1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, I study the ways in which (im)politeness strategies are used in letters sent by the Republic of Ragusa to its ambassadors in the Bosnian Kingdom during the fifteenth century. The corpus for this research comprises the collection, today kept in the Dubrovnik State Archives, Croatia. I aim to determine the politeness strategies that were used in the letters based on the Brown and Levinson framework. The paper focusses on mitigating strategies used when making requests, expressing condolences, offering congratulations and making threats. The research reveals patterns in conversational and written exchanges, whose goal is to be conventionally polite and diplomatic. This research aims to offer insights into intercultural communication in Europe, inter-European influence, and communication patterns in diplomatic discourse and might be of interest to political scientists, historians and diplomats.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00060.lal
2023-02-23
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lettere di Levante
    Lettere di Levante, Državni arhiv u Dubrovniku.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Banfi, Emanuele
    2017Italiano e altre varietà italo-romanze in Europa e nel Mediterraneo nel secolo XIX [‘Italian and Other Romance-Italian Varieties in Europe and in the Mediterranean During the XIX Century’]. Florence: Cesati.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanco Salguiero, Antonio
    2010 “Promises, Threats, and the Foundation of Speech Act Theory”. Pragmatics20 (2): 213–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Elite Olshtain
    1985 “Crosscultural Pragmatics and the Testing of Communicative Competence”. Language Testing2 (1): 16–30. 10.1177/026553228500200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200103 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    1987 “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics11 (2): 131–146. 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90192‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bousfield, Derek and Miriam A. Locher
    (eds) 2008Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bull, Peter
    2008 “Slipperiness, Evasion and Ambiguity: Equivocation and Facework in Non-committal Political Discourse”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology27 (4): 324–332. 10.1177/0261927X08322474
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322474 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bull, Peter and Anita Fetzer
    2010 “Face, Facework and Political Discourse”. International Review of Social Psychology23 (2/3): 155–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaplais, Pierre
    2003English Diplomatic Practice in the Middle Ages. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chilton, Paul
    1990 “Politeness, Politics and Diplomacy”. Discourse & Society1 (2): 201–224. 10.1177/0957926590001002005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001002005 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cicourel, Aaron V.
    1988 “Text and Context: Cognitive, Linguistic, and Organizational Dimensions in International Negotiations”. Negotiation Journal4 (3): 257–266. 10.1111/j.1571‑9979.1988.tb00470.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1988.tb00470.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics251: 349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online
    Encyclopaedia Britannica Online 2019 s.v. “History of Diplomacy”. Accessed24 December 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Escandell Vidal, Maria Victoria
    1996Introducción a la pragmática [‘Introduction to Pragmatics’]. Barcelona: Ariel Letras.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Havrylyshyn, Oleh and Nora Srzentić
    2015Institutions Always “Mattered”: Explaining Prosperity in Mediaeval Ragusa (Dubrovnik). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137339782
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339782 [Google Scholar]
  20. Held, Gudrun
    2005 “Politeness in Italy: The Art of Self-Representation in Requests”. InLeo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds), Politeness in Europe, 292–305. Clevedon, Buffalo and Toronto: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597398‑022
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597398-022 [Google Scholar]
  21. House, Juliane and Gabrielle Kasper
    1981 “Politeness Markers in English and German”. InFlorian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, 157–185. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809145.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809145.157 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kádár, Daniel and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  23. Križman, Bogdan
    1951O dubrovačkoj diplomaciji [‘On Ragusean Diplomacy’]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurtović, Esad, Lejla Nakaš, Drago Župarić, Ana Lalić and Dženan Dautović
    2018Codex diplomaticus Regni Bosnae: Pisma i povelje srednjovjekovne bosanske države [‘Codex diplomaticus Regni Bosnae: Letters and Charters from the Medieval Bosnian State’]. Sarajevo: Mladinska knjiga.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Leech, Geoffrey
    1989Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicolson, Harold
    1950Diplomacy. London, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Online Etymology Dictionary
    Online Etymology Dictionary 2020 s.v. “diploma”. Accessed23 January 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Searle, John R.
    1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  30. 1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society5 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tadić, Jorjo
    1935Pisma i uputstva Dubrovačke Republike [‘Letters and Commissions from the Republic of Ragusa’]. Belgrade: Srpska kraljevska akademija.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tasso, Torquato
    1959La letteratura italiana: storia e testi. Volume 22. Torquato Tasso – Prose [‘Italian Literature: History and Texts. Volume 22. Torquato Tasso – Prose Works’]. Verona: Riccardo Riccardi editore.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Taylor, Charlotte
    2016Mock Politeness in English and Italian: A Corpus-Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.267
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.267 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wodak, Ruth
    (ed.) 1989Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00060.lal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00060.lal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error