Politeness, speech acts and socio-cultural change

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   1996 Conversational Routines in English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aijmer, Karin
   2019 “Ooh Whoops I’m Sorry!”: Teenagers’ Use of English Apology Expressions”. Journal of Pragmatics1421: 258–269. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.017
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.017 [Google Scholar]
3. Arnovick, Leslie
   2000 Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.68
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.68 [Google Scholar]
4. Baumeister, Roy
   1987 “How the Self Became a Problem: A Psychological Review of Historical Research”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52 (1): 163–176. 10.1037/0022‑3514.52.1.163
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.163 [Google Scholar]
5. Bloch, Marc
   1964 Feudal Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bosworth, Joseph and T. Northcote Toller
   1921 (1898) An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. (Online version.) Center for the Study of the Middle Ages, Charles University. Available online at: https://bosworthtoller.com
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1979 La Distinction. Critique Sociale du Jugement [‘Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste’]. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
9. Burke, Peter
   1996 “Civilization, Discipline, Disorder: Three Case Studies in History and Social Theory”. Theoria871: 21–35.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Busse, Ulrich
    2002 “Changing Politeness Strategies in English Requests: A Diachronic Investigation”. InJacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in English Historical Linguistics and Philology: A Festschrift for Akio Oizumi, 17–35. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 49–81. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
12. Elias, Norbert
    2017 (1939) Über den Prozess der Zivilisation [‘The Civilising Process’]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Floyd, Simeon, Giovanni Rossi, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Mark Dingemanse, Kobin Kendrick, Jörg Zinken and Nick Enfield
    2018 “Universals and Cultural Diversity in the Expression of Gratitude”. Royal Society Open Science51: 180391. 10.1098/rsos.180391
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180391 [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction”. Psychiatry18 (3): 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
15. Hofstede, Geert
    1991 Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jacobsson, Mattias
    2002 “Thank You and Thanks in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal261: 63–80.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jucker, Andreas
    2012 “Changes in Politeness Cultures”. InTerttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 422–433. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0036 [Google Scholar]
18. Jucker, Andreas
    2019 “Speech Act Attenuation in the History of English: The Case of Apologies”. Glossa4 (1): 45. 10.5334/gjgl.878
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.878 [Google Scholar]
19. Jucker, Andreas and Irma Taavitsainen
    2000 “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1 (1): 67–95. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
20. Jucker, Andreas and Irma Taavitsainen
    2008a “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret”. InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 229–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
21. Jucker, Andreas and Irma Taavitsainen
    (eds) 2008b Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176 [Google Scholar]
22. Kohnen, Thomas
    2002 “Towards a History of English Directives”. InAndreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie and Hans Martin Lehmann (eds), Text Types and Corpora: Studies in Honor of Udo Fries, 165–175. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008a “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
24. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008b “Linguistic Politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A Study of Old English Address Terms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics9 (1): 140–158. 10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.9.1.11koh [Google Scholar]
25. Kopytko, Roman
    1995 “Linguistic Politeness Strategies in Shakespeare’s Plays”. InAndreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 515–541. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.27kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.27kop [Google Scholar]
26. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pollack, Detlef
    2015 “Varieties of Secularization Theories and their Indispensable Core”. The Germanic Review90 (1): 60–79. 10.1080/00168890.2015.1002361
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00168890.2015.1002361 [Google Scholar]
28. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for Theorganization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
29. Schuck, Gerhard
    1999 “Theorien moderner Vergesellschaftung in den historischenWissenschaften um 1900. Zum Entstehungszusammenhang des Selbstdisziplinierungskonzeptes im Kontext der Krisenerfahrung der Moderne” [‘Theories of Modern Civilization in the Historical Sciences around 1900: On the Rise of the Concept of Self-Discipline in the Context of Crisis Experience of Modernism’]. Historische Zeitschrift2681: 35–59. 10.1524/hzhz.1999.268.jg.35
    https://doi.org/10.1524/hzhz.1999.268.jg.35 [Google Scholar]
30. Searle, John
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
31. Southall, Humphrey
    1991 “Mobility, the artisan community and popular politics in early nineteenth-century England”. InGerry Kearns and Charles W. J. Withers (eds), Urbanising Britain: Essays on Class and Community in the Nineteenth Century, 103–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
    2008 “Methinks You Seem More Beautiful than Ever”: Compliments and Gender in the History of English”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 195–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.11taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.11taa [Google Scholar]
33. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
    2010 “Expressive Speech Acts and Politeness in Eighteenth-Century English”. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change, 159–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511781643.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781643.010 [Google Scholar]
34. Watts, Richard
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]