Presenting manuscript tables and diagrams to the Middle English reader

References

1. Ädel, Annelie
   2006 Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.24
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24 [Google Scholar]
2. Ädel, Annelie
   2017 “Remember that Your Reader Cannot Read Your Mind: Problem/Solution-Oriented Metadiscourse in Teacher Feedback on Student Writing”. English for Special Purposes451: 54–68. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.002 [Google Scholar]
3. Ädel, Annelie and Anna Mauranen
   2010 “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives”. Nordic Journal of English Studies9 (2): 1–11. 10.35360/njes.215
   https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215 [Google Scholar]
4. Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
   2009 “Stance Marking and Register in Middle English Charms”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia45 (1): 13–29. 10.2478/v10121‑009‑0002‑9
   https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-009-0002-9 [Google Scholar]
5. Alonso-Almeida, Francisco and Margarita Mele-Marrero
   2014 “Stancetaking in Seventeenth-Century Prefaces on Obstetrics”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics15 (1): 1–35. 10.1075/jhp.15.1.01alo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.1.01alo [Google Scholar]
6. Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi
   2022 “Metadiscourse in Online Advertising: Exploring Linguistic and Visual Metadiscourse in Social Media Advertisements”. Journal of Pragmatics1871: 24–40. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027 [Google Scholar]
7. Anesa, Patrizia and Ilaria Fornasini
   2017 “The Modernity of Middle English Manuscripts: A Multimodal Investigation”. Elephant & Castle171: 5–41. Available online at: https://elephantandcastle.unibg.it/index.php/eac/article/view/382
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bateman, John A.
   2008 Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Basinsgtoke: PalgraveMacmillan. 10.1057/9780230582323
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582323 [Google Scholar]
9. Bateman, John A.
   2009 “Discourse across Semiotic Modes”. InJan Renkema (ed.), Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies, 55–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.148.06bat
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.148.06bat [Google Scholar]
10. Bernard, Robert M.
    1990 “Using Extended Captions to Improve Learning from Instructional Illustrations”. British Journal of Educational Technology21 (3): 215–225. 10.1111/j.1467‑8535.1990.tb00040.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.1990.tb00040.x [Google Scholar]
11. Biber, Douglas
    2004 “Historical Patterns for the Grammatical Marking of Stance”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics5 (1): 107–136. 10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib [Google Scholar]
12. Boggel, Sandra
    2009 Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English Religious Texts. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bös, Birte
    2017 “Of Hopes and Plans: Newsmakers’ Metadiscourse at the Dawn of the Newspaper Age”. InMinna Palander-Collin, Maura Ratia and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Diachronic Developments in English News Discourse, 15–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ahs.6.02bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.6.02bos [Google Scholar]
14. Busse, Ulrich and Axel Hübler
    (eds) 2012 Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.220
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220 [Google Scholar]
15. Buyle, Anouk and Hendrik De Smet
    2018 “Meaning in a Changing Paradigm: The Semantics of you and the Pragmatics of thou”. Language Sciences681: 42–55. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Carroll, Ruth, Matti Peikola, Hanna Salmi, Mari-Liisa Varila, Janne Skaffari and Risto Hiltunen
    2013 “Pragmatics on the Page: Visual Text in Late Medieval English Books”. European Journal of English Studies17 (1): 54–71. 10.1080/13825577.2013.755006
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.755006 [Google Scholar]
17. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
    2013 “Interaction in Early Modern News Discourse: The Case of English Witchcraft Pamphlets and Their Prefaces (1566–1621)”. Text & Talk33 (2): 167–188. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
18. Crawford, Matthew R.
    2019 The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198802600.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198802600.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Crismore, Avon
    1989 Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Domínguez-Rodríguez, M. Victoria and Alicia Rodríguez-Álvarez
    2015 “Metacomments in the Prefaces to English School Grammars of the Eighteenth Century”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics16 (1): 86–108. 10.1075/jhp.16.1.04dom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16.1.04dom [Google Scholar]
21. Eagleton, Catherine
    2007 “‘Chaucer’s Own Astrolabe’: Text, Image and Object”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science38 (2): 303–326. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.03.006 [Google Scholar]
22. Eagleton, Catherine and Matthew Spencer
    2006 “Copying and Conflation in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Treatise on the Astrolabe: A Stemmatic Analysis Using Phylogenetic Software”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science37 (2): 237–268. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.020 [Google Scholar]
23. Eisner, Sigmund
    (ed.) 2002 Geoffrey Chaucer: A Treatise on the Astrolabe. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Falk, Seb
    2016 “Learning Medieval Astronomy through Tables: The Case of the Equatorie of Planetis”. Centaurus58 (1–2): 6–25. 10.1111/1600‑0498.12114
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12114 [Google Scholar]
25. Flowerdew, John
    2015 “Revisiting Metadiscourse: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Concerning Signalling Nouns”. Ibérica291: 15–34.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A., Marisol Velasco-Sacristán, Ascensión Arribas-Baño and Eva Samaniego-Fernández
    2001 “Persuasion and Advertising English: Metadiscourse in Slogans and Headlines”. Journal of Pragmatics33 (8): 1291–1307. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6 [Google Scholar]
27. van Gog, Tamara
    2021 “The Signaling (or Cueing) Principle in Multimedia Learning”. InRichard E. Mayer and Logan Fiorella (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 221–230. (Third edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108894333.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.022 [Google Scholar]
28. Gottschall, Anna
    2008 “The Lord’s Prayer in Circles and Squares: An Identification of Some Analogues of the Vernon Manuscript’s Pater Noster Table”. Marginalia71: [n.p.]. Available online at: merg.soc.srcf.net/journal/08confession/circles.php
    [Google Scholar]
29. Grund, Peter J.
    2021 The Sociopragmatics of Stance: Community, Language, and the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.329
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.329 [Google Scholar]
30. Hiippala, Tuomo and John A. Bateman
    2020 “Introducing the Diagrammatic Mode”. arXiv2001.11224. Available online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11224
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hyland, Ken
    1998 “Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse”. Journal of Pragmatics30 (4): 437–455. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00009‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5 [Google Scholar]
32. Hyland, Ken
    2004 “Engagement and Disciplinarity: The Other Side of Evaluation”. InGabriella del Lungo Camiciotti and Elena Tognini Bonelli (eds), Academic Discourse — New Insights into Evaluation, 13–30. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hyland, Ken
    2017 “Metadiscourse: What Is It and Where Is It Going?” Journal of Pragmatics1131: 16–29. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007 [Google Scholar]
34. Hyland, Ken
    2018 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. (Second edition.) London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse
    2004 “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics25 (2): 156–177. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 [Google Scholar]
36. Ifantidou, Elly
    2005 “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Metadiscourse”. Journal of Pragmatics37 (9): 1325–1353. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.006 [Google Scholar]
37. Jones, Peter Murray
    2016 (2006) “Image, Word, and Medicine in the Middle Ages”. InJean A. Givens, Karen M. Reeds and Alain Touwaide (eds), Visualizing Medieval Medicine and Natural History, 1200–1550, 1–24. London: Routledge. (First published by Ashgate.)
    [Google Scholar]
38. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2000 “Thou in the History of English: A Case for Historical Semantics or Pragmatics?” InChristiane Dalton-Puffer and Nikolaus Ritt (eds), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky, 153–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110809169.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809169.153 [Google Scholar]
39. Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso and Belén Méndez-Naya
    2020 “The Dynamics of Stance Constructions”. Language Sciences821: 1–12. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101330
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101330 [Google Scholar]
40. Keiser, George R.
    1998 “Works of Science and Information”. InAlbert E. Hartung (ed.), A Manual of the Writings in Middle English 1050–1500, 3593–3967. (Volume101.) New Haven: The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kembhavi, Aniruddha, Mike Salvato, Eric Kolve, Minjoon Seo, Hannaneh Hajishirzi and Ali Farhadi
    2016 “A Diagram is Worth a Dozen Images”. InBastian Leibe, Jiri Matas, Nicu Sebe and Max Welling (eds), Computer Vision — ECCV 2016. 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV, 235–251. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑46493‑0_15
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_15 [Google Scholar]
42. Kennedy, Kathleen E.
    2014 “Reintroducing the English Books of Hours, or ‘English Primers’”. Speculum89 (3): 693–723. 10.1017/S0038713414000773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038713414000773 [Google Scholar]
43. Kumpf, Eric P.
    2000 “Visual Metadiscourse: Designing the Considerate Text”. Technical Communication Quarterly9 (4): 401–424. 10.1080/10572250009364707
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250009364707 [Google Scholar]
44. Marchese, Francis T.
    2013 “Tables and Early Information Visualization”. InFrancis T. Marchese and Ebad Bannissi (eds), Knowledge Visualization Currents, 35–61. London: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑4303‑1_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4303-1_3 [Google Scholar]
45. Mauranen, Anna
    1993 Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Means, Laurel
    1992 “‘Ffor as moche as yche man may not haue þe astrolabe’: Popular Middle English Variations on the Computus”. Speculum67 (3): 595–623. 10.2307/2863658
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2863658 [Google Scholar]
47. Middle English DictionaryRobert E. Lewis,
    Middle English Dictionary 1952–2001 Edited byRobert E. Lewis, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Online edition in Middle English Compendium. 2000–2018. Edited byFrances McSparran, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Library. See: quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/
48. Mooney, Linne R.
    1995 The Index of Middle English Prose. Handlist XI: Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mooney, Linne R.
    (ed.) 1998 The Kalendarium of John Somer. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Murdoch, John E.
    1984 Album of Science: Antiquity and the Middle Ages. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Obrist, Barbara
    2020 “The Idea of a Spherical Universe and Its Visualization in the Earlier Middle Ages (Seventh to Twelfth Century)”. InMarcia Kupfer, Adam S. Cohen and J. H. Chajes (eds), The Visualization of Knowledge in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, 229–258. Turnout: Brepols.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Oxford English Dictionary Online
    Oxford English Dictionary Online 2000– Available online at: https://www.oed.com
53. Pahta, Päivi and Irma Taavitsainen
    2004 “Vernacularisation of Scientific and Medical Writing in its Sociohistorical Context”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (eds), Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Peikola, Matti
    2013 “Tables of Lections in Manuscripts of the Wycliffite Bible”. InEyal Poleg and Laura Light (eds), Form and Function in the Late Medieval Bible, 351–378. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004248892_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004248892_017 [Google Scholar]
55. Peikola, Matti
    2020 “Patterns of Reader Involvement on Sixteenth-Century English Title Pages, with Special Reference to Second-Person Pronouns”. InEwa Jonsson and Tove Larsson (eds), Voices Past and Present — Studies of Involved, Speech-Related and Spoken Texts: In Honor of Merja Kytö, 113–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.97.08pei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.97.08pei [Google Scholar]
56. Peikola, Matti and Birte Bös
    (eds) 2020 The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical Approaches to Paratext and Metadiscourse in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.317
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317 [Google Scholar]
57. Peikola, Matti and Mari-Liisa Varila
    2023 “Multimodal and Multilingual Practices in Late Medieval English Calendars”. InMatylda Włodarczyk, Jukka Tyrkkö and Elżbieta Adamczyk (eds), Multilingualism from Manuscript to 3D: Intersections of Modalities from Medieval to Modern Times, 93–118. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003166634‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166634-6 [Google Scholar]
58. Pozzer-Ardenghi, Lilian and Wolff-Michael Roth
    2010 “Toward a Social Practice Perspective on the Work of Reading Inscriptions in Science Texts”. Reading Psychology31 (3): 228–253. 10.1080/02702710903256361
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903256361 [Google Scholar]
59. Purchase, Helen C.
    2014 “Twelve Years of Diagrams Research”. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing25 (2): 57–75. 10.1016/j.jvlc.2013.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2013.11.004 [Google Scholar]
60. Quintana-Toledo, Elena
    2009 “Middle English Medical Recipes: A Metadiscursive Approach”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia45 (2): 21–38. 10.2478/v10121‑009‑0014‑5
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-009-0014-5 [Google Scholar]
61. Rand, Kari Anne
    2014 Index of Middle English Prose: Index to Volumes I to XX. Cambridge: Boydell & Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Rand Schmidt, Kari Anne
    1993 The Authorship of the Equatorie of the Planetis. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Reinking, David, David A. Hayes and John E. McEneaney
    1988 “Good and Poor Readers’ Use of Explicitly Cued Graphic Aids”. Journal of Reading Behavior20 (3): 229–247. 10.1080/10862968809547641
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968809547641 [Google Scholar]
64. Sandler, Lucy Freeman
    1983 The Psalter of Robert de Lisle in the British Library. London: Harvey Miller.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Scott, Kathleen L.
    (ed.) 2000– An Index of Images in English Manuscripts from the Time of Chaucer to Henry VIII. London and Turnhout: Harvey Miller.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Severs, J. Burke, Albert E. Hartung and Peter G. Beidler
    (eds) 1967–2005 A Manual of the Writings in Middle English, 1050–1500. (Eleven1volumes.) New Haven, Connecticut: The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Slough, Scott W., Erin M. McTigue, Suyeon Kim and Susan K. Jennings
    2010 “Science Textbooks’ Use of Graphical Representation: A Descriptive Analysis of Four Sixth Grade Science Texts”. Reading Psychology31 (3): 301–325. 10.1080/02702710903256502
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903256502 [Google Scholar]
68. Smith, Jordan
    2020 “A Content Analysis of Figure Captions in Academic Journals from Four Disciplines”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication63 (4): 341–360. 10.1109/TPC.2020.3032049
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2020.3032049 [Google Scholar]
69. Taavitsainen, Irma
    2000 “Metadiscursive Practices and the Evolution of Early English Medical Writing 1375–1550”. InJohn M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, 191–207. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004485211_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004485211_017 [Google Scholar]
70. Taavitsainen, Irma
    2006 “Audience Guidance and Learned Medical Writing in Late Medieval English”. InMaurizio Gotti and Françoise Salager-Meyer (eds), Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, 431–456. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Taavitsainen, Irma and Turo Hiltunen
    2012 “Now as a Text-Deictic Feature in Late Medieval and Early Modern English Medical Writing”. InUlrich Busse and Axel Hübler (eds), Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, 179–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.220.14taa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.220.14taa [Google Scholar]
72. Vande Kopple, William J.
    1985 “Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse”. College Composition and Communication36 (1): 82–93. 10.58680/ccc198511781
    https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198511781 [Google Scholar]
73. Varila, Mari-Liisa
    2020 “Book Producers’ Comments on Text-Organization in Early 16th-Century Printed Paratexts”. InMatti Peikola and Birte Bös (eds), The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical Approaches to Paratext and Metadiscourse in English, 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.317.09var
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.09var [Google Scholar]
74. Voigts, Linda Ehrsam
    1986 “The Latin Verse and Middle English Prose Texts on the Sphere of Life and Death in Harley 3719”. The Chaucer Review21 (2): 291–305.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Voigts, Linda Ehrsam
    1989 “Scientific and Medical Books”. InJeremy Griffiths and Derek Pearsall (eds), Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1475, 345–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Voigts, Linda Ehrsam
    1994 “The Golden Table of Pythagoras”. InLister M. Matheson (ed.), Popular and Practical Science of Medieval England, 123–139. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Voigts, Linda Ehrsam and Patricia Deery Kurtz
    2019 Scientific and Medical Writings in Old and Middle English: An Electronic Reference CD. (An extended and revised online version. Originally published in 2000.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Available online at: cctr1.umkc.edu/search, accessed throughhttps://www.medievalacademy.org/page/Books#etk
    [Google Scholar]
78. Wallis, Faith
    2015 “What a Medieval Diagram Shows: A Case Study of Computus”. Studies in Iconography361: 1–40.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Whitt, Richard J.
    2018 “‘And All This is Spoken of the Naturall Byrth…’: Metadiscourse in The Birth of Mankind and Its German Source Text, Rosengarten”. English Text Construction11 (2): 225–255. 10.1075/etc.00010.whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00010.whi [Google Scholar]
80. Wieck, Roger S.
    2017 The Medieval Calendar: Locating Time in the Middle Ages. New York: The Morgan Library & Museum in association with Scala Arts Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Witherden, Sian
    2017 “Balancing Form, Function, and Aesthetic: A Study of Ruling Patterns for Zodiac Men in Astro-Medical Manuscripts of Late Medieval England”. Journal of the Early Book Society for the Study of Manuscripts and Printing History201: 79–109.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Wright, Patricia
    1981 “Tables in Text: The Subskills Needed for Reading Formatted Information”. InL. John Chapman (ed.), The Reader and the Text: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Course and Conference of the United Kingdom Reading Association University of Warwick, 1980, 60–69. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
    [Google Scholar]