Judges’ reformulations in judicial interpretation in Chinese judgments

References

1. Anthony, Laurence
   2014 AntConc 3.2.4. (Computer software.) Tokyo: Waseda University. Available online at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
   [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, John Langshaw
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin, M. Mikhail
   1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
   https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
4. Cao, Deborah
   2004 Chinese Law: A Language Perspective. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cao, Deborah
   2007 “Legal Speech Acts as Intersubjective Communicative Action”. InAnne Wagner, Wouter Werner and Deborah Cao (eds), Interpretation, Law and the Construction of Meaning, 65–82. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑5320‑7_4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5320-7_4 [Google Scholar]
6. Cao, Deborah
   2009 “Illocutionary Acts of Chinese Legislative Language”. Journal of Pragmatics41 (7): 1329–1340. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.003 [Google Scholar]
7. Charnock, Ross
   2009 “Overruling as a Speech Act”. Journal of Pragmatics41 (3): 401–426. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.008 [Google Scholar]
8. Chen, Chongye
   2010 古代判词300篇 (‘300 Selected Chinese Judgments in Ancient Times’). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cheng, Shude
   1990 论语集释 (‘The Analects: An Interpretation’). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
    1985 “Two Types of Performativity and Two Types of Speech Acts”. International Pragmatics Association Conference. September 1985. Viareggio.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dallmayr, Fred
    1992 “Hermeneutics and the Rule of Law”. InDrucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Gray Carlson (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, 283–304. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Derrida, Jacques
    1986 Memoires: For Paul de Man. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Derrida, Jacques
    1992 “Forces of Law: The ‘Mysterious Foundation of Authority’”. InDrucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Gray Carlson (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, 3–67. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ferraz de Almeida, Fabio and Paul Drew
    2020 “The Fabric of Law-in-Action: ‘Formulating’ the Suspect’s Account During Police Interviews in England”. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law27 (1): 35–58. 10.1558/ijsll.38527
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.38527 [Google Scholar]
15. Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks
    1986 “On Formal Structures of Practical Action”. InHarold Garfinkel (ed.), Ethnomethodological Studies of Work, 160–193. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Giltrow, Janet and Dieter Stein
    (eds) 2017 The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1515/9781501504723
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723 [Google Scholar]
17. Good, Jeffrey
    2015 “Reported and Enacted Actions: Moving beyond Reported Speech and Related Concepts”. Discourse Studies17 (6): 663–681. 10.1177/1461445615602349
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615602349 [Google Scholar]
18. Guan, Wei
    2013 “论中国古代判词说理性修辞的意蕴及其价值趋向” (‘On the Connotative Use and Orientations of the Argumentative Rhetoric in Chinese Imperial Judgments’). 法律方法 (‘Journal of Legal Method’) 13 (1): 215–225.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Huang, Yong
    2015 “Yin (Nondisclosure/Rectification), Zhi (Fairness/Straightforwardness), and Ren (Responsibility): A New Round of Debate Concerning Analects 13.18.” Contemporary Chinese Thought46 (3): 3–16. 10.1080/10971467.2015.1016792
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10971467.2015.1016792 [Google Scholar]
20. IBM Corp
    IBM Corp 2013 SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0). New York: IBM Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jin, Rentan and Guochi Wu
    2003 断案精华 (‘A Collection of Classical Lawsuits’). 福州 (Fuzhou): 海峡文艺出版社 (‘Haixia Literature and Art Publishing House’).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
    2009 “Speech Acts in Early English Court Trials”. Journal of Pragmatics41 (3): 440–457. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.009 [Google Scholar]
23. Körner, Henrike
    2000 Negotiating Authority: The Logogenesis of Dialogue in Common Law Judgements. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Sydney: Sydney University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kurzon, Dennis
    1986 It is Hereby Promulgated: Explorations into Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Liao, Meizhen
    2006 “中国法庭互动话语(re)formulation现象研究” (‘(Re)formulation in Chinese Courtroom Interaction’), 外语研究 (‘Foreign Language Research’) 21: 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Liu, Bing
    2008 “‘亲亲相隐’与 ‘大义灭亲’” (‘Mutual Non-disclosure’ and ‘Upholding Justice at the Cost of One’s Blood Relation’). 社会科学论坛 (‘Tribune of Social Sciences’) 91: 37–46.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Matoesian, Gregory
    2000 “Intertextual Authority in Reported Speech: Production Media in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial”. Journal of Pragmatics32 (7): 879–914. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00080‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00080-6 [Google Scholar]
28. Olsen, Frances
    2017 “Pragmatic Interpretation by Judges: Constrained Performatives and the Deployment of Gender Bias”. InJanet Giltrow and Dieter Stein (eds), The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse, 205–232. Boston and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501504723‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723-009 [Google Scholar]
29. Philips, Susan
    1985 “Strategies of Clarification in Judges’ Use of Language: From the Written to the Spoken”. Discourse Processes8 (4): 421–436. 10.1080/01638538509544625
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544625 [Google Scholar]
30. Philips, Susan
    1998 Ideology in the Language of Judges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195113402.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195113402.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Rosenfeld, Michel
    1992 “Deconstruction and Legal Interpretation”. InDrucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Gray Carlson (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, 152–210. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shi, Guangquan
    2006 The Comprise of Li and Law and Historical Changes of Chinese Traditional Legal Culture. Beijing: Law Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Solan, Lawrence
    1993 The Language of Judges. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226767895.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226767895.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Su, Li
    2001 “判决的背后” (‘Logic in Judgments’). 法学研究 (‘Chinese Journal of Law’) 23 (3): 3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Supreme People’s Court of PRC
    Supreme People’s Court of PRC 2021 China Judgement Online. Accessed in 2015 at: wenshu.court.gov.cn/
    [Google Scholar]
36. Vass, Holly
    2017 “Lexical Verb Hedging in Legal Discourse: the Case of Law Journal Articles and Supreme Court Majority and Dissenting Opinions”. English for Specific Purposes481: 17–31. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
37. Visconti, Jacqueline
    2009 (Editorial) “Speech Acts in Legal Language: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics41 (3): 393–400. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.007 [Google Scholar]
38. Volosinov, Valentin Nikolaevich
    1973 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wagner, Anne, Wouter Werner and Deborah Cao
    (eds) 2007 Interpretation, Law and the Construction of Meaning. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑5320‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5320-7 [Google Scholar]
40. Wang, Shirong
    1997 Rhetorical Perspective to Traditional Judgements. Beijing: China University of Politics and Law Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Weber, Samuel
    1992 “In the Name of the Law”. InDrucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Gray Carlson (eds), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, 232–257. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zhang, Jinfan
    2003 中国法制史 (‘History of Chinese Legal Systems’). Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Zhang, Zhongqiu
    2006 中西法律文化比较研究 (‘Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Legal Cultures’). Beijing: China University of Politics and Law Press.
    [Google Scholar]