Descriptive and diachronic aspects of the Old Irish quotative marker ol

References

1. Brinton, Laurel J.
   2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
2. Buchstaller, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen
   (eds) 2012 Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.15
   https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15 [Google Scholar]
3. Collins, Daniel E.
   2001 Reanimated Voices: Speech Reporting in a Historical – Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.85
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.85 [Google Scholar]
4. Cysouw, Michael
   2002 “‘We’ rules: The Impact of an Inclusive/Exclusive Opposition on the Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking”. In Horst J. Simon and Heike Wiese (eds), Pronouns – Grammar and Representation, 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.52.06cys
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.52.06cys [Google Scholar]
5. England, Nora C. and Laura Martin
   2003 “Issues in the Comparative Argument Structure Analysis in Mayan Narratives”. In John W. DuBois , Lorraine E. Kumpf and William J. Ashby (eds), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, 131–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.14.08eng
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14.08eng [Google Scholar]
6. Floricic, Franck
   2000 “De l’impératif italien sii (sois!) et de l’impératif en général [On the Italian imperative sii (be!) and on the imperative in general]”. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris95 (1): 227–266. doi: 10.2143/BSL.95.1.503724
   https://doi.org/10.2143/BSL.95.1.503724 [Google Scholar]
7. García Castillero, Carlos
   2013 “Old Irish Tonic Pronouns as Extraclausal Constituents”. Ériu63: 1–39. doi: 10.3318/ERIU.2013.63.1
   https://doi.org/10.3318/ERIU.2013.63.1 [Google Scholar]
8. Griffith, Aaron
   2012 Dictionary of the Old Irish Glosses in the Milan MS Ambr. C301 inf.Available online at: www.univie.ac.at/indogermanistik/download/Milan_Glosses/Milan%20for%20Windows%20Feb%202012%20ZIP%20File.zip.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Güldemann, Tom
   2008 Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110211450
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211450 [Google Scholar]
10. Haspelmath, Martin
    2008 “Creating Economical Morphosyntactic Patterns in Language Change”. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Change, 185–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
11. Havers, Wilhelm
    1911 “Altirisch ol ‘inquit’” [“Old Irish ol ‘inquit’”]. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung44: 26–34.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hengeveld, Kees and John L. Mackenzie
    2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Janssen, Theo A.J.M. and Wim van der Wurff
    1996 “Introductory Remarks on Reported Speech and Thought”. In Theo A. J. M. Janssen and Wim van der Wurff (eds), Reported Speech: Forms and Functions of the Verb, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.43.03jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.43.03jan [Google Scholar]
14. Kortlandt, Frederik
    1996 “Old Irish ol ‘inquit’”. Études Celtiques32: 143–145. (Also published in Frederik Kortlandt 2007 Italo-Celtic Origins and Prehistoric Development of the Irish Language, 113–115. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.)
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
16. Mac Carthy, Bartholomew
    (ed.) 1892 The Codex Palatino-Vaticanus No. 830. Dublin: The Academy House.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Matasović, Ranko
    2009 Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden and London: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Meid, Wolfgang
    2009 Die Romanze von Froech und Findabair. Táin Bó Froích [The Romance of Froech and Findabair. Táin Bó Froích]. (Second revised edition.) Innsbruck: Department of Linguistics, University of Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Meyer, Kuno
    1905 “Three Poems in Bérla na filed ”. Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie5: 482–494. doi: 10.1515/zcph.1905.5.1.482
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zcph.1905.5.1.482 [Google Scholar]
20. Moore, Colette
    2011 Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Müller, Nicole
    1999 Agents in Early Welsh and Early Irish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ó Dónaill, Caoimhín
    (ed.) 2005 Talland Étair (A Critical Edition with Introduction, Translation, Textual Notes, Bibliography and Vocabulary). Maynooth: National University of Ireland.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ó hAodha, Donncha
    (ed.) 1978 Bethu Brigte. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
24. O’Rahilly, Cecile
    (ed.) 1967 Táin Bó Cúailnge from the Book of Leinster. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
25. O’Rahilly, Cecile
    (ed.) 1976 Táin Bó Cúailnge. Recension I. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pedersen, Holger
    1913 Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen. II. Bedeutungslehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Quin, Ernest G.
    1960 “Old-Irish ol ‘Inquit’”. Celtica5: 95–102.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rix, Helmut
    2001 Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. (Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstamm-bildungen) [A Lexicon of the Indo-European Verbs. (The Roots and Their Primary Stem Formations)], under the direction of Helmut Rix , edited by Martin Kümmel , Thomas Zehnder , Reiner Lipp and Brigitte Schirmer . (Second edition.) Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Robert, Stéphane
    2005 “The Challenge of Polygrammaticalization for Linguistic Theory: Fractal Grammar and Transcategorial Functioning”. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier , Adam Hodges and David S. Rood (eds), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, 119–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.72.07rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.07rob [Google Scholar]
30. Schumacher, Stephan
    2004 Die keltischen Primärverben. Ein vergleichendes, etymologisches und morphologisches Lexikon [The Celtic Primary Verbs. A Comparative, Etymological and Morphological Lexicon], with the collaboration of Mitarbeit von Britta Schulze-Thulin und Caroline aan de Wiel. Innsbrück: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Stassen, Leon
    1985 Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Stifter, David
    2009 “Early Irish”. In Martin J. Ball and Nicole Müller (eds), The Celtic Languages, 55–116. (Second edition.) London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Stokes, Whitley and John Strachan
    (eds) 1901–1903 Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus. A Collection of Old Irish Glosses, Scholia, Prose and Verse, (with suppl. by Whitley Stokes ), (reimpr. 1975). Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Thurneysen, Rudolf
    1918 “Irisches [Irish]”. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung48: 48–75.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Thurneysen, Rudolf
    1946 A Grammar of Old Irish. (Revised and enlarged edition.) Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]