1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Latin , contracted from (‘if you wish’) and commonly attached to imperatives in early Latin, is usually translated as ‘please’, but some scholars have seen it as urgent rather than polite. Here, an examination of all the examples of in early Latin (chiefly Plautus and Terence) demonstrates that it is neither polite nor urgent and indeed has no function in the politeness system at all: its function is as a focus-marking clitic particle. This role was only one-step in the long process of development undergone by , from an ‘if you wish’ offering genuine alternatives to ‘please’ (at a time before the earliest surviving evidence), then by weakening to the focus-marking particle (in early Latin) and then to disappearance (in Classical Latin).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00029.dic
2019-12-10
2020-04-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, James N.
    1984 “Female Speech in Latin Comedy”. Antichthon18: 43–77. 10.1017/S0066477400003142
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066477400003142 [Google Scholar]
  2. 1994aWackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin. (Supplementary Volume 18.) Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1994b “Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Personal Pronouns in Classical Latin”. Transactions of the Philological Society92 (2): 103–178. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1994.tb00430.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1994.tb00430.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrios-Lech, Peter
    2016Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316416983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316416983 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Melo, Wolfgang
    2011–2013Plautus. (Loeb Classical Library. FiveVolumes.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickey, Eleanor
    2006 “The Use of Latin sis as a Focus-marking Clitic Particle”. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics11: 21–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2012 “How to Say ‘Please’ in Classical Latin”. Classical Quarterly62 (2): 731–748. 10.1017/S0009838812000286
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838812000286 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2015 “How to Say ‘Please’ in Post-Classical Latin: Fronto and the Importance of Archaism”. Journal of Latin Linguistics14 (1): 17–31. 10.1515/joll‑2015‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2016 “Politeness in Ancient Rome: Can it Help us Evaluate Modern Politeness Theories?” Journal of Politeness Research12 (2): 197–220. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferri, Rolando
    2008 “Politeness in Latin Comedy: Some Preliminary Thoughts”. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici61: 15–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Glare, P. G. W.
    1968–1982Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall, Jon
    2009Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Halla-aho, Hilla
    2010 “Requesting in a Letter: Context, Syntax, and the Choice Between Complements in the Letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger”. Transactions of the Philological Society108 (3): 232–247. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01244.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01244.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Hofmann, Johann B.
    1951Lateinische Umgangssprache [‘Latin Colloquial Speech’]. (Third edition.) Heidelberg: C. Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Janson, Tore
    1979Mechanisms of Language Change in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kauer, Robert and Wallace M. Lindsay
    1926P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lodge, Gonzalez
    1926–1933Lexicon Plautinum II. Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Malcovati, Henrica
    1953Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae [‘Fragments of the Republican Roman Orators’]. Turin: Paravia.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Marx, Friedrich
    1904C. Lucilii Carminum Reliquiae I [‘Remains of the Poems of C. Lucilius’]. Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Müller, Roman
    1997Sprechen und Sprache: Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz [‘Speaking and Language: Linguistic Studies on the Dialogues of Terence’]. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Núnez, S.
    1995 “Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo” [“Material for a Sociology of the Latin Language: Terence and Imperatival Modifiers”]. Florentia Iliberritana: Revista de Estudios de Antigüedad Clásica6: 347–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pinkster, Harm
    1990Latin Syntax and Semantics. (Translated byH. Mulder.) London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015The Oxford Latin Syntax I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramsay, William and George G. Ramsay
    1869The Mostellaria of Plautus. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ribbeck, Otto
    1898Comicorum Romanorum Fragmenta. (Third edition.) Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Risselada, Rodie
    1989 “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals”. InMarius Lavency and Dominique Longrée (eds), Proceedings of the Vth Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 367–378. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1993Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben. 10.1163/9789004408975
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408975 [Google Scholar]
  29. Roesch, Sophie
    2004 “La politesse dans la correspondance de Cicéron” [“Politeness in Cicero’s Letters”]. InLéon Nadjo and Élisabeth Gavoille (eds), Epistulae antiquae III: Actes du IIIe colloque international “L’Épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens” [‘Ancient Letters III: Proceedings of the third international colloquium “Ancient epistolography and its European descendants”’], 139–152. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schauer, Markus
    2012Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta I [‘Fragments of the Roman tragedians I’]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. 10.13109/9783666250262
    https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666250262 [Google Scholar]
  31. Terkourafi, Marina
    2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity”. Journal of Greek Linguistics3 (1): 179–201. 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
  32. 2004 “Testing Brown and Levinson’s Theory in a Corpus of Spontaneous Conversational Data from Cypriot Greek”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language168: 119–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2005 “An Argument for a Frame-based Approach to Politeness: Evidence from the Use of the Imperative in Cypriot Greek”. InRobin Lakoff and Ide Sachiko (eds), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, 99–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.139.10ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.139.10ter [Google Scholar]
  34. 2008 “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness”. InDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Travers, Pamela L.
    1934Mary Poppins. London: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Unceta Gómez, Luis
    2009La petición verbal en latín: Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático [‘Latin Requests: A Lexical, Semantic, and Pragmatic Study’]. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017 “Estrategias de cortesía lingüística en Querolus” [“Strategies of Linguistic Politeness in Querolus”]. Latomus76 (1): 140–161.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00029.dic
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): directive , Latin , please , politeness , request and sis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error