1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain the development of European politeness as a result of courtly behaviour where “complaisance” played an important role. As traces left in the so-called “language of politeness” of numerous European linguacultures show, mutual “pleasing” determined social performance in hierarchically organised societies by merging aesthetic concepts of form and order with ethical values of benevolence and charity. An analysis of the lexical item (‘to please’) in Early Modern Italian and French documents highlights the existence of six different formulaic usages, characterised by a high consistency in frequency, evolution and diffusion all over Europe. Appearing mainly in connection with interactive moves where will is at stake, -formulae represent co-operative means, which ease social relationships by conditioning and “embellishing” directives with different elements of social . As acts of submission originating in the Medieval , they became integrated over time into the French dogma of “polished” conversation as an elitist “art de plaire” (Faret 1665). From France they spread into the European courts establishing a conception of politeness that has been underestimated in pragmatics so far.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00065.hel
2023-03-07
2024-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. anl: Anglo-Norman Letters and Petitions from ALL SOULS MS. 182
    anl: Anglo-Norman Letters and Petitions from ALL SOULS MS. 182 = Anglo-Norman Texts III (= Correspondence on the court of Richard II between 1360 and 1430]) (Edited by Dominica Legge) 1941 Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. dum: Dumonceaux
    dum: Dumonceaux 1975.
  3. ml: Manières de Langage
    ml: Manières de Langage (1396, 1399, 1415) (Edited byAndres Kristol.) London, Anglo-Norman Text-Society 1995.
  4. sm: Faba, Guido
    1239–1248Incipit Gemma Purpurea magistri Guidonis Oratoris (15 campioni) e Parlamenta magistri Guidonis Fabe et epistole ipsius. / Guittone d’Arezzo XXXX Lettere, in La Prosa del Duecento. (Edited byCesare Segre and Mario Marti) 1959 Milano – Napoli, Ricciardi.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. tvs: Testi Veronesi dell’età scaligera
    tvs: Testi Veronesi dell’età scaligera (Edited by Nello Bertoletti) 2005 Padova, Esedra.
  6. Selected comedies of Molière
    Selected comedies of Molière.
  7. Allen, Cynthia I.
    1995 “On Doing As You Please”. InAndreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 275–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.17all
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.17all [Google Scholar]
  8. Baxter, Leslie A.
    1984 “An Investigation of Compliance-Gaining as Politeness”. Human Communication Research101: 427–456. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1984.tb00026.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00026.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Beetz, Norbert
    1986Frühmoderne Höflichkeit. Komplimentierkunst und Gesellschaftsrituale im altdeutschen Sprachraum [‘Early Modern Politeness: The Art of Complimenting and Social Rituals in Old-German Language Area’]. Stuttgart: Metzler.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dumonceaux, Pierre
    1975Langue et sensibilité au XVII siècle [‘Language and Sensibility in the Seventeenth Century’]. Genève: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ehlich, Konrad
    1992 “On the Historicity of Politeness”. InRichard Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 71–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Faret, Nicolas
    1665L’Honeste Homme ou l’art de plaire à la cour [‘The Honest Man: The Art of Pleasing at Court’]. Paris: Compagnie du Libraire du Palais.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Faya Cerqueiro, Fatima
    2011 “Letter-Writing Manuals and the Evolution of Request Markers in the Eighteenth Century”. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Especificos171: 295–317.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giusti, Giuliana and Rossella Rovino
    2019 “Psychological Verbs as a Vulnerable Syntactic Domain: A Comparative Study of Latin and Italian”. Lingua2231: 29–45. 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Haferland, Harald and Paul Ingwer
    1996 “Eine Theorie der Höflichkeit” [‘A Theory of Politeness’]. OBST521: 7–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Held, Gudrun
    1999 “Submission Strategies as an Expression of the Ideology of Politeness”. Pragmatics9 (1): 21–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2005 “Politeness in Italy: The Art of Self-Representation in Requests”. InLeo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds), Politeness in Europe, 292–306. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597398‑022
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597398-022 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2016 “Is the Italian figura Just a Facet of Face? Comparative Remarks on Two Socio-Pragmatic Key-Concepts and their Explanatory Force for Intercultural Approaches”. InEwa Bodganowska (ed.), New Ways to Face and (Im)politeness, 53–77. Katowice: University of Silesia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hirst, John
    2012The Shortest History of Europe. London: Old Street Publishing Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. House, Juliane
    1989 “Politeness in English and German: The Functions of Please and Bitte”. InShoshana Blum-Kulka, Gabriele Kasper and Juliane House (eds), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, 96–123. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Koch, Peter
    1997 “Diskurstraditionen: zu ihrem sprachtheoretischen Status und ihrer Dynamik” [‘Discourse Traditions: Remarks on their Linguistic Status and Dynamics’]. InBarbara Frank, Thomas Haye and Doris Tophinke (eds), Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit [‘Genres of Mediaeval Literacy’], 43–80. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1990Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania [‘Spoken Language in the Area of Romance Linguacultures’]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111372914
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111372914 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, Robin
    1973 “The Logic of Politeness: Or Minding your P’s and Q’s”. InPapers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mauss, Marcel
    1950Essai sur le don. Paris: PUF. (The Gift. English translation 1954.)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Montandon, Alain
    1995Dictionnaire raisonné de la politesse et du savoir-vivre [‘Commented Dictionary of Politeness and Savoir Vivre’]. (Section “plaire”, 689–709.) Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Thomas, Keith
    2018In Pursuit of Civility: Manners and Civilization in Early Modern England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vietta, Silvio
    2005Europäische Kulturgeschichte. Eine Einführung [‘European Cultural History: An Introduction’]. München: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00065.hel
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): (language of) politeness; aesthetics; complaisance; courtesy; directives; ethics; social decorum
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error