1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of “Pray, Sir, Proceed”
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

Requests are speech acts that ask somebody to do something that they might not have done without being asked. They impose on the addressee. In Present-day English, a range of linguistic devices are often used to make this imposition more palatable, such as questions about the addressee’s willingness or ability to carry out the required action and the use of the courtesy request marker . However, this form of non-imposition politeness is relatively recent. In this paper, I focus on the politeness of requests before the onset of non-imposition politeness (i.e., in the eighteenth century). In the data consisting of the four-million word Corpus of Long Eighteenth-Century Epistolary Novels (18), polite requests rely on what I call “supplication politeness” rather than “non-imposition politeness”. They regularly use a format that includes a performative speech act verb, such as “I beg you…”, “I beseech you…” or “I entreat you…”. The courtesy request marker of choice was , a grammaticalised version of . Both of these elements frame the speaker in the role of a supplicant begging the addressee to do something rather than as an advice giver inquiring after the addressee’s willingness or ability to do it.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
2026-02-06
2026-03-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc/jhp.00082.juc.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Akimoto, Minoji
    2000 “The Grammaticalisation of the Verb ‘Pray’”. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalisation in English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.05aki
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.05aki [Google Scholar]
  2. Baines, Paul
    2004 The Long 18th Century. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron, Alistair and Paul Rayson
    2008 “VARD 2: A Tool for Dealing with Spelling Variation in Historical Corpora”. InProceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics. 22May 2008 Birmingham: Aston University.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Juliane House
    1989 “Cross-Cultural and Situational Variation in Requesting Behavior”. InShoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds), Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, –. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
    (eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Busse, Ulrich
    2002 “Changing Politeness Strategies in English Requests: A Diachronic Investigation”. InJacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio Oizumi, –. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick
    2010 “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214284.3.165
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.3.165 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan and Dawn Archer
    2008 “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts, 1640–1760”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.05cul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.05cul [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth-Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
  11. Elsweiler, Christine
    2022 “Gender Variation in the Requestive Behaviour of Early Modern Scottish and English Letterwriters? A Study of Private Correspondence”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics (): –. 10.1515/jhsl‑2020‑0040
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2020-0040 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2023 “Modal May in Requests: A Comparison of Regional Pragmatic Variation in Early Modern Scottish and English Correspondence”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.20013.els
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.20013.els [Google Scholar]
  13. Faya Cerqueiro, Fátima
    2015 “An Approach to Parenthetical Courtesy Markers in Requests in Late Modern English”. InStefan Schneider, Julie Glikman and Mathieu Avanzi (eds), Parenthetical Verbs, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2017 “Performative Verbs in Requests: Evidence from Eighteenth-Century Letters”. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica: –. 10.18172/cif.2955
     https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.2955 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    1998 “The Commerce of Language in the Pursuit of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England”. English Studies (): –. 10.1080/00138389808599136
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00138389808599136 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2010 “Changes in the Meaning of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England: Discourse Analysis and Historical Evidence”. InJonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kadar (eds), Historical (Im)politeness, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2016 “Sincerity and the Moral Reanalysis of Politeness in Late Modern English: Semantic Change and Contingent Polysemy”. InDon Chapman, Colette Moore and Miranda Wilcox (eds), Generalizing vs. Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110494235‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110494235-009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2020 Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589147
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589147 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2023 “Conduct Politeness versus Etiquette Politeness: A Terminological Distinction”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2023‑0071
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2023-0071 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2024 Speech Acts: Discursive, Multimodal, Diachronic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2025 “Das Konzept der Höflichkeit in England und Deutschland im 18. Jahrhundert in den Werken von Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4. Graf von Chesterfield, und Adolph Freiherr von Knigge” (‘The Concept of Politeness in Eighteenth-Century England and Germany in the Works of Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield, and Adolph Freiherr von Knigge’). InStephan Elspaß, Hirofumi Hosokawa and Megumi Sato (eds), Sprachgeschichte. Soziolinguistisch, pragmatisch und politisch. Festschrift für Hiroyuki Takada (‘Historical Linguistics: Sociolinguistic, Pragmatic, and Political. A Festschrift in Honor of Hiroyuki Takada’), –. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Klauk, Tobias and Tilmann Köppe
    2014 “Bausteine einer Theorie der Fiktionalität” (‘Foundations of a Theory of Fictionality’). InTobias Klauk and Tilmann Köppe (eds), Fiktionalität. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (‘Fictionality: An Interdisciplinary Handbook’), –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110322606.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322606.3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kohnen, Thomas
    2007 “Text Types and the Methodology of Diachronic Speech Act Analysis”. InSusan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methodological Issues in Historical Pragmatics, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197822.139
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.139 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2008 “Tracing Directives through Text and Time: Towards a Methodology of a Corpus-Based Diachronic Speech-Act Analysis”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.16koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.16koh [Google Scholar]
  25. Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
    1998 “Pragmatic Particles in Early Modern English Tracts”. InRaimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag 1997 Giessen. Proceedings, –. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, Robin
    1973 “Language and Woman’s Place”. Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500000051
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  27. Langford, Paul
    2002 “The Uses of Eighteenth-Century Politeness”. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society: –. 10.1017/S0080440102000129
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440102000129 [Google Scholar]
  28. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  31. Locher, Miriam A. and Andreas H. Jucker
    2021 The Pragmatics of Fiction: Literature, Stage and Screen Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474447959
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474447959 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lutzky, Ursula and Jane Demmen
    2013 “Pray in Early Modern English Drama”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.14.2.05lut
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.14.2.05lut [Google Scholar]
  33. Marquez Reiter, Rosina
    2000 Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.83
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.83 [Google Scholar]
  34. Moessner, Lilo
    2010 “Directive Speech Acts: A Cross-Generic Diachronic Study”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.11.2.03moe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.2.03moe [Google Scholar]
  35. Nünning, Vera and Ansgar Nünning
    1998 Englische Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts (‘English Literature of the Eighteenth Century’). Stuttgart: Klett.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Oxford English Dictionary
    Oxford English Dictionary. See: https://www.oed.com
  37. Schneider, Klaus P.
    2017 “Is That a Threat? Forms and Functions of Metapragmatic Terms in English Discourse”. AAA — Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 2022 “Referring to Speech Acts in Communication: Exploring Meta-Illocutionary Expressions in ICE-Ireland”. Corpus Pragmatics: –. 10.1007/s41701‑022‑00123‑w
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-022-00123-w [Google Scholar]
  39. Schoppa, Dominik Jan
    2022 “Conceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist Perspective on the Meta-Illocutionary Lexicon”. Corpus Pragmatics: –. 10.1007/s41701‑022‑00115‑w
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-022-00115-w [Google Scholar]
  40. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sönmez, Margaret J-M.
    2005 “A Study of Request Markers in English Family Letters from 1623 to 1660”. European Journal of English Studies (): –. 10.1080/13825570500067937
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570500067937 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
    2009 An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748631308
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631308 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid and Fátima Faya Cerqueiro
    2007 “Saying Please in Late Modern English”. InJavier Pérez Guerra, Dolores González Alvarez, Jorge L. Bueno Alonso and Esperanza Rama Martínez (eds), “Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed”: New Insights into Late Modern English, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Trosborg, Anna
    1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
  46. Vogt, Yvonne
    2022 The Metalanguage of Conduct: A Corpus-Linguistic Approach to Lexico-Grammatical Patterns of Evaluative Adjectives in 18th-Century Epistolary Fiction. (Master’s dissertation.) Zurich: University of Zurich.
  47. Watts, Richard J.
    1999 “Language and Politeness in Early Eighteenth Century Britain”. Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.9.1.02wat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.02wat [Google Scholar]
  48. Watts, Richard
    2002 “From Polite Language to Educated Language: The Re-Emergence of an Ideology”. InRichard Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds), Alternative Histories of English, –. London and New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Behn, Aphra
    1684, 1685, 1687 Love-Letters Between a Nobleman and His Sister.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Trotter, Catharine
    1693 Olinda’s Adventures: or the Amours of a Young Lady.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. De la Rivière, Mary
    1696 Letters Writen [sic] by Mrs. Manley (incl. a Letter from a Supposed Nun in Portugal to a Gentleman in France).
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Haywood, Eliza
    1719–1720 Love in Excess; Or, The Fatal Enquiry.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 1725 The Fatal Secret: or, Constancy in Distress.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Davys, Mary and Bowden, Martha
    , “The Reform’d Coquet, Familiar Letters Betwixt a Gentleman and a Lady, and The Accomplish’d Rake” (1999) Literature in English, British Isles. .
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Anonymous./Tom Brown
    (ed.) 1702 [1949] The Adventures of Lindamira, A Lady of Quality, ed. byBenjamin Boyce.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Haywood, Eliza
    1741 The Anti-Pamela; or Feign’d Innocence Detected.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 1751 The History of Miss Betsy Thoughtless.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Gunning, Susannah
    1768 Barford Abbey.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Griffith, Elizabeth
    1769 The Delicate Distress.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 1776 The story of Lady Juliana Harley: A novel in letters.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Richardson, Samuel
    1740–1761 Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 1747–1761 Clarissa, or, the History of a Young Lady.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 1753–1761 The History of Sir Charles Grandison.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Fielding, Henry
    1741 An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Griffith, Richard
    1757 A series of genuine letters between Henry and Frances.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Goldsmith, Oliver
    1762 The Citizen of the World.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Griffith, Elizabeth
    1771 The history of Lady Barton: A novel in letters.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Burney, Frances
    1778 Evelina: Or The History of A Young Lady’s Entrance into the World.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Cavendish, Georgiana
    1778 The Sylph.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Lennox, Charlotte
    1791 Hermione, or the orphan sisters: A novel.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Edgeworth, Maria
    1806 Leonora.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Shelley, Mary
    1818 Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Smollett, Tobias
    1771 The Expedition of Humphry Clinker.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Holcroft, Thomas
    1780 Alwyn: or the gentleman comedian.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 1792 Anna St. Ives: a novel.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
Loading
“Pray, Sir, Proceed”
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.00082.juc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: supplication politeness ; speech acts ; directives ; non-imposition politeness ; epicol18 ; corpus ; courtesy request markers

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error