“Yet ar ye not lyche, for thu art a fals strumpet”

References

1. Staley, Lynn
   1996 “The Book of Margery Kempe: Introduction”. InLynn Staley (ed.), The Book of Margery Kempe. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications. Accessed1 November 2022at: https://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/publication/staley-the-book-of-margery-kempe
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amsler, Mark
   2021 The Medieval Life of Language: Grammar and Pragmatics from Bacon to Kempe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bergs, Alexander T.
   2004 “Address Pronouns in Late Middle English”. InFrancisco Alonso Almeida and Alicia Rodrigues Alvarez (eds), Voices on the Past: Studies in Old and Middle English Language and Literature, 127–138. A Coruña, Spain: Netbiblo.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blake, Norman
   1992 “The Literary Language”. InNorman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume 2, 1066–1476, 500–541. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.007
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.007 [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Roger and Arthur Gilman
   1989 “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies”. Language in Society18 (2): 159–212. 10.1017/S0047404500013464
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013464 [Google Scholar]
6. Burnley, David
   1983 A Guide to Chaucer’s Language. London: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑86048‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86048-7 [Google Scholar]
7. Burnley, David
   2003 “The T/V Pronouns in Later Middle English Literature”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Andreas Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 27–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.03bur
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.03bur [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö
   2010 Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Finkenstaedt, Thomas
   1963 “You und Thou: Studien zur Anrede im Englischen, mit einem Exkurs über die Anrede im Deutschen” (‘You and Thou: Studies on the Form of Address in English, with an Excursus on the Form of Address in German’). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110822588
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822588 [Google Scholar]
10. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva
    2009 “Towards Linguistic Unity in Europe”. InUwe Hinrichs, Norbert Reiter and Siegfried Tornow (eds), Eurolinguistik: Entwicklungen und Perspektiven: Akten der internationalen Tagung vom 30.9–2.10.2007 in Leipzig (‘Eurolinguistics: Developments and Perspectives: Proceedings of the International Conference in Leipzig, 30.9–2.10.2007’), 141–164. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hickey, Raymond
    2003 “Rectifying a Standard Deficiency: Second Person Pronominal Distinction in Varieties of English”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Andreas Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 343–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.14hic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.14hic [Google Scholar]
12. Honegger, Thomas
    2003 “‘And if ye wol nat so, my lady sweete, thanne preye I thee, […]’: Forms of Address in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Andreas Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 61–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.05hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.05hon [Google Scholar]
13. Hope, Jonathan
    1994 “The Use of Thou and You in Early Modern Spoken English: Evidence from Depositions in the Durham Ecclesiastical Court Records”. InDieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 141–152. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110879599.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879599.141 [Google Scholar]
14. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2006 “‘Thou Art So Loothly and So Oold Also’: The Use of Ye and Thou in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales”. Anglistik17 (2): 57–72.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2014 “Courtesy and Politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia49 (3): 5–28. 10.1515/stap‑2015‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stap-2015-0007 [Google Scholar]
16. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2020 Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589147 [Google Scholar]
17. Knappe, Gabriele and Michael Schümann
    2006 “Thou and Ye: A Collocational–Phraseological Approach to Pronoun Change in Chaucer’s ‘Canterbury Tales’”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia421: 213–238.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kohnen, Thomas, Tanja Rütten and Ingvilt Marcoe
    2011 Early Modern English Religious Prose – A Conservative Register?University of Helsinki: Varieng. Accessed1 November 2022at: https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/06/kohnen_et_al/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mazzon, Gabriella
    1992 “Shakespearean Thou and You Revisited, or Socio-Affective Networks on Stage”. InCarmela Nocera, Nicola Pantaleo and Domenico Pezzini (eds), Early Modern English: Trends, Forms and Texts, 123–136. Bari: Schena.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mazzon, Gabriella
    2000 “Social Relations and Forms of Address in the Canterbury Tales”. InDieter Kastovsky and Arthur Mettinger (eds), The History of English in a Social Context: A Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics, 135–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110810301.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110810301.135 [Google Scholar]
21. Mazzon, Gabriella
    2003 “Pronouns and Nominal Address in Shakespearean English: A Socio-Affective Marking System in Transition”. InIrma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 223–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.107.11maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.107.11maz [Google Scholar]
22. Mazzon, Gabriella
    2009 Interactive Dialogue Sequences in Middle English Drama. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.185
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.185 [Google Scholar]
23. Mazzon, Gabriella
    2010 “Terms of Address”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics: Handbooks of Pragmatics81, 351–376. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214284.5.351
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.5.351 [Google Scholar]
24. Mustanoja, Tauno F.
    1960 A Middle English Syntax, Part 1: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Nathan, N.
    1956 “Pronouns of Address in the Friar’s Tale”. Modern Language Quarterly17 (1): 39–42. 10.1215/00267929‑17‑1‑39
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-17-1-39 [Google Scholar]
26. Nathan, N.
    1959 “Pronouns of Address in the Canterbury Tales”. Mediaeval Studies211: 193–201. 10.1484/J.MS.2.306647
    https://doi.org/10.1484/J.MS.2.306647 [Google Scholar]
27. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1996 “Social Stratification”. InTerttu Nevalainen and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds), Sociolinguistics and Language History, 57–76. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004653030_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004653030_005 [Google Scholar]
28. Nevalainen, Terttu
    2000 “Processes of Supralocalisation and the Rise of Standard English in the Early Modern Period”. InRicardo D. Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg and C. B. McCully (eds), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 329–372. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    2000 “The Changing Role of London on the Linguistic Map of Tudor and Stuart England”. InDieter Kastovsky and Arthur Mettinger (eds), The History of English in a Social Context: A Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics, 279–337. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110810301.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110810301.279 [Google Scholar]
30. Skeat, Walter W.
    (ed) 1894 Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sobecki, Sebastian
    2015 “‘The Writyng of this Tretys’: Margery Kempe’s Son and the Authorship of Her Book”. Studies in the Age of Chaucer371: 257–283. 10.1353/sac.2015.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sac.2015.0015 [Google Scholar]
32. Stenroos, Merja
    2010 “The Pronoun of Address in Piers Plowman: Authorial and Scribal Usage”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics111: 1–31. 10.1075/jhp.11.1.01ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.1.01ste [Google Scholar]
33. Stephens, J. R.
    1995 “Censorship”. InMartin Branham (ed.), The Cambridge Guide to Theatre, 178–186. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Timofeeva, Olga
    2024 “Low German in The Book of Margery Kempe”. Poetica991, 1001: 23–39.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Timofeeva, Olga and Jonas Keller
    2023 “Multilingual Encounters in The Book of Margery Kempe”. Etudes Médiévales Anglaises1021: 11–42.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Walker, Terry
    2007 Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues: Trials, Depositions, and Drama Comedy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.158
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.158 [Google Scholar]
37. Woledge, Julia
    1976 The Use of Tu and Vous in Medieval French Verse Romances from 1160 to 1230. (PhD thesis.) London: University of London.
    [Google Scholar]