A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   1997 “I think – an English Modal Particle?” InModality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. byToril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westvik, 1–47. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889932.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1 [Google Scholar]
2. Alexander, Marc
   2023 “Speech in the British Hansard.” InExploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space, ed. byMinna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 17–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.111.01ale
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.01ale [Google Scholar]
3. Alexander, Marc, and Andrew Struan
   2022 “In Barbarous Times and in Uncivilized Countries: Two Centuries of the Evolving Uncivil in the Hansard Corpus.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics27 (4): 480–505. 10.1075/ijcl.22016.ale
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22016.ale [Google Scholar]
4. Archer, Dawn
   2018 “Negotiating Difference in Political Contexts: An Exploration of Hansard.” Language Sciences681: 22–41. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.005 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Douglas
   1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
   2009 Register, Genre, and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
   2012 “The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy. Written Language in the Age of Mass Literacy.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0028
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0028 [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
   2013 “Being Specific about Historical Change: The Influence of Sub-register.” Journal of English Linguistics41 (2): 104–134. 10.1177/0075424212472509
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424212472509 [Google Scholar]
9. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
   1989 “Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres.” Language65 (3): 487–517. 10.2307/415220
   https://doi.org/10.2307/415220 [Google Scholar]
10. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
    1997 “Diachronic Relations among Speech-based and Written Registers in English.” InTo Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bolinger, Dwight
    1972 That’s That. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110872385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872385 [Google Scholar]
13. Bryant, Margaret M.
    (ed) 1962 Current American Usage. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Denis, Derek
    2022 “Reflexes of Abruptness in the Development of Pragmatic Markers.” InDiscourse-pragmatic Variation and Change: Theory, Innovations, Contact, ed. byElizabeth Peterson, Turo Hiltunen, and Joseph Kern, 15–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108864183.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864183.003 [Google Scholar]
15. Dor, Daniel
    2005 “Toward a Semantic Account of That-Deletion in English.” Linguistics43 (2): 345–382. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.345
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.345 [Google Scholar]
16. Factsheet G7 = Some Traditions and Customs of the House
    Factsheet G7 = Some Traditions and Customs of the House 2010 House of Commons Information Office. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/g07.pdf
17. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane
    2012 “Democratization.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0033 [Google Scholar]
19. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1994 “Dialect, Register, and Genre: Working Assumptions about Conventionalization.” InSociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. byDouglas Biber, and Edward Finegan, 5–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195083644.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195083644.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
20. Fetzer, Anita
    2014 “I Think, I Mean and I Believe in Political Discourse: Collocates, Functions and Distribution.” Functions of Language21 (1): 67–94. 10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet [Google Scholar]
21. Grugel, Jean
    2001 Democratization: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hiltunen, Turo
    2021 “Exploring Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers Database.” InCorpus-based Approaches to Register Variation, ed. by. Elena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.12hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.12hil [Google Scholar]
23. Hiltunen, Turo
    2023 “‘The Job Requires Considerable Expertise’. Tracking Experts and Expert Knowledge in the British Parliamentary Record (1800–2005).” InExploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary discourse across time and space, ed. byMinna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 227–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.111.08hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.08hil [Google Scholar]
24. Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto
    2020 “Democratization of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language Sciences791. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101275
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101275 [Google Scholar]
25. Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö
    2020 “Investigating Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century.” Language Sciences791. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270 [Google Scholar]
26. Hou, Liwen, and David A. Smith
    2018 “Modeling the Decline in English Passivization.” InProceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (SCiL), ed. byGaja Jarosz, Brendan O’Connor, and Joe Pater, 34–43. Salt Lake City, Utah, January 4–7, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hundt, Marianne
    2004 “Animacy, Agentivity, and the Spread of the Progressive in Modern English.” English Language and Linguistics8 (1): 47–69. 10.1017/S1360674304001248
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674304001248 [Google Scholar]
28. Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair
    1999 “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4(2): 221–242. 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
29. Ilie, Cornelia
    2015 “Parliamentary Discourse.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracy, Todd L. Sandel, and Cornelia Ilie. Chichester and Malden: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201 [Google Scholar]
30. Jordan, H. D.
    1931 “The Reports of Parliamentary Debates, 1803–1908.” Economica341: 437–449. 10.2307/2549196
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2549196 [Google Scholar]
31. Kaltenböck, Gunther
    2006 “‘… That is the Question’: Complementizer Omission in Extraposed that-clauses.” English Language and Linguistics10 (1): 371–396. 10.1017/S1360674306001961
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306001961 [Google Scholar]
32. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2003 Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. A Description of its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.115 [Google Scholar]
33. Kirk, John M.
    2015 “The Progressive in Irish English: Looking Both Ways?” InGrammatical Change in English World-Wide, ed. byPeter Collins, 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.67.05kir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.05kir [Google Scholar]
34. Kranich, Svenja
    2010 The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042031449
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042031449 [Google Scholar]
35. Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
36. Leech, Geoffrey, and Nicholas Smith
    2009 “Chance and Constancy in Linguistic Change: How Grammatical Usage in Written English Evolved in the Period 1931–1991.” InCorpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, ed. byAntoinette Renouf, and Andrew Kehoe, 173–200. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042025981_011
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042025981_011 [Google Scholar]
37. Loureiro-Porto, Lucía, and Turo Hiltunen
    2020 “Democratization and Gender-neutrality in English(es).” Journal of English Linguistics48 (3): 215–232. 10.1177/0075424220935967
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220935967 [Google Scholar]
38. Mair, Christian
    1997 “Parallel Corpora: A Real-time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress.” InCorpus-based Studies in English, ed. byMagnus Ljung, 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653641_015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653641_015 [Google Scholar]
39. Mair, Christian
    2021 “Recent Advances in the Corpus-based Study of Ongoing Grammatical Change in English.” Text & Talk41 (5–6): 763–785. 10.1515/text‑2020‑0039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0039 [Google Scholar]
40. Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt
    1995 “Why Is the Progressive Becoming More Frequent in English? A Corpus-based Investigation of Language Change in Progress.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik43 (2): 111–122.
    [Google Scholar]
41. McDavid, Virginia
    1964 “The Alternation of that and Zero in Noun Clauses.” American Speech39 (2): 102–13. 10.2307/453112
    https://doi.org/10.2307/453112 [Google Scholar]
42. Mollin, Sandra
    2007 “The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts.” Corpora2(2): 187–210. 10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187 [Google Scholar]
43. Osnabrügge, Moritz, Sara B. Hobolt, and Toni Rodon
    2021 “Playing to the Gallery: Emotive Rhetoric in Parliaments.” American Political Science Review115 (3): 885–899. 10.1017/S0003055421000356
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000356 [Google Scholar]
44. Paterson, Laura L.
    2014 British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing Linguistic and Social Influences Affecting ‘They’ and ‘He’. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rautionaho, Paula, and Robert Fuchs
    2020 “Recent Change in Stative Progressives: A Collostructional Investigation of British English in 1994 and 2014.” English Language & Linguistics25 (2): 35–60. 10.1017/S136067431900042X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431900042X [Google Scholar]
47. Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer
    2015 “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” InCorpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. byKarin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Schützler, Ole
    2020 “Frequency Changes and Stylistic Levelling of though in Diachronic and Synchronic Varieties of English – Linguistic Democratisation?” Language Sciences791. 101266. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101266
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101266 [Google Scholar]
49. Seoane, Elena, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto
    2005 “On the Colloquialization of Scientific British and American English.” ESP Across Cultures21: 106–118.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Siemund, Rainer
    1995 “‘For Who the Bell Tolls’ – or Why Corpus Linguistics should Carry the Bell in the Study of Language Change in Present-day English.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik20 (2): 351–77. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43025475
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smith, Nicholas
    2020 “Conversationalization and Democratization in a Radio Chat Show: A Grammar-Led Investigation.” Language Sciences791. 101269. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101269
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101269 [Google Scholar]
52. Smith, Nicholas, and Paul Rayson
    2007 “Recent Change and Variation in the British English Use of the Progressive Passive.” ICAME Journal311: 129–160.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Smitterberg, Erik
    2005 The Progressive in 19th-century English: A Process of Integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004333086
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333086 [Google Scholar]
54. Smitterberg, Erik
    2007 “The Progressive and Phrasal Verbs. Evidence of Colloquialization in Nineteenth-century English?” InDynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta, and Minna Korhonen, 269–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Smitterberg, Erik
    2021 Syntactic Change in Late Modern English: Studies on Colloquialization and Densification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108564984
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564984 [Google Scholar]
56. Spirling, Arthur
    2016 “Democratization and Linguistic Complexity: The Effect of Franchise Extension on Parliamentary Discourse, 1832–1915.” Journal of Politics78 (1): 120–136. 10.1086/683612
    https://doi.org/10.1086/683612 [Google Scholar]
57. Storms, Godfrid
    1966 “That-clauses in Modern English.” English Studies471: 249–70. 10.1080/00138386608597258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138386608597258 [Google Scholar]
58. Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
    1991 “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” InApproaches to Grammaticalization, ed. byElizabeth C. Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho [Google Scholar]
59. Uberoi, Elise, Matthew Burton, Shadi Danechi, and Paul Bolton
    2022 “Women in Politics and Public Life.” Commons Library Research Briefing, 6 October 2022. London: House of Commons Library.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Underhill, Robert
    1988 The Discourse Conditions for That-deletion. San Diego State University.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Van Bogaert, Julie
    2010 “A Constructional Taxonomy of I think and Related Expressions: Accounting for the Variability of Complement-taking Mental Predicates.” English Language and Linguistics14 (3): 399–427. 10.1017/S1360674310000134
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000134 [Google Scholar]
62. Vartiainen, Turo, and Minna Palander-Collin
    2023 “From Masters and Servants to Employers and Employees: Exploring Democratisation with Big Data.” InExploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space, ed. byMinna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 166–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.111.06var
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.111.06var [Google Scholar]
63. Alexander, Marc, and Mark Davies
    2015– Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. Available online atwww.hansard-corpus.org/
    [Google Scholar]