1887
image of Negotiating converso identities in the inquisition courtroom
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores the processes of identity construction and negotiation through face work in a Portuguese Inquisition record, corresponding to the trial for Judaism of Catarina de Orta. Concentrating as much on the inquisitor’s questions as on the answers offered by the defendant, I show here that impoliteness and self-politeness co-occur in interaction in the Portuguese Inquisition courtroom discourse. On the one hand, the inquisitor makes abundant use of impoliteness strategies with at least three main aims: to exert his power over the defendant, to trigger specific negative emotions, and to attack her face and her credibility. On the other hand, the defendant’s answers display numerous features of self-politeness, aimed at saving her face from the inquisitor’s attacks and accusations. It is precisely through the interplay of impoliteness and self-politeness that the two competing narratives proposed by the accuser and the defendant are constructed and re-elaborated during every interrogation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.22011.dia
2024-04-16
2024-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archer, Dawn
    2005Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.135
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135 [Google Scholar]
  2. Basso, Renato Miguel and Rodrigo Tadeu Gonçalves
    2014História concise da língua portuguesa [‘A Concise History of the Portuguese Language’]. Petrópolis: Vozes.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
    2009 “Self-Face and Self-Politeness in the Salem Witchcraft Papers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.10.1.04cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.1.04cha [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011 “Accessing Identity through Face Work: A Case Study of Historical Courtroom Discourse”. International Review of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1163/187731011X597532
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187731011X597532 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Rong
    2001 “Self-Politeness: A Proposal”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00124‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00124-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link”. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture (): –. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2016 “Impoliteness Strategies”. InAlessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo and Marco Carpezza (eds), Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology, –. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16 [Google Scholar]
  12. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goffman, Erving
    1967Interaction Ritual. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grice, Paul
    1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hiltunen, Risto
    1996 “‘Tell Me, Be You a Witch?’: Questions in the Salem Witchcraft Trials of 1692”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (): –. 10.1007/BF01130380
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130380 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2004 “Salem 1692: A Case of Courtroom Discourse in a Historical Perspective”. InRisto Hiltunen and Shinichiro Watanabe (eds), Approaches to Style and Discourse in English, –. Osaka: Osaka University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jucker, Andreas
    2020Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589147 [Google Scholar]
  18. Keinpointner, Manfred
    1997 “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances”. Functions of Language (): –. 10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie [Google Scholar]
  19. Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
    2006 “Impoliteness in Early Modern English Courtroom Discourse”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.7.2.04kry
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.2.04kry [Google Scholar]
  20. Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker
    2003 “The Linguistic Study of Early Modern English Speech-Related Texts: How ‘Bad’ can ‘Bad’ Data Be?” Journal of English Linguistics (): –. 10.1177/0075424203257260
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424203257260 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lourenço, Miguel Rodrigues, Susana Bastos Mateus and Carla Vieira
    2019O Processo de Catarina de Orta na Inquisição de Goa (1568–1569) [‘The Trial of Catarina de Orta in the Inquisition of Goa (1568–1569)’]. Lisbon: Cátedra de Estudos Sefarditas Alberto Benveniste.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Luchjenbroers, June
    1997 “In Your Own Words…”: Questions and Answers in a Supreme Court Trial”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00033‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00033-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mills, Sara
    2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2009 “Impoliteness in a Cultural Context”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  25. Niremberg, David
    1996Communities of Violence: Persecution of Minorities in the Middle Ages. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Paiva, José Pedro
    2017 “The Inquisition Tribunal in Goa: Why and For What Purpose?” Journal of Early Modern History (): –. 10.1163/15700658‑12342575
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-12342575 [Google Scholar]
  27. Saraiva, Antonio José
    2001The Marrano Factory: The Portuguese Inquisition and its New Christians, 1536–1765. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789047400868
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400868 [Google Scholar]
  28. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Starr-LeBeau, Gretchen D.
    2003In the Shadow of the Virgin: Inquisitors, Friars and Conversos in Guadalupe, Spain. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9780691187372
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187372 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.22011.dia
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error