Parallels between the negative cycle and the rise of interrogative marking in French

References

1. Armstrong, Nigel
   2001 Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French: A Comparative Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.8
   https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.8 [Google Scholar]
2. Authier, Jean-Marc
   1993 “Nonquantificational Wh and Weakest Crossover”. Linguistic Inquiry24 (1): 161–168.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bailey, Laura
   2013 “Question Particles: Thai, Japanese and English”. Linguistica Atlantica32: 34–51.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ball, Rodney
   2000 Colloquial French Grammar. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Behnstedt, Peter
   1973 Viens-tu? Est-ce que tu viens? Tu viens?. Formen und Strukturen des direkten Fragesatzes im Französischen [‘Do You Come? Forms and Structures of the French Direct Interrogative’]. Tübingen: TBL.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bencini, Giulia
   2003 “Toward a Diachronic Typology of Yes/no Question Constructions with Particles”. Chicago Linguistic Society39: 604–621.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Birner, Betty
   2006 “Semantic and Pragmatic Contributions to Information Status”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia38 (1): 14–32. 10.1080/03740463.2006.10412201
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2006.10412201 [Google Scholar]
8. Boucher, Paul
   2010 “L’interrogation partielle en français: l’interface syntaxe / sémantique” [“Wh-questions in French: The Syntax–Semantics Interface”]. Syntaxe et sémantique11: 55–82. 10.3917/ss.011.0055
   https://doi.org/10.3917/ss.011.0055 [Google Scholar]
9. Cohen, Ariel
   2007 “Incredulity Questions”. In Ron Artstein and Laure Vieu (eds), Decalog 2007: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, 133–140. 30Mayto1June 2007 Rovereto, Italy.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Coveney, Aidan
    1996 Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Bristol: Elm Bank.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dahl, Östen
    1979 “Typology of Sentence Negation”. Linguistics17 (1–2): 79–106.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Detges, Ulrich
    2003 “La grammaticalisation des constructions de négation dans une perspective onomasiologique, ou: la déconstruction d’une illusion d’optique” [“Grammaticalisation of Negation Constructions in an Onomasiological Perspective, or: The Deconstruction of an Optical Illusion”]. In Peter Koch and Andreas Blank (eds), Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie [‘Cognitive Romance Onomasiology and Semasiology’], 213–233. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110911626.213
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911626.213 [Google Scholar]
13. Detges, Ulrich
    2018 “Strong Pronouns in Modern Spoken French: Cliticization, Constructionalization, Grammaticalization?”. Linguistics56 (5): 1059–1098. 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0017 [Google Scholar]
14. Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
    2002 “Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis. A Semantic–Pragmatic Account of Functional Change in Grammar”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21 (2): 151–195. 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
15. Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
    2008 “Syntactic Change From Within and From Without Syntax: A Usage-based Analysis”. In Ulrich Detges and Richard Waltereit (eds), The Paradox of Grammatical Change: Perspectives from Romance, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.293
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.293 [Google Scholar]
16. Féry, Caroline
    2001 “Focus and Phrasing in French”. In Caroline Féry and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 153–181. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. 10.1515/9783050080116.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050080116.153 [Google Scholar]
17. Engdahl, Elisabeth
    2006 “Information Packaging in Questions”. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics6: 93–111.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie B.
    2007 “The Emergence of Emphatic ne in Conversational Swiss French”. Journal of French Language Studies17 (3): 249–275. 10.1017/S0959269507002992
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507002992 [Google Scholar]
19. Foulet, Lucien
    1921 “Comment ont évolué les formes de l’interrogation” [“How Interrogative Forms Have Developed”]. Romania47: 243–348. 10.3406/roma.1921.4437
    https://doi.org/10.3406/roma.1921.4437 [Google Scholar]
20. van Gelderen, Elly
    2011 “Cyclical Change: An Introduction”. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Greive, Artur
    1974 Neufranzösische Formen der Satzfrage im Kontext [‘Modern French Forms of the Yes/No Question in Context’]. Mainz and Wiesbaden: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Grevisse, Maurice
    1990 Le bon usage [‘The Good Usage’]. (Twelfth edition.) Gembloux: Duculot.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hagstrom, Paul and Svetlana McCoy
    2002 “Presuppositions, wh-Questions, and Discourse Particles: Russian ze ”. Paper presented atFASl-11.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hamblin, Charles L.
    1973 “Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language10 (1): 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2001 “Syntax in Interaction: Form and Function of Yes/No Interrogatives in Spoken Standard French”. Studies in Language25 (3): 463–520. 10.1075/sl.25.3.04mos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.3.04mos [Google Scholar]
26. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2014 “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: Old French ‘ja’ between Latin IAM and Modern French ‘déjà’”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Romance, 39–165. (Volume9.) Oxford: University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681600.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
27. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2016 The Structure of Modern Standard French: A Student Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2018 “Cyclic Phenomena in the Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Examples from Romance”. In Salvador Pons Bordería and Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds), Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, Studies in Pragmatics, 51–77. (Volume18.) Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004375420_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420_004 [Google Scholar]
29. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Jacqueline Visconti
    2009 “On the Diachrony of ‘Reinforced’ Negation in French and Italian”. In Corinne Rossari , Claudia Ricci and Adriana Spiridon (eds), Grammaticalization and Pragmatics, 137–171. Bingley: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Heine, Bernd
    2002 “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
32. Jespersen, Otto
    1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kaiser, Egbert
    1980 Strukturen der Frage im Französischen: Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchungen zur direkten Frage im Französischen des 15. Jahrhunderts (1450–1500) [‘Interrogative Structures in French: Synchronic and Diachronic Research on the Direct Question in 15th Century French (1450–1500)’]. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Koch, Peter
    1993 “Le ‘chinook’ roman face à l’empirie. Y a-t-il une conjugaison objective en français, en italien et en espagnol et une conjugaison subjective prédéterminante en français?” [“Romance ‘Chinook’ Put to the Test: Is There Object Agreement in French, Italian, and Spanish, as well as Leftward Subject Agreement in French?”]. In Gerold Hilty (ed.), Actes du XXe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, Université de Zurich (6–11 avril 1992) [‘Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Romance Linguistics and Philology’], 169–190. (Volume3.) Tübingen/Basel: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Krifka, Manfred
    2011 “Questions”. In Klaus von Heusinger , Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner (eds), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 1742–1758. (Volume2.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Krifka, Manfred
    2012 “Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions”. In Chungmin Lee , Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Krifka (eds), Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Krifka, Manfred
    2017 “Negated Polarity Questions as Denegations of Assertions”. In Chungmin Lee , Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Krifka (eds), Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, 359–398. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10106‑4_18
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_18 [Google Scholar]
38. Mackenzie, Ian
    2018 “The Case of Special qui ”. Journal of French Language Studies28 (1): 21–41. 10.1017/S0959269517000035
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269517000035 [Google Scholar]
39. Myers, Lindsey
    2007 WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of their Form and Function. PhD thesis. University of Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nilsenová, Marie
    2006 Rises and Falls: Studies in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Intonation. Amsterdam: ILLC.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Offord, Malcolm
    1976 “Negation in »Berinus«: A Contribution to the Study of Negation in Fourteenth Century French”. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie92: 313–385. 10.1515/zrph.1976.92.3‑4.313
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1976.92.3-4.313 [Google Scholar]
42. Poschmann, Claudia
    2015 Echo-Fragen: Vom Satztyp zur Fragebedeutung [‘Echo Questions: From Sentence Type to Interrogative Meaning’]. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110421477
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110421477 [Google Scholar]
43. Reis, Marga
    2017 “On the Analysis of Echo Questions”. Florida Linguistics Papers4 (3).
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rouquier, Magali
    2002 “Les interrogatives en ‘qui/qu’est-ce qui/que’ en ancien français et en moyen français” [“Qui/qu’est-ce qui/que Interrogatives in Old and in Modern French”]. Cahiers de grammaire27: 97–120.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Seelbach, Dieter
    1983 Linguistik und französischer Grammatikunterricht: Eine Einführung für Lehrende und Studierende [‘Linguistics and French Grammar Teaching: An Introduction for Teachers and for Students’]. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Siouffi, Gilles
    2012 “La question en est-ce que: Une histoire de ‘dé-dialogisation’?” [“The est-ce que Interrogative: A History of ‘De-dialogisation’?”]. In Jacques Bres , Aleksandra Nowakowska , Jean-Marc Sarale and Sophie Sarrazin (eds), Dialogisme: langue, discours [‘Dialogism: Language, Discourse’], 47–60. Brussels: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Söll, Ludwig
    1971 “Der neufranzösische direkte Fragesatz in einem Corpus der Kindersprache” [“The Modern French Direct Interrogative in a Children’s Language Corpus”]. In Eugenio Coseriu and Wolf-Dieter Stempel (eds), Sprache und Geschichte. Festschrift für Harri Meier zum 65. Geburtstag [‘Language and History: A Festschrift for Harri Meier on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday’], 493–506. München: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Tesnière, Lucien de
    1959 Eléments de syntaxe structural [‘Elements of Structural Syntax’]. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Waltereit, Richard
    2018 “Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the est-ce que Question”, Open Linguistics4: 56–69. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0004 [Google Scholar]