1887
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The paper discusses three instances of silence in the life and writings of Sir Thomas More in terms of conversational and thematic silence. The first is the silence of the London citizenry in More’s (1513). The second is the House of Commons’ response of silence, in 1523, to Cardinal Wolsey’s request to provide him, the Chancellor, with a substantial grant for state affairs; at that time, More was Speaker of the House. The third is More’s fatal silence when he was required to take an oath supporting Henry VIII’s divorce from Catherine and subsequent marriage to Anne Boleyn, and his refusal to discuss Henry’s break from the Pope and the Roman Church.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.17.1.05kur
2016-06-07
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Austin, John
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach, Kent and Robert Harnish
    1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellamy, John
    1979The Tudor Law of Treason: An Introduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, Charles R
    2004 “Speechlessness: Causal Attributions, Emotional Features and Social Consequences”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology23 (2): 147–79. doi: 10.1177/0261927X04263821
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04263821 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croyland Chronicles 1486 Available online at: www.r3.org/on-line-library-text-essays/crowland-chronicle/ (accessed12 October 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Derrett, J. Duncan M
    1960 “Neglected Versions of the Contemporary Account of the Trial of Sir Thomas More”. Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 33: 202–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2281.1960.tb02282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.1960.tb02282.x [Google Scholar]
  7. 1964 “The Trial of Sir Thomas More”. The English Historical Review, 307: 449–77. doi: 10.1093/ehr/LXXIX.CCCXII.449
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/LXXIX.CCCXII.449 [Google Scholar]
  8. van Dijk, Teun
    1977Text and Context. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Doerge, F.C
    2013 “Performative Utterances”. In Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics: Speech Actions, 204–56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fletcher, Catherine
    2012The Divorce of Henry VIII. New York: St Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gochnauer, Myron
    1991 “Oaths, Witnesses and Modern Law”. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence4 (1): 67–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gurevich, Zely
    1989 “Distance and Conversation”. Symbolic Interaction12 (2): 251–63. doi: 10.1525/si.1989.12.2.251
    https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1989.12.2.251 [Google Scholar]
  13. Guy, John
    2013 “For What Did Thomas More So Silently Die?”Available online at: www.tudors.org/public-lectures/for-what-did-thomas-more-so-silently-die (accessed8 December 2013).
  14. Harpsfield, Nicholas
    1963 [c. 1558]The Life and Death of Sir Thomas More . In E.E. Reynolds (ed.), Lives of St. Thomas More, 51–175. Available online at: archive.org/stream/livesofsaintthom000169mbp/livesofsaintthom000169mbp_djvu.txt (accessed25 August 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Helmholz, R.H
    2011 “Natural Law and the Trial of Thomas More”. In Henry A. Kelly , Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer (eds), Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents, 53–70. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jaworski, Adam
    1993The Power of Silence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelly, Henry A
    2011 “A Procedural Review of Thomas More’s Trial”. In Henry A. Kelly , Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer (eds), Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents, 1–52. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kelly, Henry A. , Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer
    2011a “Thomas More’s Trial: Docudrama”. In Henry A. Kelly , Louis W. Karlin and Gerard B. Wegemer (eds), Thomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents, 210–21. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (eds) 2011bThomas More’s Trial by Jury: A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kurzon, Dennis
    1992 “When Silence May Mean Power”. Journal of Pragmatics18 (1): 92–5. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90115‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90115-R [Google Scholar]
  21. 1998Discourse of Silence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.49 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2007 “Towards a Typology of Silence”. Journal of Pragmatics39 (10): 1673–88. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009 “Thematic Silence as Metaphor”. In Ken Turner (ed.), Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, 255–63. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. doi: 10.1163/9789004253209_033
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253209_033 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2010 “A Pragmatic Analysis of Silence in an American Constitutional Issue”. Łódź Papers in Pragmatics6 (1): 49–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011 “Moment of Silence: Constitutional Transparency and Judicial Control”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law29 (2): 195–209. doi: 10.1007/s11196‑010‑9205‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9205-6 [Google Scholar]
  26. Langbein, John H
    1994 “The Historical Origins of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination at Common Law”. Michigan Law Review92: 1047–85. doi: 10.2307/1289628
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1289628 [Google Scholar]
  27. Linder, Douglas
    2006 “The Trial of Sir Thomas More: An Account”. Available online at: law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/more/more.html (accessed20 July 2014).
  28. Mancini, Dominic
    1969 (1483)The Usurpation of Richard III. Ed. by C.A.J. Armstrong . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. More, Thomas
    1931 (c. 1513) “The History of Richard the Third”. In W.E. Campbell (ed.), The English Works of Sir Thomas More. Volume the First, 399–455. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pomerantz, A
    1984 “Pursuing a Response”. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structure of Social Action, 152–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Reynolds, E.E
    1964The Trial of St. Thomas More. London: Burns and Oates.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Roper, William
    2003 (c. 1556) The Life of Sir Thomas More. Ed. by Gerard B. Wegemer and Stephen W. Smith . Irving, TX: Center for Thomas More Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stapleton, Thomas
    1612 [1588]Tres Thomae. Coloniae Agrippinae. (Cologne): S. Hemmerden.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vergil, Polydore
    1844 [1534]Three Books of English History Comprising the Reigns of Henry VI, Edward IV and Richard III. Ed. by Sir Henry Ellis . London: Camden Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Villaseñor, Gala
    2013 “Effects and Interpretation of Silence in Communication: The Case of Silence as an Answer to Requests”. Paper presented at theInternational Pragmatics Conference, September 2013, in New Delhi, India.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.17.1.05kur
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): oaths , performatives , silence , speech acts and Thomas More
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error