1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In Italian, the adjective (‘right’) has performed the discourse function of response marker since at least 1613 (DELI 2008: 671). In this paper, I argue that the adjective has recently undertaken a new process of discoursivization, defined as the diachronic process that ends in discourse (Ocampo 2006: 317). In particular, I maintain that may also serve the function of invariant tag (Andersen 2001), a linguistic item appended to a statement for the purpose of seeking mutual agreement, verification or corroboration of a claim (Millar and Brown 1979). Through diachronic lexicographic, quantitative and qualitative analyses carried out over a range of historical and contemporary dictionaries and language corpora of different varieties, the results will show that, although the use of as invariant tag is currently undocumented, records of such a use are in fact found since 1990. I explore whether there are positive correlations between the use of ? in English and the use of ? in real use Italian and AV dialogues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00037.vio
2020-08-28
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aijmer, Karen
    1997 “I think: An English Modal Particle”. InToril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889932.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, Gisle
    2001Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.84 [Google Scholar]
  3. Battaglia, Salvatore
    1961–2002Grande dizionario della lingua italiana. Torino: UTET.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan and Dwight Atkinson
    1994 “ARCHER and its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers”. InUdo Fries, Peter Schneider and Gunnel Tottie (eds), Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the 14th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zurich 1993, 1–13. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Accessed9 March 2018at: www.projects.alc.manchester.ac.uk/archer/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cannella, Mario
    (ed.) 2007Lo Zingarelli 2008. Vocabolario della lingua italiana di Nicola Zingarelli con cd-rom. Bologna: Zanichelli.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cinetel
    Cinetel 2016Dati annuali cinema. Accessed9 March 2018at: www.anica.it/web/ricerche-e-studi/dati-annuali-cinema
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cresti, Emanuela and Massimo Moneglia
    (eds) 2005c-oral-rom: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.15 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cusatelli, Giorgio
    (ed.) 1965Dizionario Garzanti della lingua italiana. Milano: Aldo Garzanti Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Mauro, Tullio, Federico Mancini, Massimo Vedovelli and Miriam Voghera
    (eds) 1993lip: Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Parlato. Milano: Etaslibri. (= lip.) Accessed16 May 2017at: www.parlaritaliano.it/index.php/it/volip
    [Google Scholar]
  11. De Mauro, Tullio
    2000Dizionario della Lingua Italiana De Mauro. Versione elettronica. Torino: Paravia.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Degand, Lisbeth and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
    2015 Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics16 (1): 59–85. 10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.03deg [Google Scholar]
  13. di Devoto, Giacomo and Gian Carlo Oli
    2008Il Devoto-Oli. Vocabolario della lingua italiana 2009. (Versione elettronica.) Firenze: Le Monnier.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2013Il Devoto-Oli. Vocabolario della lingua italiana 2014. (Versione elettronica.) Firenze: Le Monnier.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Diewald, Gabriele
    2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics49 (2): 365–90. 10.1515/ling.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
  16. Erman, Britt and Kotsinas Ulla-Britt
    1993 “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know”. Studier I Modern Språkvetenskap10: 76–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frank-Job, Barbara
    2006 “A Dynamic–Interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. InKerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gabrielli, Aldo
    2011Grande Dizionario Italiano–- Speciale 150 anni. Milano: Hoepli. Accessed6 December 2017at: www.hoepli.it
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gaeta, Livio, Claudio Iacobini, D. Ricca, Marco Angster, Aurelio De Rosa and Giovanni Schirato
    2013 MIDIA: A Balanced Diachronic Corpus of Italian. Paper presented at21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, August 5–9 2013. (= MIDIA, Morfologia dell’italiano in Diacronia). Accessed6 December 2017at: www.corpusmidia.unito.it
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gardner, Rod
    2001When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.92
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grande dizionario di Italiano
    Grande dizionario di Italiano. Milano: Garzanti Linguistica. Accessed6 December 2017at: www.garzantilinguistica.it
  22. Günthner, Susanne and Katrin Mutz
    2004 “Grammaticalization vs. Pragmaticalization? The Development of Pragmatic Markers in German and Italian”. InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from Its Fringes and Its Components, 77–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
    2008Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues; A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Holmes, Janet
    1982 “The Functions of Tag Questions”. English Language Research Journal3: 40–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003 [1993]Grammaticalization. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  26. Il Grande Dizionario Garzanti della lingua italiana
    Il Grande Dizionario Garzanti della lingua italiana 1987 Milano: Garzanti.
  27. Lenker, Ursula
    2000 “Soþlice and witodlice: Discourse Markers in Old English”. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 229–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.12len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.12len [Google Scholar]
  28. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
    2009 “Grammaticalisation et pragmaticalisation des connecteurs de concession en français: cependant, toutefois, pourtant”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique54 (1–2): 7–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McEnery, Tony and Andrew Wilson
    2001 [1996]Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Migliorini, Bruno
    1950 “Appendice al Dizionario moderno”. InAlfredo Panzini (ed.), Dizionario moderno (nona edizione), 765–997. Milano: Hoepli.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Millar, Martin and Keith Brown
    1979 “Tag Questions in Edinburgh Speech”. Linguistische Berichte60 (X): 24–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ocampo, Francisco
    2006 “Movement Towards Discourse is Not Grammaticalization: The Evolution of claro from Adjective to Discourse Particle in Spoken Spanish”. InNuria Sagarra and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 308–19. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Onelli, Corinna, Proietti Domenico, Seidenari Corrado, Tamburini Fabio
    2006 “The DiaCORIS project: a diachronic corpuss of written Italian”. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1212–1215. Genova. 22–28May 2006 Genova: LREC.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Onodera, Noriko O.
    1995 “Diachronic Analysis of Japanese Discourse Markers”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics, 393–437. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.22ono
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.22ono [Google Scholar]
  35. 2000 “Development of Demo Type Connectives and Na Elements: Two Extremes of Japanese Discourse Markers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1 (1): 27–55. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.05ono
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.05ono [Google Scholar]
  36. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed9 March 2018at: www.oed.com
  37. Panzini, Alfredo
    1905Dizionario Moderno delle parole che non si trovano nei dizionari comuni. Milano: Hoepli.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pinto de Lima, José
    2002 “Grammaticalization, Subjectification and the Origin of Phatic Markers”. InIlse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 363–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.23pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.23pin [Google Scholar]
  39. Rossini Favretti, Rema, Fabio Tamburini and Cristiana De Santis
    2002 “A Corpus of Written Italian: A Defined and a Dynamic Model”. InAndrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), A Rainbow of Corpora: Corpus Linguistics and the Languages of the World, 27–38. (=coris, Corpus di italiano scritto.) Lincom-Europa: Munich. Accessed6 December 2017atcorpora.dslo.unibo.it/TCORIS/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sabatini, Francesco and Vittorio Coletti
    2008Il Sabatini Coletti. Dizionario della Lingua Italiana 2007 Milano: Rizzoli Larousse. Accessed6 December 2017at: www.dizionari.corriere.it
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Scarano, Antonietta and Sabrina Signorini
    2005 “Corpus Linguistics and Diachronic Variability: A Study on Italian Spoken Language Corpora from the 1960s until Nowadays”. InJohannes Kabatek, Claus D. Pusch and Wolfgang Raible (eds), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik II: Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft / Romance Corpus Linguistics II: Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, 191–202. Tübingen, Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Stammer, Johann, Ida Tucci and Sabrina Signorini
    2004 Il restauro e l’archiviazione elettronica del primo corpus di italiano parlato: il corpus Stammerjohann. Atti delle Giornate del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale – XIV, 119–126. Roma: Esagrafica. Accessed6 December 2017at: lablita.dit.unifi.it/corpora/imdi/stam/
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tommaseo, Nicolò and Bernardo Bellini
    2008 “Dizionario della lingua italiana con oltre centomila giunte a precedenti dizionari. Raccolte da Nicolò Tommaseo, Giuseppe Campi, Giuseppe Meini, Pietro Fanfani e da molti altri distinti filologi e scienziati. 1861–1879”. InMario Cannella (ed.), Lo Zingarelli 2008. Vocabolario della lingua italiana di Nicola Zingarelli con CD-ROM. 2007. Bologna: Zanichelli.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language57: 33–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 1995 “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization”. Paper presented at theICHL XII, Manchester. Version of 11/97. Accessed6 December 2017at: www.stanford.edu/~traugott/ect-papersonline.html
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2010 “Revisiting Subjectification and Intersubjectification”. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and B. R. Dasher
    2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Viola, Lorella
    2017 “A Corpus-based Investigation of Language Change in Italian. The Case of grazie/ringraziare di and grazie/ringraziare per”. Journal of Historical Linguistics7 (3): 372–88. 10.1075/jhl.16022.vio
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.16022.vio [Google Scholar]
  49. 2016 “Stai scherzando? ‘Are You Kidding?’ Investigating the Influence of Dubbing on the Italian Progressive”. Italian Journal of Linguistics28 (2): 181–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. . In press. “On the use of sì? ‘yes?’ as invariant follow-up in Italian: A historical corpus-based account of pragmatic language change”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vocabolario Degli Accademici Della Crusca
    Vocabolario Degli Accademici Della Crusca. Quarta edizione. 1729–1738. Firenze: Domenico Maria Manni.
  52. Vocabolario Degli Accademici Della Crusca
    Vocabolario Degli Accademici Della Crusca. Quinta edizione. 1863–1923. Firenze: Tipografia Galileiana.
  53. Vocabolario Treccani
    Vocabolario Treccani. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana. Accessed6 December 2017at: www.treccani.it/vocabolario/
  54. Waltereit, Richard
    2006 “The Rise of Discourse Markers in Italian: A Specific Type of Language Change”. InKerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wischer, Ilse
    2000 “Grammaticalization Versus Lexicalization: ‘Methinks’ There is Some Confusion”. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 355–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.17wis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.17wis [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00037.vio
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00037.vio
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error