1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Pragmatics
  4. Volume 20, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Starting from a sexual pun in Greek reputedly made by Cleopatra in 31  on the word τορύνη () (‘ladle’), this paper argues that the linguist can successfully take up the “evaluator’s role” (Kádár and Culpeper 2010: 18) in ascertaining the dysphemistic value of words in historical corpora. Typically offensive words constitute a special category of impolite verbal behaviours, and it is argued that a reflection of the historical schemata which guided the use of dysphemistic words by speakers can be detected in patterns of use in extant texts, and used as a guide for their identification. The paper highlights the need for greater openness as to which “denotata” produce offensive words, and more cross-linguistic work on dysphemism. It discusses the problems of interpretation of historical metaphors, and it ends with a detailed discussion of the evidence for the dysphemistic value of the word on which Cleopatra’s pun hinges.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00028.cok
2019-12-10
2024-10-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00028.cok
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, James N.
    1982 The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London: Duckworth.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, Robert M.
    1985 “Soft Soap and the Nitty-Gritty”. InDennis J. Enright (ed.), Fair of Speech: The Uses of Euphemism, 44–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan, Keith
    2007 “The Pragmatics of Connotation”. Journal of Pragmatics39 (6): 1047–1057. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2016 “A Benchmark for Politeness”. InAlessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey (eds), Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, 397–420. London: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_15
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_15 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allan, Keith and Kate Burridge
    1991 Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 2006 Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
  7. Attardo, Salvatore
    1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bain, David
    1991 “Six Greek Verbs of Sexual Congress (βινῶ, κινῶ, πυγίζω, ληκῶ, οἴφω, λαικάζω)”. Classical Quarterly41 (1): 51–77. 10.1017/S0009838800003530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800003530 [Google Scholar]
  9. 1997 “Two Submerged Items of Greek Sexual Vocabulary from Aphrodisias”. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik117: 81–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bax, Marcel and Daniel Z. Kádár
    2011 “The Historical Understanding of Historical (Im)politeness”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1–2): 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  12. Coker, Amy
    2019 “Obscenity: A Problem for the Lexicographer”. InChris Stray, Michael Clarke and Joshua Katz (eds), Liddell and Scott: The History, Methodology and Languages of the World’s Leading Lexicon of Ancient Greek, 61–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. . Forthcoming. “Fluid Vocabulary: The Greek and Latin Lexicon of Bodily Effluvia”. InLaurence Totelin, Victoria Leonard and Mark Bradley eds Bodily Fluids/Fluid Bodies in Greek and Roman Antiquity. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
    2015 Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Critchley, Simon
    2002 On Humour. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deignan, Alice
    2005 Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010 Theories of Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Geertz, Clifford
    1973 “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”. InClifford Geertz (ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures, 3–30New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hallett, Judith P.
    1977 “Perusinae glandes and the Changing Image of Augustus”. American Journal of Ancient History2 (2): 151–171.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Halliwell, Stephen
    1991 “The Uses of Laughter in Greek Culture”. Classical Quartlerly41 (2): 279–296. 10.1017/S0009838800004468
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800004468 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2008 Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511483004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Henderson, Jeffrey
    1991 The Maculate Muse. Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. (Second edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jocelyn, Henry D.
    1980 “A Greek Indecency and its Students: λαικάζειν”. Procedings of the Cambridge Philological Society26: 12–66. 10.1017/S006867350000420X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S006867350000420X [Google Scholar]
  25. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Jonathan Culpeper
    2010 “Historical (Im)politeness: An Introduction”. InJonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (Im)politeness. Linguistic Insights65, 9–36. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Michael Haugh
    2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. London: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Luján, Eugenio R.
    2010 “Semantic Change”. InSilvia Luraghi and Vit Bubenik (eds), The Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics, 286–310. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Müller, Dietram
    1974 Handwerk und Sprache. Die sprachlichen Bilder aus dem Bereich des Handwerks in der griechischen Literatur bis 400 v. Chr. Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Musolff, Andreas
    2010 Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203847282
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847282 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2017 “Truth, Lies and Figurative Scenarios: Metaphors at the Heart of Brexit”. Journal of Language and Politics16 (5): 641–657. 10.1075/jlp.16033.mus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16033.mus [Google Scholar]
  33. Parker, Holt
    1997 “The Teratogenic Grid”. InJudith P. Hallett and Marilyn B. Skinner (eds), Roman Sexualities, 47–65. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 2011 “Sex, Popular Beliefs, and Culture”. InMark Golden and Peter Toohey (eds), A Cultural History of Sexuality in the Classical World, 124–144. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350049666‑ch‑007
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350049666-ch-007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Patrick, Peter L.
    2002 “The Speech Community”. InJack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 573–597. London: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Pelling, Christopher
    1988 Plutarch: Life of Anthony. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea
    (ed.) 2018 Linguistic Taboo Revisited. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110582758
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582758 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sommerstein, Alan H.
    1981 Knights: The Comedies of Aristophanes Volume 2. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Sparkes, Brian A.
    1962 “The Greek Kitchen”. Journal of Hellenic Studies82: 121–137. 10.2307/628548
     https://doi.org/10.2307/628548 [Google Scholar]
  40. Taillardat, Jean
    1962 Les images d’Aristophane: étude de langue et de style. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Terkourafi, Maria
    2005 “Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture1 (2): 237–262. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  42. Valente, Stefano
    2012 I lessici a Platone di Timeo Sofista e Pseudo-Didimo: introduzione ed edizione critica. SGLG 14. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110240801
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240801 [Google Scholar]
  43. Watts, Richard J.
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00028.cok
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Ancient Greek; dysphemism; historical linguistics; impoliteness; metaphors; offence; pragmatics; semantics; sex; taboo

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error