1887
Popular News Discourse: American and British newspapers 1833-1988
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Content analysis is the most common approach to exploring the use of specific words within media studies. This approach has significant limitations that can be addressed through the application of other related approaches to understanding mediated content, including sociolinguistics and conceptual history. The emergence of large databases of digitized newspapers opens the possibility of an integrated approach that draws on elements of each of those related paradigms. An analysis of the rise and fall of the terms “jingo” and “jingoism” in the British press from 1878 to 1900 demonstrates how this integrated research paradigm can be productively applied to gain insight into how newspapers serve to broadly distribute words attached to specific concepts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.15.2.07kin
2014-07-21
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, Allen
    1991The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd-Barrett, Oliver
    2011 “Media Bias: A Comparative Study of Time, Newsweek, the National Review, and the Progressive Coverage of Domestic Social Issues, 1975–2000.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly88 (1): 216–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conboy, Martin
    2007The Language of News. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010The Language of Newspapers. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cotter, Colleen
    2005 “Discourse and Media.”InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin , Deborah Tannen , and Heidi E. Hamilton , 416–436. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470753460.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2010News Talk: Investigating the Language of JournalismCambridge: Cambridge University Press doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511811975
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811975 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham, Hugh
    1971 “Jingoism in 1877–1878.”Victorian Studies14 (4): 429–453.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. de Zengotita, Thomas
    2006Mediated: How the Media Shapes our World and the Way We Live. New York: Bloomsbury USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. English, Jim
    2006 “Empire Day in Britain: 1904–1958.”The Historical Journal49 (1): 247–276. doi: 10.1017/S0018246X0500511X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X0500511X [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fowler, Roger
    1991Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London and New York: Rouledge
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gans, Herbert
    2005Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Garrioch, David
    1987 “Verbal Insults in Eighteenth-Century Paris.”InThe Social History of Language, ed. by Peter Burke , and Roy Porter , 104–119. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. George, Alexander
    1959 “Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.”InTrends in Content Analysis, ed. by Ithiel de Sola Pool , 7–32. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall, Stuart
    [1973] 1980 “Encoding/Decoding.”InCulture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79, ed. by Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, 128–38. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2005Representation & the Media (video recording). Media Education Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartley, John
    1982Understanding News. London: Metheun & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffman, Lindsay H
    2006 “Is Internet Content Different After All? A Content Analysis of Mobilizing Information In Online And Print Newspapers.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83 (1): 58–76. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300105 [Google Scholar]
  19. Holley, Rose
    2009 “How Good Can It Get?: Analyzing and Improving OCR Accuracy in Large Scale Newspaper Digitization Programs.”D-Lib Magazine15 (3–4). Available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/march09/holley/03holley.html (accessed5 October 2012). doi: 10.1045/march2009‑holley
    https://doi.org/10.1045/march2009-holley [Google Scholar]
  20. Holyoake, G.J
    1893Sixty Years of an Agitator’s Life. 3rd edition. London: T.F. Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hughes, Geoffrey
    2010Political Correctness. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hymes, Dell
    2003 “Models of Interaction of Language and Social Life.”InSociolinguistices: The Essential Readings, ed. by Christina Bratt Paul , and G. Richard Tucker , 30–47. London: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ihalainen, Pasi
    2006 “Between Historical Semantics and Pragmatics: Reconstructing Past Political Thought through Conceptual History.”Journal of Historical Pragmatics7 (1): 115–143. doi: 10.1075/jhp.7.1.06iha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.1.06iha [Google Scholar]
  24. Jucker, Andreas H
    2011 “The Discourse of Poverty in British Newspapers: A CDA Perspective.”InMedia Discourse of Poverty and Social Exclusion, ed. by Valic Nedeljkovic Dubravka , 13–19. Nove Sad: Faculty of Philosophy.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kahneman, Daniel
    2011Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kvastad, Nils B
    1994 “Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas.”InThe History of Ideas: Canon and Variations, ed. by Donald R. Kelly , 243–260. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lasswell, Harold
    1927Propaganda Technique in the World War. London: Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1965 “Why be Quantitative?”InThe Language of Politics, ed. by Harold Lasswell , Nathan Leites , and Associates, 40–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lippman, Walter
    1922Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lovejoy, Arthur O
    1966The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Luntz, Frank
    2007Words that Work. New York: Hyperion.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McCombs, Maxell
    2004Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McLuhan, Marshall
    1964Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Signet.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. MacNamara, Jim
    2006 “Media Content Analysis: Uses, Benefits & Best Practice Methodology.”Research Paper. Available at: blogdeseminar.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/media-content-analysis.pdf (accessedDecember 10, 2013)
  35. McQuail, Denis
    1997Audience Analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nord, David Paul
    2001Communities of Journalism. Champaign, Il: University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Leary, Daniel
    2008 “Censored and Embedded Shaw: Print Culture and Shavian Analysis of Wartime Media.”Shaw: The Annual of Shaw Studies28: 168–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Riffe, Daniel , and Alan Freitag
    1997 “A Content Analysis of Content Analysis: Twenty-Five Years of Journalism Quarterly.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly74 (4): 873–882. doi: 10.1177/107769909707400414
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400414 [Google Scholar]
  39. Riffe, Daniel , Stephen Lacy , and Frederick G. Fico
    1998Analyzing Media Message: Using Quantitative Content Analysis is Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rosenberry, Jack
    2005 “The Effect of Content Mix on Circulation Penetration for U.S. Daily Newspapers.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly82 (2): 377–397. doi: 10.1177/107769900508200209
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200209 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schiffrin, Deborah , Deborah Tannen , and Heidi E. Hamilton
    (eds.) 2001The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Skinnner, Quentin
    1969 “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.”History and Theory8 (1): 3–53. doi: 10.2307/2504188
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188 [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith, Goldwin
    1896Loyalty, Aristocracy and Jingoism: Three Lectures Delivered Before the Young Men’s Liberal Club, Toronto. Toronto: HunterRose.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sporta, Sol , and Thomas Sebeok
    1959 “Linguistics and Content Analysis.”InTrends in Content Analysis, ed. by Ithiel de Sola Pool , 131–150. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Stryker, Jo Ellen , Ricardo J. Wray , Robert C. Hornik , and Itzik Yanovitzsky
    2006 “Validation of Database Search Terms for Content Analysis: The Case of Cancer News Coverage.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly83 (2): 413–430. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300212
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300212 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tuchman, Gaye
    1980Making News. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.15.2.07kin
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual history , content analysis , jingoism , media history , newspapers and public sphere
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error