Popular News Discourse: American and British newspapers 1833-1988
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper studies political language in late nineteenth century partisan newspapers by (a) evaluating the degree of pragmatic force, or ideological closure in political editorial content published during the 1872 election year in three leading Iowa newspapers; and (b) linking variations in the degree of ideological closure of these texts to the institutional and social-political contexts of their production, i.e. the political role of editors and the web of relationships within which they performed their work. The degree of ideological closure is evaluated by analysing a range of rhetorical and discursive practices. The study identified variations in degree of closure both between newspapers affiliated with the same party and within a single newspaper over time. Such variations are interpreted as reflecting editors’ need to mitigate an intricate set of political interests and obligations. The analysis also brings to light the richness of partisan editorial language of this time. These finds demonstrate the complexity of the political language and discourse of Gilded Age newspapers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.15.2.06str
2014-07-21
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alonso Belmonte, Isabel
    2007 “Newspaper Editorials and Comment Articles: A ‘Cinderella’ Genre?”RAEL: Revista Electrónica de Lingüistica Aplicada1: 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baehr, Harry W., Jr
    1972 [1936] The New York Tribune Since the Civil War. New York: Octagon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paula
    1991The Moral Frameworks of Public Life: Gender, Politics, and the State in Rural New York, 1870–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldasty, Gerald J
    1992The Commercialization of the News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnhurst, Kevin G. , and John Nerone
    2001The Form of News. (The Guilfrd Communication Series.) New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barthes, Roland
    1970S/Z. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bazzanella, Carla
    2011 “Redundancy, Repetition, and Intensity in Discourse.”Language Sciences33 (2): 243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bederman, Gail
    1995Manliness & Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. (Women in Culture and Society.) Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226041490.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041490.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berry, Stephen J
    2005 “Why Objectivity Still Matters.”Nieman Reports59 (2): 15–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bormann, Ernest G
    1972 “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality.”Quarterly Journal of Speech58: 396–407. doi: 10.1080/00335637209383138
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138 [Google Scholar]
  11. 1982 “Colloquy: I. Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: Ten Years Later.”Quarterly Journal of Speech68: 288–305. doi: 10.1080/00335638209383614
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638209383614 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowes, Andrea , and Albert Katz
    2011 “When Sarcasm Stings.”Discourse Processes48: 215–236. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke, Martin J
    1995The Conundrum of Class: Public Discourse on the Social Order in America. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Caffi, Claudia , and Richard W. Janney
    1994 “Toward a Pragmatics of Emotive Communication.”Journal of Pragmatics22: 325–373. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90115‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Calhoun, Charles W
    1996 “The Political Culture: Public Life and the Conduct of Politics.”InThe Gilded Age: Essays on the Origins of Modern America, ed. by Charles W. Calhoun , 185–213. Wilmington, DE: SR Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2010From Bloody Shirt to Full Dinner Pail: The Transformation of Politics and Governance in the Gilded Age. New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Carter, Ronald , and Walter Nash
    1990Seeing Through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carvalho, Anabela
    2008 “Media (ted) Discourse and Society: Rethinking the Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis.”Journalism Studies9 (2): 161–177. doi: 10.1080/14616700701848162
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carver, Terrel
    1997 “Identity and Narrative in Prime-Time politics: The Hill-Thomas Hearings.”InInterpreting the Political: New Methodologies, ed. by Terrel Carver , and Matti Hyvärinen , 7–17. London and New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203435342
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203435342 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cherny, Robert W
    1997American Politics in the Gilded Age, 1868–1900. Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chilton, Paul , and Christina Schäffner
    1997 “Discourse and Politics.”InDiscourse as Social Interaction. (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction 2), ed. by Teun A. van Dijk , 206–230. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chouliaraki, Lilie
    2000 “Political Discourse in the News: Democratizing Responsibility or Aestheticizing Politics?”Discourse and Society11 (3): 293–314. doi: 10.1177/0957926500011003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011003002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cmiel, Kenneth
    1990Democratic Eloquence: The Fight over Popular Speech in Nineteenth-Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cohen, Ted
    1978 “Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy.”Critical Inquiry5 (1): 3–12. doi: 10.1086/447969
    https://doi.org/10.1086/447969 [Google Scholar]
  26. Conboy, Martin
    2007The Language of the News. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Cook, Robert J
    1994Baptism by Fire: The Republican Party in Iowa, 1838–1878. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Corbett, Edward P.J
    1965Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. David, James Corbett
    2007 “The Politics of Emasculation: The Caning of Charles Sumner and Elite Ideologies of Manhood in the Mid-Nineteenth-Century United States.”Gender and History19 (2): 324–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0424.2007.00478.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2007.00478.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Davis, Howard , and Paul Walton
    1983 “Death of a Premier: Consensus and Closure in International News.”InLanguage, Image, Media, ed. by Howard Davis , and Paul Walton , 8–49. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Downey, Mathew T
    1967 “Horace Greeley and the Politicians: The Liberal Republican Convention of 1872.”The Journal of American History53: 727–750. doi: 10.2307/1893989
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1893989 [Google Scholar]
  32. Eco, Umberto
    1979The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Eisenhart, Christopher , and Barbara Johnstone
    2008 “Discourse Analysis and Rhetorical Studies.”InRhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analysis of Rhetorical Talk and Text. (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture), ed. by Barbara Johnstone , and Christopher Eisenhart , 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/dapsac.31.02eis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.31.02eis [Google Scholar]
  34. Fairclough, Norman
    1992a “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analyis.”Discourse and Society3 (2): 193–217. doi: 10.1177/0957926592003002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1992b “Intertextuality in Critical Discourse Analysis.”Linguistics and Education4: 269–293. doi: 10.1016/0898‑5898(92)90004‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G [Google Scholar]
  36. 1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. (Language in Social Life Series.) London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Flood, Christopher G
    1996Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction. (Theories of Myth.) New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Flowerdew, John
    1999 “Description and Interpretation in Critical Discourse Analysis.”Journal of Pragmatics31: 1089–1099. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00049‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00049-1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Foner, Eric
    1988Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877. Cambridge: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gamson, William A
    1992Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Gerrig, Richard J. , and Raymond W. Gibbs
    1988 “Beyond the Lexicon: Creativity in Language Production.”Metaphor and Symbolic Activity3: 1–19. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms0301_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0301_1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Green, David E
    1987Shaping Political Consciousness: The Language of Politics in America from McKinley to Reagan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gue, Benjamin F
    1903History of Iowa from the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century, IV: Iowa Biography. New York: Century History.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hall, Stuart
    1980 “Encoding/Decoding.”InCulture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79, ed. by Stuart Hall , Dorothy Hobson , Andrew Lowe , and Paul Willis , 128–138. London: Hutchinson & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hartley, John
    1982Understanding News. London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hilkey, Judy
    1997Character is Capital: Success Manuals and Manhood in Gilded Age America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hirshson, Stanley P
    1962Farewell to the Bloody Shirt: Northern Republicans and the Southern Negro, 1847–1893. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hofstadter, Richard
    1962Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. New York: Alfred Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Hoganson, Kristin L
    1998Fighting for American Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Jensen, Richard
    1971The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kaplan, Richard
    2002Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2010 “The Origins of Objectivity in American Journalism.”InThe Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, ed. by Stuart Allan , 25–37. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. King, Elliot
    2005 “Objectivity During a Clash of Titans, 1883–1915.”InFair & Balanced: A History of Journalistic Objectivity, ed. by Steven R. Knowlton , and Karen L. Freeman , 117–130. Northport, AL: Vision Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kleppner, Paul
    1970The Cross of Culture: A Social Analysis of Midwestern Politics, 1850–1900. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Leech, Geoffrey N
    1969A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. (English Language Series 4.) London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Levine, Lawrence W
    1993The Unpredictable Past: Explorations in American Cultural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195082975.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195082975.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mayer, Gordon
    2006 “Party Rags? Politics and the News Business in Chicago’s Party Press, 1831–71.”Journalism History32 (3): 138–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. McGerr, Michael E
    1986The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. McGerr, Michael
    1990 “Political Style and Women’s Power, 1830–1930.”The Journal of American History77 (3): 864–885. doi: 10.2307/2078989
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2078989 [Google Scholar]
  60. McPherson, James M
    1965 “Grant or Greeley? The Abolitionist Dilemma in the Election of 1872.”The American Historical Review71: 43–61. doi: 10.2307/1863035
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1863035 [Google Scholar]
  61. McQuarrie, Edward F. , and David G. Mick
    1996 “Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language.”Journal of Consumer Research22 (4): 424–438. doi: 10.1086/209459
    https://doi.org/10.1086/209459 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mindich, David T.Z
    1998Just the Facts: How “Objectivity” Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mothersbaugh, David L. , Bruce A. Huhmann , and George R. Franke
    2002 “Combinatory and Separative Effects of Rhetorical Figures on Consumers’ Effort and Focus in Ad Processing.”Journal of Consumer Research28 (4): 589–602. doi: 10.1086/338211
    https://doi.org/10.1086/338211 [Google Scholar]
  64. Mott, Frank L
    1952The News in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674182578
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674182578 [Google Scholar]
  65. Murphy, Kevin P
    2008Political Manhood: Red Bloods, Mollycoddles, and the Politics of Progressive Era Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. n.a
    1897 “Editorial Department: Notable Deaths.”Annals of Iowa3 (1): 75.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Nelson, Dana D
    1998National Manhood: Capitalist Citzenship and the Imagined Fraternity of White Men. Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822382140
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822382140 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ostler, Jeffrey
    1993Prairie Populism: The Fate of Agrarian Radicalism in Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa, 1880–1892. (Rural America.) Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Patnode, Randall , Donald L. Shaw , and Steven R. Knowlton
    2005 “The 19th Century: The Evolution of Objectivity.”InFair & Balanced: A History of Journalistic Objectivity, ed. by Steven R. Knowlton , and Karen L. Freeman , 65–75. Northport, AL: Vision Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Payne, Charles E
    1938Josiah Bushnell Grinnell. Iowa City: State Historical Society of Iowa.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Pendergast, Tom
    2000Creating the Modern Man: American Magazines and Consumer Culture, 1900–1950. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Pilkington, Adrian
    1992 “Poetic Effects.”Lingua87: 29–51. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90024‑D
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90024-D [Google Scholar]
  73. Plett, Heinrich F
    1999 “Rhetoric and Intertextuality.”Rhetorica17 (3): 313–329. doi: 10.1525/rh.1999.17.3.313
    https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1999.17.3.313 [Google Scholar]
  74. Rasmussen, Claire , and Michael Brown
    2005 “The Body Politic as Spatial Metaphor.”Citizenship Studies9 (5): 469–484. doi: 10.1080/13621020500301254
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020500301254 [Google Scholar]
  75. Reitano, Joanne
    1994The Tariff Question in the Gilded Age: The Great Debate of 1888. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Riffaterre, Michael
    1990 “Compulsory Reader Response: The Intertextual Drive.”InIntertextuality: Theories and Practices, ed. by Michael Worton , and Judith Still , 56–78. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Robertson, Andrew W
    1995The Language of Democracy: Political Rhetoric in the United States and Britain, 1790–1900. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Rodgers, Daniel T
    1987Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics Since Independence. New York: Basic Books Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Roeh, Izhak , and Akiba Cohen
    1992 “One of the Bloodiest Days: A Comparative Analysis of Open and Closed Television News.”Journal of Communication42 (2): 42–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1992.tb00777.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00777.x [Google Scholar]
  80. Rubin, Joan Shelley
    1998 “Listen, My Children: Modes and Functions of Poetry Reading in American Schools, 1880–1950.”In Moral Problems in American Life: New Perspectives on Cultural History, ed. by Karen Halttunen , and Lewis Perry , 261–281. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Ryfe, David M
    2006 “News, Culture and Public Life: A Study of 19th-Century American Journalism.”Journalism Studies7 (1): 60–77. doi: 10.1080/14616700500450343
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500450343 [Google Scholar]
  82. Ryfe, David M. , and Markus Kemmelmeier
    2010 “Quoting Practices, Path Dependency and the Birth of Modern Journalism.”Journalism Studies12: 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Sage, Leland L
    1956William Boyd Allison: A Study in Practical Politics. Iowa City: State Historical Society of Iowa.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Seidel, Gill
    1985 “Political Discourse Analysis.”InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, 4: Discourse Analysis in Society, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk , 43–60. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Shenhav, Shaul R
    2005 “Thin and Thick Narrative Analysis: On the Question of Defining and Analyzing Political Narratives.”Narrative Inquiry15 (1): 75–99. doi: 10.1075/ni.15.1.05she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.15.1.05she [Google Scholar]
  86. Simpson, Brooks D
    1998The Reconstruction Presidents. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Slotkin, Richard
    1985The Fatal Environment: The Myth of the Frontier in the Age of Industrialization, 1800–1890. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Smythe, Ted Curtis
    2003The Gilded Age Press, 1865–1900. (The History of American Journalism 4.) Westport, Conn. and London: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Strauss, Dafnah
    2006 “Between Partisanship and Independence: American Editor-Politicians and Independent-Partisan Newspapers, 1870–1910.”Ph.D. Dissertation. Haifa: Haifa University.
  90. Suleiman, Susan R
    1980 “Redundancy and the ‘Readable’ Text.”Poetics Today1 (3): 119–142. doi: 10.2307/1772415
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1772415 [Google Scholar]
  91. Summers, Mark W
    1994The Press Gang: Newspapers and Politics, 1865–1878. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Tannen, Deborah
    1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. (Studies in Interactional Sociolonguistics 6.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Testi, Arnalso
    1995 “The Gender of Reform Politics: Theodore Roosevelt and the Culture of Masculinity.”The Journal of American History81 (4): 1509–1533. doi: 10.2307/2081647
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2081647 [Google Scholar]
  94. Throne, Mildred
    1955 “The Liberal Republican Party in Iowa, 1872.”Iowa Journal of History53: 121–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Titscher, Stefan , Michael Meyer , Ruth Wodak , and Eva Vetter
    2000Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Translated by Bryan Jenner . London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Tonear, Mark , and James Munch
    2001 “Consumer Responses to Tropes in Print Advertising.”Journal of Advertising30 (1): 55–65. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2001.10673631
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673631 [Google Scholar]
  97. Toolan, Michael J
    2001Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, 2nd edition. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Tucher, Andie
    2001 “In Search of Jenkins: Taste, Style, and Credibility in Gilded-Age Journalism.”Journalism History27: 50–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Ungerer, Friedrich
    1997 “Emotions and Emotional Language in English and German News Stories.”InThe Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation, ed. by Susanne Niemeier , and René Dirven , 307–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. van Dijk, Teun A
    1992 “Racism and Argumentation: Race Riot Rhetoric in Tabloid Editorials.”InArgumentation Illuminated, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren , Rob Grootendorst , J. Anthony Blair , and Charles A. Willard , 243–257. Amsterdam: SICSAT.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 1996 “Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials.”Unpublished Paper for the 4th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social Life and Critical Thought, Athens, 14–16December, 1995 (second draft available at: www.discursos.org/unpublished%20articles/Opinions%20and%20ideologies%20in%20editorials.htmaccessed4 December 2013).
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 1998 “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press.”InApproaches to Media Discourseed. by Allan Bell , and Peter Garrett , 21–63. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Walsh, Justin E
    1968To Print the News and Raise Hell! A Biography of Wilbur F. Storey. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Weizman, Elda
    1984 “Some Register Characteristics of Journalistic Language: Are They Universals?”Applied Linguistics5 (1): 39–50. doi: 10.1093/applin/5.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  105. Wilson, John
    1990Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Wolfsfeld, Gadi
    1997Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.15.2.06str
Loading
Keyword(s): 1872 elections; discursive practices; Gilded Age; ideological closure; Iowa; political language; rhetorical practices

Most Cited