Democratisation

References

1. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
   1989 “Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres.” Language65 (3): 487–517. 10.2307/415220
   https://doi.org/10.2307/415220 [Google Scholar]
2. Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
   2012 “The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy. Written Language in the Age of Mass Literacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0028
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0028 [Google Scholar]
3. Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
   2013 “Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-register.” Journal of English Linguistics41 (2): 104–134. 10.1177/0075424212472509
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424212472509 [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, Douglas, Jack Grieve, and Gina Iberri-Shea
   2009 “Noun Phrase Modification”. In One Language, Two Grammars, ed. byGünter Rohdenburg, and Julia Schlüter, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551970.010
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551970.010 [Google Scholar]
5. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
   2010 “Locating Identity in Language.” In Language and Identities, ed. byCarmen Llamas, and Dominic Watt, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635788‑006
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635788-006 [Google Scholar]
6. Coppedge, Michael
   2012 Democratization and Research Methods. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139016179
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139016179 [Google Scholar]
7. Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge
   (eds) 2018 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. 1st ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315696010
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696010 [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan, and Minna Nevala
   2012 “Sociocultural Processes and the History of English.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 365–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0032
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0032 [Google Scholar]
9. Davies, Mark
   2008– The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990–present. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
10. De Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society10 (2): 149–173. 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fairclough, Norman
    1995 “Technologisation of Discourse.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byCarmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fairclough, Norman, and Anna Mauranen
    1997 “The Conversationalisation of Political Discourse: A Comparative View.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics11 (1): 89–119. 10.1075/bjl.11.06fai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.06fai [Google Scholar]
14. Fanego, Teresa, and Paula Rodríguez-Puente
    (eds) 2019 Corpus-Based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.91
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91 [Google Scholar]
15. Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane
    2012 “Democratisation.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0033 [Google Scholar]
16. Gonçalves, Bruno, Lucía Loureiro-Porto, José J. Ramasco, and David Sánchez
    2018 “Mapping the Americanization of English in Space and Time.” PLOS ONE13 (5). 10.1371/journal.pone.0197741
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197741 [Google Scholar]
17. Greenfield, Patricia M.
    2013 “The Changing Psychology of Culture from 1800 through 2000.” Psychological Science24 (9): 1722–1731. 10.1177/0956797613479387
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479387 [Google Scholar]
18. Grugel, Jean
    2001 Democratisation: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heller, Monica
    2010 “The Commodification of Language.” Annual Review of Anthropology391: 101–114. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951 [Google Scholar]
20. Hilpert, Martin
    2020 “The Great Temptation. What Diachronic Corpora Do and Do Not Reveal about Social Change.” In Corpora and the Changing Society. Studies in the Evolution of English, ed. byPaula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi, and Juhani Klemola, 3–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.96.01hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.96.01hil [Google Scholar]
21. Hiltunen, Turo
    2021 “Exploring Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers Database.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation, ed. byElena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.12hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.12hil [Google Scholar]
22. Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto
    2020 “Democratisation of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language Sciences791. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101275
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101275 [Google Scholar]
23. Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö
    2020 “Investigating Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century.” Language Sciences791. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270 [Google Scholar]
24. Hiltunen, Turo, and Irma Taavitsainen
    (eds.) 2022 Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.330
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.330 [Google Scholar]
25. Holly, Werner
    2008 “Tabloidisation of Political Communication in the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. byRuth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 317–342. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198980.3.317
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198980.3.317 [Google Scholar]
26. Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair
    1999 “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-Based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4 (2): 221–241. 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
27. Huntington, Samuel P.
    1991 The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Landert, Daniela
    2014 Personalisation in Mass Media Communication: British Online News between Public and Private. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.240
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.240 [Google Scholar]
29. Landert, Daniela, Daria Dayter, Thomas C. Messerli, and Miriam A. Locher
    2023 Corpus Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009091107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009091107 [Google Scholar]
30. Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
31. Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, and Turo Hiltunen
    2020 “Democratisation and Gender-neutrality in English(es).” Journal of English Linguistics48 (3): 215–232. 10.1177/0075424220935967
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220935967 [Google Scholar]
32. Mair, Christian
    2006 Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486951 [Google Scholar]
33. Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech
    2006 “Current change in English syntax.” In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ed. byBas Aarts, and April McMahon, 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch14 [Google Scholar]
34. Myhill, John
    1995 “Change and Continuity in the Functions of the American English modals.” Linguistics33 (2): 157–211. 10.1515/ling.1995.33.2.157
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1995.33.2.157 [Google Scholar]
35. Pons Bordería, Salvador
    2014 “El siglo xx como diacronía: intuición y comprobación en el caso de o sea [The 20th century as a diachrony: Intuition and case of o sea].” Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica30 (3): 985–1016. 10.15581/008.30.395
    https://doi.org/10.15581/008.30.395 [Google Scholar]
36. Romero-Trillo, Jesús
    2017 “Corpus Pragmatics.” Corpus Pragmatics1 (1): 1–2. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0005‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0005-z [Google Scholar]
37. Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer
    2015 “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. byKarin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rühlemann, Christoph, and Martin Hilpert
    2017 “Colloquialization in Journalistic Writing: The Case of Inserts with a Focus on Well.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics18 (1): 104–135. 10.1075/jhp.18.1.05ruh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18.1.05ruh [Google Scholar]
39. Schützler, Ole
    2020 “Frequency Changes and Stylistic Levelling of Though in Diachronic and Synchronic Varieties of English – Linguistic Democratisation?” Language Sciences791. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101266
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101266 [Google Scholar]
40. Skärlund, Sanna
    2018 “Den intima ledaren? Om ledarartiklar, informalisering och språklig förändring [The intimate editorial? On editorial articles, informalisation, and linguistic change].” Språk & Stil281: 78–111. 10.33063/diva‑376235
    https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-376235 [Google Scholar]
41. Smitterberg, Erik
    2021 Syntactic Change in Late Modern English: Studies on Colloquialization and Densification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108564984
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564984 [Google Scholar]
42. Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen
    (eds) 2014 Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.243
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243 [Google Scholar]
43. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
44. Verschueren, Jef
    2013 “Continental European Perspective View.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byYan Huang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wray, Alison, and Michael R. Perkins
    2000 “The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model.” Language & Communication20 (1): 1–28. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]