A perspective on “impoliteness” in early modern Romanian court and diplomatic interactions

References

1. Mihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu
   AB - Istoria Ţării Romîneşti de la octombrie 1688 pînă la martie 1717(Cronica Anonimă despre Brâncoveanu) in Cronicari munteni, vol.II 1961 Edition byMihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu, Bucureşti: Editura pentru literatură.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Costin – Miron Costin, Opere 1958 Critical edition with introductory study, notes, comments, variants, index and glossary by P.P. Panaitescu. Bucureşti: Editura de Stat pentru Literatură şi Artă.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Gabriel Ştrempel
   Neculce – Ion Neculce, Opere. Letopiseţul Ţării Moldovei şi O samă de cuvinte 1982 Critical edition and introductory study byGabriel Ştrempel. Bucureşti: Minerva.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Mihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu
   RG – Radu Greceanu, Începătura istoriii vieţii luminatului şi preacreştinului domnului Ţărîi Rumîneşti, Io Costandin Brîncoveanu Basarab-voievod… in Cronicari munteni, vol.II 1961 Edition byMihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu. Bucureşti: Editura pentru literatură.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Mihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu
   RP – Radu Popescu, Istoriile domnilor Ţărîi Romîneştiin Cronicari munteni, vol.I 1961 Edition byMihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu. Bucureşti: Editura pentru literatură.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ağildere, Suna Timur
   2009 “Les interprètes au carrefour des cultures ou les drogmans dans l’Empire ottoman (XVIe – début du XXe siècle)”. Babel55 (1): 1–19.10.1075/babel.55.1.01agi
   https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.55.1.01agi [Google Scholar]
7. Arndt, Horst and Richard Janney
   1985 “Improving Emotive Communication: Verbal, Prosodic and Kinezic Conflict Avoidance Techniques”. Per Linguam1: 21–33.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bax, Marcel
   2010 “Rituals”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics (Volume 8: Historical Pragmatics), 483–519. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bax, Marcel
   2011 “An Evolutionary Take on (Im)politeness: Three Broad Developments in the Marking out of Socio-proxemic Space”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 255–82.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.11bax
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.11bax [Google Scholar]
10. Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011 “The Historical Understanding of Historical (Im)politeness: Introductory Notes”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 1–24.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.01bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax [Google Scholar]
11. Bayraktaroğlu, Arın and Maria Sifianou
    2001 “Introduction”. InArın Bayraktaroğlu and Maria Sifianou (eds), Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.88.02bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.88.02bay [Google Scholar]
12. Boia, Lucian
    2002 România: ţară de frontieră a Europei [‘Romania. Borderland of Europe’]. Bucureşti: Humanitas.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bryson, Anna
    1998 From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Collins, Daniel E.
    2001 Reanimated Voices: Speech Reporting in a Historical-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.85
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.85 [Google Scholar]
15. Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
    2013 “Forme și strategii ale politeții la cronicari” [‘Politeness Forms and Strategies at the Chroniclers’]. InRodica Zafiu et al. (eds) Limba română: variație sincronică, variație diacronică [‘Romanian: Synchronic Variation, Diachronic Variation’], VolumeII, 53–66. București: Editura Universității din București.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
    2015a “Observații asupra mărcilor comportamentale ale politeții la cronicari (sec. XVII-XVIII)” [‘Remarks on Politeness Behavioural Markers at the Chroniclers (Seventeenth-Eighteenth Centuries)’]. InMarius Sala et al. (eds), Lucrările celui de-al cincilea simpozion internațional de lingvistică, București 27–28 septembrie 2013 [‘Proceedings of the Fifth International Linguistics Symposium. Bucharest, 27–28 September 2013’], 763–76. București: Enciclopedic Gold.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
    2015b Principatele române între Orient și Occident: dinamica modelelor culturale ale politeții și impoliteții în secolul al XIX-lea [‘The Romanian Principalities between the Orient and the Occident: The Dynamics of Cultural Models of Politeness and Impoliteness in the Nineteenth Century’]. București: Editura Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
    2015c “Metacommunicative Aspects of Im/politeness in mid-19th Century Romanian Principalities”. Diversité et identité culturelle en Europe [‘Diversity and Cultural Identity in Europe’] 12 (1): 61–78.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
20. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth-century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 49–81.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
21. Culpeper, Jonathan and Dániel Z. Kádár
    (eds) 2010 Historical (Im)politeness. Bern and Berlin, etc.: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    2014 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Culpeper, Jonathan, Gila Shauer, Leyla Marti, Meilan Mei and Minna Nevala
    2014 “Impoliteness and Emotions in a Cross-cultural Perspective”. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature30: 67–88.
    [Google Scholar]
24. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1987 Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Eelen, Gino
    2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gáldi, Ladislas
    1939 Les mots d’origine néo-grecque en roumain à l'époque des phanariotes. Budapest: Kir. M. Pàzmàny Péter Tudom ányegyetemi Görog Filológiai Intézet.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Genette, Gérard
    1972 Figures III [coll. « Poétique »]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haugh, Michael
    2015 Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin, Munich and Boston: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Held, Gudrun
    2010 “Supplica la mia parvidade… Petitions in Medieval Society – A Matter of Ritualized or First Reflexive Politeness?” Journal of Historical Pragmatics11 (2): 194–218.10.1075/jhp.11.2.02hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.2.02hel [Google Scholar]
30. Hitchins, Keith
    2014 A Concise History of Romania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hofstede, Geert
    2001 Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. (Second edition.) London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and ‘Discernment’: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness”. Multilingua8 (2/3): 223–48.10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
33. Işık-Güler, Hale and Şükriye Ruhi
    2010 “Face and Impoliteness at the Intersection with Emotions: A Corpus-based Study in Turkish”. Intercultural Pragmatics7 (4): 625–60.10.1515/iprg.2010.028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.028 [Google Scholar]
34. Janney, Richard and Horst Arndt
    2005 [1992] “Intracultural Tact versus Intercultural Tact” InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 21–70. (Second revised and expanded edition, with a new introduction.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jucker, Andreas H.
    (ed.) 1995 Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
36. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2008 “Historical Pragmatics”. Language and Linguistics Compass2 (5): 894–906.10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00087.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x [Google Scholar]
37. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2010 “In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest: Politeness in Middle English”. InJonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (Im)politeness, 175–200. Bern and Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2011 “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 178–97.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.08juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.08juc [Google Scholar]
39. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
    2000 “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1 (1): 67–95.10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
40. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
    (eds) 2010 Historical Pragmatics. Berlin and New York: DeGruyter.10.1515/9783110214284
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284 [Google Scholar]
41. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Jonathan Culpeper
    2010 “Historical (Im)politeness: An Introduction”. InJonathan Culpeper and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (Im)politeness, 9–36. Bern and Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013 Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230393059
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
43. Kádár, Daniel Z. and Michael Haugh
    2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
44. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills
    2013 “Rethinking ‘Discernment’”. Journal of Politeness Research9 (2): 133–58.10.1515/pr‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
45. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Annick Paternoster
    2015 “Historicity in Metapragmatics: A Study on ‘Discernment’ in Italian Metadiscourse”. Pragmatics25 (3): 369–91.10.1075/prag.25.3.03kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.3.03kad [Google Scholar]
46. Kelly, Catriona
    2007 Refining Russia: Advice Literature, Polite Culture and Gender from Catherine to Yeltsin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachttheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch36: 15–43.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008 “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
49. Langlotz, Andreas and Miriam A. Locher
    2013 “The Role of Emotions in Relational Work”. Journal of Pragmatics58: 87–107.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014 [Google Scholar]
50. Leech, Geoffrey N. and Mick Short
    2007 Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. (Second edition. First edition 1981.) London: Pearson Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lintvelt, Jaap
    1989 [1981]  Essai de typologie narrative. Le “point de vue”. Théorie et analyse. Paris: Corti.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Locher, Miriam A. and Andreas Langlotz
    2008 “Relational Work: At the Intersection of Cognition, Interaction and Emotion”. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée88: 165–91.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts
    2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research1 (1): 9–33.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
54. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts
    2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour”. InDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 77–99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
55. Mazilu, Dan Horia
    2008 Văduvele sau despre istorie la feminin [‘Widows or about Feminine History’]. Iaşi: Polirom.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Muchembled, Robert
    2004 Societatea rafinată. Politică şi politeţe în Franţa, din secolul al XVI-lea până în secolul al XX-lea [‘Polished Society. Politics and Politeness in France from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century’]. (Translated from French byIlie Dan.) Chişinău: Cartier.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ogiermann, Eva
    2009 On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.191
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.191 [Google Scholar]
58. Palander-Collin, Minna
    2009 “Variation and Change in Patterns of Self-Reference in early English Correspondence”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (2): 260–85.10.1075/jhp.10.2.06pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.06pal [Google Scholar]
59. Paternoster, Annick
    2015 Cortesi e scortesi. Percorsi di pragmatica storica da Castiglione a Collodi. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pernau, Margrit, Helge Jordheim, Orit Bashkin, Christian Bailey, Oleg Benesch, Jan Ifversen, Mana Kia, Rochona Majumdar, Angelika C. Messner, Myoung-kyu Park, Emmanuelle Saada, Mohinder Singh and Einar Wigen
    2015 Civilizing Emotions: Concepts in Nineteenth Century Asia and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745532.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745532.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
61. Pippidi, Andrei
    1980 Hommes et idées du Sud-Est européen à l’aube de l'âge moderne. București: Editura Academiei/Paris: Editions du C.N.R.S.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Plantin, Christian
    2011 Les bonnes raisons des émotions. Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours émotionné. Berne: Peter Lang.10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑0070‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-0070-6 [Google Scholar]
63. Rathmayr, Renate
    1999 “Métadiscours et réalité linguistique: L’exemple de la politesse russe”. Pragmatics9 (1): 75–95.10.1075/prag.9.1.06rat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.06rat [Google Scholar]
64. Rosetti, Alexandru, Boris Cazacu and Liviu Onu
    1971 Istoria limbii române literare: de la origini pînă la începutul secolului al XIX-lea [‘History of the Romanian Literary Language: From the Beginnings until the Early 19th Century]. (Volume1.) Bucureşti: Minerva.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Rothman, E. Natalie
    2009 “Interpreting Dragomans: Boundaries and Crossings in the Early Modern Mediterranean”. Comparative Studies in Society and History51 (4): 771–800.10.1017/S0010417509990132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417509990132 [Google Scholar]
66. Ruhi, Șükriye and Daniel Z. Kádár
    2011 “‘Face’ across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 25–48.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.02ruh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.02ruh [Google Scholar]
67. Semino, Elena and Mick Short
    2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Short, Mick, Elena Semino and Martin Wynne
    2002 “Revisiting the Notion of Faithfulness in Discourse Presentation Using a Corpus Approach”. Language and Literature11 (4): 325–55.10.1177/096394700201100403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100403 [Google Scholar]
69. Somel, Selçuk Akşin
    2010 The A to Z of the Ottoman Empire. Lanham, Maryland, USA: The Scarecrow Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face”. Journal of Pragmatics39: 639–56.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
71. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2011 “Conceptualising ‘the Relational’ in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion and (Im)politeness Comments”. Journal of Pragmatics43: 3565–78.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009 [Google Scholar]
72. Stevanovic, Melissa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface between Knowledge, Power and Emotion in Interaction and Social Ralations”. Language in Society43 (2): 185–207.10.1017/S0047404514000037.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
73. Stoica, Gabriela
    2010 “Lexicul socio-afectiv în româna veche. Studiu de caz – ruşine” [‘Socio-affective Lexicon in Old Romanian. A Case Study-Shame’]. InRodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu and Alexandru Nicolae (eds), Limba română: Controverse, delimitări, noi ipoteze (I), 355–66. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
    2010 “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 3–30. Berlin and New York: Degruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Terkourafi, Marina
    2008 “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness and Rudeness”. InDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Ţighiliu, Iolanda
    1998 Societate şi mentalitate în Ţara Românească şi Moldova. Secolele XV-XVII [‘Society and Mentality in Wallachia and Moldavia. Fifteenth – Seventeenth Centuries’]. Bucureşti: Paideia.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Verschueren, Jef
    1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Verschueren, Jef
    2000 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use”. Pragmatics10 (4): 439–56.10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver [Google Scholar]
79. Verschueren, Jef
    2012 “The Metapragmatics of Civilized Belligerence” inUlrich Busse and Axel Hubler (eds), Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, 111–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.220.10ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220.10ver [Google Scholar]
80. Watts, Richard J.
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
81. Watts, Richard J.
    2005 “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo vadis?” InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, xi–xlvii. (Second revised and expanded edition, with a new introduction.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199819.1.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199819.1.131 [Google Scholar]
82. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich
    (eds) 1992 “Introduction”. InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 1–17. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]