1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Pragmatics
  4. Volume 23, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the emergence of the Chinese adverb and its further development into a stance discourse marker (). Most previous studies consider the epistemic modal adverb (‘indeed, truly’) to have originated from the temporal adverb (‘originally’). Based on the framework of constructionalisation (Traugott and Trousdale 2013) and Van de Velde et al.’s (2013) idea of multiple sources, I argue that the temporal adverb might not have been the only source for the modal to occur. Furthermore, the modal adverb changed into an , thereby signaling the speaker’s subjective evaluation while linking the coherence of the discourse. I argue that the change was enabled by both subjectification and analogisation. The exemplars to which was by hypothesis analogised include the extant discourse connectives (e.g., ) and the extant commentary pragmatic markers (e.g., and ) (Fraser 2009).

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
2022-11-11
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, Henning
    2001 “Actualization and the (Uni)Directionality”. InHenning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.219.11and
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.11and [Google Scholar]
  2. Barcelona Sanchez, Antonio
    (ed.) 2000 Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea
    (eds) 2015 Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
    (eds) 2014 Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas
    2004 “Historical Patterns for the Grammatical Marking of Stance: A Cross-register Comparison”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics5 (1): 107–136. 10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan
    1988 “Adverbial Stance Types in English”. Discourse Processes111: 1–34. 10.1080/01638538809544689
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blakemore, Diane
    2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
  9. Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent and George Walkden
    2015 “On Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change”. Transactions of the Philological Society113 (3): 363–382. 10.1111/1467‑968X.12068
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12068 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan L.
    2013 “Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representation”. InThomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca
    1987 “The Evolution of Future Meaning”. InAnna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini (eds), Papers from the VIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 109–122. 9–13September 1985 Pavia, Italy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.48.09byb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.09byb [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Changlai
    2013 “Jinran lei shuangyinci yanhua de xitongxing jiqi xiangguan wenti” [‘The Systematicity of the Development of the Disyllabic Temporal Words like jinlai and its Related Issues’]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University42 (5): 99–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber
    2000 “Adverbial Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing”. InSusan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Croft, William
    2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard
    2011 “Alors Between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of Language18 (1): 29–56. 10.1075/fol.18.1.02deg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.1.02deg [Google Scholar]
  16. Degand, Liesbeth and Richard Waltereit
    2014 “Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi: French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right Periphery”. InKate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 24–46. Brill: Leiden.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 “The Stance Triangle”. InRobert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking in Discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  18. De Smet, Hendrik
    2016 “How Gradual Change Progresses: The Interaction between Convention and Innovation”. Language Variation and Change28 (1): 83–102. 10.1017/S0954394515000186
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
  19. Feng, Guangwu
    2008 “Pragmatic Markers in Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics401: 1687–1718. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fischer, Olga
    2007 Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fraser, Bruce
    1988 “Types of English Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica381: 19–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 1996 “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics6 (2): 167–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 2006 “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. InKerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. North Holland: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 2009 “An Account of Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics1 (2): 293–320. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489818
     https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489818 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fried, Mirjam
    2008 “Constructions and Constructs: Mapping a Shift between Predication and Attribution”. InAlexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds), Constructions and Language Change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli
    2014 “Italian Guarda, Prego, Dai: Pragmatic markers and the left and right periphery”. InKate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 117–150. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Givón, Talmy
    1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldberg, Adele E.
    2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell
    1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hilpert, Martin
    2018 “Three Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar”. InEvie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson (eds), Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.21.c2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.21.c2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003 Grammaticalization. (Revised edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hüning, Matthias and Geert Booij
    2014 “From Compounding to Derivation: The Rise of Derivational Affixes through Constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica (special issue on Refining Grammaticalizationedited byFerdinand von Mengden and Horst Simon) 48 (2): 579–604. 10.1515/flin.2014.019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.019 [Google Scholar]
  33. Iwasaki, Shoichi and Foong Ha Yap
    (eds) 2015 “Stance-Marking and Stance-Taking in Asian Languages”. Journal of Pragmatics (special issue) 83 (1): 1–9. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
    1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  35. Jucker, Andreas H.
    (ed.) 1995 Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lehmann, Christian
    2002 “New Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization”. InIlse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.03leh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.03leh [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, Yuming
    1996 “Feiwei xingrongci de cilei diwei” [‘The Non-predicative Adjectives as a Word Class’]. Chinese Language11: 1–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    1991 “Semantic Change and Heterosemy in Grammaticalization”. Language67 (3): 475–509. 10.1353/lan.1991.0009
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0009 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980 Xiandai Hanyu Babaici [‘800 words in Modern Chinese’]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Luo, Zhufeng
    1993 Hanyu da Cidian [‘The Dictionary of Chinese’]. Beijing: Hanyu da cidian chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Meillet, Antoine
    1958 [1912] “L’évolution des formes grammaticales” [‘The Evolution of Grammatical Forms’]. InAntoine Meillet (ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale [‘Historical Linguistics and General Linguistics’], 130–148. Paris: Champion. (Originally published in Scientia (Rivista di scienza) XXII, 1912).
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Paradis, Carita
    2001 “Adjectives and Boundedness”. Cognitive Linguistics12 (1): 47–65. 10.1515/cogl.12.1.47
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  43. Petré, Peter
    2014 Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pustejovsky, James
    1991 “The Generative Lexicon”. Computational Linguistics17 (4): 409–441.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  46. Smirnova, Elena
    2015 “Constructionalization and Constructional Change: The Role of Context in the Development of Constructions”. InJóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea (eds), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18.03smi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.03smi [Google Scholar]
  47. Sun, Chaofen
    1996 Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Tang, Weiqun
    2010 “Fuci ‘benlai’ he ‘benlai’ ju ‘Adverb ‘benlai’ and ‘benlai’ sentences”. Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)63 (4): 477–482.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1995 “Subjectification in Grammaticalization”. InDieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, 31–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2004 “Historical Pragmatics”. InLaurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 538–561. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 2010 “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2012 “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery”. InLieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde (eds), Intersections of Intersubjectivity (special issue on English Text Construction) 51: 7–28. 10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau [Google Scholar]
  53. 2014 “On the Function of the Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the Clause”. InKate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 2020 “The Development of ‘Digressive’ Discourse-Topic Shift Markers in English”. Journal of Pragmatics1561: 121–135. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  55. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher
    2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Ekkehard König
    1991 “The Semantics–Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited”. InElizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 189–218. (VolumeI1.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
  57. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet and Lobke Ghesquière
    2013 “On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Studies in Language37 (3): 473–488. 10.1075/sl.37.3.01int
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.01int [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, Li
    1988 Hanyu yufa shi [‘The History of Chinese Grammar’]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Xing, Fuyi
    2003 Cilei nanbian [‘Word Classes’ Differentiation’]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhan, Fangqiong, Yue Zhang and Haiping Long
    2021 “Origin of Modern Chinese Pragmatic Markers Bushi: Negative Copula or Negative Adjective?” Lingua2501: 102922. 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102922
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102922 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhan, Fangqiong and Chaofen Sun
    2022 “The Development of the Chinese Discourse Marker and Expressive Wanle”. Journal of Pragmatics1891: 37–54. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo and Yirong Chen
    2003 The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. – present. Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (abbreviated as CCL) at: ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, Bojiang
    1994 “Cilei huoyong de gongneng jieshi” [‘The Functional Explanation of Flexible Use of Word Classes’]. Chinese Language51: 339–346.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhu, Xinjun
    2008 “‘Benlai’ de yufahua” [‘The Grammaticalization of “benlai”’]. Jiaozuo University Journal11: 21–23.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
Loading
A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse marker běnlái
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23, 245 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analogisation; commentary pragmatic marker; constructionalisation; discourse connectives; multiple sources; stance discourse marker; subjectification

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error