1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper1 addresses the visual-pragmatic functions of the so-called common mark of abbreviation, or macron, in a section of BL Royal MS 18 D II (ff. 147v–162r) – one of the best known “deluxe” manuscripts containing Lydgate’s . Contextualised within the framework of visual pragmatics, or Pragmatics on the Page (Carroll et al. 2013), the manuscript in question is considered here as a visual text (Kendall et al. 2013) – one for which the readers construe the meaning through internalising the physical organisation of discourse. The paper attempts to unpack the ways in which the common mark of abbreviation, employed by the scribes as a visual-pragmatic marker, organises the discourse of the manuscript page on three levels of meaning: textual, interactional and metalinguistic (following Erman 2001). The pragmatic roles of the macron are then confronted with the visual forms and possible functions of its notorious graphic (i.e., the otiose stroke).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00034.rog
2020-08-28
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. British Library Royal MS 18 D II
    British Library Royal MS 18 D II. Available online at: www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Royal_MS_18_d_ii
  2. Bischoff, Bernhard
    1990 [1979]Latin Paleography: Antiquity and the Middle Ages. (Translated byDáibhí Ó Cróinín and David Ganz.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809927
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809927 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blake, Norman F.
    2002 “On Shakespeare’s Informal Language”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics3 (2): 179–204. 10.1075/jhp.3.2.02bla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.2.02bla [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Gillian and George Yule
    1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cappelli, Adriano
    1982 [1899]The Elements of Abbreviation in Medieval Latin Paleography. (Translated byDavid Heimann and Richard Kay.) Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll, Ruth, Matti Peikola, Hanna Salmi, Mari-Lisa Varila, Janne Skaffari and Risto Hiltunen
    2013 “Pragmatics on the Page: Visual Text in Late Medieval English Books”. European Journal of English Studies17 (1): 54–71. 10.1080/13825577.2013.755006
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.755006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clemens, Raymond and Timothy Graham
    2007Introduction to Manuscript Studies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    2000 “Gender Voices in the Spoken Interaction of the Past: A Pilot Study Based on Early Modern English Trial Proceedings”. InDieter Kastovsky and Arthur Mettinger (eds), The History of English in a Social Context, 53–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110810301.53
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110810301.53 [Google Scholar]
  9. Derolez, Albert
    2003The Paleography of Gothic Manuscript Books: From the Twelfth to the Early Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Erman, Britt
    1992 “Female and Male Usage of Pragmatic Expressions in Same-sex and Mixed-sex Interaction”. Language Variation and Change4 (2): 217–234. 10.1017/S0954394500000764
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000764 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2001 “Pragmatic Markers Revisited with a Focus on ‘You Know’ in Adult and Adolescent Talk”. Journal of Pragmatics33 (9): 1337–1359. Available online at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03782166000006674
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Even-Zohar, Itamar
    1982 “The Emergence of Speech Organizers in a Renovated Language: the Case of Hebrew Void Pragmatic Connectives”. InNils Eri Enkvist (ed.), Impromptu Speech: A Symposium. Papers Contributed to a Symposium on Problems in the Linguistic Study of Impromptu Speech, 179–193. Abo, Finland. 20–22November 1981 Åbo: Åbo Akademi.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox Tree, Jean E.
    2010 “Discourse Markers Across Speakers and Settings”. Language and Linguistics Compass3 (1): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fraser, Bruce
    1996 “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics6 (2): 167–190. 10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  15. Genette, Gérard
    1997 [1987]Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. (Translated byJane E. Levin. Foreword byRichard Macksey.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511549373
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549373 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghezzi, Chiara
    2014 “The Development of Discourse and Pragmatic Markers”. InChiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 10–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2002 “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English”. InPeter Trudgill and Richard J. Watts (eds), Alternative Histories of English, 210–230. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, Andreas H. and Pahta, Päivi
    2011 “Communicating Manuscripts: Authors, Scribes, Readers, Listeners and Communicating Characters”. InPäivi Pahta and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Communicating Early English Manuscripts, 3–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kendall, Judy, Manuel Portela and Glyn White
    2013 “Introducing Visual Text”. European Journal of English Studies17 (1): 1–9. 10.1080/13825577.2013.758408
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.758408 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
    1998 “Pragmatic Particles in Early Modern English Court Trials”. InRaimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag 1997. Giessen. Proceedings, 47–56. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laing, Margaret and Roger Lass
    2009 “Shape-shifting, Sound Change and the Genesis of Prodigal Writing Systems”. English Language and Linguistics13 (1): 1–31. 10.1017/S1360674308002840
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002840 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lutzky, Ursula
    2006 “Discourse Markers? Well… Delimiting the Basic Features of Discourse Markers”. Vienna English Working Papers15 (1): 3–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2012Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.227 [Google Scholar]
  24. Machan, Tim William
    2011 “The Visual Pragmatics of Code-Switching in Late Middle English Literature”. InHerbert Schendl and Laura Wright (eds), Code-Switching in Early English, 303–333. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110253368.303
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253368.303 [Google Scholar]
  25. Macksey, Richard
    1997 “Foreword”. InParatexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, xi–xx. (Translated byJane E. Levin. Foreword byRichard Macksey.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511549373.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549373.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin, Charles Trice
    1892The Record Interpreter: A Collection of Abbreviations, Latin Words and Names Used in English Historical Manuscripts and Records. London: Reeves and Turner.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Parkes, Malcolm Beckwith
    1991 “The Influence of the Concepts of Ordinatio and Compilatio on the Development of the Book”. InMary A. Rouse and Richard H. Rouse (eds), Scribes, Scripts and Readers: Studies in the Communication, Presentation and Dissemination of Medieval Texts, 35–70. London: The Hambledon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Petti, Anthony G.
    1977English Literary Hands from Chaucer to Dryden. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Roberts, Jane
    2005Guide to Scripts Used in English Writings up to 1500. London: British Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  31. Twyman, Michael
    1998The British Library Guide to Printing: History and Techniques. London: The British Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wakelin, Daniel
    2013 “Writing the Words”. InAlexandra Gillespie and Daniel Wakelin (eds), The Production of Books in England, 1350–1500, 34–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wichmann, Anne, Nicole Dehé and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
    2009 “Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics: Research at the Interface”. InDagmar Barth-Weingarten, Nicole Dehé and Anne Wichmann (eds), Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics, 1–22. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1163/9789004253223_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253223_002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00034.rog
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00034.rog
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): abbreviation , macron , otiose stroke , visual pragmatics and visual text
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error