Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The paper focuses on impoliteness dealt with from a historical pragmatics perspective ( Jucker [ed.] 1995 ; Culpeper and Kádár [eds] 2010 ; Jucker and Taavitsainen [eds] 2010 ; etc.). The approach adopted in this study favours a first-order im/politeness view ( Watts et al. [eds] 1992 ; Eelen 2001 ; etc.), which is mainly concerned with the evaluation of behavioural elements by the participants in a communicative event. As im/politeness in Romanian is under-researched from a historical sociopragmatic perspective, this analysis tries to fill a gap exploring the seventeenth to early-eighteenth century cultural patterns and their characteristics in only two main Romanian provinces, Moldavia and Wallachia (separate states from the Middle Ages until their union in 1859).

My analysis is limited to the understanding and practices of “impoliteness” in official settings (court and diplomatic interactions), aiming to capture the production and evaluation, as well as some self-reflexive aspects ( Eelen 2001 ; Kádár 2013 ) and emotional effects of “impoliteness”. The corpus consists of Moldavian and Wallachian chronicles from the second half of the seventeenth-century and first half of the eighteenth-century, presenting local court life and also scenes at the Ottoman court.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. AB - Istoria Ţării Romîneşti de la octombrie 1688 pînă la martie 1717(Cronica Anonimă despre Brâncoveanu) in Cronicari munteni, vol.II 1961 Edition byMihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu, Bucureşti: Editura pentru literatură.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Costin – Miron Costin, Opere 1958 Critical edition with introductory study, notes, comments, variants, index and glossary by P.P. Panaitescu. Bucureşti: Editura de Stat pentru Literatură şi Artă.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Neculce – Ion Neculce, Opere. Letopiseţul Ţării Moldovei şi O samă de cuvinte 1982 Critical edition and introductory study byGabriel Ştrempel. Bucureşti: Minerva.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. RG – Radu Greceanu, Începătura istoriii vieţii luminatului şi preacreştinului domnului Ţărîi Rumîneşti, Io Costandin Brîncoveanu Basarab-voievod… in Cronicari munteni, vol.II 1961 Edition byMihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu. Bucureşti: Editura pentru literatură.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RP – Radu Popescu, Istoriile domnilor Ţărîi Romîneştiin Cronicari munteni, vol.I 1961 Edition byMihail Gregorian, introductory study by Eugen Stănescu. Bucureşti: Editura pentru literatură.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ağildere, Suna Timur
    2009 “Les interprètes au carrefour des cultures ou les drogmans dans l’Empire ottoman (XVIe – début du XXe siècle)”. Babel55 (1): 1–19.10.1075/babel.55.1.01agi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.55.1.01agi [Google Scholar]
  7. Arndt, Horst and Richard Janney
    1985 “Improving Emotive Communication: Verbal, Prosodic and Kinezic Conflict Avoidance Techniques”. Per Linguam1: 21–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bax, Marcel
    2010 “Rituals”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics (Volume 8: Historical Pragmatics), 483–519. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2011 “An Evolutionary Take on (Im)politeness: Three Broad Developments in the Marking out of Socio-proxemic Space”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 255–82.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.11bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.11bax [Google Scholar]
  10. Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011 “The Historical Understanding of Historical (Im)politeness: Introductory Notes”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 1–24.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.01bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax [Google Scholar]
  11. Bayraktaroğlu, Arın and Maria Sifianou
    2001 “Introduction”. InArın Bayraktaroğlu and Maria Sifianou (eds), Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.88.02bay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.88.02bay [Google Scholar]
  12. Boia, Lucian
    2002România: ţară de frontieră a Europei [‘Romania. Borderland of Europe’]. Bucureşti: Humanitas.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bryson, Anna
    1998From Courtesy to Civility: Changing Codes of Conduct in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198217657.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, Daniel E.
    2001Reanimated Voices: Speech Reporting in a Historical-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.85
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.85 [Google Scholar]
  15. Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
    2013 “Forme și strategii ale politeții la cronicari” [‘Politeness Forms and Strategies at the Chroniclers’]. InRodica Zafiu et al. (eds) Limba română: variație sincronică, variație diacronică [‘Romanian: Synchronic Variation, Diachronic Variation’], VolumeII, 53–66. București: Editura Universității din București.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2015a “Observații asupra mărcilor comportamentale ale politeții la cronicari (sec. XVII-XVIII)” [‘Remarks on Politeness Behavioural Markers at the Chroniclers (Seventeenth-Eighteenth Centuries)’]. InMarius Sala et al. (eds), Lucrările celui de-al cincilea simpozion internațional de lingvistică, București 27–28 septembrie 2013 [‘Proceedings of the Fifth International Linguistics Symposium. Bucharest, 27–28 September 2013’], 763–76. București: Enciclopedic Gold.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015bPrincipatele române între Orient și Occident: dinamica modelelor culturale ale politeții și impoliteții în secolul al XIX-lea [‘The Romanian Principalities between the Orient and the Occident: The Dynamics of Cultural Models of Politeness and Impoliteness in the Nineteenth Century’]. București: Editura Muzeul Național al Literaturii Române.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2015c “Metacommunicative Aspects of Im/politeness in mid-19th Century Romanian Principalities”. Diversité et identité culturelle en Europe [‘Diversity and Cultural Identity in Europe’] 12 (1): 61–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  20. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth-century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 49–81.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
  21. Culpeper, Jonathan and Dániel Z. Kádár
    (eds) 2010Historical (Im)politeness. Bern and Berlin, etc.: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
    2014Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Culpeper, Jonathan, Gila Shauer, Leyla Marti, Meilan Mei and Minna Nevala
    2014 “Impoliteness and Emotions in a Cross-cultural Perspective”. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature30: 67–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1987Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gáldi, Ladislas
    1939Les mots d’origine néo-grecque en roumain à l'époque des phanariotes. Budapest: Kir. M. Pàzmàny Péter Tudom ányegyetemi Görog Filológiai Intézet.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Genette, Gérard
    1972Figures III [coll. « Poétique »]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haugh, Michael
    2015Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin, Munich and Boston: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Held, Gudrun
    2010 “Supplica la mia parvidade… Petitions in Medieval Society – A Matter of Ritualized or First Reflexive Politeness?” Journal of Historical Pragmatics11 (2): 194–218.10.1075/jhp.11.2.02hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.2.02hel [Google Scholar]
  30. Hitchins, Keith
    2014A Concise History of Romania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hofstede, Geert
    2001Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. (Second edition.) London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ide, Sachiko
    1989 “Formal Forms and ‘Discernment’: Two Neglected Aspects of Linguistic Politeness”. Multilingua8 (2/3): 223–48.10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  33. Işık-Güler, Hale and Şükriye Ruhi
    2010 “Face and Impoliteness at the Intersection with Emotions: A Corpus-based Study in Turkish”. Intercultural Pragmatics7 (4): 625–60.10.1515/iprg.2010.028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.028 [Google Scholar]
  34. Janney, Richard and Horst Arndt
    2005 [1992] “Intracultural Tact versus Intercultural Tact” InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 21–70. (Second revised and expanded edition, with a new introduction.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jucker, Andreas H.
    (ed.) 1995Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2008 “Historical Pragmatics”. Language and Linguistics Compass2 (5): 894–906.10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00087.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x [Google Scholar]
  37. 2010 “In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest: Politeness in Middle English”. InJonathan Culpeper and Daniel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (Im)politeness, 175–200. Bern and Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011 “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 178–97.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.08juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.08juc [Google Scholar]
  39. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
    2000 “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1 (1): 67–95.10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
  40. (eds) 2010Historical Pragmatics. Berlin and New York: DeGruyter.10.1515/9783110214284
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Jonathan Culpeper
    2010 “Historical (Im)politeness: An Introduction”. InJonathan Culpeper and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Historical (Im)politeness, 9–36. Bern and Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2013Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230393059
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kádár, Daniel Z. and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Sara Mills
    2013 “Rethinking ‘Discernment’”. Journal of Politeness Research9 (2): 133–58.10.1515/pr‑2013‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0007 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Annick Paternoster
    2015 “Historicity in Metapragmatics: A Study on ‘Discernment’ in Italian Metadiscourse”. Pragmatics25 (3): 369–91.10.1075/prag.25.3.03kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.3.03kad [Google Scholar]
  46. Kelly, Catriona
    2007Refining Russia: Advice Literature, Polite Culture and Gender from Catherine to Yeltsin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachttheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch36: 15–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008 “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
  49. Langlotz, Andreas and Miriam A. Locher
    2013 “The Role of Emotions in Relational Work”. Journal of Pragmatics58: 87–107.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014 [Google Scholar]
  50. Leech, Geoffrey N. and Mick Short
    2007Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. (Second edition. First edition 1981.) London: Pearson Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Lintvelt, Jaap
    1989 [1981]Essai de typologie narrative. Le “point de vue”. Théorie et analyse. Paris: Corti.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Locher, Miriam A. and Andreas Langlotz
    2008 “Relational Work: At the Intersection of Cognition, Interaction and Emotion”. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée88: 165–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts
    2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research1 (1): 9–33.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour”. InDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 77–99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mazilu, Dan Horia
    2008Văduvele sau despre istorie la feminin [‘Widows or about Feminine History’]. Iaşi: Polirom.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Muchembled, Robert
    2004Societatea rafinată. Politică şi politeţe în Franţa, din secolul al XVI-lea până în secolul al XX-lea [‘Polished Society. Politics and Politeness in France from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century’]. (Translated from French byIlie Dan.) Chişinău: Cartier.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Ogiermann, Eva
    2009On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.191
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.191 [Google Scholar]
  58. Palander-Collin, Minna
    2009 “Variation and Change in Patterns of Self-Reference in early English Correspondence”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (2): 260–85.10.1075/jhp.10.2.06pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.06pal [Google Scholar]
  59. Paternoster, Annick
    2015Cortesi e scortesi. Percorsi di pragmatica storica da Castiglione a Collodi. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Pernau, Margrit, Helge Jordheim, Orit Bashkin, Christian Bailey, Oleg Benesch, Jan Ifversen, Mana Kia, Rochona Majumdar, Angelika C. Messner, Myoung-kyu Park, Emmanuelle Saada, Mohinder Singh and Einar Wigen
    2015Civilizing Emotions: Concepts in Nineteenth Century Asia and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745532.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745532.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pippidi, Andrei
    1980Hommes et idées du Sud-Est européen à l’aube de l'âge moderne. București: Editura Academiei/Paris: Editions du C.N.R.S.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Plantin, Christian
    2011Les bonnes raisons des émotions. Principes et méthode pour l’étude du discours émotionné. Berne: Peter Lang.10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑0070‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-0070-6 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rathmayr, Renate
    1999 “Métadiscours et réalité linguistique: L’exemple de la politesse russe”. Pragmatics9 (1): 75–95.10.1075/prag.9.1.06rat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.06rat [Google Scholar]
  64. Rosetti, Alexandru, Boris Cazacu and Liviu Onu
    1971Istoria limbii române literare: de la origini pînă la începutul secolului al XIX-lea [‘History of the Romanian Literary Language: From the Beginnings until the Early 19th Century]. (Volume1.) Bucureşti: Minerva.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rothman, E. Natalie
    2009 “Interpreting Dragomans: Boundaries and Crossings in the Early Modern Mediterranean”. Comparative Studies in Society and History51 (4): 771–800.10.1017/S0010417509990132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417509990132 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ruhi, Șükriye and Daniel Z. Kádár
    2011 “‘Face’ across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 25–48.10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.02ruh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.02ruh [Google Scholar]
  67. Semino, Elena and Mick Short
    2004Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Short, Mick, Elena Semino and Martin Wynne
    2002 “Revisiting the Notion of Faithfulness in Discourse Presentation Using a Corpus Approach”. Language and Literature11 (4): 325–55.10.1177/096394700201100403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100403 [Google Scholar]
  69. Somel, Selçuk Akşin
    2010The A to Z of the Ottoman Empire. Lanham, Maryland, USA: The Scarecrow Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face”. Journal of Pragmatics39: 639–56.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2011 “Conceptualising ‘the Relational’ in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatic Emotion and (Im)politeness Comments”. Journal of Pragmatics43: 3565–78.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  72. Stevanovic, Melissa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface between Knowledge, Power and Emotion in Interaction and Social Ralations”. Language in Society43 (2): 185–207.10.1017/S0047404514000037.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
  73. Stoica, Gabriela
    2010 “Lexicul socio-afectiv în româna veche. Studiu de caz – ruşine” [‘Socio-affective Lexicon in Old Romanian. A Case Study-Shame’]. InRodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu and Alexandru Nicolae (eds), Limba română: Controverse, delimitări, noi ipoteze (I), 355–66. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
    2010 “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 3–30. Berlin and New York: Degruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Terkourafi, Marina
    2008 “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness and Rudeness”. InDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher (eds), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Ţighiliu, Iolanda
    1998Societate şi mentalitate în Ţara Românească şi Moldova. Secolele XV-XVII [‘Society and Mentality in Wallachia and Moldavia. Fifteenth – Seventeenth Centuries’]. Bucureşti: Paideia.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Verschueren, Jef
    1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 2000 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use”. Pragmatics10 (4): 439–56.10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver [Google Scholar]
  79. 2012 “The Metapragmatics of Civilized Belligerence” inUlrich Busse and Axel Hubler (eds), Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, 111–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.220.10ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220.10ver [Google Scholar]
  80. Watts, Richard J.
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  81. 2005 “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo vadis?” InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, xi–xlvii. (Second revised and expanded edition, with a new introduction.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199819.1.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199819.1.131 [Google Scholar]
  82. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich
    (eds) 1992 “Introduction”. InRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 1–17. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): emotional effects; evaluation; impoliteness; metalinguistic comments
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error