Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In Section 1 of my introduction to this Special Issue, I define the concept of semantic–pragmatic cycles, a relatively recently discovered phenomenon, drawing a distinction between two sub-types: onomasiological and semasiological cycles. Semantic–pragmatic cycles are contrasted with the more widely known (morpho-)syntactic cycles such as the Negative Cycle (or Jespersen Cycle), and I discuss possible connections between these two types of cycles. Finally, I raise some questions for further research. In Section 2, I outline the empirical and/or theoretical contribution of each of the six papers that follow – considering, in particular, how they contribute to elucidating the role of pragmatics in cyclic change.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bouzouita, Miriam , Anne Breitbarth , Lieven Danckaert and Elisabeth Witzenhausen
    (eds) 2019Cycles in Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198824961.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198824961.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bybee, Joan , Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
    1994The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cuenca, Maria Josep
    1992–93 “Sobre l’evolució dels nexes conjuntius in català” [“On the Evolution of the Conjunctive Nexus in Catalan”]. Llengua and Literatura5: 173–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Smet, Hendrik , Frauke D’hoendt , Lauren Fonteyn and Kristel Van Goethem
    2018 “The Changing Functions of Competing Forms: Attraction and Differentiation”. Cognitive Linguistics29 (2): 197–234. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0025 [Google Scholar]
  5. Detges, Ulrich
    2018 “Strong Pronouns in Modern Spoken French. Cliticization, Constructionalization, Grammaticalization?”. Linguistics56 (5): 1059–1098. 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0017 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2020 “Future Markers in Western Romance: Cyclic Change, Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Competition”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics21 (2): 290–315. 10.1075/jhp.00045.det
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00045.det [Google Scholar]
  7. Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
    2002 “Grammaticalization vs Reanalysis: A Semantic–Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21 (2): 151–195. 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016 “Grammaticalization and Pragmaticalization”. In Susann Fischer and Christoph Gabriel (eds), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, 635–657. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110311860‑024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110311860-024 [Google Scholar]
  9. Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas
    1993 “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know”. Studier i modern språkvetenskap10: 76–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fedriani, Chiara and Chiara Ghezzi
    2014 “The Pragmaticalization of Verbs of Movement and Exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of Development from Lexicon to Pragmatics”. In Ilona Badescu and Mihaela Popescu (eds), Studia linguistica et philologica: In honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Livescu [‘Studies in Linguistic Philology: In Honour of University Professor Dr. Michaela Livescu’], 116–139. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth Beale
    2007 “The Emergence of Emphatic ne in Conversational Swiss French”. Journal of French Language Studies17 (3): 249–275. 10.1017/S0959269507002992
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507002992 [Google Scholar]
  12. von der Gabelentz, Georg
    1901Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse [‘Linguistics: Tasks, Methods and Results So Far’]. (Second edition.) Leipzig: Chr. Herm. Tauchnitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. van Gelderen, Elly
    2004Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.71 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2011The Linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2017 “Cyclicity”. In Adam Ledgeway and Ian Roberts (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, 467–488. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279070.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279070.023 [Google Scholar]
  16. (ed) 2009Cyclical Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146 [Google Scholar]
  17. (ed) 2016Cyclical Change Continued. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gergel, Remus
    2016 “Modality and Gradation: Comparing the Sequel of Developments in rather and eher ”. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change Continued, 319–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.227.11ger
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227.11ger [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli
    2014 “Deverbal Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. quaeso and Italian prego): The Cyclic Nature of Functional Developments”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 61–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  20. Grossman, Eitan and Stéphane Polis
    2014 “On the Pragmatics of Subjectification: The Emergence and Modalization of an Allative Future in Ancient Egyptian”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia46 (1): 25–63. 10.1080/03740463.2014.956007
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.956007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2008Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs. Oxford and Leiden: Elsevier and Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013 “Negation in the History of French”. In David Willis , Christopher Lucas and Anne Breitbarth (eds), The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, 51–76. (VolumeI: Case Studies.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602537.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602537.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014 “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: Old French ja between Latin iam and Modern French déjà ”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2018a “Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Examples from Romance”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Oscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, 51–77. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004375420_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420_004 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018b “The Expression of Clause Negation: From Latin to Early French”. In Anne Carlier and Céline Guillot-Barbance (eds), Latin tardif/français ancien: continuïtés et ruptures [‘Late Latin/Old French: Continuity and Radical Change’], 267–295. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110551716‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551716-014 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2018c “The Role of Inferencing in Semantic–Pragmatic Cyclicity: The Case of Latin nunc and French or/maintenant ”. Open Linguistics4: 127–146. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2020a “Cyclic Changes to the French Negative Coordinating Conjunction”. Paper presented at the53rd Annual Conference of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. 26 August to 1 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2020b “De ainz à plutôt: un cycle de pragmaticalisation” [“From ainz to plutôt: A Cycle of Pragmaticalization”]. In Olga Inkova (ed.), Autour de la reformulation [‘Studies on Reformulation’]. Geneva: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Jacqueline Visconti
    2009 “On the Diachrony of ‘Reinforced’ Negation in French and Italian”. In Corinne Rossari , Claudia Ricci and Adriana Spiridon (eds), Grammaticalization and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, 137–171. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004253193_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253193_009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Heine, Bernd
    1997Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Heine, Bernd , Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Jespersen, Otto
    1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst and Søn.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kiparsky, Paul and Cleo Condoravdi
    2006 “Tracking Jespersen’s Cycle”. In Mark Janse , Brian D. Joseph and Angela Ralli (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, 172–197. Mytilene: Doukas.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Larrivée, Pierre and Richard A. Ingham
    (eds) 2011The Evolution of Negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238617
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238617 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lehmann, Christian
    1982 “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e stileXX (3): 303–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lucas, Christopher
    2007 “Jespersen’s Cycle in Arabic and Berber”. Transactions of the Philological Society105 (3): 398–431. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2007.00189.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2007.00189.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Meillet, Antoine
    1921 “L’évolution des formes grammaticales” [“The Evolution of Grammatical Forms”]. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale [‘Historical Linguistics and General Linguistics’], 130–148. Paris: Honoré Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Norde, Muriel
    2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Raible, Wolfgang
    1996 “Kognition und Sprachwandel” [“Cognition and Language Change”]. Akademie-Journal1: 38–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reinöhl, Uta and Nikolaus Himmelmann
    2017 “Renewal: A Figure of Speech or a Process sui generis?”. Language93 (2): 381–413. 10.1353/lan.2017.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0018 [Google Scholar]
  41. Roberts, Ian
    1992 “A Formal Account of Grammaticalization in the History of Romance Futures”. Folia Linguistica Historica13 (1/2): 219–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rosemeyer, Malte and Eitan Grossman
    2017 “The Road to Auxiliariness Revisited: The grammaticalization of finish anteriors in Spanish”. Diachronica34 (3): 516–558. 10.1075/dia.16024.ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16024.ros [Google Scholar]
  44. Rupp, Laura and Sali Tagliamonte
    2017 “ This Here Town: Evidence for the Development of the English Determiner System from a Vernacular Demonstrative Construction in York English”. English Language and Linguistics23 (1): 81–103. 10.1017/S1360674317000326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000326 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten , Natalia Levshina , Susanne Maria Michaelis and Ilja. A. Seržant
    (eds) 2019Explanation in Linguistic Typology: Diachronic Sources, Functional Motivations and the Nature of the Evidence. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwegler, Armin
    1990Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110872927
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872927 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwenter, Scott A.
    2006 “Fine-Tuning Jespersen’s Cycle”. In Betty J. Birner and Gregory Ward (eds), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.80.19sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80.19sch [Google Scholar]
  48. Scivoletto, Giulio
    2020 “Semasiological Cyclicity in the Evolution of Discourse Markers: A Case from Sicilian”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics21 (2): 237–263. 10.1075/jhp.00043.sci
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00043.sci [Google Scholar]
  49. Van der Auwera, Johan
    2009 “The Jespersen Cycles”. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change, 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146.05auw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146.05auw [Google Scholar]
  50. Vindenes, Urd
    2018 “Cyclic Renewal of Demonstratives”. Studies in Language42 (3): 641–668. 10.1075/sl.17047.vin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17047.vin [Google Scholar]
  51. Wallage, Phillip
    2017Negation in Early English: Grammatical and Functional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316335185
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335185 [Google Scholar]
  52. Waltereit, Richard
    2020 “Parallels Between the Negative Cycle and the Rise of Interrogative Marking in French”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics21 (2): 264–289. 10.1075/jhp.00044.wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00044.wal [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error