1887
Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a case study which brings together the fields of contrastive pragmatics and historical pragmatics. Specifically, we contrastively investigate the ways in which the speech act set of “farewell” – representing the closing phase of an interaction – was realised in nineteenth-century historical letters in different linguacultures, including the English, German and Chinese ones. We argue that contrastive pragmatics provides a fruitful contribution to historical research for two inter-related reasons. First, contrastive pragmatics allows us to identify similar pragmatic patterns between typologicially “close” linguacultures, such as the English and the German ones. Second, it prompts researchers to attest the validity of such patterns by comparing such typologically close linguacultures with more distant ones such as the Chinese. Our study is based on a corpus of family letters written to elderly relatives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00068.kad
2023-03-09
2024-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Sollors, Werner and Ruth I. Cape
    (eds) 2014New World View: Letters from a German Immigrant Family in Texas (1854–1885). (New Directions in German-American Studies.) Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Henrietta E. Litchfield
    (ed.) 2010Emma Darwin, Wife of Charles Darwin: A Century of Family Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Zeng Guofan jiashu曾国藩家书 (‘The Family Letter of Zeng Guofan’) 2008 Beijing Yanshan Edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bax, Marcel
    2010 “Epistolary Presentation Rituals: Face-work, Politeness and Ritual Display in Early Modern Dutch Letters”. InJonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (ed.), Historical (Im)Politeness, 37–85. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
    1989Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Stamford: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bös, Birte
    2007 “What Do You Lacke? What is it You Buy? Early Modern English Service Encounters”. InSusan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 219–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.219 [Google Scholar]
  7. Connor, Ulla, Ed Nagelhout and William Rozycki
    (eds) 2008Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.169
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
    (eds) 2012Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.218
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.218 [Google Scholar]
  9. Edmondson, Willis
    1981Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edmondson, Willis and Juliane House
    1981Let’s Talk and Talk About It: An Interactional Grammar of English. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Finnegan, Ruth
    1969 “How to Do Things with Words: Performative Utterances among the Limba of Sierra Leone”. Man4 (4): 537–552. 10.2307/2798194
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2798194 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2002The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A Pragmatic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.95
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.95 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitzpatrick, David
    2006 “Irish Emigration and The Art of Letter-Writing”. InBruce S. Elliott, David A. Gerber and Suzanne M. Sinke (eds), Letters across Borders, 97–106. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230601079_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601079_5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomenon in Modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics141: 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo, Yingjie and Baogang He
    1999 “Reimagining the Chinese Nation: The ‘Zeng Guofan Phenomenon’”. Modern China25 (2): 142–170. 10.1177/009770049902500202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009770049902500202 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hendrickx, Iris, Michel Generaux and Rita Marquilhas
    2011 “Automatic Pragmatic Text Segmentation of Historical Letters”. InC. Sporleder (ed.), Language Technology for Cultural Heritage: Selected Papers from the LaTeCH Conference Series, 135–153. New York. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑20227‑8_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20227-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  17. How, James
    2019Epistolary Spaces: English Letter-Writing from the Foundation of the Post Office to Richardson’s “Clarissa”. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315198828
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315198828 [Google Scholar]
  18. House, Juliane
    1996 “Contrastive Discourse Analysis and Misunderstanding: The Case of German and English”. InMarlis Hellinger and Amon Ulrich (eds), Contrastive Sociolinguistics, 345–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110811551.345
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811551.345 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2005 “Politeness in Germany. Politeness is Germany?” InLeo Hickey and Miranda Stewart (eds), Politeness in Europe, pp.13–28. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597398‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597398-003 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2006 “Communicative Styles in English and German”. European Journal of English Studies10 (3): 249–267. 10.1080/13825570600967721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570600967721 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016Translation as Communication across Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2021Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954587
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954587 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jucker, Andreas
    2017 “Speech Acts and Speech Act Sequences: Greetings and Farewells in the History of American English”. Studia Neophilologica891: 39–58. 10.1080/00393274.2017.1358662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2017.1358662 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2010Historical Chinese Letter Writing. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Juliane House
    2020 “Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Approach”. Pragmatics30 (1): 142–168. 10.1075/prag.19018.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19018.kad [Google Scholar]
  27. Kádár, Dániel Z., Gudrun Held and Annick Paternoster
    2023 “Introduction: Politeness in and across Historical Europe”. Special issue ofJournal of Historical Pragmatics24 (1): 1–15. 10.1075/jhp.00064.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00064.kad [Google Scholar]
  28. Koutlaki, Sofia
    2020 “‘By the Elders’ Leave, I Do’: Rituals and Perceptions of the Moral Order in Iranian Tehrani Marriage Ceremonies”. Pragmatics30 (1): 88–115. 10.1075/prag.19021.kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19021.kou [Google Scholar]
  29. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Markus, Manfred
    2006 “Abbreviations in Early Modern English Correspondence”. InMarina Dossena and Susan M. Fitzmaurice (eds), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations, 107–128. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nevalainen, Terttu and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
    (eds) 2007Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.1 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Panetta, Clayann Gilliam
    (ed.) 2001Contrastive Rhetoric Revisited and Redefined. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pizziconi, Barbara
    2011 “Honorifics: The Cultural Specificity of a Universal Mechanism in Japanese”. InDániel Z. Kádár and Sara Mills (eds), Politeness in East Asia, 45–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977886.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
    1995Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Reisigl, M.
    2014 “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methodological Approach”. InChristopher Hart and Piotr Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 67–96. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Richter, Antje
    2013Letters and Epistolary Culture in Early Medieval China. Washington: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker
    2019 “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics1441: 56–66. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schegloff, Emanuel
    1988 “Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics12 (1): 55–62. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90019‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90019-7 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharoff, Serge, Reinhard Rapp, Pierre Zweigenbaum and Pascale Fung
    2013Building and Using Comparable Corpora. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑20128‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20128-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2016 “The Bases of (Im)Politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate”. East Asian Pragmatics1 (1): 73–106. 10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084
    https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084 [Google Scholar]
  42. Taavitsainen, Irma and Matylda Włodarczyk
    2021 “Contrastive Pragmatics in a Diachronic Perspective: Insights from Othello”. Contrastive Pragmatics2 (2): 168–199. 10.1163/26660393‑BJA10022
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-BJA10022 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00068.kad
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00068.kad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contrastive pragmatics; family letters; farewell; speech act
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error