopragmatics and Swedish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error