1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, I argue for a systematic study of the role that language contact has played in the development of German, French, Italian and Spanish address systems. While the current state of research clearly points to contact-induced changes in Early Modern European polite address, some important desiderata concerning the precise direction, nature and scope of contact influences remain. Against this background, I present historical foreign language manuals as a promising source for the comparative study of historical European address practices and their development. Through an explorative analysis of metapragmatic comments and model dialogues in selected foreign language manuals, the increasingly dynamic pressures experienced by interlocutors both to distance themselves from one another and to express solidarity come to light, as multi-level address systems emerge and mixed styles of address gain in importance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00061.gen
2023-03-06
2024-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chirchmair, Matthias
    1703Grammatica della lingua Todesca. Venice: Lorenzo Basegio.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Colloques avec un dictionnaire en six langues; flamen, anglois, alleman, françois, espagnol, & italien
    Colloques avec un dictionnaire en six langues; flamen, anglois, alleman, françois, espagnol, & italien 1576 Antwerp: Henric Hendrickx.
  3. Deschamps, Pierre
    1690Nouvelle Grammaire ou Méthode. Besançon: Louis Rigoine.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. de Sumarán, Juan Ángel
    1621Das Newe Sprachbuch. Munich: Anna Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. di Veneroni, Giovanni
    1694Der Vollkommene Italiänische Sprachmeister. Frankfurt am Main: Philipp Fievet.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kramer, Matthias
    1696Nouveau Parlement. C’est à dire Dialogues François-Alemands. Frankfurt am Main: Johann Balthasar Niesen.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. La Civilité Novvelle: Contenant la vraye & parfaite Instruction de la Jeunesse
    La Civilité Novvelle: Contenant la vraye & parfaite Instruction de la Jeunesse 1671 Basel: Johann-Herman Widerhold.
  8. Andersen, Gisle
    2014 “Pragmatic Borrowing”. Journal of Pragmatics671 (June): 17–33. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
    1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity”. InThomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, 253–276. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Burke, Peter
    1995The Fortunes of the Courtier: The European Reception of Castiglione’s Cortegiano. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2000 “A Civil Tongue: Language and Politeness in Early Modern Europe”. InPeter Burke and Brian Harrison (eds), Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas, 31–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207108.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207108.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Croce, Benedetto
    1895La lingua spagnuola in Italia: appunti [‘The Spanish Language in Italy: Notes’]. Rome: Loescher.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2017 “The Influence of Italian Manners on Politeness in England, 1550–1620”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics18 (2): 195–213. 10.1075/jhp.00002.cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00002.cul [Google Scholar]
  15. Ehrismann, Gustav
    1902 “Duzen und Ihrzen im Mittelalter (Fortsetzung)” [‘Address with “du” and “ihr” in the Middle Ages (Continuation)’]. Zeitschrift Für Deutsche Wortforschung21: 118–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Faraco, Carlos Alberto
    2017 “O tratamento ‘você’ em português: uma abordagem histórica” [‘The Form of Address ‘você’ in Portuguese: A Historical Approach’]. LaborHistórico3 (2): 114–132. 10.24206/lh.v3i2.17150
    https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v3i2.17150 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghezzi, Chiara
    2015 “Thanking Formulae: The Role of Language Contact in the Diachrony of Italian”. InCarlo Consani (ed.), Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato [‘Interlinguistic Contact between the Present and the Past’], 315–341. Il Segno e Le Lettere 14. Milan: LED. 10.7359/728‑2015‑ghez
    https://doi.org/10.7359/728-2015-ghez [Google Scholar]
  18. Grand, Camille
    1930Tu, voi, Lei: Étude des pronoms allocutoires italiens [‘Tu, Voi, Lei: Study of Italian Pronouns of Address’]. (PhD thesis.) Fribourg.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Helmbrecht, Johannes
    2003 “Politeness Distinctions in Second Person Pronouns”. InFriedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person, 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.112.10hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.112.10hel [Google Scholar]
  20. 2010 “Höflichkeitspronomina in Europa – Synchronie und Diachronie eines arealtypologischen Merkmals” [‘Polite Pronouns in Europe – Synchrony and Diachrony of an Areal Feature’]. InUwe Hinrichs (ed.), Handbuch der Eurolinguistik [‘Manual of Eurolinguistics’], 683–702. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 “Politeness Distinctions in Personal Pronouns: A Case Study on Competing Motivations”. InBrian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik (eds), Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, 315–332. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jucker, Andreas H. and Joanna Kopaczyk
    2017 “Historical (Im)Politeness”. InJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 433–460. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_17
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_17 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held and Annick Paternoster
    2023 “Introduction: Politeness in and across Historical Europe”. Special issue ofJournal of Historical Pragmatics24 (1): 1–15. 10.1075/jhp.00064.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00064.kad [Google Scholar]
  24. Listen, Paul
    1999The Emergence of German Polite Sie: Cognitive and Sociolinguistic Parameters. New York: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Matras, Yaron and Jeanette Sakel
    2007 “Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence”. Studies in Language31 (4): 829–865. 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
  26. Migliorini, Bruno
    1957 “Primordi del Lei” [‘Origins of “Lei”’]. InSaggi linguistici, 187–196. Florence: Le Monnier.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Molinelli, Piera
    2018 “Sociocultural and Linguistic Constraints in Address Choice from Latin to Italian”. InKate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Positioning the Self and Others: Linguistic Perspectives, 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.292.03mol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.292.03mol [Google Scholar]
  28. Niculescu, Alexandru
    1974Strutture allocutive pronominali reverenziali in italiano [‘Pronominal Structures of Reverential Address in Italian’]. Florence: Olschki.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. del Olmo, Francisco Javier Calvo
    2011 “Sobre la gramaticalización de los tratamientos nominales en las lenguas románicas: paralelismos e influencias” [‘About the Grammaticalization of Nominal Forms of Address in the Romance Languages: Parallelisms and Influences’]. Caligrama: Revista de Estudos Românicos16 (2): 131–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schröder, Konrad
    2000 “Kommerzielle und kulturelle Interessen am Unterricht der Volkssprachen im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert” [‘Commercial and Cultural Interest for Vernacular Language Teaching in the 15th and 16th Centuries’]. InSylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe and Kees Versteegh (eds), History of the Language Sciences, 681–687. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Svennung, Josef
    1958Anredeformen: Vergleichende Forschungen zur indirekten Anrede in der dritten Person und zum Nominativ für den Vokativ [‘Forms of Address: Comparative Studies of Indirect Third Person Address and of the Nominative for the Vocative’]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00061.gen
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00061.gen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error