1887
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study addresses the development undergone by , a form which is in the process of becoming fixed as an argumentative operator and additive connector. has undergone a process of subjectification (Traugott 1995a), which is crucial in the development of discourse markers, where the presence of the speaker is manifested in various ways to cover important areas of meaning in the interpretation of the discourse. It has polarized its meaning in the negative and has progressed to indicate scalar saturation, or a position at the highest level of the argumentative scale, with an evaluation of excess on the part of the speaker. The study has been carried out on the basis of both diachronic and synchronic corpora compiled by the Real Academia Española, and covers the period from 1200 to 2004.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.17.1.04rod
2016-06-07
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, Werner
    (ed.) 1991Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.12 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alarcos, Emilio
    1973 “Aditamento, adverbio y cuestiones conexas” [“Adjunct, Adverb and Related Aspects”]. In Emilio Alarcos (ed.), Estudios de gramática funcional del español [Studies in Spanish Functional Grammar], 219–53. Madrid: Gredos.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anscombre, Jean C. and Oswald Ducrot
    1983L’argumentation dans la langue [Argumentation in Language]. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazzanella, Carla
    2006 “Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a ‘Compositional’ Meaning”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 449–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinton, Laurel J
    1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2010 “Discourse Markers”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Briz, Antonio
    1998El español coloquial en la conversación. [Colloquial Spanish in Conversation]. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan L
    1985Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick
    2010 “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 165–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Company, Concepción
    2004a “Gramaticalización por subjetivización como prescindibilidad de la sintaxis” [“Gramaticalization by Subjetification as Dispensability of Syntax”]. Nueva Revista Filología Hispánica52 (1): 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2004b “¿Gramaticalización o desgramaticalización? Reanálisis y subjetivización de verbos como marcadores discursivos en la historia del español” [“Grammaticalization or degrammaticalization? Reanaysis and subjectification of verbs as discourse markers in the history of Spanish”]. Revista de Filología Española84 (1): 29–66. doi: 10.3989/rfe.2004.v84.i1.97
    https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2004.v84.i1.97 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2006 “Zero in Syntax, Ten in Pragmatics: Subjectification as Syntactic Cancellation”. In Angeliki Athanasiadou , Costas Canalis and Bert Cornillie (eds), Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, 375–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Diewald, Gabriele
    2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics49 (2): 365–90. doi: 10.1515/ling.2011.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dik, Simon C
    1997The Theory of Functional Grammar II: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110218374
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218374 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dostie, Gaetane
    2004Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs[Pragmaticalization and Discourse Markers]. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot. doi: 10.3917/dbu.dosti.2004.01
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.dosti.2004.01 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ducrot, Oswald
    1980Les mots du discours [Discourse Words]. Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1984El decir y lo dicho [The Act of Saying and What’s Said]. Buenos Aires: Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 1995 “Les modificateurs déréalisants” [“Derealizer Modifiers”]. Journal of Pragmatics24 (1–2): 145–65. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00112‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00112-R [Google Scholar]
  20. Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas
    1993 “Pragmaticalization: The Case of ba’ and you know ”. Studies I modern sprakvetenskap [Studies in Modern Linguistics] NS10, 79–93. Stockholm: Amsqvist and Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1975a “Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure”. Linguistic Inquiry6 (3): 353–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1975b “Polarity and the Scale Principle”. In Robin E. Grossman , L. James San and Timothy J. Vance (eds), Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–99. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferrari, Angela
    1995Connessioni. Uno studio integrato della subordinazione avverbiale [Linking: An Integrated Study of Adverbials]. Genève: Slatkine.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fischer, Kerstin
    (ed.) 2006Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fischer, Olga
    2007Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Frank-Job, Barbara
    2006 “A Dynamic-interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 359–74. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fraser, Bruce
    1990 “An Approach to Discourse Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics14 (3): 383–95. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90096‑V
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V [Google Scholar]
  28. 1996 “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics6 (2): 167–90. doi: 10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  29. 1999 “What are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics31 (7): 931–52. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00101‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2006 “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (eds), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2009 “Topic Orientation Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics41 (5): 892–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
    1987Enlaces extraoracionales [Extra-sentential Linking Devices]. Sevilla: Alfar.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1991 “Adverbios de modalidad” [“Modal adverbs”]. Verba18: 275–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 1996aLa sintaxis de los relacionantes supraoracionales [The Syntax of Discourse Markers]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 1996bEjercicios de sintaxis supraoracional. [Extraclausal Syntax Exercises]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2000Lingüística pragmática y Análisis del discurso [Pragmatic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2003 “Operador/ conector, un criterio para la sintaxis discursiva” [“Operator/connector, a discourse syntax distinction”]. Rilce19 (1): 61–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2009Diccionario de conectores y operadores del español [Dictionary of Spanish Connectors and Operators]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2012a “Sobre la gramaticalización de los operadores discursivos, como no podía ser de otra manera” [“On the grammaticalization of discourse operators, como no podía ser de otra manera”]. Lingüística Española Actual34 (1): 27–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2012b “El margen derecho del enunciado” [“Sentential right margin”]. Revista Española de Lingüística42 (2): 63–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2013 “Marcadores argumentativos escalares y gramaticalización” [“Scalar argumentative markers and grammaticalization”]. In Inés Olza and Elvira Manero Richard (eds), Fraseopragmática, 263–301. Place: Frank and Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2014 “Comment Clauses and the Emergence of New Discourse Markers: Spanish lo que es más ”. Journal of Pragmatics61 (1): 103–19. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.020 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina and Esperanza Alcaide Lara
    2002Mecanismos lingüísticos de la persuasión [Linguistic Devices of Persuasion]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Galán, Carmen
    1999 “La subordinación causal y final” [“Causal and final subordination”]. In Ignacio Bosque-Violeta Demonte (ed.), Gramática descriptiva de la Lengua Española [Descriptive Grammar of Spanish Language], 3597–642. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Garcés, María Pilar
    (ed.) 2008Diccionario histórico: nuevas perspectivas lingüísticas [Historical Dictionary: New Linguistic Approaches]. Madrid: Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. García Negroni, María Marta
    2003Gradualité et réinterpretation [ Graduality and Reinterpretation ]. Paris: L´Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Girón, José Luis
    2008 “Lexicalización y gramaticalización en la creación de marcadores del discurso… y de otras palabras” [“Lexicalization and grammaticalization in the creation of discourse markers... and other words”]. In Elisabeth Star , Roland Schmidt-Riese and Eva Stoll (eds), Romanische Syntax im Wandel [Romance Syntax in Change], 363–85. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Greenbaum, Sidney
    1969Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador
    1997 “La determinación de los niveles oracionales” [“Determining Levels of Sentence Structure”]. In Salvador Gutiérrez (ed.), La oración y sus funciones [The Sentence and its Functions], 368–426. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Halliday, Michael A.K
    1979 “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structures and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions”. In David J. Allerton , Edward Carney and David Holdcroft (eds), Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: A Fetschrift for William Haas, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hopper, Paul J
    1991 “On some principles of Grammaticization”. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  52. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Second edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  53. Horn, Laurence R
    1984 “Toward a new Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based implicature”. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Application, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Jucker, Andreas H
    1997 “The Discourse Marker well in the History of English”. English Language and Linguistics1 (1): 91–110. doi: 10.1017/S136067430000037X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067430000037X [Google Scholar]
  56. 2002 “Discourse Markers in Early Modern English”. In Richard J. Watts and Peter Trudgill (eds), Alternative Histories of English, 210–30. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv
    (eds) 1998Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.57
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kovacci, Ofelia
    1992El comentario gramatical [ The Grammatical Commentary ]. Madrid. Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lehmann, Christian
    1985 “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e Stile20 (3): 303–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2002 “New Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele M. Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.49.03leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.03leh [Google Scholar]
  61. Levinson, Stephen C
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Lewis, Diana M
    2006 “Discourse Markers in English: A Discourse–Pragmatic View”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 43–59. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Loureda, Oscar and Esperanza Acín
    (eds) 2010Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy [Current Studies about Discourse Markers]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Lo Cascio, Vicenzo
    1998Gramática de la argumentación [The Grammar of Argumentation]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. López Couso, María J
    2010 “Subjectification and Intersubjectification”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 127–63. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia and José Portolés
    1999 “Los marcadores del discurso” [“Discourse markers”]. In Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española [Descriptive Grammar of Spanish Language], 4051–213. Madrid: Espasa,
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Montolío, Estrella
    2000Manual de escritura académica [Manual of Academic Writing]. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Nuyts, Jan
    2001Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization: A Cognitive–Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2004 “Remarks on Layering in a Cognitive–Functional Language Production Mode”. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie and M. Ángeles Gómez González (eds), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, 275–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197112.275
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197112.275 [Google Scholar]
  70. Pons, Salvador
    1998Conexión y conectores [Connexion and Connectors]. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Pons, Salvador and Leonor Ruiz
    2001 “Los orígenes del conector de todas maneras: fijación formal y pragmática” [“The origins of de todas maneras: the formation of a formal fixed expression and pragmatics”]. Revista Filología EspañolaLXXXI (3–4): 317–51. doi: 10.3989/rfe.2001.v81.i3/4.180
    https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2001.v81.i3/4.180 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pons, Salvador and Scott Schwenter
    2005 “Polar Meaning and ‘Expletive’ Negation in Approximative Adverbs: Spanish por poco (no) ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics6 (2): 262–82. doi: 10.1075/jhp.6.2.06pon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.6.2.06pon [Google Scholar]
  73. Portolés, José
    1998aMarcadores del discurso [Discourse Markers]. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 1998b “El concepto de suficiencia argumentativa” [“The Concept of Argumentative Sufficiency”]. Signo y seña9: 199–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2007 “Escalas informativas aditivas: pruebas del español” [“Additive Informative Scales: Arguments in Spanish”]. Spanish in Context4 (2): 135–57. doi: 10.1075/sic.4.2.02por
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.02por [Google Scholar]
  76. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
    1972A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Second edn. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Real Academia Española
    2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española [A New Grammar of the Spanish Language]. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Reyes, Graciela
    1990La pragmática lingüística [Linguistic Pragmatics]. Barcelona: Montesinos.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Ross, John R
    1970 “On Declarative Sentences”. In Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 222–77. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Ruiz, Leonor and Salvador Pons
    1995 “Escalas argumentativas y escalas pragmáticas” [“Argumentative Scales and Pragmatic Scales”]. Español Actual64: 53–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Stein, Dieter
    1995 “Subjective Meanings and the History of Inversions in English”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 128–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469 [Google Scholar]
  82. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  83. Traugott, Elizabeth C
    1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language65 (1): 31–55. doi: 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  84. 1995a “Subjectification in Grammaticalization”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  85. 1995b “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization”. Paper presented atICHL XII, Manchester. Available online at: www.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/discourse.pdf (accessed10 June 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 2010 “Grammaticalization”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 97–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher
    2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.17.1.04rod
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): argumentation , discourse marker , grammaticalization , pragmatics and subjectification
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error