1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Hortative constructions are good sources of discourse markers (s) because they have an engaging effect on the addressee. Such an engaging illocutionary effect enables hortative-based s to acquire diverse functions, such as attracting and maintaining the addressee’s attention and foiling the interlocutor’s initiating an utterance. The (‘well, let’s see’; literally ‘where, let’s see’) is not a genuine hortative requesting the addressee to direct visual attention to something or somewhere together with the speaker, but is a strategic signal for management of interaction, information and the speaker’s self. The detailed functions that emerged through time include marking the speaker’s intent to hold the floor by way of filling unwanted pauses, to solicit common ground, to signal responsiveness, to encourage self to better concentrate on a task, and to affirm the self’s stance on the issues at hand.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00036.rhe
2020-08-28
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beeching, Kate and Ulirch Detges
    2014 “Introduction”. InKate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
    1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Degand, Liesbeth and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
    2015 “Grammaticalization or Pragmaticalization of Discourse Markers? More Than a Terminological Issue”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics16 (1): 59–85. doi:  10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg [Google Scholar]
  5. Diewald, Gabriel
    2006 “Discourse Particles and Modal Particles as Grammatical Elements”. InKerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 403–425. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay and Mary Kay O’Connor
    1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone”. Language64: 501–538. 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraser, Bruce
    1990 “An Approach to Discourse Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics14: 383–395. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90096‑V
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V [Google Scholar]
  8. 2006 “Toward a Theory of Discourse Markers”. InKerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Haselow, Alexander
    2012 “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final Particles in English”. Language and Communication32: 182–204. doi:  10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heine, Bernd
    2013 “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics51 (6): 1205–1247. doi: 10.1515/ling.2013.0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2013.0048 [Google Scholar]
  11. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva
    2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huh, Woong
    1989 16-seyki Wuli Yeysmalpon [‘The 16th c. Korean Grammar’]. Seoul: Saem Publishing.
  14. Jucker, Andreas H. and Sara W. Smith
    1998 “And People Just You Know Like “Wow”: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.10juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.10juc [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
    2011 “On Thetical Grammar”. Studies in Language35 (4): 852–897. doi: 10.1075/sl.35.403kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.403kal [Google Scholar]
  16. Koo, Jongnam
    1999 “On the Discourse ‘eodi’”. Linguistics7 (3): 217–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koo, Hyun Jung and Seongha Rhee
    2013 “On an Emerging Paradigm of Sentence-Final Particles of Discontent: A Grammaticalization Perspective”. Language Sciences37: 70–89. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2012.07.002.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Han-gyu
    2008 “The Pragmatics of the Discourse Particle eti”. Urimalgeul: The Korean Language and Literature44: 83–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehmann, Christian
    2002 [1982]Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Leith, Dick, and George Myerson
    1989The Power of Address: Explorations in Rhetoric. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, Samuel E.
    1992A Reference Grammar of Korean. A Complete Guide to the Grammar and History of the Korean Language. Tokyo: Tuttle Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Östman, Jan-Ola
    1982 “The Symbolic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech”. InNils Erik Enkvist (ed.), Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, 147–177. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rhee, Seongha
    2008 “From Rhetoric to Grammar: Grammaticalization of Rhetorical Strategies in Korean”. Japanese/Korean Linguistics13: 359–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2012 “Context-Induced Reinterpretation and (Inter)subjectification: The Case of Grammaticalization of Sentence-Final Particles”. Language Sciences34: 284–300. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2011.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2017 “What Happens When the Will Withers: The Case of Hortative in Korean”. Lingua189/190: 46–65. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2016.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rhee, Seongha, and Hyun Jung Koo
    2017 “Audience-Blind Sentence-Enders in Korean: A Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics120: 101–121. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1999The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sung, Ki Ryun
    2013 “A Study on the Association between the 154-sheet Chunhyangga Owned by Hong Yun-pyo and the Pansori of Junggoje of the Mid-19th Century”. Journal of Pansori36: 39–92. 10.18102/jp.2013.10.36.39
    https://doi.org/10.18102/jp.2013.10.36.39 [Google Scholar]
  30. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1995 The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization. Paper presented at the12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. 13–18 August 1995. Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. van Bogaert, Julie
    2011 “I think and Other Complement-taking Mental Predicates: A Case of and for Constructional Grammaticalization”. Linguistics49 (2): 295–332. doi:  10.1515/ling.2011.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.009 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wales, Katie
    2001A Dictionary of Stylistics. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Waltereit, Richard
    2006 “The Rise of Discourse Markers in Italian: A Specific Type of Language Change”. InKerstin Fischer (ed)., Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Watts, Richard J.
    1989 “Taking the Pitcher to the ‘well’: Native Speakers’ Perception of their Use of Discourse Markers in Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics13: 203–237. 10.1016/0378‑2166(89)90092‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90092-1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Yeon, Jaehoon and Lucien Brown
    2011Korean: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yu, Chang-Don
    2000 [1964]Icoe Sacen [‘A Dictionary of the Joseon Dynasty Language’]. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00036.rhe
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00036.rhe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attention maintaining , common-ground soliciting , discourse marker , floor-holding , hortative and stance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error