1887
image of Forms of address as politic behaviour in seventeenth-century Dutch
private and business letters

Abstract

Abstract

Various characteristics of historical letters, such as formulaic language and forms of address, have been analysed from a politeness perspective (e.g., Bijkerk [2004] and Tiisala [2004]) and sometimes also explicitly from a sociopragmatic perspective (Nevala 2004a). In Rutten and van der Wal (2014), we analysed Dutch private letters of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, arguing that the many changes occurring in the system of forms of address, which includes both nominal and pronominal forms, can be modelled sociopragmatically, with reference to both sociolinguistic factors and politic behaviour in the sense of Watts (2003). We also observed differences between the private letters in our corpus and a limited number of business letters that we had at our disposal at the time, and it is this issue that we explore in this paper. On the basis of a recently compiled subset of business letters by seventeenth-century merchants (van der Wal and Rutten 2024), of whom we also have private letters, we first analyse the distribution of forms of address in the business letters against the background of what we know about private letters in general. We then compare qualitatively the use of forms of address in the business letters with private letters by the same writers, focussing on three prolific authors.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00081.rut
2026-02-10
2026-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jhp.00081.rut/jhp.00081.rut.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00081.rut&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Letters as Loot Corpus (lal)
    Letters as Loot Corpus (lal). Leiden University. Compiled by Marijke van der Wal (Programme Leader), Gijsbert Rutten, Judith Nobels and Tanja Simons, with the assistance of volunteers of the Leiden-based Wikiscripta Neerlandica transcription project, and lemmatised, tagged and provided with search facilities by the Institute for Dutch Lexicology (inl), the present Dutch Language Institute (int). Third release: January 2021 See: hdl.handle.net/10032/tm-a2-s4 and https://brievenalsbuit.ivdnt.org
  2. Letters as Loot-2 (lal-2). Version 1.0
    Letters as Loot-2 (lal-2). Version 1.0. 26February 2021 Compiled byMarijke van der Wal, Leiden University. Available at theDutch Language Institute (int). See: hdl.handle.net/10032/tm-a2-s6 and https://brievenalsbuit2.ivdnt.org
  3. Berteloot, Amand
    2003 “Van du naar ghi: Waarom het pronomen du uit het Nederlands verdween” (‘From Du to Ghi: Why the Pronoun Du Disappeared in Dutch’). Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bijkerk, Annemieke
    2004 “Yours Sincerely and Yours Affectionately: On the Origin and Development of Two Positive Politeness Markers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.5.2.08bij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.08bij [Google Scholar]
  5. Culpeper, Jonathan and Michael Haugh
    2021 “(Im)Politeness and Sociopragmatics”. InMichael Haugh, Daniel Kádár and Marina Terkourafi (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954105.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.018 [Google Scholar]
  6. van der Horst, Joop
    2008Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis (‘History of Dutch Syntax’). (volumes.) Louvain: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2020Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589147 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
    2003 “Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems: Introduction”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.02juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.02juc [Google Scholar]
  9. Nevala, Minna
    2003 “Family First: Address and Subscription Formulae in English Family Correspondence from the Fifteenth to the Seventeenth Century”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.08nev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.08nev [Google Scholar]
  10. 2004a “Accessing Politeness Axes: Forms of Address and Terms of Reference in Early English Correspondence”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2004b “Inside and Out: Forms of Address in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Letters”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.5.2.07nev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.07nev [Google Scholar]
  12. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    1995 “Constraints on Politeness: The Pragmatics of Address Formulae in Early English Correspondence”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.28nev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.28nev [Google Scholar]
  13. Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker
    2019 “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-Evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.012 [Google Scholar]
  14. Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke van der Wal
    2014Letters as Loot: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ahs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
    (eds) 2003Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107 [Google Scholar]
  16. Tiisala, Seija
    2004 “Power and Politeness: Languages and Salutation Formulas in Correspondence between Sweden and the German Hanse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.5.2.03tii
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.03tii [Google Scholar]
  17. van der Wal, Marijke and Gijsbert Rutten
    2024 “Comparing the Register of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Business Letters to Private Letters: Formulaic Language and French-Origin Items”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics (): –. 10.1515/jhsl‑2023‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2023-0003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Watts, Richard J.
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00081.rut
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00081.rut
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error