1887
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, which examines the cyclic evolution of future markers in Western Romance (mainly French and Spanish), I make use of the “satellite model” in the version proposed by Koch and Oesterreicher (1996) to capture the complex interplay between functional change, synchronic variation and sociolinguistic evolution. This model conceives of linguistic cycles as push-chains. Thus, I will argue, young future markers originally arise from argumentative patterns that are aimed at validating announcements concerning the speaker’s projected actions. The rationale behind these mechanisms is pragmatic efficiency rather than the functioning of the language system itself. Thus, linguistic systems usually contain more items than are technically needed to keep the language system operative. In the categories of the satellite model, a certain number of younger constructions (“satellites”) exist side-by-side with a canonical construction (i.e., a functionally and sociolinguistically unmarked item), which one of the former may eventually oust from its privileged position. As I will show by sketching the evolution of the numerous future markers of peninsular Spanish from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, this perspective allows a fresh look at the evolution of cycles. More often than not, the competition between the canonical form and its satellites does not cause the former’s replacement by the latter; rather, it normally ends with the obsolescence of one the satellites involved. The eventual replacement of the canonical form by a satellite – that is, the completion of a full cycle – represents a very special (and relatively rare) case.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00045.det
2021-03-03
2021-05-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Philip and Chris Corne
    1982Isle de France Creole: Affinities and Origins. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benveniste, Émile
    1974Problèmes de linguistique générale [‘Problems in General Linguistics’]. (VolumeII.) Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berschin, Helmut
    1987 “Futuro analítico y futuro sintético en el español peninsular colombiano” [‘Analytic and Synthetic Future in Peninsular and Columbian Spanish’]. Lingüística Española Actual9: 101–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blas Arroyo, José Luis
    2008 “The variable expression of future tense in Peninsular Spanish: The present (and future) of inflectional forms in the Spanish spoken in a bilingual region”. Language Variation and Change20: 85–126. 10.1017/S095439450800001X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450800001X [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan , Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
    1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cartagena, Nelson
    1994 “Das Tempussystem der spanischen Gegenwartssprache” [‘The Tense System of Contemporary Spanish’]. In Rolf Thieroff and Joachim Ballweg (eds), Tense Systems in European Languages, 173–190. (Volume1). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 “Grammaire, sémantique et pragmatique des temps du futur en espagnol” [‘Grammar, semantics and pragmatics of future tenses in Spanish’]. In Laura Baranzini (ed.), Le futur dans les langues romanes [‘The Future in the Romance Languages’], 105–132. Frankfurt, M.: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Company Company, Concepción
    2006 “Tiempos de formación romance II. Los futuros y condicionales” [‘Tense Markers of Romance Origin II: Futures and Conditionals’]. In Company Company, Concepción (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española [‘Historical Syntax of the Spanish Language’], 349–418. (Volume1.) Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Corne, Chris
    1977Seychelles Creole Grammar: Elements for Indian Ocean Proto-Creole Reconstruction. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coseriu, Eugenio
    1976Das romanische Verbalsystem [‘The Verbal System of the Romance Languages’]. (Edited by Hansbert Bertsch .) Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Damoiseau, Robert
    1987 “Situation de communication et fonctionnement de la langue en créole haïtien” [‘Communicative Situation and Language Functioning in Haitian Creole’]. Études Créoles10: 90–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Detges, Ulrich and Richard Waltereit
    2016 “Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization”. In Susann Fischer and Christoph Gabriel (eds), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, 635–657. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110311860‑024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110311860-024 [Google Scholar]
  13. Detges, Ulrich
    1999 “Wie entsteht Grammatik? Kognitive und pragmatische Determinanten der Grammatikalisierung von Tempusmarkern” [‘How Does Grammar Come About? Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of the Grammaticalization of Tense Markers’]. In Jürgen Lang and Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in denromanischen Sprachen [‘Reanalysis and Grammaticalization in the Romance Languages’], 31–52. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2004 “How Cognitive is Grammaticalization? The History of the Catalan perfet perifràstic ”. In Olga Fischer , Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds), Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization, 211–227. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.59.11det
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59.11det [Google Scholar]
  15. Díaz Peralta, Marina
    1997 “Variación sintáctica y estilo discursivo: La expresión de la futuridad en el español de las Palmas de Gran Canaria” [‘Syntactic Variation and Discourse Style: The Expression of Futurity in the Spanish of Las Palmas/Gran Canaria’]. Lingüística Española Actual19: 185–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fleischman, Suzanne
    1982The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1983 “From Pragmatics to Grammar: Diachronic Reflections on Complex Pasts and Futures in Romance”. Lingua60: 183–214. 10.1016/0024‑3841(83)90074‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90074-8 [Google Scholar]
  18. Givón, Talmy
    1976 “Topic, Pronoun and Grammatical Agreement”. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 149–185. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1979On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gougenheim, Georges
    1971 [1929]Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française [‘Studies on the Verbal Periphrases of the French Language’]. Paris: Nizet.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heath, Jeffrey
    1998 “Hermit Crabs: Formal Renewal of Morphology by Phonologically Mediated Affix Substitution”. Language74: 728–759. 10.2307/417001
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heine, Bernd
    1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heine, Bernd
    1997Possession. Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  24. Helland, Hans Petter
    1995 “Futur simple et futur périphrastique: du sens aux emplois” [‘Simple Future and Periphrastic Future: From Meaning to Usage’]. Revue Romane30: 3–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hernández, César
    1971Sintaxis española [‘Spanish Syntax’]. Valladolid: Colegio de España.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. (Volume1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  27. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1996 “Sprachwandel und expressive Mündlichkeit” [‘Linguistic Change and Oral Expressivity’]. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik26 (102): 64–96. 10.1007/BF03396105
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396105 [Google Scholar]
  28. Koch, Peter
    1995Zukunft und Mündlichkeit. Zu Genese und Verlust von Futurbildungen in romanischen Varietäten [‘Future and Orality: On the Rise and Loss of Future Contructions within Certain Romance Varieties’]. Paper presented inBamberg11/28/1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1997 “Diglossie in Frankreich?” [‘Diglossia in France?’]. In Winfried Engler (ed.), Frankreich an der Freien Universität [‘France at the Free University of Berlin’], 219–249. Stuttgart: Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuteva, Tania A.
    1995 “The Auxiliation Constraint and Reference”. In Richard Geiger (ed.), Reference in Multidisciplinary Perspective: Philosophical Object, Cognitive Subject, Intersubjective Process, 374–386. Hildesheim: Olms.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2001Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Laurendeau, Paul
    2000 “L’alternance futur simple/futur périphrastique: Une hypothèse modale” [‘The Alternation between Simple Future and Periphrastic Future: A Modal Hypothesis’]. Verbum22: 277–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lehmann, Christian
    2002Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lindschouw, Jan
    2017 “Tense, Aspect, Mood”. In Andreas Dufter and Elisabeth Stark (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, 397–448. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110377088‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-011 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lope Blanch, Juan Miguel
    1983 “La reducción del paradigma verbal en el español de México” [‘The Reduction of the Verbal Paradigm in the Spanish of Mexico’]. In Juan M. Lope Blanch (ed.), Estudios sobre el español de México [‘Studies on the Spanish of Mexico’], 145–159. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lorenz, Bettina
    1989Konkurrenz zwischen dem futur simple und dem futur périphrastique im gesprochenen Französisch der Gegenwart [‘Competition between the Simple Future and the Periphrastic Future in Contemporary French’]. Münster: Kleinheinrich.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lorenz, Sabine
    1988Die Konkurrenz zwischen dem futur simple und dem futur périphrastique im geschriebenen Französisch der Gegenwart. Münster: Kleinheinrich.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ludwig, Ralph
    1988Modalität und Modus im gesprochenen Französisch [‘Modality and Mood in Spoken French’]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Maingueneau, Dominique
    1999Précis de Grammaire pour les Concours [‘Grammar Handbook for State Exams’]. Paris: Dunod.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Massot, Benjamin
    2003Éléments linguistiques pour une vision diglossique du français contemporain [‘Linguistic Elements for a Diglossia Account of Contemporary French’]. Mém. de D.E.A., Université Paris 8 Vincennes. Available online at: ciel8.free.fr/SPIP-v1-7-2/IMG/pdf/DEA_massot.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Meier, Harri , Leopoldo Sáez Godoy , Klaus Hunnius , Raúl Avila and Larry Grimes
    1968 “Futur und Zukunft im Spanischen” [‘Future and Futurity in Spanish’]. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen119 (204): 332–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Patard, Adeline , Walter de Mulder and Natalia Grabar
    2017 “Le futur synthétique français a-t-il eu un sens intentionnel?” [‘Does the Synthetic Future of French Have an Intentional Meaning?’]. In Laura Baranzini (ed.), Le futur dans les langues romanes [‘The Future in the Romance Languages’], 15–47. Frankfurt, M.: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Petré, Peter
    2016 “Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation. Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [BE going to INF]”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics30: 115–146. 10.1075/bjl.30.06pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.30.06pet [Google Scholar]
  44. Pitloun, Petr
    2005 “La perífrasis ir a + infinitivo y la expresión de la posterioridad en el habla culta de Costa Rica” [‘The Periphrasis ir a + Infinitive and the Expression of Posteriority in Costa Rican Educated Speech’]. Filología y Lingüística31: 233–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Poplack, Shana and Nathalie Dion
    2009 “Prescription vs. Praxis. The Evolution of Future Temporal Reference in French”. Language85: 557–587. 10.1353/lan.0.0149
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0149 [Google Scholar]
  46. Reed, Cory A.
    1991 “Cervantes and the Novelization of Drama: Tradition and Innovation in the Entremeses ”. Bulletin of the Cervantes Society of America11 (1): 61–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Reinöhl, Uta and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
    2017 “Renewal: A Figure of Speech or a Process Sui Generis?”, Language93: 381–413. 10.1353/lan.2017.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0018 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rohlfs, Gerhard
    1949Historische Grammatik der italienischen Sprache und ihrer Mundarten [‘Historical Grammar of the Italian Language and its Vernaculars’]. (VolumeII: Formenlehre und Syntax.) Bern: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schlupp, Daniel
    1997Modalités prédicatives, modalités aspectuelles et auxiliaires en créole à base lexicale française de la Guyane française. XVIIIe – XXe siècles [‘Predicative Modalities, Aspectual Modalities and Auxiliaries in the French-Based Creole of French Guyana. 18th-20th Century’]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110931624
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110931624 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schrott, Angela
    1997Futurität im Französischen der Gegenwart. Semantik und Pragmatik der Tempora der Zukunft [‘Futurity in Contemporary French. Semantics and Pragmatics of the Future Tenses’]. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Searle, John R.
    1975 “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts”. In John Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, 344–379. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sedano, Mercedes
    1994 “El futuro morfológico y la expresión ir a + infinitivo en el español hablado de Venezuela” [‘The Morphological Future and the Expression ir a + Infinitive in Venezuelan Spoken Spanish’]. Verba21: 225–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Silva Corvalán, Carmen and Tracy Terrell
    1989 “Notas sobre la expresión de futuridad en el español del Caribe” [‘Notes on the Expression of Futurity in Caribbean Spanish’]. Hispanic Linguistics2: 191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Söll, Ludwig
    1968 “Synthetisches und analytisches Futur im modernen Spanischen” [‘Synthetic and Analytic Future in Modern Spanish’]. Romanische Forschungen80: 239–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Togeby, Knud
    1982Grammaire française [‘French Grammar’]. (Volume2: Les formes personnelles du verbe [‘The Personal Forms of the Verb’].) Copenhagen: Akad. Forl.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Valesio, Paolo
    1968 “The Romance Synthetic Future Pattern and its First Attestations (i)”. Lingua20: 113–161. 10.1016/0024‑3841(68)90139‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(68)90139-3 [Google Scholar]
  57. Von der Gabelentz, Georg
    1901 [1891]Die Sprachwissenschaft: ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse [‘Linguistics: Its Tasks, Methods and Present Results’]. Leipzig: Weigel.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Von Wartburg, Walther
    1970 [1943]Einführung in Problematik und Methodik der Sprachwissenschaft [‘Introduction into Issues and Methodologies in Linguistics’]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Werner, Edeltraud
    1980Die Verbalperiphrase im Mittelfranzösischen. Eine semantisch- syntaktische Analyse [‘The Verbal Periphrases in Middle French: A Semantic and Syntactic Account’]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Westmoreland, Maurice
    1997 “The dialectalization of Spanish future tense usage”. Word48: 375–395. 10.1080/00437956.1997.11432474
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1997.11432474 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilmet, Marc
    1970Le système de l’indicatif en Moyen Français [‘The System of the Indicative in Middle French’]. Genève: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Yllera, Alicia
    1980Sintaxis histórica del verbo español: las perífrasis medievales [‘Historical Syntax of the Spanish Verb: The Medieval Periphrases’]. Zaragoza: Departamento de Filología Francesa.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zeman, Sonja
    2015 “The Elementary Particles of Distance in Space, Time, Grammar, and Discourse”. In Barbara Sonnenhauser and Anastasia Meermann (eds), Distance in Language: Grounding a Metaphor, 7–36. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 2019 “The Emergence of Viewpoints in Multiple Perspective Constructions”. In Caroline Gentens , An van Linden , Maria Sol Sansiñena Pascual and Stef Spronck (eds), Perspective Shifts, special issue of Pragmatics29 (2): 226–249.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00045.det
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00045.det
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error