1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Pragmatics
  4. Volume 25, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 25, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Although there has been a plethora of research on formulaic language in contemporary English, conducted with various purposes in mind (descriptive, applied and otherwise), studies of formulaic phrasings in Old English texts are rare. In this paper, we employ selected corpus linguistic methods to identify and explore the use and discoursal functions of recurrent multi-word items that contribute the most to the formulaicity of homilies, chronicles and biblical translations, which are the Old English text types under scrutiny. The findings of this primarily descriptive and exploratory research provide new insights into the pragmatic functions of Old English recurrent phraseological units as well as into the structure and communicative functions of the analysed text varieties. Finally, the results of the study cast some new light on the role those formulaic phrasings play in Old English prose.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.21008.cic
2024-01-29
2024-10-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhp.21008.cic
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, Annelie and Britt Erman
    2012 “Recurrent Word Combinations in Academic Writing by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: A Lexical Bundles Approach”. English for Specific Purposes311: 81–92. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bech, Kristin
    2001 Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. (PhD thesis.) Bergen: University of Bergen.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 2012 “Word Order, Information Structure, and Discourse Relations: A Study of Old and Middle English Verb-Final Clauses”. InAnneli Meurman-Solin, Maria Lopez-Couso and Bettelou Los (eds), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 66–86. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas
    2006 University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 “A Corpus-driven Approach to Formulaic Language in English: Multi-Word Patterns in Speech and Writing”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14 (3): 275–311. 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999 The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Viviana Cortes
    2003 “Lexical Bundles in Speech and Writing: An Initial Taxonomy”. InAndrew Wilson, Paul Rayson and Anthony McEnery (eds), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 71–92. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 2004 “‘If You Look At…’: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks”. Applied Linguistics25 (3): 371–405. 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  9. Breeze, Ruth
    2013 “Lexical Bundles across Four Legal Genres”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18 (2): 229–253. 10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.2.03bre [Google Scholar]
  10. Brinton, Laurel
    2010 “Discourse Markers”. InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214284.5.285
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.5.285 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2017 The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Buerki, Andreas
    2020 Formulaic Language and Linguistic Change: A Data-Led Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108769976
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769976 [Google Scholar]
  13. Calle-Martín, Javier and Antonio Miranda-García
    2010 “‘Gehyrdon ge þæt gecweden wæs’ – a Corpus-Based Approach to Verb-Initial Constructions in Old English”. Studia Neophilologica821: 49–57. 10.1080/00393271003795202
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00393271003795202 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cao, Feng
    2019 “A Comparative Study of Lexical Bundles across Paradigms and Disciplines”. Corpora16 (1): 97–128. 10.3366/cor.2021.0210
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2021.0210 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen, Yu-Hua and Paul Baker
    2010 “Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing”. Language Learning and Technology14 (2): 30–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves and Martin Warren
    2006 “From N-gram to Skipgram to Concgrams”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics11 (4): 411–433. 10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.4.04che [Google Scholar]
  17. Cichosz, Anna
    2020 “Negation and Verb-initial Order in Old English Main Clauses”. Journal of English Linguistics48 (4): 355–381. 10.1177/0075424220941911
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220941911 [Google Scholar]
  18. CIchosz, Anna
    2022 “Old English V-initial and þa-VS Main Clauses: Independent Constructions or Allostructions?” Constructions and Frames14 (2): 301–336. 10.1075/cf.21002.cic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21002.cic [Google Scholar]
  19. diPaolo Healey, Antonette, John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang
    2018 Dictionary of Old English A to I online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English project. See: tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doe/
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellison, Robert
    1998 The Victorian Pulpit: Spoken and Written Sermons in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Enkvist, Nils Erik
    1972 “Old English Adverbial þa – An Action Marker?” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen731: 90–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Fletcher, William
    2002 KfNgram. Annapolis, Maryland: USNA. Available online at: www.kwicfinder.com/kfNgram/kfNgramHelp.html
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Forsyth, Richard
    2015a Formulib: Formulaic Language Software Library. Available online at: www.richardsandesforsyth.net/zips/formulib.zip
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015b Formulib: Formulaic Language Software Library. (User notes.) Available online at: www.richardsandesforsyth.net/docs/formulib.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 2021 “Cascading Collocations: Collocades as Correlates of Formulaic Language”. InAleksandar Trklja and Łukasz Grabowski (eds), Formulaic Language: Theories and Methods, 31–52. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fox, Michael and Manish Sharma
    2012 Old English Literature and the Old Testament. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Fuster-Marquez, Miguel
    2014 “Lexical Bundles and Phrase Frames in the Language of Hotel Websites”. English Text Construction7 (1): 84–121. 10.1075/etc.7.1.04fus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.7.1.04fus [Google Scholar]
  28. Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
    2011 Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English: A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑00659‑9
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grabowski, Łukasz
    2015 “Keywords and Lexical Bundles within English Pharmaceutical Discourse: A Corpus-Driven Description”. English for Specific Purposes381: 23–33. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Grabowski, Łukasz and Rita Juknevičienė
    2016 “Towards a Refined Inventory of Lexical Bundles: An Experiment in the Formulex Method”. Kalbu Studijos/Studies About Languages291: 58–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Grabowski, Łukasz
    2019 “Distinctive Lexical Patterns in Russian Patient Information Leaflets: A Corpus-Driven Study”. Russian Journal of Linguistics23 (3): 659–680. 10.22363/2312‑9182‑2019‑23‑3‑659‑680
     https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-659-680 [Google Scholar]
  32. Granger, Sylviane and Fanny Meunier
    2008 “Introduction: The Many Faces of Phraseology”. InSylviane Granger and Fanny Meunier (eds), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, xix–xxx. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.04gra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.04gra [Google Scholar]
  33. Heffernan, Thomas J.
    1984 “Sermon Literature”. InAnthony Stockwell Garfield Edwards (ed.), Middle English Prose: A Critical Guide to Major Authors and Genres, 177–207. Ithaca, New York: Rutgers University Press. 10.36019/9781978816954‑012
     https://doi.org/10.36019/9781978816954-012 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hogg, Richard
    2006 “Old English Dialectology”. InAns van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds), The Handbook of the History of English, 395–416. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757048.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis
    2000 Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hyland, Ken
    2008 “As Can be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation”. English for Specific Purposes271: 4–21. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. van Kemenade, Ans and Meta Links
    2020 “Discourse Particles in Early English: Clause Structure, Pragmatics and Discourse Management”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics5 (1): 1–23. 10.5334/gjgl.1020
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1020 [Google Scholar]
  38. van Kemenade, Ans and Marit Westergaard
    2012 “Syntax and Information Structure: Verb-Second Variation in Middle English”. InAnneli Meurman-Solin, Maria Jose Lopez-Couso and Bettelou Los (eds), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 87–118. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860210.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kleist, Aaron J.
    2001 “Ælfric’s Corpus: A Conspectus”. Florilegium18 (2): 113–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Knappe, Gabriele
    2012 “Idioms and Fixed Expressions”. InAlexander Bergs and Laurel Brinton (eds), Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, 177–196. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008 “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
  42. Kopaczyk, Joanna
    2012 “Long Lexical Bundles and Standardisation in Historical Legal Texts”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies47 (2–3): 3–25. 10.2478/v10121‑012‑0001‑0
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-012-0001-0 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013 The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs: Standardization and Lexical Bundles (1380–1560). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945153.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945153.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kuiper, Koenraad
    2009 Formulaic Genres. Berlin: Springer. 10.1057/9780230241657
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230241657 [Google Scholar]
  45. Labov, William
    1994 Principles of Linguistic Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Lehto, Artu
    2018 “Lexical Bundles in Early Modern and Present-day English Acts of Parliament”. InJoanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö (eds), Applications of Pattern-Driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics, 159–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.82.07leh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.07leh [Google Scholar]
  48. Lenker, Ursula
    2000 “Soþlice and witodlice: Discourse Markers in Old English”. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 229–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.12len
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.12len [Google Scholar]
  49. 2012 “Old English: Pragmatics and Discourse”. InAlexander Bergs and Laurel Brinton (eds), Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, 325–340. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Los, Bettelou
    2009 “The Consequences of the Loss of Verb-Second in English: Information Structure and Syntax in Interaction”. English Language and Linguistics13 (1): 97–125. 10.1017/S1360674308002876
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002876 [Google Scholar]
  51. Louviot, Elise
    2018 “Pragmatic Uses of nu in Old Saxon and Old English”. InSylvie Hancil, Tine Breban and Jose Vincente Lozano (eds), New Trends in Grammaticalisation and Language Change, 259–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.202.11lou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.11lou [Google Scholar]
  52. Magoun, Francis Peabody
    1953 Oral-Formulaic Character of Anglo-Saxon Narrative Poetry. Speculum281: 446–484. 10.2307/2847021
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2847021 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mel’čuk, Igor
    2020 “Cliches and Pragmatemes”. Neophilologica321: 9–20. 10.31261/NEO.2020.32.01
     https://doi.org/10.31261/NEO.2020.32.01 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mel’čuk, Igor and Jasmina Milićević
    2020 An Advanced Introduction to Semantics: A Meaning-Text Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108674553
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674553 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pawley, Andrew
    2007 “Developments in the Study of Formulaic Language Since 1970: A Personal View”. InPaul Skandera (ed.), Phraseology and Culture in English, 3–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197860.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197860.3 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pawley, Andrew and Frances Hodgetts Syder
    1983 “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency”. InJack Richards and Richard Schmidt (eds), Language and Communication, 191–226. New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Petrova, Svetlana
    2006 “A Discourse-Based Approach to Verb Placement in Early West-Germanic”. InShinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz and Anne Schwarz (eds), Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure51, 153–182. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Pęzik, Piotr
    2018 Facets of Prefabrication: Perspectives on Modelling and Detecting Phraseological Units. Łódź: Wydawnictwo UŁ.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Pintzuk, Susan and Ann Taylor
    2012 “The Effect of Information Structure on Object Position in Old English: A Pilot Study”. InAnneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso and Bettelou Los (eds), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 47–65. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Randall, Beth, Anthony Kroch and Ann Taylor
    2005–2013 CorpusSearch21. Available online at: corpussearch.sourceforge.net/
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruehlemann, Christoph and Brian Clancy
    2018 “Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics”. InCornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick (eds), Pragmatics and its Interfaces, 241–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.294.11ruh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.11ruh [Google Scholar]
  62. Salazar, Danica
    2014 Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-Native Scientific Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.65
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.65 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmitt, Norbert
    2010 Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230293977
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmitt, Norbert and Ronald Carter
    2004 “Formulaic Sequences in Action: An Introduction”. InNorbert Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.9.02sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.9.02sch [Google Scholar]
  65. Scott, Mike and Chris Tribble
    2006 Textual Patterns: Keyword and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sidtis, Diana
    2021 Foundations of Familiar Language: Formulaic Expressions, Lexical Bundles, and Collocations at Work and Play. New York: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119163305
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119163305 [Google Scholar]
  67. Simpson-Vlach, Rita and Nick Ellis
    2010 “An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research”. Applied Linguistics31 (4): 487–512. 10.1093/applin/amp058
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058 [Google Scholar]
  68. Stanton, Robert
    2002 The Culture of Translation in Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Struik, Tara and Ans van Kemenade
    2018 “On the Givenness of OV Word Order: A (Re)Examination of OV/VO Variation in Old English”. English Language and Linguistics19 (1): 49–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk and Frank Beths
    2003 The York–Toronto–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (ycoe). York: Department of Linguistics, University of York.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Wanner, Leo
    1996 “Introduction”. InLeo Wanner (ed.), Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing, 1–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.31
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.31 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wårvik, Brita
    2011 “Connective or ‘Disconnective’ Discourse Marker? Old English þa, Multifunctionality and Narrative Structuring”. InAnneli Meurman-Solin and Ursula Lenker (eds), Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages. Helsinki: Varieng.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 2013a “Participant Continuity and Narrative Structure: Defining Discourse Marker Functions in Old English”. Folia Linguistica Historica341: 1–34. 10.1515/flih.2013.008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2013.008 [Google Scholar]
  74. 2013b “Peak-Marking Strategies in Old English Narrative Prose”. Style47 (2): 168–184.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Wood, David
    2015 Fundamentals of Formulaic Language. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Wray, Alison
    2002 Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2008 Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Wray, Alison and Michael Perkins
    2000 “The Functions of Formulaic Language: An Integrated Model”. Language and Communication201: 1–28. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.21008.cic
Loading
Formulaic language in Old English prose
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25, 467 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.21008.cic
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.21008.cic
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.21008.cic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corpus-driven approach; discoursal functions; formulaic language; Old English prose; recurrent n-grams; text types

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error