1887
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard Watts (eds). 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/jhp.18.1.07wlo-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.18.1.07wlo
2017-10-13
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brownlees, Nicholas , Gabriella Del Lungo and John Denton
    (eds) 2010The Language of Public and Private in a Historical Perspective. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Daybell, James
    2012The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137006066
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137006066 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dossena, Marina and Susan M. Fitzmaurice
    (eds) 2006Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jucker, Andreas and Joanna Kopaczyk
    (eds) 2013 Communities of Practice in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch36: 15–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Laitinen, Mikko and Anita Auer
    2014 “Letters of Artisans and the Labouring Poor (England, c. 1750–1835): Approaching Linguistic Diversity in Late Modern English”. In Simone E. Pfenninger , Olga Timofeeva , Anne-Christine Gardner , Alpo Honkapohja , Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier (eds), Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English, 187–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Landert, Daniela
    2013Personalisation in Mass Media Communication. British Online News between Public and Private. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Martineau, France
    2013 “Written Documents”. In Marijke J. van der Wal and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Touching the Past: Studies in the Historical Sociolinguistics of Ego-Documents, 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ahs.1.07mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.1.07mar [Google Scholar]
  9. Nordlund, Taru
    2013 “Letter-Writing as a Communicative Practice – Polyphony in Finnish Emigrant Letters in the 19th Century”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics (special issue) 49 (3): 381–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nurmi, Arja , Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin
    (eds) 2009The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.183
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.183 [Google Scholar]
  11. Pahta, Päivi , Minna Nevala , Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin
    (eds) 2010Social Roles and Language Practices in Early Modern England. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.195 [Google Scholar]
  12. Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke J. van der Wal
    2014Letters as Loot: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ahs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamošiūnaitė, Aurelija
    2013 “Lithuanian on both sides of the Atlantic: Toward the ‘intended’ standard”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics (special issue) 49 (3): 355–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thaisen, Jacob
    2014 “Initial Position in the Middle English Verse Line”. English Studies95 (5): 500–513. doi: 10.1080/0013838X.2014.924275
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2014.924275 [Google Scholar]
  15. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid M.
    2014 InSearch of Jane Austen: The Language of the Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945115.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945115.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Vosters, Rik , Mike Kestemont and Folgert Karsdorp
    2015 “Open-set Authorship Verification and Language History from below: Determining Authorship in a Corpus of 18th-Century Correspondence”. Paper presented at theData to Evidence Conference. 19–23 October. Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Watts, Richard J.
    2008 “Grammar Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain: A Community of Practice or a Discourse Community?” In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing, 37–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams, Graham T.
    2013Women’s Epistolary Utterance: A Study of the Letters of Joan and Maria Thynne, 1575–1611. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.233
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.233 [Google Scholar]
  19. Wood, Johanna L.
    2009 “Structures and Expectations: A Systematic Analysis of Margaret Paston’s Formulaic and Expressive Language”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (2): 187–214. doi: 10.1075/jhp.10.2.03woo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.03woo [Google Scholar]
  20. Włodarczyk, Matylda
    2013 “1820 Settler Petitions in the Cape Colony: Genre Dynamics and Materiality”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics14 (1): 45–69. doi: 10.1075/jhp.14.1.02wlo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.14.1.02wlo [Google Scholar]
  21. Włodarczyk, Matylda and Irma Taavitsainen
    eds Forthcoming. “ Historical (Socio)Pragmatics ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (special issue) 18 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.18.1.07wlo
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error