Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Previous studies have found discourse markers to be represented with only low frequencies in Early Modern English trial proceedings, especially when compared to other dialogic and fictional text types from the same period. Nevertheless, they comprise certain classes of markers, such as contrastive markers, which operate on different levels of discourse. This study aims to provide further insights into the use of the coordinator in a sociopragmatically annotated corpus of trial proceedings from the period 1560 to 1760. Drawing on contextual information, the analysis will assess the distribution of throughout the Early Modern English period and address certain peaks in its use. In addition, the sociopragmatic information included in the corpus will be consulted to discover which trial participants used the form repeatedly in their speech and with which functions. Overall, this study will therefore offer an innovative sociopragmatic profile of as a contrastive marker in Early Modern English trials.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. CED
    CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 2006 Compiled under the supervision ofMerja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SPC
    SPC = Sociopragmatic Corpus 2007 Annotated under the supervision ofJonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). A derivative ofA Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760, compiled under the supervision ofMerja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Archer, Dawn
    2005Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.135
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135 [Google Scholar]
  4. Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper
    2003 “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics”. InAndrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blake, Norman F.
    1996A History of the English Language. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑24954‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24954-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinton, Laurel J.
    2010 “Discourse Markers”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Csulich, Gabriela
    2016 “(Im)politeness, Social Status, and Roles in the Early Modern English Courtroom: Your Lordship and Traitor in High Treason and Ordinary Criminal Trials”. InMinna Nevala, Ursula Lutzky, Gabriella Mazzon and Carla Suhr (eds), The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation. Available online at: www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/17/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    1999 “Modifying Pragmatic Force. Hedges in Early Modern English Dialogues”. InAndreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz and Franz Lebsanft (eds), Historical Dialogue Analysis, 293–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.12cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.12cul [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fraser, Bruce
    2009 “An Account of Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics1(2): 293–320. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013 “Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English”. International Review of Pragmatics5(2): 318–340. 10.1163/18773109‑13050209
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-13050209 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2015 “The Combining of Discourse Markers – a Beginning”. Journal of Pragmatics86: 48–53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hammer, Paul E. J.
    2004Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, s.v. “Devereux, Robert, second earl of Essex (1565–1601)”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online edition, October 2008 Accessed13 January 2017at: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/7565
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopkins, Paul
    2004Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, s.v. “Rookwood, Ambrose (1664–1696)”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online edition, January 2008 Accessed18 January 2017at: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/24067
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2002 “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English”. InRichard Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds), Alternative Histories of English, 210–230. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Langbein, John H.
    2003The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lutzky, Ursula
    2012Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.227 [Google Scholar]
  20. Redeker, Gisela
    1991 “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure”. Linguistics29: 1139–1172.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Salmon, Eric
    2004Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, s.v. “Cibber, Theophilus (1703–1758)”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online edition, May 2005 Accessed13 November 2017: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/5418
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams, Graham T.
    2013Women’s Epistolary Utterance: A Study of the Letters of Joan and Maria Thynne, 1575–1611. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.233
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.233 [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams, Penry
    2004Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, s.v. “Babington, Anthony (1561–1586)”. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online edition, September 2015 Accessed13 November 2017at: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/967
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error