Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Interjections have been studied for all periods in the history of English, ranging from the study of Old English exclamations such as (Brinton 2017) to the pragmatic functions of forms such as in Present Day English (Lutzky and Kehoe 2017). The Early Modern English (EModE) period represents a turning point as it witnessed an increase in dialogic and speech-related text types, including drama comedy and trial proceedings. Nevertheless, despite recent advances in the compilation and especially the sociopragmatic annotation of corpora, EModE pragmatic markers have not been studied extensively over the last decade. This article addresses this gap by offering an investigation into the sociopragmatic nature of interjections in EModE drama comedy. It is based on the sociopragmatically annotated Drama Corpus which includes a total of 242,561 words from the period 1500 to 1760. Taking a data-driven, form-to-function mapping approach, this study explores the use of interjections in the Drama Corpus with a focus on their distribution according to sociopragmatic variables. The aim of this study is to contribute to reaching a more comprehensive understanding of pragmatic marker use in EModE.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (ced)
    A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (ced) 2006 Compiled under the supervision ofMerja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
  2. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (ppceme)
    Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (ppceme) 2004 Compiled byAnthony Kroch, Beatrice Santorini and Lauren Delfs. See: www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/.
  3. Sociopragmatic Corpus (spc)
    Sociopragmatic Corpus (spc) 2007 Annotated under the supervision ofJonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). A derivative ofA Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760, compiled under the supervision ofMerja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aijmer, Karin
    2004 “Interjections in a Contrastive Perspective”. InEdda Weigand (ed.), Emotion in Dialogic Interaction: Advances in the Complex, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.248.09aij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.248.09aij [Google Scholar]
  5. 2015 “Pragmatic Markers”. InKarin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ameka, Felix
    1992 “Interjections: The Universal Yet Neglected Part of Speech”. Journal of Pragmatics18 (2): 101–118. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90048‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G [Google Scholar]
  7. Amsler, Mark
    2021The Medieval Life of Language: Grammar and Pragmatics from Bacon to Kempe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper
    2003 “Sociopragmatic Annotation: New Directions and Possibilities in Historical Corpus Linguistics”. InAndrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Tony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Archer, Dawn
    2005Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.135
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Randi Reppen
    1998Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blake, Norman F.
    2002A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑4039‑1915‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1915-1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Culpeper, Jonathan and Samuel J. Oliver
    2020 “Pragmatic Noise in Shakespeare’s Plays”. InEwa Jonsson and Tove Larsson (eds), Voices Past and Present – Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts, 11–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.97.02cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.97.02cul [Google Scholar]
  17. Hiltunen, Risto
    2006 “Eala, geferan and gode wyrhtan: On Interjections in Old English”. InJohn Walmsley (ed.), Inside Old English: Essays in Honour of Bruce Mitchell, 91–116. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470776360.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776360.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2002 “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English”. InRichard Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds), Alternative Histories of English, 210–230. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2008 “Historical Pragmatics”. Language and Linguistics Compass2 (5): 894–906. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00087.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x [Google Scholar]
  20. 2013 “Corpus Pragmatics”. InJan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hop.17.cor3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.17.cor3 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv
    1998 “Discourse Markers: Introduction”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.03juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.03juc [Google Scholar]
  22. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
    2013English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748644704
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748644704 [Google Scholar]
  23. van Kemenade, Ans and Meta Links
    2020 “Discourse Particles in Early English: Clause Structure, Pragmatics and Discourse Management”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics5 (1): 3, 1–23. 10.5334/gjgl.1020
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1020 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
    2006 “Impoliteness in Early Modern English Courtroom Discourse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics7 (2): 213–243. 10.1075/jhp.7.2.04kry
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.2.04kry [Google Scholar]
  25. Lenker, Ursula
    2000 “Soþlice and witodlice. Discourse Markers in Old English”. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 229–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.12len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.12len [Google Scholar]
  26. Lutzky, Ursula
    2012Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.227 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2013 “Early Modern English Discourse Markers – A Feature of Female Speech?” InGabriella Mazzon and Luisanna Fodde (eds), Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogue, 80–98. Naples: Franco Angeli Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lutzky, Ursula and Jane Demmen
    2013 “Pray in Early Modern English Drama”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics14 (2): 263–284. 10.1075/jhp.14.2.05lut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.14.2.05lut [Google Scholar]
  29. Lutzky, Ursula and Andrew Kehoe
    2017 “‘Oops, I Didn’t Mean to Be So Flippant’: A Corpus Pragmatic Analysis of Apologies in Blog Data”. Journal of Pragmatics116: 27–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    2003Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Norrick, Neal R.
    2009 “Interjections as Pragmatic Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics41 (5): 866–891. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  32. OED = The Oxford English Dictionary
    OED = The Oxford English Dictionary. (Online Edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at: www.oed.com
  33. Person, Raymond F.
    2009 “‘Oh’ in Shakespeare: A Conversation Analytic Approach”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (1): 84–107. 10.1075/jhp.10.1.05per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.05per [Google Scholar]
  34. Sauer, Hans
    2008 “Interjection, Emotion, Grammar, and Literature”. InMasachiyo Amano, Michiko Ogura and Masayuki Ohkado (eds), Historical Englishes in Varieties of Texts and Contexts, 387–403. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  36. Taavitsainen, Irma
    1995 “Interjections in Early Modern English: From Imitation of Spoken to Conventions of Written Language”. InAndreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 439–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.23taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.23taa [Google Scholar]
  37. Traugott, Elisabeth C.
    2015 “‘Ah, Pox o’ your Pad-lock’: Interjections in the Old Bailey Corpus 1720–1913”. Journal of Pragmatics86: 68–73. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.013 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error