1887
Volume 19, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article is concerned with “speech descriptors”, markers that describe or evaluate the nature of represented speech, such as in “The Gentlewoman very modestly bade him welcome” (CED, D2FKIT). The form, frequency and function of such features are charted in Early Modern English prose fiction, drawn from , and the results are compared to those of Grund (2017a), which considers speech descriptors in contemporaneous witness depositions. The comparison reveals generic differences and points to the importance of studying speech descriptors for our understanding of the dynamics of speech representation in the history of English.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00022.gru
2019-02-01
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED)
    A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED) 2006 Compiled under the supervision ofMerja Kytö (Uppsala University) andJonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
  2. Baynham, Mike and Stef Slembrouck
    1999 “Speech Representation and Institutional Discourse”. Text19 (4): 439–457. 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.439
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1999.19.4.439 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, Douglas
    2004 “Historical Patterns for the Grammatical Marking of Stance: A Cross-Register Comparison”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics5 (1): 107–136. 10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Gillian
    1990Listening to Spoken English. (Second edition.) London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Busse, Beatrix
    2010 “Adverbial Expressions of Stance in Early Modern ‘Spoken’ English”. InJörg Helbig and René Schallegger (eds), Proceedings. Anglistentag 2009 Klagenfurt, 47–63. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Camiciotti, Gabriella Del Lungo
    2007 “Discoursal Aspects of the Legends of Holy Women by Osbern Bokenham”. InSusan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 285–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.285
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.285 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
    2012 “Performing Self on the Witness Stand: Stance and Relational Work in Expert Witness Testimony”. Discourse and Society23 (5): 465–486. 10.1177/0957926512441111
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441111 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotations as Demonstrations”. Language66 (4): 764–805. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2001Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle”. InRobert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, and Interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2003 “The Grammar of Stance in Early Eighteenth-Century English Epistolary Language”. InPepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer (eds), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, 107–131. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fludernik, Monika
    1993The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Garretson, Gregory and Annelie Ädel
    2008 “Who’s Speaking? Evidentiality in US Newspapers during the 2004 Presidential Campaign”. InAnnelie Ädel and Randi Reppen (eds), Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings, 157–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.31.11gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.31.11gar [Google Scholar]
  16. Gray, Bethany, Douglas Biber and Turo Hiltunen
    2011 “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665–1712) Publications of the Philosophical Transactions and Other Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering Discourse”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (eds), Medical Writing in Early Modern English, 221–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921193.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921193.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grund, Peter J.
    2017a “Description, Evaluation and Stance: Exploring the Forms and Functions of Speech Descriptors in Early Modern English”. Nordic Journal of English Studies16 (1): 41–73. Special issue “Texts from Speech and Speech in Texts”, Terry Walker and Merja Kytö (eds).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2017b “From ‘ludicrously faintly’ to ‘warmingly, in a modulated voice’: Speech Description and Stance in Late Modern English”. Paper presented atLMEC6. 17–19 August. Uppsala University.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Güldemann, Tom and Manfred von Roncador
    (eds) 2002Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.52 [Google Scholar]
  20. de Haan, Pieter
    1996 “More on the Language of Dialogue in Fiction”. ICAME Journal20: 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holt, Elizabeth and Rebecca Clift
    (eds) 2007Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
    1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, Deidre
    1982Stratemeyer Pseudonyms and Series Books. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jucker, Andreas H. and Manuel Berger
    2014 “The Development of Discourse Presentation in The Times, 1833–1988”. Media History20 (1): 67–87. 10.1080/13688804.2013.879793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2013.879793 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker
    2006Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lederer, Richard
    2006Get Thee to a Punnery: An Anthology of Intentional Assaults upon the English Language. Layton, Utah: Wyrick.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Levorato, Alessandra
    2009 “‘Be Steady Then, My Countrymen, Be Firm, United and Determined’: Expressions of Stance in the 1798–1800 Irish Paper War”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (1): 132–157. 10.1075/jhp.10.1.11lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.11lev [Google Scholar]
  28. Lippman, Louis G., Kristine Bennington and Ivan L. Sucharski
    2002 “Contextual Connections to Puns in Tom Swifties”. Journal of General Psychology129 (2): 202–208. 10.1080/00221300209603139
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209603139 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lippman, Louis G. and Sarah L. Tragesser
    2005 “Constructing Something Funny: Levels of Associative Connection in Tom Swifties”. Journal of General Psychology132 (3): 231–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lutzky, Ursula
    2015 “Quotations in Early Modern English Witness Depositions”. InJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds), The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, 343–367. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-016 [Google Scholar]
  31. McIntyre, Dan and Brian Walker
    2011 “Discourse Presentation in Early Modern English Writing: A Preliminary Corpus-Based Investigation”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics16 (1): 101–130. 10.1075/ijcl.16.1.05mci
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.1.05mci [Google Scholar]
  32. Moore, Colette
    2011Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Oostdijk, Nelleke
    1990 “The Language of Dialogue in Fiction”. Literary and Linguistic Computing5 (3): 235–241. 10.1093/llc/5.3.235
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.3.235 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pooley, Roger
    1992English Prose of the Seventeenth Century, 1590–1700. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Semino, Elena and Mick Short
    2004Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tannen, Deborah
    1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Walker, Terry and Peter J. Grund
    2017 “‘Speaking ase approbious words’: Speech Representation in Early Modern English Witness Depositions”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics18 (1): 1–29. 10.1075/jhp.18.1.01wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18.1.01wal [Google Scholar]
  38. . Forthcoming. “Free Indirect Speech, Slipping, or a System in Flux? Exploring the Continuum between Direct and Indirect Speech in Early Modern English”. InPeter J. Ground eds Speech Representation in the History of English: Topics and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Włodarczyk, Matylda
    2007Pragmatic Aspects of Reported Speech: The Case of Early Modern English Courtroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00022.gru
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00022.gru
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error