Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Archer, Dawn
    2017 “Context and Historical (Socio)pragmatics Twenty Years On”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics18 (2): 315–336. 10.1075/jhp.00008.arc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00008.arc [Google Scholar]
  2. Bax, Marcel and Nanne Streekstra
    2003 “Civil Rites: Ritual Politeness in Early Modern Dutch Letter-writing”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics4 (2): 303–325. 10.1075/jhp.4.2.09bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.4.2.09bax [Google Scholar]
  3. Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011 “The Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)politeness: Introductory Notes”. InMarcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness: Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergs, Alexander
    2005Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110923223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923223 [Google Scholar]
  5. van der Bom, Isabelle and Karen Grainger
    2015 “Journal of Politeness Research: An Introduction”. Journal of Politeness Research11 (2): 165–178. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Lucien
    2017 ““Nwuna’s Body is So Sexy”: Pop Culture and the Chronotopic Formulations of Kinship Terms in Korean”. Discourse, Context and Media15: 1–10. 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
    1960 “Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. InThomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, 253–276. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. de Clercq, Trevor and David Temperley
    2011 “A Corpus Analysis of Rock Harmony”. Popular Music30 (1): 47–70. 10.1017/S026114301000067X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026114301000067X [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2017 “The Influence of Italian Manners on Politeness in England, 1550–1620”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics18 (2): 195–213. 10.1075/jhp.00002.cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00002.cul [Google Scholar]
  11. Eelen, Gino
    1999 “Politeness and Ideology: A Critical Review”. Pragmatics9 (1): 163–173. 10.1075/prag.9.1.09eel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.09eel [Google Scholar]
  12. 2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Feezell, Jessica
    2017 “It’s Not Only Rock and Roll: The Influence of Music Preferences on Political Attitudes”. InUche Onyebadi (ed.), Music as a Platform for Political Communication, 167–186. Hershey: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑1986‑7.ch009
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1986-7.ch009 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, Ersheng, Xiayun Zuo, Li Wang, Chaohua Zuo, Yan Cheng and Laurie Zabin
    2016 “How Does Traditional Confucian Culture Influence Adolescents’ Behavior in Three Asian Cities”. Journal of Adolescent Health50 (3): 12–17. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heidegger, Martin
    1991 [1927]Being and Time. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness”. Multilingua8 (2–3): 223–248. 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  17. Janney, Richard and Arndt Horst
    1993 “Universality and Relativity in Cross-cultural Politeness Research: A Historical Perspective”. Multilingua12 (1): 13–50. 10.1515/mult.1993.12.1.13
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1993.12.1.13 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2000 “‘Thou’ in the History of English: A Case for Historical Semantics or Pragmatics?” InChristiane Dalton-Puffer and Nikolaus Ritt (eds), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, 153–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809169.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.153 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jucker, Andreas
    2011 “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. InMarcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)politeness–Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 178–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2010Historical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2017 “Politeness in Pragmatics”. Oxford Research Encyclopaedias: Linguistics (online), doi:  10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.218
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.218 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Jonathan Culpeper
    (eds) 2010Historical (Im)politeness. Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills
    2011 “Introduction”. InDániel Kádár and Sara Mills (eds), Politeness in East Asia, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, Tae Wan and Alan Strudler
    2012 “Workplace Civility: A Confucian Approach”. Business Ethics Quarterly22 (3): 557–577. 10.5840/beq201222334
    https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222334 [Google Scholar]
  26. Klein, Lawrence
    1994 “‘Politeness’ as Linguistic Ideology in Late Seventeenth- and Early Eighteenth-Century England”. InDieter Stein and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostede (eds), Towards a Standard English, 31–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kohnen, Thomas
    2005 “Historical Linguistics: Corpus Linguistics, Text Linguistics and Historical Pragmatics”. InStephan Kohl (ed.), Anglistik – Research Paradigms and Institutional Policies, 1930–2000, 271–292. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kopytko, Roman
    1995 “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays”. InAndreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Development in the History of English, 515–540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.27kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.27kop [Google Scholar]
  29. Kreyer, Rolf
    2015 “‘Funky Fresh Dressed to Impress’: A Corpus-linguistic View on Gender Roles in Pop Songs”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics20 (2): 174–204. 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.02kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.02kre [Google Scholar]
  30. Kurokawa, Shozo
    1972 “Japanese Terms of Address: Some Usages of First and Second Person Pronouns”. Papers in Japanese Linguistics1 (2): 228–238. 10.1515/jjl‑1972‑0205
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1972-0205 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lass, Robert
    1997Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620928
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620928 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, Cher Leng
    2012 “Self-presentation, Face and First-person Pronouns in the Analects”. Journal of Politeness Research8 (1): 75–92. 10.1515/pr‑2012‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, Lydia H.
    1995Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture and Translated Modernity, China. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Magnusson, Lynne
    2007 “A Pragmatics for Interpreting Shakespeare’s Sonnets 1 to 20: Dialogue Scripts and Erasmian Intertexts”. InSusan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 167–183. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.167
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.167 [Google Scholar]
  35. Márquez-Reiter, Rosina
    2000Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.83
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.83 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2003Socio-Historical Linguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. Longman: London.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Nichols, Johanna
    1992Linguistic Diversity across Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pakis, Valentin
    2011 “Insults, Violence, and the Meaning of lytegian in the Old English Battle of Maldon”. InMarcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness–Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 198–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Richter, Max M.
    2008 “Musical Sexualisation and the Gendered Habitus in Yogyakarta”. Indonesia and the Malay World36 (104): 21–45. 10.1080/13639810802016273
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13639810802016273 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ridealgh, Kim
    2016a “Polite like an Egyptian? Case Studies of Politeness in the Late Ramesside Letters”. Journal of Politeness Research12 (2): 245–266. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]
  41. (ed.) 2016bCase Studies in Historical Politeness (Ancient Languages) – Special Issue of Journal of Politeness Research12 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruhi, Śukriye and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011 “‘Face’ across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. InMarcel Bax and Dániel Kádár (eds), Historical Understandings of Historical (Im)Politeness – Double Special Issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 25–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Silverstein, Michael
    1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function”. InJohn A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
  44. Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2016 “The Bases of (Im)politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East–West Debate”. East Asian Pragmatics1 (1): 73–106. 10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084 [Google Scholar]
  45. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
    2003Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2015 “Twenty Years of Historical Pragmatics: Origins, Developments and Changing Thought Styles”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics16 (1): 1–24. 10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa [Google Scholar]
  47. Unceta Gómez, Luis
    2016 “Congratulations in Latin Comedy: Types and Functions”. Journal of Politeness Research12 (2): 267–290. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Watts, Richard J.
    1992 “Linguistic Politeness and Politic Verbal Behaviour: Reconsidering Claims for Universality”. InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice, 43–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110886542‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542-005 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wente, Edward
    1990Letters from Ancient Egypt. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Werner, Valentin
    Ed. 2018The Language of Pop Culture. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315168210
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168210 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error