When please ceases to be polite

References

1. Adams, James N.
   1984 “Female Speech in Latin Comedy”. Antichthon18: 43–77. 10.1017/S0066477400003142
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066477400003142 [Google Scholar]
2. Adams, James N.
   1994a Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin. (Supplementary Volume 18.) Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adams, James N.
   1994b “Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Personal Pronouns in Classical Latin”. Transactions of the Philological Society92 (2): 103–178. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.1994.tb00430.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1994.tb00430.x [Google Scholar]
4. Barrios-Lech, Peter
   2016 Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316416983
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316416983 [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
6. De Melo, Wolfgang
   2011–2013 Plautus. (Loeb Classical Library. FiveVolumes.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dickey, Eleanor
   2006 “The Use of Latin sis as a Focus-marking Clitic Particle”. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics11: 21–25.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dickey, Eleanor
   2012 “How to Say ‘Please’ in Classical Latin”. Classical Quarterly62 (2): 731–748. 10.1017/S0009838812000286
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838812000286 [Google Scholar]
9. Dickey, Eleanor
   2015 “How to Say ‘Please’ in Post-Classical Latin: Fronto and the Importance of Archaism”. Journal of Latin Linguistics14 (1): 17–31. 10.1515/joll‑2015‑0002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
10. Dickey, Eleanor
    2016 “Politeness in Ancient Rome: Can it Help us Evaluate Modern Politeness Theories?” Journal of Politeness Research12 (2): 197–220. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0008 [Google Scholar]
11. Ferri, Rolando
    2008 “Politeness in Latin Comedy: Some Preliminary Thoughts”. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici61: 15–28.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Glare, P. G. W.
    1968–1982 Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hall, Jon
    2009 Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329063.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Halla-aho, Hilla
    2010 “Requesting in a Letter: Context, Syntax, and the Choice Between Complements in the Letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger”. Transactions of the Philological Society108 (3): 232–247. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01244.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01244.x [Google Scholar]
15. Hofmann, Johann B.
    1951 Lateinische Umgangssprache [‘Latin Colloquial Speech’]. (Third edition.) Heidelberg: C. Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Janson, Tore
    1979 Mechanisms of Language Change in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kauer, Robert and Wallace M. Lindsay
    1926 P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lodge, Gonzalez
    1926–1933 Lexicon Plautinum II. Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Malcovati, Henrica
    1953 Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae [‘Fragments of the Republican Roman Orators’]. Turin: Paravia.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Marx, Friedrich
    1904 C. Lucilii Carminum Reliquiae I [‘Remains of the Poems of C. Lucilius’]. Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Müller, Roman
    1997 Sprechen und Sprache: Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz [‘Speaking and Language: Linguistic Studies on the Dialogues of Terence’]. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Núnez, S.
    1995 “Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo” [“Material for a Sociology of the Latin Language: Terence and Imperatival Modifiers”]. Florentia Iliberritana: Revista de Estudios de Antigüedad Clásica6: 347–366.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pinkster, Harm
    1990 Latin Syntax and Semantics. (Translated byH. Mulder.) London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pinkster, Harm
    2015 The Oxford Latin Syntax I. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
25. Ramsay, William and George G. Ramsay
    1869 The Mostellaria of Plautus. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ribbeck, Otto
    1898 Comicorum Romanorum Fragmenta. (Third edition.) Leipzig: Teubner.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Risselada, Rodie
    1989 “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals”. InMarius Lavency and Dominique Longrée (eds), Proceedings of the Vth Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 367–378. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Risselada, Rodie
    1993 Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben. 10.1163/9789004408975
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408975 [Google Scholar]
29. Roesch, Sophie
    2004 “La politesse dans la correspondance de Cicéron” [“Politeness in Cicero’s Letters”]. InLéon Nadjo and Élisabeth Gavoille (eds), Epistulae antiquae III: Actes du IIIe colloque international “L’Épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens” [‘Ancient Letters III: Proceedings of the third international colloquium “Ancient epistolography and its European descendants”’], 139–152. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Schauer, Markus
    2012 Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta I [‘Fragments of the Roman tragedians I’]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. 10.13109/9783666250262
    https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666250262 [Google Scholar]
31. Terkourafi, Marina
    2002 “Politeness and Formulaicity”. Journal of Greek Linguistics3 (1): 179–201. 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
32. Terkourafi, Marina
    2004 “Testing Brown and Levinson’s Theory in a Corpus of Spontaneous Conversational Data from Cypriot Greek”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language168: 119–134.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Terkourafi, Marina
    2005 “An Argument for a Frame-based Approach to Politeness: Evidence from the Use of the Imperative in Cypriot Greek”. InRobin Lakoff and Ide Sachiko (eds), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, 99–116. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.139.10ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.139.10ter [Google Scholar]
34. Terkourafi, Marina
    2008 “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness”. InDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Travers, Pamela L.
    1934 Mary Poppins. London: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Unceta Gómez, Luis
    2009 La petición verbal en latín: Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático [‘Latin Requests: A Lexical, Semantic, and Pragmatic Study’]. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Unceta Gómez, Luis
    2017 “Estrategias de cortesía lingüística en Querolus” [“Strategies of Linguistic Politeness in Querolus”]. Latomus76 (1): 140–161.
    [Google Scholar]