1887
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

General extenders (s) are elements such as occurring at the right periphery. On the referential level, they implicate a set, but they also serve a range of discourse-pragmatic functions, such as hedging and interpersonal relations. Some sociolinguistic studies have seen the development of s as synchronic grammaticalization involving phonetic reduction, decategorialization, semantic bleaching and pragmatic enrichment, but other studies have found no evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. Historical studies of s are few. This paper sets out to fill this gap by studying the rise of disjunctive, adjunctive and bare s formed with  – and . Despite their apparent similarity, these are shown to have quite different sources and histories. Their development conforms to some of the recognized parameters of grammaticalization but is more fruitfully understood from a constructionist approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.20009.bri
2023-09-05
2024-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, Laurence
    2018 AntConc. (Version 3.5.7) [MacIntosh]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available online at: www.laurenceanthony.net/software
  2. ceal = Corpus of Early American Literature
    ceal = Corpus of Early American Literature. SeeHöglund and Syrjanen (2016).
  3. cen = Corpus of English Novels
    cen = Corpus of English Novels. Created byHendrik De Smit. See: https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/
  4. clmet3.0 = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, Version 3.0
    clmet3.0 = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, Version 3.0. Created byHendrik De Smet, Hans-Jürgen Diller and Jukka Tyrkkö. See: https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/clmet3_0.htm
  5. coca = The Corpus of Contemporary American English
    coca = The Corpus of Contemporary American English 2008– Mark Davies (compiler). Available online at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
  6. coha = The Corpus of Historical American English
    coha = The Corpus of Historical American English 2010– Mark Davies (compiler). Available online at: https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/
  7. eebo = Early English Books Online Corpus
    eebo = Early English Books Online Corpus 2017 Mark Davies (compiler). Available online at: https://www.english-corpora.org/eebo/
  8. The Globe and Mail
    The Globe and Mail (1844–2014) ProQuest Historical Newspapers. See: https://media2.proquest.com/documents/hnp_globemail.pdf
  9. The New York Times
    The New York Times (1851–1993) ProQuest Historical Newspapers. See: https://media2.proquest.com/documents/HNP_NYT.pdf
  10. ob = The Old Bailey Proceedings Online
    ob = The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913. Tim Hitchcock, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin eds Available online at: www.oldbaileyonline.org (Version 7.0, March 2012.)
  11. oed = Oxford English Dictionary
    oed = Oxford English Dictionary 2000– (Online. Third edition.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. See: www.oed.com/
  12. Aijmer, Karin
    1985 “What Happens at the End of Our Utterances? – The Use of Utterance-Final Tags Introduced by And and Or”. InOle Togeby (ed.), Papers from the Eighth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 366–389. Copenhagen: Institut for Nordisk Filologi, Københavns Universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2002English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2013Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748635511
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635511 [Google Scholar]
  15. Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges
    (eds) 2014Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822 [Google Scholar]
  16. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brinton, Laurel J.
    2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014 “If You Choose/Like/Prefer/Want/Wish: The Origin of Metalinguistic and Politeness Functions”. InMarianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English Syntax, 271–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139507226.020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507226.020 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2017The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carroll, Ruth
    2007 “Lists in Letters: NP-Lists and General Extenders in Early English Correspondence”. InIsabel Moskowich-Spiegel and Begoña Crespo-García (eds), Bells Chiming from the Past: Cultural and Linguistic Studies on Early English, 37–53. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401205405_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401205405_004 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2008 “Historical English Phraseology and the Extender Tag”. SELIM: Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature15 (1): 7–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Channell, Joanna
    1994Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cheshire, Jenny
    2007 “Discourse Variation, Grammaticalisation, and Stuff Like That”. Journal of Sociolinguistics12 (2): 155–193. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00317.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00317.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Dines, Elizabeth R.
    1980 “Variation in Discourse and ‘Stuff Like That’”. Language in Society9 (1): 12–33. 10.1017/S0047404500007764
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007764 [Google Scholar]
  25. Denis, Derek
    2015 The Development of Pragmatic Markers in Canadian English. (PhD thesis.) University of Toronto. Accessed25 July 2020at: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/69269/3/Denis_Derek_201506_PhD_thesis.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Enghels, Renata
    2018 “Towards a Constructional Approach to Discourse-Level Phenomena: The Case of Spanish Interpersonal Epistemic Stance Constructions”. Folia Linguistica52 (1): 107–138. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Erman, Britt
    1995 “Grammaticalization in Progress: The Case of Or Something”. InInger Moen, Hanne Gram Simonsen and Helge Lødrup (eds), Papers from The XVth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 136–147. Oslo. 12–15January 1995 Oslo: Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2018 “Constructionalist Approaches”. InThomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 16–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hilpert, Martin
    2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 “Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds), What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale
    (eds) 2018The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Höglund, Mikko and Kaj Syrjänen
    2016 “Corpus of Early American Literature”. ICAME Journal40 (1): 17–38. Accessed1 March 2021at: https://content.sciendo.com/configurable/contentpage/journals$002ficame$002f40$002f1$002farticle-p17.xml. 10.1515/icame‑2016‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticization”. InElizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. (Volume11.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  36. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  37. McColm, Dan and Graeme Trousdale
    2019 “Whatever Happened to Whatever?” InNuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen and Willem B. Hollmann (eds), Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108303576.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108303576.004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Noël, Dirk
    2007 “Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory”. Functions of Language14 (2): 177–202. 10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe [Google Scholar]
  39. Ortega Barrera, Ivalla
    2012 “A Diachronic Discussion of Extenders in English Remedies Found in the Corpus of Early English Recipes (1350–1850)”. InHans Sauer and Gaby Waxenberger (eds), English Historical Linguistics 2008, 223–236. (VolumeII1: Words, Texts and Genres.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.324.13bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.324.13bar [Google Scholar]
  40. Overstreet, Maryann
    1999Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2014 “The Role of Pragmatic Function in the Grammaticalization of English General Extenders”. Pragmatics24 (1): 105–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Overstreet, Maryann and George Yule
    1997 “On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English”. Journal of English Linguistics25 (3): 250–258. 10.1177/007542429702500307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542429702500307 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2021General Extenders: The Forms and Functions of a New Linguistic Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108938655
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108938655 [Google Scholar]
  44. Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
    2011 “‘I Might, I Might Go I Mean it Depends on Money Things and Stuff’: A Preliminary Analysis of General Extenders in British Teenagers’ Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics43 (9): 2452–2470. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Perek, Florent
    2020 “Productivity and Schematicity in Constructional Change”. InLotte Sommerer and Elena Smirnova (eds), Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, 141–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.27.04per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27.04per [Google Scholar]
  46. Pichler, Heike and Stephen Levey
    2011 “In Search of Grammaticalization in Synchronic Dialect Data: General Extenders in Northeast England”. English Language and Linguistics15 (3): 441–471. 10.1017/S1360674311000128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000128 [Google Scholar]
  47. Poutsma, Hendrik
    1916A Grammar of Late Modern English, for the Use of Continental, Especially Dutch, Students. (Part IIThe Parts of Speech. Section I, BPronouns and Numerals.) Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2016a “Antecedents of Innovation: Exploring General Extenders in Conservative Dialects”. InHeike Pichler (ed.), Discourse–Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights, 115–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107295476.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295476.006 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2016bTeen Talk: The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139583800
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583800 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Derek Denis
    2010 “The Stuff of Change: General Extenders in Toronto, Canada”. Journal of English Linguistics38 (4): 335–368. 10.1177/0075424210367484
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424210367484 [Google Scholar]
  51. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1982 “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic–Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization”. InWinfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds), Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  52. 2016 “On the Rise of Types of Clause-Final Pragmatic Markers in English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics17 (1): 26–54. 10.1075/jhp.17.1.02tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.1.02tra [Google Scholar]
  53. 2022Discourse Structuring Markers in English: A Historical Constructionist Perspective on Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.33 [Google Scholar]
  54. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Trousdale, Graeme
    2012 “Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Grammaticalization of Constructions”. InKristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems and Tine Mortelmanns (eds), Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections, 167–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.130.07tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.130.07tro [Google Scholar]
  56. Van de Velde, Freek
    2014 “Degeneracy: The Maintenance of Constructional Networks”. InRonny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman and Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110366273.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273.141 [Google Scholar]
  57. Winter, Joanne and Catrin Norrby
    2000 “Set Marking Tags –‘and Stuff’”. InJohn Henderson (ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Perth. 28September to 2October 1999 Accessed18 August 2020 at: www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als1999/winter&norrby.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.20009.bri
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.20009.bri
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error