Women’s voices in the public sphere

References

1. Anthony, Laurence
   2020 AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available fromhttps://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
   2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes, Joel
   2018 “The British Suffrage Movement and the Ancient Constitution, 1867–1909.” Historical Research91 (253): 505–527. 10.1111/1468‑2281.12234
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.12234 [Google Scholar]
4. Beniger, James R.
   1987 “Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo Community.” Communication Research14 (3): 352–371. 10.1177/009365087014003005
   https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014003005 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Douglas
   1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
   1997 “Diachronic Relations among Speech-based and Written Registers in English.” InTo Explain the Present. Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bös, Birte
   2015 “From 1760 to 1960: Diversification and Popularization.” InNews as Changing Texts – Corpora, Methodologies and Analysis. 2nd ed., ed. byRoberta Facchinetti, Nicholas Brownlees, Birte Bös, and Udo Fries, 91–143. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bös, Birte
   2021 “Contextualising British Suffrage Newspapers”. InThe Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, ed. byNicholas Brownlees, 155–177, Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
10. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies7 (4–5): 584–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
11. Carstens, Lisa
    2011 “Unbecoming Women: Sex Reversal in the Scientific Discourse on Female Deviance in Britain, 1880–1920.” Journal of the History of Sexuality20 (1): 62–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40986355
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coppedge, Michael
    2012 Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139016179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139016179 [Google Scholar]
13. Crawford, Elizabeth
    1999 The Women’s Suffrage Movement: A Reference Guide 1866–1928. London: UCL Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2009 “Keyness: Words, Parts-of-speech and Semantic Categories in the Character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14 (1): 29–59. 10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03cul [Google Scholar]
15. De Fina, Anna
    2010 “The Negotiation of Identities”. InInterpersonal Pragmatics, HoPs 6. ed. byMiriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 205–224. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214338.1.205
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.205 [Google Scholar]
16. DiCenzo, Maria
    2011 “Unity and Dissent: Official Organs of the Suffrage Campaign.” InFeminist Media History. Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere, ed. byMaria DiCenzo, Lucy Delap, and Leila Ryan, 76–119. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299078_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299078_4 [Google Scholar]
17. DiCenzo, Maria, Lucy Delap, and Leila Ryan
    2011 Feminist Media History. Suffrage, Periodicals and the Public Sphere. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299078
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299078 [Google Scholar]
18. Dossena, Marina
    2019 “The Prince and the Sassenach. Constructing Group Homogeneity through Labels (and Anachronisms) in Late Modern Times and Beyond.” InReference and Identity in Public Discourses, ed. byUrsula Lutzky, and Minna Nevala, 43–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.306.02dos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.306.02dos [Google Scholar]
19. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fairclough, Norman
    1994 “Conversationalization of Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer.” InThe Authority of the Consumer, ed. byRussell Keat, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercrombie, 253–268. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fairclough, Norman
    2001 Language and Power. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Farrelly, Michael, and Elena Seoane
    2012 “Democratization.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byTerttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, 392–401. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0033 [Google Scholar]
23. Garrard, John
    2002 Democratisation in Britain. Elites, Civil Society, and Reform since 1800. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑4039‑1938‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1938-0 [Google Scholar]
24. Gupta, Katherine E.
    2013 A Corpus Linguistic Investigation into the Media Representation of the Suffrage Movement. Nottingham: PhD thesis, University of Nottingham.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hiltunen, Turo
    2021 “Exploring Sub-register Variation in Victorian Newspapers: Evidence from the British Library Newspapers Database”. InCorpus-based Approaches to Register Variation, ed. byElena Seoane, and Douglas Biber, 313–338. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.12hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.12hil [Google Scholar]
26. Hiltunen, Turo, and Lucía Loureiro-Porto
    2020 “Democratization of Englishes: Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches.” Language Sciences791: 1–8. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101275
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101275 [Google Scholar]
27. Hundt, Marianne, and Christian Mair
    1999 ““Agile” and “Uptight” Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4 (2): 221–242. 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
28. Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine
    2014 Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511998126
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998126 [Google Scholar]
29. Jia, Sen, Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, Saatviga Sudhahar, Cynthia Carter, and Nello Cristianini
    2016 “Women Are Seen More than Heard in Online Newspapers.” PLoS ONE11 (2): 1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148434
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148434 [Google Scholar]
30. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2012 “Changes in Politeness Culture.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. byElizabeth Closs Traugott, and Terttu Nevalainen, 422–433. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036 [Google Scholar]
31. Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen
    2012 “Pragmatic Variables.” InThe Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by. Juan M. Hernández-Campoy, and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 293–306. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118257227.ch16
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch16 [Google Scholar]
32. Kent, Susan Kingsley
    1987 Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860–1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka
    2012 “Class, Age, and Gender-based Patterns.” In: Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, 307–331. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118257227.ch17
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch17 [Google Scholar]
34. Kleinke, Sonja, Nuria Hernández, and Birte Bös
    2018 “Introduction: Identity Construction in Complex Discourse Contexts.” InThe Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal – Group – Collective, ed. byBirte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.78.01kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.01kle [Google Scholar]
35. Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte [‘Language of Immediacy – Language of Distance: Orality and Literacy from the Perspective of Language Theory and Linguistic History’].” InRomanistisches Jahrbuch361, 15–43. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110244922.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110244922.15 [Google Scholar]
36. Landert, Daniela
    2014 Personalisation in Mass Media Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.240
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.240 [Google Scholar]
37. Landert, Daniela
    2017 “Participation as User Involvement.” InPragmatics of Social Media, HoPs 11, ed. byChristian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 31–59. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-002 [Google Scholar]
38. Landert, Daniela, and Andreas Jucker
    2011 “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (5): 1422–1434. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.016 [Google Scholar]
39. Lee, Alan J.
    1976 The Origins of the Popular Press in England 1855–1914. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
41. Locher, Miriam A.
    2004 Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110926552
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110926552 [Google Scholar]
42. Lohmann, Arne
    2012 “A Processing View on Order in Reversible and Irreversible Binomials.” View[z] Vienna English Working Papers211: 25–50.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lutzky, Ursula, and Minna Nevala
    (eds) 2019 Reference and Identity in Public Discourses. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.306
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.306 [Google Scholar]
44. Mair, Christian
    1997 “Parallel Corpora: A Real Time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress.” InCorpus-Based Studies in English, ed. byMagnus Ljung, 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653641_015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653641_015 [Google Scholar]
45. Mayhall, Laura E. Nym
    2003 The Militant Suffrage Movement. Citizenship and Resistance in Britain, 1860–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195159936.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159936.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
46. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary (online), Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/
47. Palander-Collin, Minna, and Minna Nevala
    2020 “Person Reference and Democratization.” Language Sciences791: 1–12. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101265
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101265 [Google Scholar]
48. Pugh, Martin
    2002 The March of the Women: A Revisionist Analysis of the Campaign for Women’s Suffrage, 1866–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250226.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199250226.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
49. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer
    2015 “Corpus pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” InCorpus Pragmatics. A Handbook, ed. byKarin Aijmer, and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sandvoss, Cornell
    2006 “Social constructionism.” InThe Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology, ed. byBrian S. Turner, 569–571, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Silander, Daniel
    2005 Democracy from the Outside-In? The Conceptualization and Significance of Democracy Promotion. Växjö: Växjö University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Smith, Harold L.
    2010 The British Women’s Suffrage Campaign 1866–1928. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Soules, Marshall
    2015 Media, Persuasion and Propaganda. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press. 10.1515/9780748644179
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748644179 [Google Scholar]
55. Taavitsainen, Irma; Andreas H. Jucker
    2015 “Twenty Years of Historical Pragmatics. Origins, Developments and Changing Thought Styles.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics16 (1): 1–24. 10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.01taa [Google Scholar]
56. Tusan, Michelle Elizabeth
    2005 Women Making News. Gender and Journalism in Modern Britain. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. VERBI Software
    VERBI Software 2019 MAXQDA 2020 [Computer Software]. Berlin: VERBI Software.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Westin, Ingrid
    2002 Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334007 [Google Scholar]
59. Whitehead, Laurence
    2002 Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199253285.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253285.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
60. British Newspaper Archive
    British Newspaper Archive, https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/
61. The Times Digital Archive
    The Times Digital Archive, https://nl.sub.uni-goettingen.de/collection/nlh-tda1